切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 105 -108. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.02.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的临床改进
魏灿1, 井俊峰1, 杨晓亮1, 吴畏1, 席俊华1, 陈运1, 杨振兴1, 王伟1, 应全胜1, 张艳斌1,()   
  1. 1. 230011 合肥市第二人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-06 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张艳斌

The clinical application of modified laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Can Wei1, Junfeng Jing1, Xiaoliang Yang1, Wei Wu1, Junhua Xi1, Yun Chen1, Zhenxing Yang1, Wei Wang1, Quansheng Ying1, Yanbin Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Anhui 230011, China
  • Received:2016-04-06 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yanbin Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yanbin, Email:
引用本文:

魏灿, 井俊峰, 杨晓亮, 吴畏, 席俊华, 陈运, 杨振兴, 王伟, 应全胜, 张艳斌. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的临床改进[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 105-108.

Can Wei, Junfeng Jing, Xiaoliang Yang, Wei Wu, Junhua Xi, Yun Chen, Zhenxing Yang, Wei Wang, Quansheng Ying, Yanbin Zhang. The clinical application of modified laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 105-108.

目的

探讨改良式腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的操作技巧和疗效。

方法

我科2014年3月至2015年9月共行16例腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(LRP),回顾性分析其临床资料。其中7例行标准术式的LRP(标准组),同期另有9例在标准组的基础上进行手术技巧改进(改良组),改良采用了筋膜内背深静脉复合体免缝扎技术,并改进一系列措施以保护血管神经束、尿道括约肌,降低膀胱尿道吻合口张力。比较改良组和标准组的手术时间、术中出血量、尿管留置天数和术后尿控率等临床指标。

结果

标准组的手术时间、出血量、尿管留置天数分别为230 min、371 ml、21.4 d,而改良组的上述指标分别为197 min、324 ml、16.7 d,其中手术时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),改良组术后30 d、90 d和180 d控尿率均高于标准组。

结论

改良式腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的改进处理方式能提高手术效率,减少手术时长,能早期拔除尿管,有利于术后尿控恢复,且不增加术中出血量,是一种安全有效的手术方法,值得推广。

Objective

To evaluate the technique and clinical outcomes of modified laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP).

Methods

Sixteen cases of LRP from March 2014 to September 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, 7 cases were enrolled in standard group, other contemporaneous 9 cases were improved group. Dorsal vascular complex ligation-free method and other improved skills were adopted to protect neurovascular bundle and urethral sphincter. Bladder-urethral anastomotic tension was reduced. Indicators such as operative time, blood loss, indwelling catheter days and urinary continence were studied.

Results

The operation time, blood loss, urine tube indwelling days of the standard group were 230 minutes, 371 ml and 21.4 days respectively, the corresponding indexes of the improved group were 197 minutes, 324 ml and 16.7 days respectively. The operative time of improved group was obviously reduced than standard group (P<0.05). The 30 days, 90 days and 180 days postoperative continence rates of the improved group were higher than standard group.

Conclusion

The delicate skills in the modified LRP can improve the efficiency of operation, reduce the operation time, remove catherer earlier without increasing bleeding, and the urinary continence can recover better. Modified LRP is safe and effective and worth to be popularized.

表2 标准组与改良组参数比较
[1]
Siegel R, Ma JM, Zou ZH, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64(1):9-29.
[2]
韩苏军,张思维,陈万青,等.中国前列腺癌发病现状和流行趋势分析[J].临床肿瘤学杂志, 2013, 18(4):330-334.
[3]
叶章群,那彦群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014: 68.
[4]
Canda A, Balbay MD. Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives[J]. Asian J Androl, 2015, 17(6):908-915.
[5]
王世栋,邓雪飞,王娜,等.前列腺周围筋膜及其毗邻结构的三维断层解剖研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2010, 28(6):643-646.
[6]
Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Grande S, et al. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 55(6):1377-1385.
[7]
Ferrara V, Giannubilo W, Azizi B, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without ligation of the Santorini's venous plexus[J]. Urologia, 2010, 77(1):57-62.
[8]
高旭,王海峰,杨波,等.机器人腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术中保留性神经的技术改进及短期随访[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2015, 9(4):239-242.
[9]
施振凯,高旭,王海峰,等.机器人辅助筋膜内前列腺癌根治术对术后尿控影响的研究[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2016, 10(1):8-11.
[10]
Hamada A, Razdan S, Etafy MH, et al. Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(8):930-938.
[11]
Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 55(3):629-639.
[12]
马潞林,邓绍晖.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术相关进展[J].现代泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 21(1):1-3.
[13]
Al-Mamari SA, Quintens H, Mentine N, et al. RALP: comparison of the oncological and functional outcomes of the intrafascial and the interfascial approaches[J]. Progres en Urologie, 2015, 25(1):54-61.
[14]
Xylinas E, Ploussard G, Salomon LA, et al. Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing radical prostatectomy with a laparoscopic Robot-Assisted extraperitoneal approach: early oncological and functional results[J]. J Endourol, 2010, 24(4):577-582.
[15]
张旭,居正华,王超,等.腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术膀胱尿道单针连续吻合法[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2009, 30(7):476-479.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[13] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[14] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[15] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
阅读次数
全文


摘要