切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 94 -97. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.02.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

基层医院耻骨上经膀胱和经尿道切除大体积前列腺的比较
游猛1, 郑彬1, 陈岳1, 詹河涓1, 谢克基2, 欧汝彪2, 胡成3, 狄金明3,()   
  1. 1. 528000 广州,佛山市禅城区中心医院泌尿外科
    2. 510000 广州市第一人民医院泌尿外科
    3. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-13 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 狄金明
  • 基金资助:
    佛山市科技局医学类科技攻关项目(200908089)

The comparison of efficacy of open and transurethral prostatectomy for treating big volume prostate in primary hospital

Meng You1, Bin Zheng1, Yue Chen1, Hejuan Zhan1, Keji Xie2, Nvbiao Ou2, Cheng Hu3, Jinming Di3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Chancheng District Central Hospital, Foshan 528031, China
    2. Guangzhou First Municipal People’s Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, China
    3. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2017-02-13 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinming Di
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Di Jinming,
引用本文:

游猛, 郑彬, 陈岳, 詹河涓, 谢克基, 欧汝彪, 胡成, 狄金明. 基层医院耻骨上经膀胱和经尿道切除大体积前列腺的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 94-97.

Meng You, Bin Zheng, Yue Chen, Hejuan Zhan, Keji Xie, Nvbiao Ou, Cheng Hu, Jinming Di. The comparison of efficacy of open and transurethral prostatectomy for treating big volume prostate in primary hospital[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 94-97.

目的

比较基层医院耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术(TVP)和等离子经尿道前列腺电切术(PKRP)治疗大体积前列腺患者的安全性及疗效。

方法

将2009年6月至2012年5月在佛山市禅城区中心医院泌尿外科经尿动力学与超声检查诊断膀胱出口梗阻并前列腺体积>80 ml的80例患者将随机分为TVP和PKRP组,记录并比较所有患者术前、术后3个月、12个月随访资料,包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、围手术期资料、术中情况、术后并发症情况等。

结果

80例入组患者中,69例完成12个月的随访,两组患者在手术时间、手术前列腺切除重量差异无统计学意义,PKRP组出血量、留置尿管时间、膀胱冲洗时间、住院天数均显著优于TVP组,术后随访3个月、12个月,两组患者IPSS、Qmax、QOL差异无统计学意义。

结论

TVP和PKRP都可用于治疗前列腺体积80 ml以上前列腺增生患者,但PKRP创伤更小、恢复更快,利于在基层医院临床推广。

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of transvesical prostatectomy(TVP)and plasma kinetic resection of prostate (PKRP) for treating big volume prostate in primary hospital.

Methods

Eighty patients with urodynamic obstruction and whose prostate volume was bigger than 80 ml were prospectively randomized and assigned to TVP group or PKRP group. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. International prostate symptom score, quality of life score and maximum flow rate were obtained. Perioperative data and postoperative complications were also recorded.

Results

Among 80 participants, 69 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in operation time and the weight of resecting prostate between the two groups. The PKRP group had significantly less blood loss of operation, shorter postoperative bladder washing time, shorter postoperative catheterization time and shorter hospital stay than the TVP group. There were no significant differences in International prostate symptom score, quality of life score and maximum flow rate between the two groups at 3 or 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

Both PKRP and TVP are effective alternatives for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia whose volume, is bigger than 80 ml, but PKRP is less wound and recover rapidly so that it worth to popularize in primary hospital.

表1 两组患者术前资料比较[MQ)]
表2 两组患者术中术后资料比较
表3 两组患者术后随访不同时间各项指标的比较[MQ)]
[1]
陈弋生, 邹滨, 孔艰,等. 三种经尿道术式治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(6): 489-492.
[2]
Yoo TK, Cho HJ. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: from bench to clinic[J]. Korean J Urol, 2012, 53(3): 139-148.
[3]
王忠, 陈其, 陈彦博. 钬激光前列腺剜除术-前列腺增生手术金标准新的挑战者[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2013, 27(5): 3-5.
[4]
Persu C, Georgescu D, Arabagiu I, et al. TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?[J]. J Med Life, 2010, 3(4): 376-380.
[5]
Ou R, You M, Tang P, et al. A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL[J]. Urology, 2010, 76(4): 958-961.
[6]
Protogerou V, Argyropoulos V, Patrozos K, et al. An alternative minimally invasive technique for large prostates (>80 mL): transvesical prostatectomy through a 3-cm incision[J]. Urology, 2010, 75(1): 184-186.
[7]
Malaeb BS, Yu X, Mcbean AM, et al. National trends in surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the United States (2000-2008)[J]. Urology, 2012, 79(5): 1111-1116.
[8]
李贺洋, 孟凡学, 阎文新, 等. 经尿道前列腺电切术与开放手术治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(6): 406-409.
[9]
Busetto GM, Giovannone R, Antonini G, et al. Short-term pretreatment with a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor before bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP): evaluation of prostate vascularity and decreased surgical blood loss in large prostates[J]. BJU Int, 2015, 116(1): 117-123.
[10]
游猛, 吴杰英, 陈岳, 等. 耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(3): 203-206.
[11]
Ran L, He W, Zhu X, et al. Comparison of fluid absorption between transurethral enucleation and transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia[J]. Urol Int, 2013, 91(1): 26-30.
[12]
Falsaperla M, Cindolo L, Saita A, et al. Transurethral resection of prostate: technical progress by bipolar Gyrus plasma-kinetic tissue management system[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2007, 59(2): 125-129.
[13]
Coskuner ER, Ozkan TA, Koprulu S, et al. The role of the bipolar plasmakinetic TURP over 100 g prostate in the elderly patients[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014, 46(11): 2071-2077.
[14]
唐伟, 杨正宏. 经尿道前列腺电切术后低血压相关因素分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 34-36.
[15]
廖伟强, 罗立旷. 经尿道前列腺电切术1370例手术体会[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 119-122.
[16]
罗刚, 汪良, 曾甫清, 等. 经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生诊疗体会[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 29(4): 293-295.
[1] 李腾成, 谭益元, 黄群雄, 吴杰英, 肖恒军, 胡成, 李茂胤, 高新, 狄金明. 机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-456.
[2] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[3] 方昌华, 杜霖, 陈鑫楠, 王昊, 王文帝, 张成伟, 秦海翔, 邱雪峰, 庄君龙, 徐林峰, 郭宏骞, 张古田. 以累积和分析法研究保留耻骨后间隙机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 319-325.
[4] 郑军, 许新, 江爽, 俞继卫. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗前列腺根治性切除术后并发腹股沟疝疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 557-560.
[5] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[6] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[7] 王刚, 单伟根, 刘娟, 李长庆, 王新民. 常规治疗联合阿托伐他丁钙片对支气管扩张症临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 538-540.
[8] 王红敏, 谢云波, 王彦虎, 王福生. 间充质干细胞治疗新冠病毒感染的临床研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-256.
[9] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[10] 李美娜, 宋艳丽, 杨姗姗, 李聚彩, 罗慧利, 吕杰. 三联预康复策略在退行性脊柱侧弯患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 356-364.
[11] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
[12] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[13] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
[14] 曹文玺, 陈箫, 竺来法, 周永平. 尼妥珠单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗胰腺癌的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 409-413.
[15] 李新华, 罗依, 袁颖, 黄颖, 徐美华, 吴静. 以学生为中心的线上线下混合式教学改革在交流技能学中的应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 217-221.
阅读次数
全文


摘要