切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 348 -350. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.05.007

临床研究

腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱再植术治疗医源性输尿管阴道瘘的疗效
谢文君1, 李文标2, 杨飞2, 丁虹璐2, 刘柏隆2, 湛海伦2, 周祥福2,()   
  1. 1. 510530 广州,中山大学附属第三医院岭南医院手术室
    2. 510530 广州,中山大学附属第三医院岭南医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-20 出版日期:2020-10-10
  • 通信作者: 周祥福
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81670688)

The effect of laparoscopic cesico-ureteral reimplantation in treatment of iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula

Wenjun Xie1, Wenbiao Li2, Fei Yang2, Honglu Ding2, Bolong Liu2, Hailun Zhan2, Xiangfu Zhou2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Operation Room, , the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
    2. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2018-11-20 Published:2020-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Xiangfu Zhou
引用本文:

谢文君, 李文标, 杨飞, 丁虹璐, 刘柏隆, 湛海伦, 周祥福. 腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱再植术治疗医源性输尿管阴道瘘的疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 348-350.

Wenjun Xie, Wenbiao Li, Fei Yang, Honglu Ding, Bolong Liu, Hailun Zhan, Xiangfu Zhou. The effect of laparoscopic cesico-ureteral reimplantation in treatment of iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 348-350.

目的

总结并分析腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱再植术治疗医源性输尿管阴道瘘的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2018年1月期间我院收治并行腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱再植术的14例输尿管阴道瘘患者资料。年龄27~69岁,平均(44±5)岁。发现阴道漏尿时间为1~29 d,平均12 d。左侧9例(64.3%),右侧5例(35.7%)。本组所有患者术前均行血常规、生化、泌尿系彩超、美蓝实验、静脉泌尿系造影以及CTU检查确诊。

结果

本组14例患者手术均成功完成,手术用时100~160 min,平均125 min。术中出血20~100 ml。术后平均3 d拔除腹腔引流管,7~10 d拔除尿管;住院时间9~18 d,平均13 d。术后随访3~24个月,平均13个月,本组全部治愈。术后1例患者出现无痛性肉眼血尿,未行特殊处理嘱多饮水保守治疗后好转(Ⅰ级);2例患者术后出现发热症状,血常规复查提示血白细胞升高,尿常规白细胞升高,予以加强抗感染治疗后好转(Ⅱ级);余患者均无严重并发症(Ⅲ-Ⅴ级)发生。

结论

引起输尿管阴道瘘的原因主要为妇产科手术所致,对于输尿管阴道瘘建议早期诊断,条件允许的情况下早期手术治疗,腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱再植术治疗输尿管阴道瘘疗效满意。

Objective

To summarize and analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic ureteral bladder replantation in the treatment of iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 14 patients with ureterovaginal fistula who underwent concurrent laparoscopic ureteral replantation between June 2014 and January 2018. The age ranged from 27 to 69 years, with an average of (44 ± 5) years. The time of vaginal leakage was found to be 1 day to 29 days, with an average of 12 days. 9 cases (64.3%) on the left side and 5 cases (35.7%) on the right side. All patients in this group underwent blood routine, biochemical, urinary ultrasound, Meilan experiment, intravenous urography and CTU examination.

Results

All the 14 patients were successfully operated. The operation time was 100-160 min, with an average of 125 min. Intraoperative bleeding 20~100 ml. Abdominal drainage tube was removed on average 3 days after operation, and the catheter was removed 7 to 10 days. The hospital stay was 9 to 18 days, with an average of 13 days. All patients were followed up for 3 to 24 months, with an average of 13 months. All the patients were cured. One patient developed painless gross hematuria after surgery, and did not undergo special treatment (Class I); 2 patients developed fever after operation, and were cured after anti-infective treatment (Class II); the remaining patients had no serious complications.

Conclusion

Ureteral fistula is mainly caused by gynecological and gynecological surgery, early diagnosis is recommended for ureterovaginal fistula, early surgical treatment is suggested under conditions, and laparoscopic ureteral bladder replantation is satisfactory for ureterovaginal fistula.

[1]
Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2006, 33(1): 55-66.
[2]
Raassen TJ1, Ngongo CJ, Mahendeka MM. Iatrogenic genitourinary fistula: an 18-year retrospective review of 805 injuries [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(12): 1699-1706.
[3]
潘铁军. 女性输尿管阴道瘘的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 38(10): 725-727.
[4]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-213.
[5]
Hillary CJ, Osman NI, Hilton P, et al. The Aetiology, treatment, and outcome of urogenital fistulae managed in well- and low-resourced countries: a systematic review [J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 70(3): 478-492.
[6]
Kostakopoulos A, Deliveliotis C, Louras G, et al. Early repair of injury to the ureter or bladder after hysterectomy[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 1998, 30(4): 445-450.
[7]
Alonso Gorrea M, Fernandez Zuazu J, Mompó Sanchis JA, et al. Spontaneous healing of ureterogenital fistulas: selection criteria[J]. Eur Urol, 1986, 12(5): 322-326.
[8]
Upadhyay AM, Kunwar A, Shrestha S, et al. Managing Ureterovaginal Fistulas following Obstetric and Gynecological Surgeries [J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2018, 16(2): 233-238.
[9]
Raassen T, Ngongo CJ, Mahendeka MM. Diagnosis and management of 365 ureteric injuries following obstetric and gynecologic surgery in resource-limited settings [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2018, 29(9): 1303-1309.
[10]
Linder BJ, Frank I, Occhino JA. Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation for ureterovaginal fistula[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2018, 29(4): 595-597.
[11]
嵇福荣,蔡龙俊,晁流, 等. 腹腔镜下膀胱腰大肌悬吊输尿管再植术处理妇科输尿管损伤的初步研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 407-410.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要