切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 156 -161. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.02.014

临床研究

后腹腔镜手术患者术后球结膜水肿的危险因素
刘思敏1, 杨保仲1,(), 高丽红1, 张艳鹏1   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学麻醉学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-19 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 杨保仲

Risk factors of postoperative chemosis in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic surgery

Simin Liu1, Baozhong Yang1,(), Lihong Gao1, Yanpeng Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2020-11-19 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Baozhong Yang
引用本文:

刘思敏, 杨保仲, 高丽红, 张艳鹏. 后腹腔镜手术患者术后球结膜水肿的危险因素[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 156-161.

Simin Liu, Baozhong Yang, Lihong Gao, Yanpeng Zhang. Risk factors of postoperative chemosis in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 156-161.

目的

分析泌尿外科后腹腔镜手术患者术后发生球结膜水肿的危险因素。

方法

收集2018年9月至2019年12月在山西医科大学第一医院接受泌尿外科后腹腔镜手术患者的临床资料,按术后是否发生球结膜水肿分为球结膜水肿组与未发生球结膜水肿组。对患者相关资料进行单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析,绘制ROC曲线并计算曲线下面积。

结果

825例患者中术后球结膜水肿85例(10.3%)。单因素分析显示,与对照组相比,肾癌手术占比明显增高,术中出血量、输液量明显增多,折刀位头低角度增大,手术时间明显延长。CO2气腹压力升高、气管插管5 min后、侧卧折刀位5 min后、恢复平卧位前、气腹结束并恢复平卧位后5 min时PETCO2明显增高(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示:折刀位头低角度(OR=2.967,95%CI:1.825~4.826,P<0.001),手术时间(OR=30.673,95%CI:3.861~243.676,P=0.001),CO2气腹压力(OR=8.371,95%CI:3.126 ~22.418,P<0.001),侧卧折刀位5 min后的PETCO2OR=1.931,95%CI:1.453~2.565,P<0.001)是导致患者术后球结膜水肿的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示:折刀位头低角度(AUC=0.744,P<0.001,灵敏度为0.624,特异度为0.765),手术时间(AUC=0.868,P<0.001,灵敏度0.882,特异度0.724),CO2气腹压力(AUC=0.855,P<0.001,灵敏度0.765,特异度0.818),侧卧折刀位5 min后的PETCO2(AUC=0.818,P<0.001,灵敏度0.906,特异度0.612)对术后球结膜水肿具有一定诊断效能。

结论

折刀位头低角度大、手术时间长、高CO2气腹压力、侧卧折刀位5 min后高PETCO2是泌尿外科后腹腔镜手术术后球结膜水肿的独立危险因素。

Objective

To analyze the risk factors for postoperative chemosis in patients undergoing urological retroperitoneoscopic surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of patients who received urological retroperitoneoscopic surgery in the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from September 2018 to December 2019 were collected and divided into chemosis group and without chemosis group according to whether postoperative chemosis occurred. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed on patient-related data, ROC curves were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

Among the 825 patients, 85(10.3%) had postoperative chemosis.Univariate analysis showed that compared with the control group, the proportion of renal cancer surgery was significantly higher, the intraoperative blood loss and infusion volume was significantly increased, the low angle of the jackknife head was increased, the operation time was significantly prolonged, and the CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure, PETCO2 were significantly higher after 5 min of endotracheal intubation, after 5 min of lateral jackknife position, before restoring the supine position, at the end of pneumoperitoneum and 5 min after restoring the supine position (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that: low angle of the head in the jacket position (OR=2.967, 95%CI: 1.825 to 4.826, P<0.001), operation time (OR= 30.673, 95% CI: 3.861 to 243.676, P=0.001), CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure (OR=8.371, 95% CI: 3.126 to 22.418, P<0.001), and PETCO2 after 5 min in the lateral jacket position (OR=1.931, 95%CI: 1.453 to 2.565, P<0.001) were independent risk factors leading to postoperative chemosis in patients. ROC curve analysis showed that: low angle of the folding knife head (AUC=0.744, P<0.001, sensitivity 0.624, specificity 0.765), operation time (AUC=0.868, P<0.001, sensitivity 0.882, specificity 0.724), CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure (AUC=0.855, P<0.001, sensitivity 0.765, specificity 0.818), PETCO2 after 5 min of lateral recumbent folding knife position (AUC=0.818, P<0.001, sensitivity 0.906, specificity 0.612) had some diagnostic efficacy for postoperative chemosis.

Conclusion

Large low angle of jackknife position, long operation time, high CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure and high PETCO2 after 5 min of lateral jackknife position are independent risk factors of chemosis after retroperitoneoscopic urological surgery.

表1 两组后腹腔镜泌尿外科手术患者术前资料比较
表2 两组后腹腔镜泌尿外科手术患者术中资料比较
表3 后腹腔镜手术患者术后球结膜水肿危险因素多因素分析
图1 头低角度、手术时间、气腹压力、侧卧折刀位后5 min的PETCO2对术后球结膜水肿诊断效能的ROC曲线
表4 预测术后球结膜水肿各影响因素的ROC曲线分析结果
[1]
陈春莲, 何国龙, 赵体玉. 术中体位调整对全麻甲状腺手术患者眼压的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2017, 32(16): 50-51.
[2]
覃华凤. 综合护理预防妇科腹腔镜手术头低脚高位引发眼球结膜水肿的效果观察[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2019, 5(4): 119-122.
[3]
Jeon YT, Park YO, Won HJ, et al. Effect of head position on postoperative chemosis after prone spinal surgery[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2007, 19(1): 1-4.
[4]
McCord CD, Kreymerman P, Nahai F, et al. Management of postblepharoplasty chemosis[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2013, 33(5): 654-661.
[5]
Kiekens S, De Groot V, Coeckelbergh T, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy is associated with an increase in intraocular pressure in obstructive sleep apnea[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008, 49(3): 934-940.
[6]
Molloy BL, Cong X, Watson C. Preventive dorzolamide-timolol for rising intraocular pressure during steep trendelenburg position surgery[J]. AANA J, 2016,84(3): 189-196.
[7]
王宝, 李斌, 白映红,等. 眼内压测定监测颅内压变化的临床研究[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018, 5(92): 83.
[8]
Vitish-Sharma P, Acheson AG, King AJ. Intraocular pressure during robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures utilizing steep trendelenburg positioning[J]. J Glaucoma, 2017, 26(2): e122.
[9]
Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Kanadani FN, et al. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2010, 55(5): 445-453.
[10]
卞春, 徐洁, 胡雪萍. 改良侧卧折刀位对后腹腔镜手术患者术中眼压增高的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(9): 96-97,100.
[11]
Mondzelewski TJ, Schmitz JW, Christman MS, et al. Intraocular pressure during robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures utilizing steep trendelenburg positioning[J]. J Glaucoma, 2015, 24(6): 399-404.
[12]
潘裕国, 钱以德, 卫智强. 不同气腹压力对全麻下腹腔镜胆囊切除术病人眼压的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2010, 9(20): 1529-1531.
[13]
左艳霞, 秦寿泽. 腹腔镜手术与眼内压变化的研究现状与进展[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 740-744.
[14]
Hofer CK, Zalunardo MP, Klaghofer R, et al. Changes in intrathoracic blood volume associated with pneumoperitoneum and positioning[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2002, 46(3): 303-308.
[15]
罗新书, 刘淑玲, 励秀武, 等. 腹腔镜手术气腹压力对机体影响的研究进展[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2011, 24(9): 88-90.
[16]
胡芸, 米克热依·赛买提, 黄建成, 等. 不同肌松深度及气腹压力对腹腔镜下行胆囊手术操作空间的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2020, 41(2): 184-188.
[17]
Rammohan A, Manimaran AB, Manohar RR, et al. Nitrous oxide for pneumoperitoneum: no laughing matter this! A prospective single blind case controlled study[J]. Int J Surg, 2011, 9(2): 173-176.
[18]
周路阳, 蒋忠. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者术中眼内压升高的多因素分析[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2013, 29(4): 331-333.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[4] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[5] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?