切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 293 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.04.002

临床研究

国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在前列腺癌根治术中的初步应用
张超1, 魏勇2, 景泰乐3, 王正1, 肖成武1, 沈露明2, 杨健2, 彭鼎3, 杨波1, 汪朔3, 夏丹3,(), 朱清毅2,(), 王林辉1,()   
  1. 1. 200433 上海,海军军医大学第一附属医院泌尿外科
    2. 210011 南京医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科
    3. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-05 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 夏丹, 朱清毅, 王林辉
  • 基金资助:
    上海市自然科学基金(18ZR1438400); 上海市卫健委科研课题(20174Y0019)

Feasibility and safety of a novel single-port robotic surgical system in radical prostatectomy: initial experiences

Chao Zhang1, Yong Wei2, Taile Jing3, Zheng Wang1, Chengwu Xiao1, Luming Shen2, Jian Yang2, Ding Peng3, Bo Yang1, Shuo Wang3, Dan Xia3(), Qingyi Zhu2(), Linhui Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
    2. Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, China
    3. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2022-05-05 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Dan Xia, Qingyi Zhu, Linhui Wang
引用本文:

张超, 魏勇, 景泰乐, 王正, 肖成武, 沈露明, 杨健, 彭鼎, 杨波, 汪朔, 夏丹, 朱清毅, 王林辉. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在前列腺癌根治术中的初步应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 293-297.

Chao Zhang, Yong Wei, Taile Jing, Zheng Wang, Chengwu Xiao, Luming Shen, Jian Yang, Ding Peng, Bo Yang, Shuo Wang, Dan Xia, Qingyi Zhu, Linhui Wang. Feasibility and safety of a novel single-port robotic surgical system in radical prostatectomy: initial experiences[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 293-297.

目的

探讨国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统用于前列腺癌根治术的安全性和可行性。

方法

2021年10月至2022年4月,海军军医大学第一附属医院、南京医科大学第二附属医院、浙江大学医学院附属第一医院采用国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统完成前列腺癌根治术17例,记录患者一般情况、肿瘤学指标、手术入路、手术时间、操作时间、术中出血量、辅助孔数量、围术期并发症、病理结果、术后一个月PSA及尿控情况等指标。

结果

患者平均年龄(70±7)岁,平均BMI (24.8±2.7) kg/m2,术前平均PSA 11.9(6.6) ng/ml,Gleason评分6分者7例,7分者10例。17例手术均顺利完成,其中经腹腔入路10例,经腹膜外入路7例。5例手术为纯单孔术式,12例手术增加一枚12 mm辅助通道。平均手术时间(210±63)min,主刀医师上机操作时间(172±52)min,术中出血量(115±92)ml,围手术期无输血、肠道损伤、漏尿、发热、切口愈合不良等并发症。术后病理提示Gleason评分6分者4例,7分者12例,9分者1例;T2期14例,T3期3例;切缘阳性者4例(23.5%)。术后1个月平均PSA 0.01(0.074) ng/ml,12例患者尿控满意(71%)。

结论

采用国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统可安全、有效的开展经腹腔和经腹膜外的前列腺癌根治术。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of a novel single-port robotic surgical system in radical prostatectomy.

Methods

From October 2021 to April 2022, 17 cases of radical prostatectomy were carried out in the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University with a novel single-port robotic surgical system. The perioperative information was recorded, such as oncological profiles, surgical approach, operating time, console time, estimated blood loss, number of auxiliary ports, perioperative complications, pathological results, PSA and continence 1 month after operation.

Results

The average age of the patients was (70±7) years old, the average BMI was (24.8±2.7) kg/m2, the average PSA before operation was 11.9(6.6) ng/ml, and the Gleason score was 6 in 7 cases and 7 in 10 cases. All operations were successfully completed, including 10 transperitoneal cases and 7 extraperitoneal cases. Five cases were received pure single-port operation, and in 12 cases, a 12 mm auxiliary port was added. The average operation time was (210±63) minutes, the console time was (172±52) minutes, and estimated blood loss was (115±92) ml. There were no complications observed, such as blood transfusion, colon injury, urinary leakage, fever, poor wound healing and so on. Postoperative pathology showed that Gleason score was 6 in 4 cases, 7 in 12 cases, and 9 in 1 case. Fourteen cases were in T2 stage and 3 cases were T3. There were 4 cases (23.5%) with positive margin. One month after operation, the average PSA was 0.01(0.074) ng/ml, and continence was achieved in 12 cases (71%).

Conclusions

The novel single-port robotic surgical system can be safely and effectively applied in transperitoneal and extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

图1 蛇形臂在手术中
表1 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统行前列腺癌根治术中主要指标与代表性达芬奇机器人的比较
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(1): 7-30.
[2]
叶定伟,朱耀. 中国前列腺癌的流行病学概述和启示[J].中华外科杂志, 2015, 53(4): 249-252.
[3]
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(2): 243-262.
[4]
Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chamber SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(8): 1051-1060.
[5]
Jazayeri SB, Weissman B, Samadi DB. Outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Pentafecta and Trifecta achievements[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2018, 70(1): 66-73.
[6]
Zattoni F, Montebelli F, Rossanese M, et al. Should radical prostatectomy be encouraged at any age? A critical non-systematic review[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2018, 70(1): 42-52.
[7]
Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J]. Urology, 2008, 72(6): 1190-1193.
[8]
Sortino G, Giannubilo W, Di Biase M, et al. Laparoscopic single port radical prostatectomy in the 2020: Why not? Our experience[J]. Urologia, 2021, 88(3): 212-217.
[9]
Wen XQ, Huang WT, Situ J, et al. Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and technical points to reduce its difficulties [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2011. 124(23): 4092-4095.
[10]
Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66: 1-33-1043.
[11]
张超,王正,张宗勤,等. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在零缺血肾部分切除术中的初步应用[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(2): 81-86.
[12]
Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience[J]. Urology, 1997, 50(6): 854-857.
[13]
Dobbs RW, Magnan BP, Abhyankar N, et al. Cost effectiveness and robot-assisted urologic surgery: does it make dollars and sense? [J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2017, 69(4): 313-323.
[14]
Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 70(5): 837-845.
[15]
Du Y, Long Q, Guan B, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients: a system review and meta-analysis[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 272-287.
[16]
Basiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, et al. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? [J]. World J Urol, 2018, 36(4): 609-621.
[17]
Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Urology, 2008, 72(6): 1190-1193.
[18]
Wei Y, Tang J, Yuan L, et al. Laparoendoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP): stepwise transition from multi-site to single-site with the aid of the transurethral port[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2021, 53(2): 249-255.
[19]
Jiang C, Huang J, Lin T, et al. Extraperitoneal transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy using a homemade single-port device: 20 cases with midterm outcomes[J]. World J Urol, 2014, 32(3): 829-836.
[20]
Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation [J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(6): 1033-1043.
[21]
Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Madueke I, et al. Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci SP platform[J]. BJU Int, 2019, 124(6): 1022-1027.
[22]
Agarwal DK, Sharma V, Toussi A, et al. Initial experience with da Vinci single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomies[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 77(3): 373-379.
[23]
Moschovas MC, Bhat S, Sandri M, et al. Comparing the approach to radical prostatectomy using the multiport da Vinci Xi and da Vinci SP robots: a propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(3): 393-404.
[24]
Saidian A, Fang AW, Hakim O, et al. Perioperative outcomes of single vs multi-port robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single institutional experience[J]. J Urol, 2020, 204(3): 490-495.
[25]
Lenfant L, Sawczyn G, Aminsharifi A, et al. Pure single-site robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using single-port versus multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: a single-institution comparative study[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2021, 7(5): 964-972.
[26]
Vigneswaran HT, Schwarzman LS, Francavilla S, et al. A comparison of perioperative outcomes between single-port and multiport robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 77(6): 671-674.
[27]
Ju GQ, Wang ZJ, Shi JZ, et al. A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si Surgical System[J]. Asian J Androl, 2021, 23(6): 640-647.
[28]
杜巍,徐伟东,杨悦, 等. 多种路径机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的初步疗效[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41(11): 815-819.
[29]
Kaouk JH, Bertolo R. Single-site robotic platform in clinical practice: first cases in the USA [J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2019, 71(3): 294-298.
[30]
Ng CF, Teoh JY, Chiu PK, et al. Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy: a phase 1 clinical study [J]. Int J Urol, 2019, 26(9): 878-883.
[31]
Steinberg RL, Johnson BA, Meskawi M, et al. Magnet-assisted robotic prostatectomy using the da Vinci sp robot: an initial case series [J]. J Endourol, 2019, 33(10): 829-834.
[32]
Kaouk J, Valero R, Sawczyn G, et al. Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique [J]. BJU Int 2020, 125(1): 182-189.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[3] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[4] 吕玥彤, 靳梦圆, 周大为, 叶啟发. 机器人辅助下肾移植的临床进展与争议[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 242-246.
[5] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[6] 庞名扬, 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱清毅. 运用国产单孔机器人完成经膀胱入路膀胱部分切除术治疗膀胱癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-643.
[7] 王岩, 钱宏阳, 朱寅杰, 董柏君, 潘家骅, 薛蔚. 机器人辅助单孔腹膜外根治性前列腺切除治疗高危前列腺癌的瘤控效果初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 435-440.
[8] 台苏鹏, 梁朝朝, 郝宗耀, 邰胜, 陶军跃, 周骏. 机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗肾错构瘤合并下腔静脉瘤栓两例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-478.
[9] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[10] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[11] 罗迎吉星, 隗瑞丽, 王天晓, 黄笳, 徐力, 孙永亮, 杨志英. 开放、腔镜、机器人辅助肝血管瘤剥除术治疗巨大肝血管瘤对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 277-283.
[12] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[13] 李澄清, 郭文毅, 王磊. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术:微创胰腺外科的合理决策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 620-624.
[14] 李元新, 徐田磊, 刘伯涛. 第四代达芬奇机器人辅助慢性放射性肠炎确定性手术一例(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 435-440.
[15] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
阅读次数
全文


摘要