切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 351 -355. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.04.008

临床研究

乳头状肾细胞癌单中心11年临床诊治与预后分析
刘麒, 曾弘, 徐子昕, 方超, 黄铭, 郑俊炯, 吴少旭, 钟广正, 林天歆, 黄健, 董文()   
  1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科;528406 深圳,中山大学附属第八医院泌尿外科
    510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院病理科
    510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-19 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 董文
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81972383); 广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2023A1515010355)

Clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis analysis of papillary renal cell carcinoma in a single center with 11-year experiences

Qi Liu, Hong Zeng, Zixin Xu, Chao Fang, Ming Huang, Junjiong Zheng, Shaoxu Wu, Guangzheng Zhong, Tianxin Lin, Jian Huang, Wen Dong()   

  1. Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China; Department of Urology, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat sen University, Shenzhen 528406, China
    Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2023-04-19 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Wen Dong
引用本文:

刘麒, 曾弘, 徐子昕, 方超, 黄铭, 郑俊炯, 吴少旭, 钟广正, 林天歆, 黄健, 董文. 乳头状肾细胞癌单中心11年临床诊治与预后分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 351-355.

Qi Liu, Hong Zeng, Zixin Xu, Chao Fang, Ming Huang, Junjiong Zheng, Shaoxu Wu, Guangzheng Zhong, Tianxin Lin, Jian Huang, Wen Dong. Clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis analysis of papillary renal cell carcinoma in a single center with 11-year experiences[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 351-355.

目的

分析不同分型乳头状肾细胞癌(pRCC)的临床特征及治疗效果,探讨pRCC预后相关危险因素。

方法

回顾性收集了中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院2011年1月至2021年10月经微创手术治疗且病理确诊的70例pRCC患者的临床及病理资料。所有患者术前已排除远处转移,并对患者生存及复发转移情况进行跟踪随访,随访至2021年12月底,以出现疾病进展或任何原因的死亡为终点。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,COX回归用于多因素分析无进展生存(PFS)的危险因素。

结果

70例患者均诊断为pRCC,包括21例Ⅰ型及49例Ⅱ型,其中男55例,中位年龄57岁。中位肿瘤直径为4.0 cm(Q1~Q3:2.9~6.3 cm)。肿瘤TNM分期:pT1期52例,pT2期7例,pT3期10例及pT4期1例,Ⅰ型及Ⅱ型患者肿瘤直径(4.0 cm vs 4.0 cm)及pT分期差异无统计学意义。Ⅰ型患者中1例伴癌栓,Ⅱ型患者中9例伴癌栓,7例淋巴结转移患者均为Ⅱ型。肿瘤侵犯肾包膜34例,含31例Ⅱ型(P<0.001),Ⅱ型患者WHO/ISUP分级显著高于Ⅰ型(P<0.001)。总体中位随访时间46个月,Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型pRCC患者中位随访时间分别为43个月和51个月。5年无进展生存率分别为100%和67.3%,Kaplan-Meier生存分析示Ⅰ型pRCC患者PFS优于Ⅱ型(P<0.05)。Cox多因素分析发现肿瘤直径与pRCC的PFS相关,此外术前碱性磷酸酶异常亦与Ⅱ型pRCC的PFS相关。

结论

Ⅱ型pRCC较Ⅰ型核分级更高,更易发生包膜入侵,更易发生疾病进展。直径较大的pRCC患者预后更差,术前碱性磷酸酶异常是Ⅱ型pRCC的独立危险因素。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics and therapeutic effects of different subtypes of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), and to explore the prognostic risk factors related to pRCC.

Methods

The clinical and pathological data of 70 patients with pRCC who were treated by minimally invasive procedure and confirmed pathologically from January 2011 to October 2021 in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively collected. All patients were excluded from distant metastasis before surgery, and their survival, recurrence, and metastasis were followed up until the end of December 2021, with disease progression or death from any cause as the endpoint. The Kaplan Meier method was used to plot the survival curve, and COX regression was used for multivariate analysis of risk factors for progression free survival (PFS).

Results

All 70 patients were diagnosed with pRCC, including 21 cases of type I and 49 cases of type II, including 55 males, all patients with a median age of 57 years. The median tumor diameter is 4.0 cm (Q1~Q3: 2.9-6.3 cm). Tumor TNM staging: 52 cases in pT1 phase, 7 cases in pT2 phase, 10 cases in pT3 phase, and 1 case in pT4 phase. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter (4.0 cm vs 4.0 cm) and pT staging between type I and type II patients. One patient was accompanied by a tumor thrombus in type I, 9 patients were accompanied by a tumor thrombus in type II, and 7 patients with lymph node metastasis were all type II patients. There were 34 cases of tumor invasion of renal capsule, including 31 cases of type II (P<0.001). The WHO/ISUP grading of type II patients was significantly higher than that of type I (P<0.001). The overall median follow-up time was 46 months, with a median follow-up time of 43 months for type I and 51 months for type II pRCC patients, respectively, the 5-year progression free survival rates were 100% and 67.3%, respectively. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed that PFS in type I pRCC patients was significantly better than that in type II pRCC patients (P<0.05). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the tumor diameter was significantly related to the PFS of pRCC, and the preoperative alkaline phosphatase abnormality was also significantly related to the PFS of type II pRCC.

Conclusions

Type II pRCC has a higher nuclear grading than type I, which is more prone to capsule invasion, and more prone to disease progression. The prognosis of patients with larger diameter pRCC is worse, and abnormal preoperative alkaline phosphatase is an independent risk factor for type II pRCC.

表1 70例乳头状肾细胞癌患者Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型临床病理特征的比较
图1 两种亚型乳头状肾细胞癌患者的生存曲线
表2 乳头状肾细胞癌患者无进展生存相关单因素及多因素分析
表3 Ⅱ型乳头状肾细胞癌患者无进展生存相关单因素及多因素分析
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2022, 72(1): 7-33.
[2]
Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: esmo clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†[J]. Ann Oncol , 2019, 30(5): 706-720.
[3]
Mendhiratta N, Muraki P, Sisk AE Jr. Shuch B. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: Review[J]. Urol Oncol, 2021, 39(6): 327-337.
[4]
Bigot P, Bernhard JC, Gill IS, et al. The subclassification of papillary renal cell carcinoma does not affect oncological outcomes after nephron sparing surgery[J]. World J Urol, 2016, 34(3): 347-352.
[5]
Wong ECL, Di Lena R, Breau RH, et al. Morphologic subtyping as a prognostic predictor for survival in papillary renal cell carcinoma: Type 1 vs. type 2[J]. Urol Oncol, 2019, 37(10): 721-726.
[6]
Deng J, Li L, Xia H, et al. A comparison of the prognosis of papillary and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(27): e16309.
[7]
Lobo J, Ohashi R, Amin MB, et al. WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma[J]. Histopathology, 2022: 81(4): 426-438.
[8]
Delahunt B, Eble JN. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 105 tumors[J]. Mod Pathol, 1997, 10(6): 537-544.
[9]
Le X, Wang XB, Zhao H,et al . Comparison of clinicopathologic parameters and oncologic outcomes between type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma[J]. BMC urology, 2020, 20(1):148.
[10]
Hong B, Hou H, Chen L, et al. The clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study in chinese population[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 753690.
[11]
Sweeney PL, Jang A, Halat SK, et al. Advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: Epidemiology, genomic drivers, current therapies, and ongoing trials[J]. Cancer Treat Res Commun, 2022, 33: 100639.
[12]
Dudani S, de Velasco G, Wells JC, et al. Evaluation of clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma metastasis sites and association with survival[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(1): e2021869.
[13]
Pan H, Ye L, Zhu Q, et al. The effect of the papillary renal cell carcinoma subtype on oncological outcomes[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 21073.
[14]
博尔术, 洪鹏, 张宇, 等. 乳头状肾细胞癌的临床病理特征和预后分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 615-620.
[15]
Manola J, Royston P, Elson P, et al. Prognostic model for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the international kidney cancer working group[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2011, 17(16): 5443-5450.
[16]
艾克拜尔·努尔买买提,王文光,乔炳璋,等. 肾嫌色细胞癌和乳头状肾细胞癌的临床病理特点及预后分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40(3): 167-170.
[17]
周硕明,甘卫东. 2022版欧洲泌尿外科学会肾细胞癌诊疗指南更新要点解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(2): 100-104.
[18]
Murugan P, Jia L, Dinatale RG, et al. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a single institutional study of 199 cases addressing classification, clinicopathologic and molecular features, and treatment outcome[J]. Mod Pathol, 2022, 35(6): 825-835.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[9] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[10] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[11] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[12] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要