切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 277 -283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.03.014

继续教育

腹腔镜肾部分切除术离体猪肾培训模型的构建
张子旭1, 郑俊炯2, 罗云3, 林天歆2,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科;230041 合肥,中国人民武装警察部队安徽省总队医院泌尿外科
    2. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科
    3. 510630 广州,中山大学第三附属医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-14 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 林天歆
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U21A20383); 广东省援疆农村科技(特派员)项目(KTP2020321)

Development of isolated porcine kidney training model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Zixu Zhang1, Junjiong Zheng2, Yun Luo3, Tianxin Lin2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China; Department of Urology, Anhui Provincial General Hospital of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Hefei 230041, China
    2. Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China
    3. Department of Urology, the third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2023-03-14 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Tianxin Lin
引用本文:

张子旭, 郑俊炯, 罗云, 林天歆. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术离体猪肾培训模型的构建[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 277-283.

Zixu Zhang, Junjiong Zheng, Yun Luo, Tianxin Lin. Development of isolated porcine kidney training model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 277-283.

目的

构建琼脂糖离体猪肾肾癌模型,并验证其在泌尿外科医师腹腔镜肾部分切除术模拟培训中的应用效果。

方法

21名不同腹腔镜手术经验的泌尿外科医师参与培训,根据不同腹腔镜手术经验分为三组:无经验组(A组,n=8)、少经验组(B组,n=7)、经验丰富组(C组,n=6)。利用琼脂糖混合物注射到离体猪肾包膜下构建肾癌模型,将模型放置到腹腔镜培训模拟器中,三组学员分别进行6次培训,记录每名学员的手术时间,质量评分及全球腹腔镜技术手术评估(GOALS)评分,对每次模拟操作进行评价,比较各组学员的手术技能,评估该模型的有效性。

结果

首次培训时A、B、C三组中位手术时间、中位质量评分及中位GOALS评分两两比较均存在显著差异(P<0.05)。A组和B组的手术时间分别在第4、5次培训时达到了C组基线水平,质量评分均在第2次达到C组基线水平,GOALS评分分别在第5、4次培训时达到C组基线水平(P>0.05)。经过6次培训,三组学员的评价指标均有不同程度地改善。

结论

本研究构建了一种琼脂糖离体猪肾腹腔镜肾部分切除术培训模型,该模型经济易得,适用于不同手术经验的医师培训,可较快提高临床医师手术技能,易于推广。

Objective

To construct an agarose ex vivo porcine kidney renal carcinoma model and validate its training effectiveness in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy simulation training.

Methods

Twenty-one urologists with different laparoscopic surgical experience participated in the training and were categorized into three groups based on their laparoscopic surgical experience: no experience group (group A, n=8), little experience group (group B, n=7), and experienced group (group C, n=6). A renal cancer model using an agarose mixture injected under the envelope of isolated porcine kidneys was constructed. The model was placed into a laparoscopic training simulator and all the trainees performed 6 training sessions. Each trainee's operative time, quality scores, and GOALS scores for each simulated operation were recorded, and the evaluation metrics were compared between the three groups to assess the effectiveness of the model.

Results

During the first training, there were significant differences in the median operative time, median quality score, and median GOALS score between groups A, B, and C (P<0.05). The operative time of Group A and Group B reached the baseline level of Group C at the 4th and 5th training sessions, and the quality score reached the baseline level of Group C at the 2nd training session. The GOALS score reached the baseline level of Group C at the 5th and 4th training sessions, respectively (P>0.05). After 6 training sessions, the evaluation indicators of the three groups have improved to varying degrees.

Conclusion

This study constructed an agarose isolated porcine kidney training model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, which is economical and suitable for the training of surgeons with different surgical experiences. The model can improve surgical skills of surgeons and is easy to popularize and promote.

图1 离体猪肾琼脂糖肾癌模型及腹腔镜肾部分切除术模拟训练注:a为离体猪肾琼脂糖肾癌模型;b为培训医师利用模型进行腹腔镜肾部分切除术训练;c为切除癌肿后缝合肾实质;d为癌肿切除及完成缝合后
表1 培训医师腹腔镜下切除模型中癌肿质量评分表
表2 全球腹腔镜技术手术评估(GOALS)评分标准
表3 21名泌尿外科培训学员基本信息[MQ)]
表4 首次培训三组学员在手术时间、质量评分及全球腹腔镜技术手术评估(GOALS)评分的差异情况[MQ)]
图2 腹腔镜手术培训过程中三组学员各项评价指标的变化情况
表5 A、B组各次腹腔镜手术模型训练与C组训练前技能水平的比较[MQ)]
[14]
van Velthoven RF, Hoffmann P. Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2006, 7(2): 114-119.
[15]
Golab A, Smektala T, Kaczmarek K, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy supported by training involving personalized silicone replica poured in three-dimensional printed casting mold[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(4): 420-422.
[16]
Wanderling C, Saxton A, Phan D, et al. Recent advances in surgical simulation for resident education[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2023, 24(11): 491-502.
[17]
Hidalgo J, Belani J, Maxwell K, et al. Development of exophytic tumor model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial experience[J]. Urology, 2005, 65(5): 872-876.
[18]
Hung AJ, Ng CK, Patil MB, et al. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(6): 870-874.
[19]
Hung A J, Shah S H, Dalag L, et al. Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2015, 194(2): 520-526.
[20]
Brewin J, Nedas T, Challacombe B, et al. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator[J]. BJU Int, 2010, 106(6): 850-854.
[21]
Rasheed F, Bukhari F, Iqbal W, et al. A low-cost unity-based virtual training simulator for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using HTC Vive[J]. PeerJ Comput Sci, 2023, 9: e1627.
[22]
Alaker M, Wynn GR, Arulampalam T. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 29: 85-94.
[23]
Sinitsky DM, Fernando B, Berlingieri P. Establishing a curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills in the virtual reality environment[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(3): 367-376.e1.
[24]
McDougall EM. Validation of surgical simulators[J]. J Endourol, 2007, 21(3): 244-247.
[25]
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(2): 194-205.
[26]
Wang HQ, Yang B, Sun YH. Laparoscopic training of urology in China: current status[J]. Chin Med J, 2012, 125(21): 3769-3770.
[1]
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, et al. Kidney cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2022, 20(1): 71-90.
[2]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(1): 7-30.
[3]
Zhao PT, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 36(Pt C): 548-553.
[4]
Klatte T, Ficarra V, Gratzke C, et al. A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(6): 980-992.
[5]
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review[J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114(4): 617-629.
[6]
Hardon SF, van Gastel LA, Horeman T, et al. Assessment of technical skills based on learning curve analyses in laparoscopic surgery training[J]. Surgery, 2021, 170(3): 831-840.
[7]
Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, et al. Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(5): 1690-1694.
[8]
Paludo AO, Knijnik P, Brum P, et al. Urology residents simulation training improves clinical outcomes in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. J Surg Educ, 2021, 78(5): 1725-1734.
[9]
Simmons MN, Gill IS. Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177(6): 2067-2073.
[10]
Taylor GD, Johnson DB, Hogg DC, et al. Development of a renal tumor mimic model for learning minimally invasive nephron sparing surgical techniques[J]. J Urol, 2004, 172(1): 382-385.
[11]
Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills[J]. Am J Surg, 2005, 190(1): 107-113.
[12]
Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A. Laparoscopic skills training and assessment[J]. Br J Surg, 2004, 91(12): 1549-1558.
[13]
Ackermann J, Pahls J, Baumann J, et al. The pelvitrainer for training in laparoscopic surgery - a prospective, multicenter, interdisciplinary study: experimental research[J]. Int J Surg, 2022, 101: 106604.
[1] 朱楠, 沈锋. 腹腔镜半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 367-367.
[2] 刘连新, 张树庚. 腹腔镜左半肝联合左尾状叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 368-368.
[3] 赵淑樱, 张聃. 腹腔镜胃癌外科治疗进展与发展趋势[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 459-462.
[4] 施烨鑫, 马翔, 鲁明, 夏青城, 王鹏超, 宋青雨, 赵庆洪. 腹腔镜下结直肠肿瘤定位研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 463-466.
[5] 刘连新, 孟凡征. 不断提高腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-358.
[6] 戴朝六, 赵阳. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除应该重视的几个问题[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 359-362.
[7] 陆朝阳, 金也, 孙备. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-366.
[8] 刘炯, 彭乐, 马伟, 江斌. 鞘外解剖肝蒂技术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的疗效评估[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 373-376.
[9] 李晓鸥, 杨鹤鸣, 王国栋, 林海冠, 杨建武. 不同入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术治疗效果对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 377-380.
[10] 张翼翔, 马明, 田金龙, 杨珊珊, 尚程程, 张景欣. 腹腔镜肝叶切除联合胆道镜取石治疗肝内胆管结石的临床观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 381-384.
[11] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[12] 陈文进, 张月君, 王传泰. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后肠梗阻发生的影响因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 389-392.
[13] 吉顺富, 汤晓燕, 徐进. 腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中拓展胃后间隙在肥胖患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-396.
[14] 嵇晋, 吴胜文, 姜明瑞, 汪刘华, 王伟, 任俊, 王道荣, 马从超. 三种方式关闭盆底联合改良造口在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-410.
[15] 郭倩, 张晓峰, 张鹏, 苏文博. “四步法”清扫No.253淋巴结在保留LCA的直肠癌根治术中的研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
阅读次数
全文


摘要