切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 323 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.04.005

临床研究

联合盆底彩超数据和临床资料探讨压力性尿失禁的危险因素
黄俊龙1, 刘柏隆1, 罗瑞翔1, 李晓阳1, 李文双1, 柳政1, 陈嘉良1, 周祥福1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2024-08-01
  • 通信作者: 周祥福
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(202103000035); 中山大学附属第三医院临床研究专项基金远航计划项目(YHJH202205); 广州地区临床高新、重大和特色技术项目(2023P-TS34)

A combined analysis of clinical data and pelvic floor ultrasound data for exploring the risk factors of stress urinary incontinence

Junlong Huang1, Bolong Liu1, Ruixiang Luo1, Xiaoyang Li1, Wenshuang Li1, Zheng Liu1, Jialiang Chen1, Xiangfu Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Third Affliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2022-11-28 Published:2024-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangfu Zhou
引用本文:

黄俊龙, 刘柏隆, 罗瑞翔, 李晓阳, 李文双, 柳政, 陈嘉良, 周祥福. 联合盆底彩超数据和临床资料探讨压力性尿失禁的危险因素[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-330.

Junlong Huang, Bolong Liu, Ruixiang Luo, Xiaoyang Li, Wenshuang Li, Zheng Liu, Jialiang Chen, Xiangfu Zhou. A combined analysis of clinical data and pelvic floor ultrasound data for exploring the risk factors of stress urinary incontinence[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 323-330.

目的

结合盆底彩超测量数据及相关的临床资料,构建压力性尿失禁的多因素Logistic回归模型,探讨压力性尿失禁发病的危险因素。

方法

选取2022年10月至2023年10月所有就诊于中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科门诊需要完善盆底彩超检查的女性患者238例,其中压力性尿失禁组123例,无压力性尿失禁组115例。收集所有患者的临床资料以及盆底彩超测量数据。采用t检验或卡方检验进行差异性分析筛选压力性尿失禁的危险因素,运用多因素Logistic回归进一步筛选压力性尿失禁的独立危险因素,根据独立危险因素构建压力性尿失禁的预测模型并绘制该模型的受试者工作特征曲线加以验证。此外,根据尿失禁咨询委员会国际评分标准(ICI-Q-SF)将压力性尿失禁患者分为轻、中、重度三组,利用卡方检验对三组患者的盆底独立危险因素进行差异性分析。

结果

多因素Logistic回归显示,患者BMI≥24 kg/m2、有阴道分娩史、分娩胎儿体质量大、膀胱颈移动度增大、尿道内口漏斗形成、肛提肌裂孔扩张、膀胱膨出及会阴体运动过度与压力性尿失禁的发生密切相关,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。基于多因素分析结果,构建出压力性尿失禁的预测模型,ROC曲线下面积为0.928(95%CI:0.890~10.966,P<0.001),模型的最佳截断值为0.382,灵敏度为92.0%,特异度为84.3%。并且,与轻度压力性尿失禁相比,中、重度压力性尿失禁患者膀胱颈移动度增大率、尿道内口漏斗的形成率、肛提肌裂孔扩张率、膀胱膨出率及会阴体过度运动率更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

临床资料结合盆底彩超构建的压力性尿失禁预测模型,可以为临床筛查女性压力性尿失禁高危人群提供简便、科学的工具。盆底彩超数据有望成为压力性尿失禁分度的客观依据。

Objective

To explore the risk factors of stress incontinence with pelvic floor ultrasound data and related clinical data.

Methods

A total of 238 female patients who were admitted to Urology Department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from October 2022 to October 2023 in need of perfect pelvic floor ultrasound examination were selected, including 123 in the stress incontinence group and 115 in the non-stress incontinence group. Clinical data and pelvic floor ultrasound data of all patients were collected. T test or Chi-square test were used for difference analysis to screen the risk factors of stress urinary incontinence. Secondly, multiple Logistic regression was used to further screen the independent risk factors of stress urinary incontinence. A prediction model of stress urinary incontinence was constructed according to the independent risk factors and the receiver operator characteristic curve of the model was drawn for verification. In addition, patients with stress urinary incontinence were divided into mild, moderate and severe groups according to the Incontinence Advisory Committee International Scoring Criteria (ICI Q-SF), and Chi-square test was used to analyze the differences in independent risk factors of pelvic floor among the three groups.

Results

Multivariate Logistic regression showed that BMI≥24 kg/m2, history of vaginal delivery, large fetal weight during delivery, increased bladder neck mobility, infundibular formation of internal urethral orifice, expansion of anal divider, cystocele and excessive movement of perineal body were closely related to the occurrence of stress incontinence, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Based on the results of multi-factor analysis, a prediction model for stress urinary incontinence was constructed. The area under ROC curve was 0.928(95%CI: 0.890-10.966, P<0.001), the optimal cut-off value of the model was 0.382, the sensitivity was 92.0%, and the specificity was 84.3%. In addition, compared with mild stress incontinence, the increased rate of bladder neck movement, the formation rate of inner urethral orifice funnel, the expansion rate of anal levator hiatus, the cystocele rate and the overmovement rate of perineal body were higher in patients with moderate and severe stress incontinence, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The prediction model of stress urinary incontinence constructed by the combination of clinical data and pelvic floor ultrasound can provide a simple and scientific tool for clinical screening of females at high risk of stress urinary incontinence. The ultrasound data of pelvic floor may be the objective reference for the classification of stress urinary incontinence.

图1 门诊接受盆底彩超检查患者盆底参数示意图  图2 压力性尿失禁(SUI)预测模型的ROC曲线注:图1为静息状态下盆底正中矢状切面,其中PS为耻骨联合,U为尿道,BL为膀胱,V为阴道,F为肛管,R为直肠;图1b、1c分别为静息状态及Valsalva状态下膀胱颈位置,其中C为耻骨联合水平线,A、B分别为静息状态及Valsalva状态下膀胱颈到C的距离,A-B差值即为膀胱颈移动度,D为膀胱尿道后角;图1d为肛提肌裂孔;图1e为Valsalva状态下尿道内口漏斗形成,箭头所示即为尿道内口漏斗
表1 压力性尿失禁(SUI)危险因素的单因素分析
因素 SUI组 无SUI组 统计值 P
例数 123 115    
年龄[例(%)]     χ2=6.976 0.031
≤35岁 15(12.20) 23(20.00)    
36~55岁 64(52.03) 41(35.65)    
≥56岁 44(35.77) 51(44.35)    
BMI[例(%)]     χ2=10.642 0.001
< 24 kg/m2 72(56.54) 90(78.26)    
≥24 kg/m2 51(41.46) 25(21.74)    
职业[例(%)]     χ2=0.231 0.972
脑力劳动者 52(42.28) 47(40.87)    
体力劳动者 37(30.08) 33(28.70)    
家庭主妇 26(21.14) 27(23.48)    
无业 8(6.50) 8(6.95)    
受教育程度[例(%)]     χ2=4.257 0.234
初中以下 23(18.70) 29(25.22)    
初中 47(38.21) 41(35.65)    
高中及大中专 31(25.20) 22(19.13)    
大学及以上 22(17.89) 23(20.00)    
是否绝经[例(%)]     χ2=1.482 0.224
62(50.41) 67(58.26)    
61(49.59) 48(41.74)    
是否经产[例(%)]     χ2=1.486 0.223
78(63.41) 64(55.65)    
45(36.59) 51(44.35)    
末次分娩至今间隔时间[例(%)]     χ2=4.232 0.238
10年内 16(13.01) 22(19.13)    
10~20年 27(21.95) 16(13.91)    
20~30年 31(25.20) 25(21.74)    
>30年 49(39.84) 52(45.22)    
存在阴道分娩[例(%)]     χ2=4.331 0.037
98(79.67) 78(67.83)    
25(20.33) 37(32.17)    
最大儿体质量[kg,(±s)] 3.35±0.04 3.23±0.04 t=2.168 0.031
阴道侧切/裂伤史[例(%)]     χ2=4.903 0.027
69(56.10) 48(41.74)    
54(43.90) 67(58.26)    
子宫切除[例(%)]     χ2=10.681 0.001
18(14.63) 3(2.61)    
105(85.37) 112(97.39)    
膀胱颈移动度增大[例(%)]     χ2=51.760 <0.001
102(82.93) 43(37.39)    
21(17.07) 72(62.61)    
膀胱后角开放[例(%)]     χ2=16.548 <0.001
96(78.05) 61(53.04)    
27(21.95) 54(46.96)    
尿道内口漏斗形成[例(%)]     χ2=64.753 <0.001
92(74.80) 26(22.61)    
31(25.20) 89(77.39)    
肛提肌裂孔扩张[例(%)]     χ2=20.512 <0.001
91(73.98) 52(45.22)    
32(26.02) 63(54.78)    
膀胱膨出[例(%)]     χ2=16.971 <0.001
86(66.92) 50(43.48)    
37(30.08) 65(56.52)    
子宫脱垂[例(%)]     χ2=6.150 0.013
42(34.15) 27(23.48)    
81(65.85) 88(76.52)    
会阴体运动过度     χ2=33.472 <0.001
83(67.50) 35(30.43)    
39(31.70) 80(69.57)    
表2 压力性尿失禁(SUI)危险因素的多因素Logistic回归分析
表3 不同严重程度压力性尿失禁(SUI)的盆底数据对比[例(%)]
[1]
Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2017, 28(2): 191-213.
[2]
李志毅, 朱兰. 女性压力性尿失禁流行病学现状[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(3): 161-162.
[3]
Pang H, Lv J, Xu T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of female urinary incontinence: a 4-year longitudinal study among 24 985 adult women in China[J]. BJOG, 2022, 129(4): 580-589.
[4]
吴军. 探究Valsalva动作下二维、三维超声与女性压力性尿失禁严重程度的相关性[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2016.
[5]
熊岩砚. 压力性尿失禁分娩因素的Logistic回归分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2022, 26(5): 7-10.
[6]
谭秋晓,叶俊彤,何云霞,等. 分娩方式对初产妇产后盆底功能状态的影响[J]. 新医学,2023,54(12):889-894.
[7]
于津, 谢军. 产后压力性尿失禁危险因素的探讨及其预测模型的构建[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2022, 43(3): 421-426.
[8]
魏亚楠, 栗河舟, 张红彬, 等. 经会阴超声检查在女性压力性尿失禁患者分度中的应用价值[J]. 中国医学创新, 2020, 17(10): 64-68.
[9]
Falah-Hassani K, Reeves J, Shiri R, et al. The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2021, 32(3): 501-552.
[10]
Ptaszkowski K, Paprocka-Borowicz M, Słupska L, et al. Assessment of bioelectrical activity of synergistic muscles during pelvic floor muscles activation in postmenopausal women with and without stress urinary incontinence: a preliminary observational study[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2015, 10: 1521-1528.
[11]
裘轶超. 产妇盆底功能障碍列线图预测模型的构建[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2021, 32(5): 724-729.
[12]
韩盼盼, 张楠, 胡燕玲, 等. 成年女性压力性尿失禁风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2023, 45(2): 143-146, 193.
[13]
黄昱忻, 曹明欣, 钟海涛,等. 女性尿道憩室的病理特征与慢性感染[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2024, 24(1): 75-78.
[14]
Xiao T, Cao Y, Zhen C, et al. Nomogram analysis based on clinical and sonographic characteristics for the assessment of postpartum stress urinary incontinence[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2023, 42(11): 2591-2601.
[15]
Shao XH, Kong DJ, Zhang LW, et al. Ultrasound analysis of the effect of second delivery on pelvic floor function in Chinese women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022, 42(2): 261-267.
[16]
李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(6): 549-552.
[17]
向吉翠. 产后压力性尿失禁的影响因素及预测模型[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2020, 33(24): 4166-4168.
[18]
Babini D, Lemos A. Risk factors for urinary incontinence in primiparous adolescents after vaginal delivery: a cohort study[J]. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2020, 33(5): 500-505.
[19]
Li N, Cui C, Cheng Y, et al. Association between magnetic resonance imaging findings of the pelvic floor and de novo stress urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2018, 19(4): 715-723.
[20]
van Geelen H, Ostergard D, Sand P. A review of the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor function as assessed by objective measurement techniques[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2018, 29(3): 327-338.
[21]
裘轶超, 张珂, 邱丽倩, 等. 妊娠期尿失禁患者产后自然转归[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2018, 27(4): 290-292.
[22]
郑璇, 赵云. 孕期与产后盆底功能障碍性疾病及防治研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(3): 366-372.
[23]
朱丽丽, 李冰, 薛静, 等. 椎管内分娩镇痛对经阴道分娩初产妇产后早期盆底功能的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(4): 484-491.
[24]
Gordon B, Shorter B, Isoldi K K, et al. Obesity with comorbid stress urinary incontinence in women: a narrative review to inform dietetics practice[J]. J Acad Nutr Diet, 2017, 117(6): 889-907.
[25]
王松娟. 不同产次的胎儿出生体重与产后压力性尿失禁的相关性研究[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2022.
[26]
Wang K, Xu X, Jia G, et al. Risk factors for postpartum stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Reprod Sci, 2020, 27(12): 2129-2145.
[27]
赵媛媛. 产后42天女性压力性尿失禁的临床数据分析与研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2019.
[28]
石洁芳. 盆底超声检查对压力性尿失禁的诊断价值[J]. 医疗装备, 2022, 35(20): 37-39.
[29]
张红彬, 孟欣雨, 栗河舟, 等. 经会阴超声检查肛提肌裂孔面积对女性压力性尿失禁的诊断价值分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(8): 931-934.
[30]
臧加英, 高波, 刘洋, 等. 盆底四维超声检测肛提肌裂孔前后径对压力性尿失禁女性患者盆底病变的评估价值[J]. 中国性科学, 2022, 31(4): 91-94.
[31]
Pelsang RE, Bonney WW. Voiding cystourethrography in female stress incontinence[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 166(3): 561-565.
[32]
樊卫敏, 梅小会, 陈记娜, 等. 盆底肌锻炼改善中老年女性绝经相关症状的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(1): 94-101.
[33]
Yang X, Wang X, Gao Z, et al. The anatomical pathogenesis of stress urinary incontinence in women[J]. Medicina, 2022, 59(1): 5.
[34]
Turkoglu A, Coskun A, Arinkan SA, et al. The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2022,48(1):70-77.
[35]
李静, 朱媛, 李仰懿, 等. 盆底实时超声检测尿道内口漏斗在女性压力性尿失禁中的诊断价值[J]. 世界复合医学, 2022, 8(9): 79-82.
[36]
曹韵清, 肖汀, 黄伟俊, 等. 盆底实时三维超声检测尿道内口漏斗在女性压力性尿失禁中的诊断价值[J]. 广东医科大学学报, 2019, 37(4): 458-461.
[37]
徐净, 张奥华, 郑志娟, 等. 实时三维超声鉴别诊断阴道后壁膨出病变[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(7): 1075-1077.
[38]
王洁, 顾娇娇, 李鹤, 等. 经会阴超声评估子宫全切术后远期盆底功能与结构变化[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2020, 36(9): 839-841.
[39]
Bu L, Yang D, Nie F, et al. Correlation of the type and degree of cystocele with stress urinary incontinence by transperineal ultrasound[J]. J Med Ultrason, 2020, 47(1): 123-130.
[40]
Song C, Wen W, Pan L, et al. Analysis of the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the pelvic floor in cystocele[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2023, 102(12): 1661-1673.
[41]
Sartori DV, Gameiro MO, Yamamoto HA, et al. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women[J]. BMC Urol, 2015, 15: 29.
[1] 韩燕鸿, 潘建科, 罗明辉, 黄和涛, 曹厚然, 李想, 曾令烽, 梁桂洪, 陈红云, 刘军, 杨伟毅. 肩袖撕裂修复术后腱-骨愈合影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 239-244.
[2] 林雪, 陈锰, 杨梅琳, 刘兴会, 周红雨. 妊娠合并重症肌无力患者的围产结局和重症肌无力病情恶化的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 125-132.
[3] 郭立珍, 范天群, 张欣凯, 蒋韵红, 金蓉, 刘冬云. 早产小于胎龄儿发生支气管肺发育不良的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 209-215.
[4] 丁关棣, 黄云, 曹震, 刘刚. 胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测:基于真实世界数据的Nomogram模型开发与验证[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.
[5] 高佳, 姜吉询, 王鑫, 吴婷, 向江明. 病理性乳头溢液单中心临床分析附168例报告[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 323-326.
[6] 郝智勇, 雷霞, 张国锋, 李锋. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗阴囊疝术后血清肿的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-295.
[7] 王鹏, 翟洪涛, 秦旭东. 腹股沟疝患者术后手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 307-310.
[8] 陈传勤, 张凯, 单世涵, 陶亮, 傅巧美. 腹壁巨大切口疝修补术后早期疼痛的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 178-183.
[9] 谭明达, 颜军, 郭诗翔. 保留十二指肠、胆总管、Oddi括约肌的胰头整块全切除术后并发症分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 145-150.
[10] 杨明, 张金珠, 王锡山. 全国肿瘤登记中心发布的2013年至2022年结直肠癌流行数据趋势解读[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 177-181.
[11] 王如海, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 孙菲琳, 杨震. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者术后慢性意识障碍的危险因素及其预测价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 78-83.
[12] 鹿海龙, 朱玉辐, 贺雪凤, 蔡廷江, 王栋, 朱圣玲, 张恩刚, 王策. 创伤性颅脑损伤二次手术的危险因素分析及预警模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 97-101.
[13] 周建芳, 罗旭颖, 张琳琳, 李宏亮, 杨燕琳, 陈光强, 石广志. 开颅术后危重患者急性肾损伤的发病率、危险因素及其对预后的影响[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 148-156.
[14] 肖增丽, 杜安琪, 孙瑶, 赵慧颖, 安友仲. 脑出血术后AKI发生的危险因素分析及预测模型建立[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 157-163.
[15] 孙秀芹, 高美娟, 张琼阁, 吕凯敏, 王宏宇. 京西地区无心血管病史2型糖尿病中老年人群患心血管疾病的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 245-252.
阅读次数
全文


摘要