切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 83 -87. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2025.01.015

临床研究

前后结合入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术早期疗效分析
冯帆1, 马文亮1, 董翔1, 潘骏1, 甘卫东1,(), 郭宏骞1   
  1. 1.210008 江苏,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-30 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 甘卫东
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生健康委员会医学科研重点项目(ZD2022013)

An evidence-based analysis in early postoperation: robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach

Fan Feng1, Wenliang Ma1, Xiang Dong1, Jun Pan1, Weidong Gan1,(), Hongqian Guo1   

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University,Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2023-10-30 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Weidong Gan
引用本文:

冯帆, 马文亮, 董翔, 潘骏, 甘卫东, 郭宏骞. 前后结合入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术早期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 83-87.

Fan Feng, Wenliang Ma, Xiang Dong, Jun Pan, Weidong Gan, Hongqian Guo. An evidence-based analysis in early postoperation: robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 83-87.

目的

探讨前后结合入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(AP-RARP)治疗前列腺癌的安全性和早期疗效。

方法

收集2019年12月至2021年12月南京鼓楼医院收治的82例行AP-PARP前列腺癌患者的病例资料。手术操作首先经后入路分离精囊、输精管和前列腺后壁,而后改为经前入路完成剩余手术步骤。统计患者围手术期及术后早期并发症相关指标(吻合口尿瘘、感染等),并统计患者病理切缘阳性率、术后尿控率、勃起功能情况。

结果

82例手术均顺利完成。平均手术时间(105±13)min,平均术中出血量(139±62)ml,无输血患者,术后吻合口尿瘘1例,术后感染2例。T2期患者术后切缘阳性率7.0%(4/57),T3a期患者术后切缘阳性率28.0%(7/25)。术后拔尿管即刻、术后1个月、3个月和6个月尿控恢复率分别为17.1%(14/82)、46.3%(38/82)、84.1%(69/82)、98.8%(81/82),患者术后6个月国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)指数12(0,17)。

结论

AP-RARP结合了前入路RARP和保留Retzius间隙的RARP的优势,是治疗前列腺癌的可选择手术路径之一。

Objective

To review the safety and efficacy of anterior approach robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (AP-RARP) in the treatment of prostate cancer through a retrospective analysis.

Methods

Clinical data of 82 patients with cT1c-T3a stage prostate cancer who underwent AP-RARP at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were collected. The surgical procedure began by initially separating the seminal vesicles, vas deferens, and the posterior wall of the prostate through a posterior approach. Subsequently, the procedure was then switched to an anterior approach to complete the remaining surgical steps. Perioperative and early postoperative complications were recorded, along with postoperative urinary continence rate, erectile function, and positive surgical margin rate.

Results

All 82 surgeries were successfully completed. The average operation time was(105±13) minutes, with an average intraoperative blood loss of (139±62) ml. No blood transfusion was required. Postoperative complications included one case of urinary fistula and two cases of infection.The positive surgical margin rate was 7.0% (4/57) for patients with T2 stage cancer and 28.0% (7/25) for patients with T3a stage cancer. The recovery rates for urinary continence at catheter removal, 1 month,3 months, and 6 months postoperatively were 17.1% (14/82), 46.3% (38/82), 84.1% (69/82), and 98.8%(81/82), respectively.

Conclusion

AP-RARP combines the advantages of anterior approach RARP and Retzius-sparing RARP, making it one of the viable surgical options for the treatment of prostate cancer.

视频1 前后结合入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术
图1 前后结合入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术手术操作步骤 注:a为经Douglas窝游离输精管和精囊;b示经筋膜内间隙游离前列腺背面;c示打开盆内筋膜;d示打开膀胱颈后壁,与先前游离的前列腺背面空间汇合;e示离断前列腺侧韧带;f示吻合尿道与膀胱颈口
[1]
Sekhoacha M, Riet K, Motloung P, et al. Prostate cancer review:genetics, diagnosis, treatment options, and alternative approaches[J].Molecules, 2022, 27(17): 5730.
[2]
Costello AJ. Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2020, 17(3): 177-188.
[3]
Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2001, 87(4): 408-410.
[4]
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, et al. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 457-461.
[5]
Dirie NI, Pokhrel G, Guan W, et al. Is Retzius-sparing robotassisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis[J]. Asian J Urol, 2019, 6(2): 174-182.
[6]
Qiu X, Li Y, Chen M, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a 1-year follow-up[J].BJU Int, 2020, 126(5): 633-640.
[7]
Galfano A, Secco S, Olivero A, et al. The spread of retzius-sparing robotic prostatectomy: an update after 10 years[J]. Curr Opin Urol,2023, 33(5): 367-374.
[8]
Chalouhy C, Gurram S, Ghavamian R. Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer[J]. Urol Oncol, 2019,37(3): 219-226.
[9]
Penezić L, Kuliš T, Hudolin T, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single center case series[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2022,61(Suppl 3): 15-20.
[10]
Moretti TBC, Magna LA, Reis LO. Surgical results and complications for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a reverse systematic review[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2022,44: 150-161.
[11]
Lumen N, Lambert E, Poelaert F, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. J Vis Exp, 2022(183).
[12]
沈东来, 戚大伟, 李世超, 等. 系统教学模式下无腔镜经验术者实施机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线分析[J]. 现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2023, 15(3): 155-161.Shen DL, Qi DW, Li SC, et al. Learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of a systematic training program on sur-geons with no previous laparoscopic experience [J]. J Contemp Urol Reprod Oncol, 2023, 15(3): 155-161.
[13]
赵浩辰, 廖鑫扬, 鲍一歌, 等. 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术技术进展[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2024, 62(2): 116-121.Zhao HC, Liao XY, Bao YG, et al. Technological development of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J]. Chin J Surg, 2024, 62(2):116-121.
[14]
Liu J, Zhang J, Yang Z, et al. Comparison of Retzius-sparing and conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding continence and sexual function: an updated metaanalysis[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2022, 25(1): 47-54.
[15]
Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up[J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 64(6): 974-980.
[16]
徐林锋, 马浩鑫, 邱雪峰, 等. 保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术100例报告[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32(8):595-598.Xu LF, Ma HX, Qiu XF, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 100 cases[J]. J Clin Urol, 2017, 32(8): 595-598.
[17]
徐林锋, 邱雪峰, 张青, 等. 改良后入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗移行带前列腺癌的安全性和疗效[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(2): 107-110.Xu LF, Qiu XF, Zhang Q, et al. Modified retzius-sparing robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized transitional zone prostate cancer[J]. Chin J Urol, 2022, 43(2): 107-110.
[18]
Barakat B, Othman H, Gauger U, et al. Retzius sparing radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which technique is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients (MASTER study)? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol Focus,2022, 8(4): 1060-1071.
[19]
Tahra A, Sen UT, Sobay R, et al. Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2022, 46(5): 293-300.
[20]
Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Investigating the mechanism underlying urinary continence using dynamic MRI after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Sci Rep,2022, 12(1): 3975.
[21]
Kadhim H, Ang KM, Tan WS, et al. Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16(6):1419-1426.
[22]
王明超, 章又云, 俞世成, 等. 机器人辅助膀胱后入路根治性前列腺切除术的疗效分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(15): 1083-1087.Wang MC, Zhang YY, Yu SC, et al. An evidence-based analysis comparing two approaches of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the standard technique and Retzius-sparing technique[J]. Natl Med J China, 2021, 101(15): 1083-1087.
[23]
Davis M, Egan J, Marhamati S, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted robotic prostatectomy: past, present, and future[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2021, 48(1): 11-23.
[24]
Xu JN, Xu ZY, Yin HM. Comparison of retzius-sparing robotassisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8:738421.
[25]
Bahouth Z, Laniado M, Fowler R, et al. Positive surgical margins rate of retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a contemporary, unselected cohort[J]. J Urol, 2022, 207(3): 609-616.
[26]
Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad MA, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 72(5): 677-685.
[27]
Li Y, Fu Y, Li W, et al. Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2020, 126(1): 152-158.
[1] 汪鑫, 向涵, 张伟. T型线联合超微创钳辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 133-133.
[2] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[3] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[4] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[5] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[6] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[7] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[8] 刘志新, 陈小林, 肖文军, 刘思琪. 日间手术在儿童鞘膜积液腹腔镜手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 36-40.
[9] 韦锦焕, 陈旭, 卢军, 陈炜, 罗俊航. 机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术中逆行切除技术在治疗巨大复杂肾癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 叶照华, 李志雄, 罗杰鑫, 刘绍虔, 李牧, 米其武. 输尿管脱套技术在腹腔镜无功能重度积水重复上位半肾切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 47-52.
[11] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[12] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[13] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[14] 伊力扎提·阿扎提, 吐尔洪江·吐逊. 腹腔镜活体供肝切取术的临床现状[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 30-35.
[15] 马子慧, 郭卫星. 腹腔镜肝尾状叶切除术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 36-40.
阅读次数
全文


摘要