切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 77 -83. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2026.01.011

临床研究

两种单层面法在后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术的应用比较
田义阳, 李涵(), 胡渫枫, 胡显辉, 秦鑫, 蒋理海, 解致远, 李代春, 尹勇   
  1. 610041 四川,成都市中西医结合医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-17 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 李涵
  • 基金资助:
    成都市科技计划项目(2024-YF05-00916-SN)

Comparison of two single-layer approaches in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Yiyang Tian, Han Li(), Xiefen Hu, Xianhui Hu, xin Qin, Lihai Jiang, Zhiyuan Xie, Daichun Li, Yong Yin   

  1. Department of Urology, Chengdu Traditional Chinese and Western Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2025-01-17 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Han Li
引用本文:

田义阳, 李涵, 胡渫枫, 胡显辉, 秦鑫, 蒋理海, 解致远, 李代春, 尹勇. 两种单层面法在后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 77-83.

Yiyang Tian, Han Li, Xiefen Hu, Xianhui Hu, xin Qin, Lihai Jiang, Zhiyuan Xie, Daichun Li, Yong Yin. Comparison of two single-layer approaches in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 77-83.

目的

比较两种单层面法在后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用情况。

方法

回顾性分析了2016年6月至2023年6月期间我院进行的后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤手术患者资料。根据手术方式将患者分为后腹腔镜肾上腺全切术组(A组)和保留肾上腺的后腹腔镜肾上腺部分切除术组(B组),并根据手术入路将其分为经肾表面层面组(入路一)和经肾内上方肾周脂肪囊与肾筋膜前层之间的层面组(入路二)。其中,A组入路一有64例,入路二有56例。B组入路一有47例,入路二有42例。分别对两组患者在两种入路中的性别、年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、肿瘤直径、手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间(首次排气时间)、术后引流量、拔除引流管时间以及手术并发症进行比较。

结果

所有手术均取得了成功,A组中,在性别、年龄、BMI、肿瘤直径、住院时间、术中出血量、拔除引流管时间、并发症发生率方面,入路一和入路二之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而在手术时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后引流量方面,入路一和入路二之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组在性别、年龄、BMI、肿瘤直径、住院时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后引流量、并发症发生率方面,入路一和入路二差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而在手术时间和术中出血量方面,入路一和入路二差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

在进行后腹腔镜肾上腺全切术时,选择入路一有助于减少手术时间、术后肠道功能恢复时间并降低术后引流量;而在进行保留肾上腺的后腹腔镜肾上腺部分切除术时,可选择入路二,以减少手术时间和出血量。

Objective

To compare the application of two single-layer approaches in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors.

Methods

The data of patients with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy procedures performed in our hospital from June 2016 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure. Group A, which underwent complete resection of the adrenal gland; group B, which underwent partial resection with preservation of the adrenal gland. The patients were further classified into two subgroups based on the surgical approach: approach one, which involved the renal surface layer, and approach two, which was between the perirenal fat and the anterior layer of the renal fascia. Among them, group A had 64 cases in approach one and 56 cases in approach two. Group B had 47 cases in approach one and 42 cases in approach two. A comparison was made between the two groups regarding gender, age, BMI, tumor diameter, surgical time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus (indicating postoperative gastrointestinal recovery), drainage volume, time to removal of drainage tube, and surgical complications.

Results

All operations were successful. In group A, there were no statistically significant differences between approach one and approach two in gender, age, BMI, tumor diameter, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, time to drainage tube removal, incidence of complications (P>0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in terms of surgical time, time to postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, drainage volume (P<0.05). In group B, there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMI, tumor diameter, length of hospital stay, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative drainage volume, incidence of complications between the two approaches (P>0.05); however, there were statistically significant differences in terms of surgical time and intraoperative blood loss between the two approaches (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for complete resection of the adrenal gland, the approach one can reduce surgical time, time to postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, and drainage volume. In retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with partial resection and preservation of the adrenal gland, the approach two can reduce surgical time and blood loss.

图1 后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术中两种单层面法入路示意图注:图中①为经肾表面层面,②为经肾内上方肾周脂肪囊与肾筋膜前层之间的层面
图2 两种单层面法在后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用注:图a为完全游离后的入路一层面,红色箭头为肾上腺区域;图b为打开入路一层面行肾上腺切除手术,红色箭头为肾上腺肿瘤,蓝色箭头为肾脏;图c为打开入路二层面,红色箭头为肾周脂肪,蓝色箭头为肾筋膜前层,黄色箭头为层面之间的疏松组织;图d为打开入路二的层面寻找肾上腺肿瘤,红色箭头为肾上腺肿瘤,蓝色箭头为肾上腺,黄色箭头为腹膜
表1 后腹腔镜肾上腺全切术不同入路组患者资料对比
表2 保留肾上腺的后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术不同入路组患者资料对比
[1]
梁朝朝, 邰胜. 肾上腺肿瘤微创手术治疗方法的选择[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 33(10): 765-768. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2018.10.001.
[2]
马中立, 贾占奎, 顾朝辉, 等. 后腹腔镜单层面肾上腺切除术临床价值研究(附298例报告)[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 31(3): 253-255. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2016.03.016.
[3]
马亚南, 王志新, 丁友鹏, 等. 后腹腔镜单层面肾上腺肿瘤切除术的临床研究(附53例报告)[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 7(5): 294-296. DOI: 10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2018.05.002.
[4]
Bowlin PR, Farhat WA. Laparoscopic nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy: intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, single site[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2015, 42(1): 31-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.012.
[5]
张旭. 解剖性后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的手术方法和技巧[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2007, 22(8): 561-564. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2007.08.001.
[6]
田义阳, 李涵, 秦鑫, 等. 单孔和标准通道后腹腔镜在肾上腺肿瘤手术中的对照研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(11): 822-826, 834. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2023.11.004.
[7]
丁映辉, 黄珍林, 顾朝辉, 等. 单层面与传统三层面分离法后腹腔镜肾上腺切除手术比较[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2015, 32(11): 2866-2868. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2015.11.076.
[8]
马涛, 杨文增, 索勇, 等. 经肾表层面后腹腔镜肾上腺解剖性切除的应用体会(附光盘)[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 25(2): 101-104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2020.02.003.
[9]
Janetschek G, Finkenstedt G, Gasser R, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for pheochromocytoma: adrenalectomy, partial resection, excision of paragangliomas[J]. J Urol, 1998, 160(2): 330-334. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62886-6.
[10]
Indupur RR, Nerli RB, Reddy MN, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma[J]. BJU Int, 2007, 100(5): 1126-1129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07179.x.
[11]
Rossitti HM, Söderkvist P, Gimm O. Extent of surgery for phaeochromocytomas in the genomic era[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(2): e84-e98. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10744.
[12]
Meyer LS, Wang X, Sušnik E, et al. Immunohistopathology and steroid profiles associated with biochemical outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism[J]. Hypertension, 2018, 72(3): 650-657. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11465.
[13]
Weisbrod AB, Webb RC, Mathur A, et al. Adrenal histologic findings show no difference in clinical presentation and outcome in primary hyperaldosteronism[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(3): 753-758. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2670-2.
[14]
罗光恒, 刘刚. 肾上腺部分切除术与肾上腺全切术治疗原发性醛固酮增多症的争议与决策[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(34): 2662-2666. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210506-01061.
[15]
Fu B, Zhang X, Wang GX, et al. Long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial comparing retroperitoneoscopic partial versus total adrenalectomy for aldosterone producing adenoma[J]. J Urol, 2011, 185(5): 1578-1582. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.051.
[16]
Chen SF, Chueh SC, Wang SM, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for unilateral aldosterone producing adenoma: partial versus total adrenalectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(9): 1103-1106. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0102.
[17]
Nieman LK, Biller BMK, Findling JW, et al. Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2015, 100(8): 2807-2831. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-1818.
[18]
Walz MK, Peitgen K, Diesing D, et al. Partial versus total adrenalectomy by the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach: early and long-term results of 325 consecutive procedures in primary adrenal neoplasias[J]. World J Surg, 2004, 28(12): 1323-1329. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7667-y.
[19]
罗光恒, 刘刚. 肾上腺部分切除术与肾上腺全切术治疗原发性醛固酮增多症的争议与决策[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(34): 2662-2666. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210506-01061.
[20]
李艳丽, 李迎晔, 林英立. 后腹腔镜单层面右肾上腺嗜铬细胞瘤切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(6): 656. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.06.023.
[21]
郑建波,汤凯,路盛行,等. 后腹腔镜下左侧单层面肾上腺切除术的临床研究(附13例报告)[J/OL]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 10(4): 32-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7410.2018.04.010.
[1] 刘宾, 王伟, 任俊, 汪刘华, 王道荣. 腹腔镜改良Devine术在晚期胃癌合并幽门梗阻患者中的临床可行性及术后效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 369-375.
[2] 刘慧, 袁野. 右侧前入路与左侧后入路腹腔镜根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 14-17.
[3] 康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期血液管理措施的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 18-21.
[4] 王博申, 陈超武, 刘祺. 头侧-尾侧-中间入路腹腔镜全系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 26-29.
[5] 张升涛, 丁敬健, 刘洋, 郭永锋, 祁亚斌, 李亚俊. 回字型右下入路与常规中间入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 30-33.
[6] 沈振, 周岩. 中间尾侧联合入路腹腔镜系膜切除对右半结肠癌并肠梗阻患者炎症与应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 34-37.
[7] 许舜, 汪瀚, 胡涛, 钱梦佳, 崔一尧, 陈信浩. 两种术式治疗胆总管中下段结石合并急性胆管炎患者疗效及预后比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 38-41.
[8] 吴鹏, 许维, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 脾静脉近端结扎在腹腔镜脾切除术后预防门静脉血栓形成的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 59-62.
[9] 李瑞, 陈文浩, 徐镇, 蒋维荣, 李志文, 侯以森, 孟勇. 3D打印解剖模型联合腹腔镜手术视频在腹腔镜肝切除术临床教学的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 63-66.
[10] 魏平, 赵鑫, 田广健. 腹腔镜下置入IPST专用疝补片并开放原位造口重建治疗造口旁疝疗效分析(附52例报告)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 67-70.
[11] 李志军, 李宏伟, 吕瑞昌, 黄勇, 尚培中, 李晓武. 腹腔镜脾部分切除治疗脾脏硬化性血管瘤样结节性转化一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 75-77.
[12] 李晓英, 金芳, 张润萍, 陈晓丽, 庞粉萍, 翟佳琪, 王兰, 尚培中. 3D腹腔镜切除Hartmann术后远端残留直肠再发癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 99-100.
[13] 张翊乔, 李梦伊, 刘洋, 张鹏, 张忠涛. 我国腹腔镜减重代谢手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-4.
[14] 谷冰冰, 宋韦, 范博士, 王萍, 马静, 张静文, 周娜, 李盼盼. 肺康复训练管理在微创食管癌切除术后并发肺部感染患者中的临床应用观察[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 949-954.
[15] 唐鑫, 管子龙, 朱爽, 刘方舟, 孙国栋, 王天阳, 石云浩, 齐浩楠, 刘云霄, 王佳琦, 袁子茗, 张巍远, 黄睿. 国产手术机器人与腹腔镜在直肠癌患者术后短期疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 516-525.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?