切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 45 -48. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.01.011

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

一体位完全腹腔镜下治疗上尿路移行上皮癌
张学宝1, 王科2,(), 张其强1, 赵海卫1, 刘楚1   
  1. 1. 264001 山东烟台,青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院泌尿外科
    2. 266003 山东青岛,青岛大学附属医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-17 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王科
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划项目(2018GSF118036)

Clinical study of totally laparoscopic treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma under a single position

Xuebao Zhang1, Ke Wang2,(), Qiqiang Zhang1, Haiwei Zhao1, Chu Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Yantai 264001, China
    2. Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2018-07-17 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ke Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Ke, Email:
引用本文:

张学宝, 王科, 张其强, 赵海卫, 刘楚. 一体位完全腹腔镜下治疗上尿路移行上皮癌[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 45-48.

Xuebao Zhang, Ke Wang, Qiqiang Zhang, Haiwei Zhao, Chu Liu. Clinical study of totally laparoscopic treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma under a single position[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 45-48.

目的

探讨一体位完全腹腔镜下治疗上尿路移行上皮癌的手术方法及临床效果。

方法

选取2016年1月至2017年6月至烟台毓璜顶医院就诊的89例上尿路移行上皮癌患者为研究对象,采用前瞻性临床对照研究方法,按照随机数字表法将患者分为实验组与对照组。实验组(n=45)手术方式选择一体位完全腹腔镜下上尿路移行上皮癌根治术,对照组(n=44)采用后腹腔镜联合下腹部斜行小切口治疗上尿路移行上皮癌。对比两组患者的围手术期相关指标及肿瘤复发情况的差异,分析一体位完全腹腔镜下治疗上尿路移行上皮癌的临床效果。

结果

实验组与对照组均顺利完成手术,术中均无中转开放,围术期均未出现明显的并发症。实验组患者的平均手术时间(96.6±8.6) min、术中出血量(39.6±4.2) ml、术后首次下床活动时间(7.5±1.0) h以及平均住院时间(7.0±1.1) d与对照组患者相比(147.5±9.2) min,(46.5±4.6) ml,(11.4±1.8) h,(9.9±1.5) d,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组患者的肿瘤分期、肿瘤分级、胃肠功能恢复时间、随访时间及术后肿瘤复发情况的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

一体位完全腹腔镜下治疗上尿路移行上皮癌较传统术式具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后首次下床活动时间早等优势,可缩短患者的住院时间,加速患者康复,是切实可行的术式,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of totally laparoscopic treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) which under a single position.

Methods

Eighty nine UUTUC patients were enrolled from Jan. 2016 to Jun. 2017. The prospective clinical controlled analysis method was adopted in our study. All patients were divided into test group and control group according to the random number table. Fourty five cases (test group) underwent totally laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with single position, while 44 cases (control group) received retroperitoneal laparoscopy combined with hypogastric oblique incision to treat the UUTUC. The differences between the two groups in perioperative related indicators and tumor recurrence rate were compared. And the clinical effect of neo-surgical treatment of UUTUC was analyzed.

Results

All the 89 operations for UUTUC were successful without conversion to open surgery. No obvious complications occurred during perioperative period. The average operation time in the test group was shorter (96.6±8.6) min versus (147.5±9.2) min, the blood loss was less (39.6±4.2) ml versus (46.5±4.6) ml, the leaving bed time was shorter (7.5±1.0) h versus (11.4±1.8) h, the hospital stay was shorter (7.0±1.1) d versus (9.9±1.5) d), and the difference were significant (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in tumor stage, tumor grade, the recovery time of postoperative gastrointestinal function, follow-up time and the difference of tumor recurrence rate between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Compared with the traditional surgical methods, the totally laparoscopic treatment for UUTUC which under a single position has advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss and shorter leaving bed time. The new operative method could shorten the hospital stay and accelerate recovery of patients, and it is a viable surgical procedure which deserved application and promotion in clinical work.

图1 一例左侧上尿路移行上皮癌患者行一体位完全腹腔镜下上尿路移行上皮癌根治术
表1 两组患者一般情况及围手术期相关指标的比较
[1]
Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, et al. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2018. 73(1): 111-122.
[2]
王科,门昌平,林春华,等. 腹股沟切口在后腹腔镜上尿路尿路上皮癌手术中的应用价值[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(2): 105-108.
[3]
Verges DP, Lallas CD, Hubosky SG, et al. Endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2017, 18(4): 31.
[4]
Kang HW, Jung HD, Ha YS, et al. Preoperative underweight patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma survive less after radical nephroureterectomy[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2015, 30(10): 1483-1489.
[5]
王鑫,高平生,朱刚,等. 完全腹腔镜下肾、输尿管及膀胱袖状切除术治疗上尿路肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(3): 196-199.
[6]
王振,甘卫东,郭宏骞. 上尿路上皮癌局部治疗的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 73-75.
[7]
Mandalapu RS, Matin SF. Contemporary evaluation and management of upper tract urothelial cancer[J]. Urology, 2016, 94: 17-23.
[8]
Favaretto RL, Shariat SF, Chade DC, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and diease-specific survival associated with surgical technique?[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(5): 645-651.
[9]
徐林锋,甘卫东,张士伟,等. 经尿道电切镜辅助后腹腔镜治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:附视频 [J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(1): 26-29.
[10]
Ni S, Tao W, Chen Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(6): 1142-1153.
[11]
王科,于胜强,门昌平,等. 后腹腔镜下的上尿路上皮癌根治术无瘤原则探讨 [J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 369-372.
[12]
王健涛,张春红,于胜强,等. 后腹腔镜下肾输尿管切除术联合经尿道电凝治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的前瞻性临床对照研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 35(12): 905-908.
[13]
Hattori R, Yoshino Y, Komatsu T, et al. Pure laparoscopic complete excision of distal ureter with a bladder cuff for upper tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. World J Urol, 2009, 27(2): 253-258.
[14]
Xylinas E, Rink M, Cha EK, et al. Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(1): 210-217.
[15]
Kanno T, Kobori G, Kubota M, et al. Standardized and simplified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper ureter or renal pelvis: En Bloc Resection technique[J]. Urology, 2018, 112: 85-91.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要