切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 183 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.03.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

标准三步法在改善经腹入路腹腔镜肾癌根治术学习曲线中的应用
李培华1, 陈苗1, 王燕2, 侯建国2,()   
  1. 1. 266109 青岛市城阳区人民医院泌尿外科
    2. 200433 上海,长海医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-22 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 侯建国

The application of standardized 3-step program in improving the learning curve of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Peihua Li1, Miao Chen1, Yan Wang2, Jianguo Hou2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Qingdao Chengyang People's Hospital, Qingdao 206109, China
    2. Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2017-08-22 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianguo Hou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hou Jianguo, Email:
引用本文:

李培华, 陈苗, 王燕, 侯建国. 标准三步法在改善经腹入路腹腔镜肾癌根治术学习曲线中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 183-186.

Peihua Li, Miao Chen, Yan Wang, Jianguo Hou. The application of standardized 3-step program in improving the learning curve of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 183-186.

目的

探讨标准化三步法操作流程在改善经腹入路腹腔镜肾癌根治学习曲线中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析我院自2015年2月至2017年5月间由同一位医师实施的经腹入路腹腔镜肾癌根治术的60例患者病历资料,患者资料入院时间先后顺序整理,分实验组和对照组两组,每组选取患者30例,对照组时间范围为2015年2月至2016年7月,期间主刀医生未按照标准三步法手术流程操作,实验组时间范围为2016年8月至2017年5月,期间主刀医师均按照"标准化三步法"操作流程进行操作。

结果

两组的年龄,体重,肿瘤侧别以及肿瘤大小比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组手术时间为(100±27)min,低于对照组(117±33)min,两者比较差异有统计学意义(t=6.374,P<0.05),实验组手术出血量为(142±50)ml,显著低于对照组(201±75)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),实验组术后并发症发生率3.33%,对照组术后并发症发生率6.66%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两者住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。我们以手术时间为参照,描绘两组的学习曲线,发现实验组约15例达到平台期,对照组25例左右达到平台期,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

通过标准化三步法操作流程实施经腹腔入路肾癌根治术,能够减少手术时间,减少术中出血量,缩短手术的进程,改善手术的学习曲线。

Objective

To explore the application of standardized three-step approach in improving the learning curve of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy via trans-abdominal approach.

Methods

Clinical data of 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy via trans-abdominal approach performed by the same surgeon in our hospital from February 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data were collected according to the date of admission and divided into the experimental (n=30) and control groups (n=30). In the control group, patients enrolled from February 2015 to July 2016 underwent surgery without the standardized three-step approach. In the experimental group, those enrolled from August 2016 to May 2017 received surgery with the standardized three-step approach.

Results

Age, weight, tumor side and size had no difference between two groups (allP>0.05). The operation time in the experimental group was (100±27) min, shorter than that in the control group (117±33) min (t=6.374,P<0.05). In the experimental group, the intraoperative blood loss was less than the control group [(142±50) ml vs (201±75) ml,P<0.01]. The incidence of postoperative complications was different between the experimental and control groups (3.33% vs 6.66%,P<0.05). The length of hospital stay wasn't different between the two groups (P>0.05). The learning curve was delineated by referring to the operation time. In the experimental group, 15 patients reached the plateau phase and 25 cases in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The radical nephrectomy through the standardized three-step approach can reduce operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, shorten surgical process and improve learning curve of the surgery.

表1 患标准三步法组(实验组)与非标准三步法组(对照组)围术期临床资料的比较
图1 学习曲线分布图
[1]
周利群,宋刚,姚鲲, 等. 后腹腔镜下解剖性肾切除405例经验总结[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010, 31(5): 296-299.
[2]
Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report[J]. J Urol, 1991, 146(2): 278-282.
[3]
Fan X, Xu K, Lin T, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(4): 611-621.
[4]
王浩飞,徐兆平,黄欣等. 经腹膜后和经腹腹腔镜下肾根治性切除术的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 243-244.
[5]
方东,李学松. 腹腔镜上尿路手术经腹腔路径更有优势[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 18(2): 183-184.
[6]
吴雄辉. 后腹腔镜肾部分切除术学习曲线的研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 30(5): 389-392.
[7]
张军,张旭,李宏召, 等. 后腹腔镜下根治性肾切除治疗肾癌的疗效观察[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2007, 28(7): 439-443.
[8]
Jackson CL. Urologic laparoscopy[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2001, 10(3): 571-578.
[9]
刘茁,孟一森,虞巍, 等. 单中心95例三孔法经腹膜外途径腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线结果分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(9): 680-685.
[10]
吴雄辉,余祖虎,来永庆, 等. 后腹腔镜肾部分切除术学习曲线的研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 30(5): 389-392.
[11]
Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of trans peritoneal versus retroperitoneal. laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(1): 38-41.
[12]
Cook JA, Ramsay CR, Fayers P. Statistical evaluation of learning curve effects in surgical trials[J]. Clin Trials, 2004, 1(5): 421-427.
[13]
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review[J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114(4): 617-629.
[14]
刘晟,仇明,江道振, 等. 微创手术学习曲线的新概念与临床意义[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2008, 8(1): 5-6.
[15]
邵世修,王永华. 手术模式的流程化设计对腹腔镜根治性肾切除术学习曲线的影响[J], 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2011, 26(12): 909-911.
[16]
Jeon SH, Han KS, Yoo KH, et a1. How many cases are necessary to develop competence for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J]. Endourol, 2009, 23(12): 1965-1969.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[12] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[13] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[14] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[15] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
阅读次数
全文


摘要