切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 140 -144. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.02.014

所属专题: 文献

实验研究

前列腺癌组织中酪氨酸硫酸化转移酶1(TPST1)的表达水平及临床意义
万颂1, 周宇林1, 习明1, 江文聪1, 万跃平1,()   
  1. 1. 510800 广州市花都区人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-13 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 万跃平

Expression levels and clinical significance of TPST1 mRNA and protein in prostate cancer

Song Wan1, Yulin Zhou1, Ming Xi1, Wencong Jiang1, Yueping Wan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Guangzhou Huadu People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510800, China
  • Received:2019-11-13 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yueping Wan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Wan Yueping, Email:
引用本文:

万颂, 周宇林, 习明, 江文聪, 万跃平. 前列腺癌组织中酪氨酸硫酸化转移酶1(TPST1)的表达水平及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 140-144.

Song Wan, Yulin Zhou, Ming Xi, Wencong Jiang, Yueping Wan. Expression levels and clinical significance of TPST1 mRNA and protein in prostate cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 140-144.

目的

分析酪氨酸硫酸化转移酶1(TPST1)在前列腺癌(PCa)组织中的表达情况,并探讨其与前列腺癌患者临床病理特征和预后的关系。

方法

在肿瘤基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库收集499例前列腺癌患者,分析TPST1 mRNA与PCa患者临床病理特征及预后的关系;采用免疫组织化学SP法检测前列腺组织芯片(TMA)中TPST1蛋白的表达,并分析其与PCa患者临床病理特征的关系。

结果

TCGA数据库结果显示TPST1表达量与年龄具有显著相关性(P<0.05),与血清PSA、Gleason评分、临床T分期、淋巴结转移和远处转移相关性没有统计学意义(P>0.05);免疫组化结果显示,PCa癌组织中TPST1蛋白的高表达率为78.0%(39/50),明显高于非前列腺癌组织的46.67%(14/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);TPST1的TMA分析结果显示,TPST1蛋白表达量与年龄、肿瘤分级、Gleason评分、临床T分期、淋巴结转移以及远处转移相关性没有统计学意义(P>0.05);TCGA数据库样本的Kaplan-Meier生存分析结果显示TPST1 mRNA高表达组的无生化复发生存情况和无病生存情况差于低表达组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);COX单因素和多因素分析结果显示,TPST1不是影响PCa患者生存预后的独立危险因素。

结论

TPST1在PCa癌组织中呈高表达,TPST1高表达提示预后差,但其与PCa患者临床分期、淋巴结转移无明显相关性,不是影响PCa患者生存预后的独立危险因素。

Objective

To analyze expression of tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 1 (TPST1) in prostate cancer (PCa) tissues, and to explore its relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis of PCa patients.

Methods

Data of 499 PCa patients were enrolled from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database. The relationship between TPST1 mRNA and clinicopathological features, prognosis of PCa patients was analyzed. The expression of TPST1 protein in prostate tissue microarray (TMA) was detected by immunohistochemical SP method. And its relationship with clinicopathological features of PCa patients was analyzed.

Results

The results of TCGA database showed that expression quantity of TPST1 was significantly correlated with age (P<0.05), while not significantly correlated with serum PSA, Gleason score, clinical T stage, lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis (P>0.05). The results of immunohistochemistry showed that high expression rate of TPST1 protein in PCa tissues was significantly higher than that in non-prostate cance tissues [78.0%(39/50) vs 46.67%(14/30)] (P<0.05). TMA analysis results of TPST1 showed that expression quantity of TPST1 was not significantly correlated with age, tumor grade, Gleason score, clinical T stage, lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis (P>0.05). The results of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of PCa patients from TCGA showed that biochemical recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival in TPST1 mRNA high-expression group were less than that in TPST1 mRNA low-expression group (P<0.05). The results of COX univariate and multivariate analysis showed that TPST1 was not an independent risk factor influencing survival prognosis of PCa patients.

Conclusion

TPST1 is highly expressed in PCa tissues. TPST1 high-expression indicates poor prognosis, which is not significantly correlated with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis of PCa patients. And it is not an independent risk factor influencing survival prognosis of PCa patients.

图1 TPST1在前列腺癌组织和非前列腺癌组织中的表达(IHC)
表1 TPST1蛋白、TPST1 mRNA表达量与临床病理特征的关系
图2 前列腺癌患者无生化复发和无病生存曲线
表2 影响前列腺癌患者生存预后的COX单因素分析
表3 影响前列腺癌患者生存预后的COX多因素分析
[1]
曹德宏,柳良仁,魏强, 等. 前列腺癌的治疗研究进展[J]. 华西医学, 2017, 32(2): 122-126.
[2]
Tanaka S, Nishiyori T, Kojo H , et al. Structural basis for the broad substrate specificity of the human tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase-1[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 8776.
[3]
Toruner GA, Ulger C, Alkan M , et al. Association between gene expression profile and tumor invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 2004, 154(1): 27-35.
[4]
谢立平,李江枫. 2017年欧洲泌尿外科学会年会前列腺癌诊治进展及热点关注[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 38(6): 408-411.
[5]
Byrne DP, Li Y, Ngamlert P, et al. New tools for evaluating protein tyrosine sulphation: Tyrosyl Protein Sulphotransferases (TPSTs) are novel targets for RAF protein kinase inhibitors[J]. Biochemical J, 2018, 475(15): 2435-2455.
[6]
Nedumpullygovindan P, Li L, Alexov E G, et al. Structural and energetic determinants of tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase sulfation specificity[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(16): 2302-2309.
[7]
Marforio TD, Giacinto P, Bottoni A, et al. Computational evidence for the catalytic mechanism of tyrosylprotein sulfotransferases: a density functional theory investigation[J]. Biochemistry, 2015, 54(28): 4404-4410.
[8]
徐娟,吴诚龙,赖带欢, 等. TPST1表达在CXCR4诱导的乳腺癌细胞侵袭中的作用研究[J]. 激光生物学报, 2018, 27(5): 55-61.
[9]
Kim JG, Chae YS, Lee SJ , et al. Genetic variation in microRNA-binding site and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2014, 141(1): 35-41.
[10]
Xu J, Deng X, Tang M, et al. Tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase-1 and tyrosine sulfation of chemokine receptor 4 are induced by epstein-barr virus encoded latent membrane protein 1 and associated with the metastatic potential of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(3): e56114.
[11]
Miyanabe K, Yamashita T, Abe Y, et al. Tyrosine sulfation restricts the conformational ensemble of a flexible peptide, strengthening the binding affinity for an antibody[J]. Biochemistry, 2018, 57(28): 4177-4185.
[12]
Hartmann-Fatu C, Trusch F, Moll CN, et al. Heterodimers of Tyrosylprotein Sulfotransferases Suggest Existence of a Higher Organization Level of Transferases in the Membrane of the trans-Golgi Apparatus[J]. J Mol Biol, 2015, 427(6): 1404-1412.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[9] 祝炜安, 林华慧, 吴建杰, 黄炯煅, 吴婷婷, 赖文杰. RDM1通过CDK4促进前列腺癌细胞进展的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 618-625.
[10] 王功炜, 李书豪, 魏松, 吕博然, 胡成. 溶瘤病毒M1对不同前列腺癌细胞杀伤效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 626-632.
[11] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[12] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[13] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要