切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 330 -333. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.05.003

临床研究

达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术手术体位的优化
罗敏1, 盛夏2, 梁敏1, 蔡春明1, 黄海3,()   
  1. 1. 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院手术室
    2. 200488 上海,海军医科大学长海医院手术室
    3. 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-16 出版日期:2020-10-10
  • 通信作者: 黄海
  • 基金资助:
    广东省护理学会科研立项课题(gdhlxueh2019zx 078)

Optimization of surgical position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assisted by Da Vinci Robot

Min Luo1, Xia Sheng2, Min Liang1, Chunming Cai1, Hai Huang3,()   

  1. 1. Operation Room, Sun Yan-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
    3. Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2020-04-16 Published:2020-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Hai Huang
引用本文:

罗敏, 盛夏, 梁敏, 蔡春明, 黄海. 达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术手术体位的优化[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 330-333.

Min Luo, Xia Sheng, Min Liang, Chunming Cai, Hai Huang. Optimization of surgical position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assisted by Da Vinci Robot[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 330-333.

目的

探讨达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中患者的体位管理策略。

方法

回顾性分析2017年5月至2019年12月于中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院收治的213例接受达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者临床资料。对照组86例按常规体位护理,实验组127例设计专项体位管理方案,包括患者评估、体位安置方法、手术中体位的调节、安全预警及加强护理措施。比较两组患者体位摆设用时、手术时间、机器人二次泊位发生率、术者满意度、护理质量观察指标(1期压疮、深静脉血栓指标)。

结果

213例患者手术均按计划顺利完成。实验组患者体位摆设用时及手术时间明显降低,机械臂碰撞躯体及二次泊位发生率减低,术者满意度明显提升,且差异有统计学意义。两组患者在护理不良事件发生率上亦存在差异,但差异并无统计学意义。

结论

达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治手术中科学的体位管理不仅可充分暴露手术部位,为流畅完成手术操作提供保证,提高手术效率,而且可避免患者术中受到损伤以及减少术中、术后并发症的发生,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the postural management strategy of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assisted by Da Vinci robot.

Methods

Clinical data of 213 patients admitted to Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from May 2017 to Dec. 2019 who received laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assisted by Da Vinci robot were retrospectively analyzed. In the early control group, 86 patients received routine postural nursing, while in the late intervention group, 127 patients received special postural management plans, including patient evaluation, postural placement method, postural adjustment during surgery, safety warning and nursing measures. The patients in the two groups were compared in terms of positioning time, operation time, incidence of robot second berth, doctor satisfaction, and observation indexes of nursing quality (stage Ⅰ pressure ulcer, deep vein thrombosis).

Results

All 213 patients completed the operation successfully. In the late intervention group, positioning time and operation time were significantly reduced, the incidence of robotic arm collides with the body and the second berth was also significantly reduced, and the satisfaction of the operator was significantly increased. The difference was statistically significant in the above index. There was also different in the incidence of nursing adverse events between the two groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The scientific position management of Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical surgery for prostate cancer can not only fully expose the surgical site, provide guarantee for smooth surgical operation, improve surgical efficiency, but also avoid intraoperative injury and reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 常规体位(对照组)与优化体位(实验组)两组患者基线资料的比较
图3 头低小腿下垂式反弓体位
表2 两组患者观察指标比较
[1]
Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et a1. Perioperative Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(4): 679-685.
[2]
Mottrie A, Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still beconsidered a new technology pushed by marketers. The IDEAL evaluation[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(4): 525-527.
[3]
Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Novara G, et a1. Robotic radical prostatectomy: A critical analysis of the impact on cancer control[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2011, 21(3): 179-184.
[4]
张旭,丁强. 机器人技术的沿革与展望[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(4): 225-226.
[5]
Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, et al. Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity workload and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(6): 1516-1521.
[6]
Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines onprostate cancer.Part II:treatment of relapsing metastatic and castration-resistantprostate cancer[J].Eur Urol, 2017, 71 (4): 630-642.
[7]
屈晓玲,方汉萍,陈小芹, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治性切除术患者快速康复护理[J]. 护理学杂志, 2015, 30(20): 47-48.
[8]
王春霞,丁萍,宋真, 等. 达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜下行根治性前列腺癌切除术的应用及护理[J]. 安徽医药, 2016, 20(2): 390-392.
[9]
梁伟霞,苏丽凤,苏蕾, 等. 达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术的护理体会[J]. 微创医学, 2016, 11(06): 959-961.
[10]
Axel Heidenreich, Patrick J Bastian, Joaquim Bellmunt, et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Advanced, Relapsing, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(2): 467-479
[11]
谭淑芳,潘丽芬,罗敏, 等. 机器人腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除原位回肠新膀胱术中手术室护理配合的意义[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 52-55.
[12]
曾彩桃. 腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术围手术期护理研究进展[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2017, 9: 34-36.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要