切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 33 -37. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.01.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

经尿道国产1 470 nm激光汽化术治疗<30 g小体积前列腺增生的临床体会
李腾成1, 肖楚天1, 任文娟1, 吴杰英1, 李科1,(), 高新1   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-25 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 李科
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金项目(2018A030313261); 广东省医学科研基金项目(A2018079)

Transurethral domestic 1 470 nm laser vaporization for the treatment of <30 g small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia

Tengcheng Li1, Chutian Xiao1, Wenjuan Ren1, Jieying Wu1, Ke Li1,(), Xin Gao1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2019-10-25 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ke Li
引用本文:

李腾成, 肖楚天, 任文娟, 吴杰英, 李科, 高新. 经尿道国产1 470 nm激光汽化术治疗<30 g小体积前列腺增生的临床体会[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 33-37.

Tengcheng Li, Chutian Xiao, Wenjuan Ren, Jieying Wu, Ke Li, Xin Gao. Transurethral domestic 1 470 nm laser vaporization for the treatment of <30 g small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 33-37.

目的

探讨经尿道国产1 470 nm激光汽化术治疗<30 g小体积前列腺增生患者的安全性、有效性和远期并发症情况。

方法

回顾性研究2017年10月至2018年9月我院45例<30 g小体积前列腺增生患者的临床资料,其中TURP组20例,1470 nm激光组25例。详细记录两组患者的临床资料、围手术期并发症和随访情况。

结果

45例患者手术均成功,术后平均随访时间12.6个月(9~16个月)。两组患者年龄、前列腺体积和IPSS、RUV、Qmax和QOL基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TURP组和1 470 nm激光组患者术后3个月IPSS、RUV、Qmax和QOL均较术前改善(P<0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。1 470 nm激光组患者手术时间[(48.6±13.6)min vs(56.8±11.7)min,P=0.038]、术后膀胱持续冲洗时间[(0.8±0.5)d vs (1.5±0.9)d,P=0.001]、导尿管留置时间[(2.7±0.6)d vs (4.7±0.9)d,P<0.001]和住院时间[(4.2±1.2)d vs (5.2±1.9) d,P=0.036]较TURP组患者明显缩短,术前术后血红蛋白浓度变化更小[(5.5±2.4)g/L vs (11.6±2.7)g/L,P<0.01]。随访发现TURP组有2例出现尿道狭窄,1 470 nm激光组无尿道狭窄病例发生。

结论

经尿道国产1 470 nm激光汽化术治疗<30 g小体积前列腺增生安全有效,与传统TURP比较术中出血少,术后恢复时间更短,无尿道狭窄并发症发生,为BPH的个体化治疗提供了新的思路。

Objective

To investigate the safety, efficacy and long-term complications of transurethral domestic 1 470 nm laser vaporization for the treatment of <30 g small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Methods

From October 2017 to September 2018, 45 patients with <30 g small benign prostatic hyperplasia were retrospectively studied, including 20 patients in the TURP group and 25 patients in the 1 470 nm laser group. The general clinical materials, perioperative complications and follow-up data of the two groups were recorded.

Results

45 patients were operated successfully, the mean follow-up period was 12.6 months (9-16 months). There were no significant differences in age, prostate volume, IPSS, RUV, Qmax, and QOL baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The IPSS, RUV, Qmax and QOL of the two groups were improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05) and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time of the 1 470 nm laser group [(48.6±13.6) min vs (56.8±11.7) min, P=0.038], bladder irrigation duration [(0.8±0.5) d vs (1.5±0.9) d, P=0.001], catheter indwelling time [(2.7±0.6) d vs (4.7±0.9) d, P<0.001] and hospital stay [(4.2±1.2) d vs (5.2±1.9) d, P=0.036] were significantly shorter than those in the TURP group, with less hemoglobin changes before and after surgery [(5.5±2.4) g/L vs (11.6 ±2.7) g/L, P<0.01]. Follow-up period revealed 2 cases of urethral stricture in the TURP group and no urethral stricture in the 1 470 nm laser group.

Conclusions

Transurethral domestic 1 470 nm laser vaporization is safe and effective for the treatment of <30 g small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia, intraoperative bleeding is less and recovery time is shorter when compared with TURP, and no urethral stricture complication was discovered during the follow-up period, which can provide an individualized treatment method for BPH.

表1 两组BPH患者术前一般临床资料比较(±s
表2 两组BPH患者围手术期和术后3个月随访资料比较(±s
[1]
Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline[J]. J Urol, 2018, 200(3): 612-619.
[2]
Kang M, Kim M, Choo MS, et al. Urodynamic features and significant predictors of bladder outlet obstruction in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and small prostate volume[J]. J Urol, 2016, 89(3): 96-102.
[3]
江东根, 肖楚天, 庞俊, 等. 1 470 nm激光顺行法前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(1): 4-8.
[4]
Xiao K-W, Zhou L, He Q, et al. Enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia thulium laser versus holmium laser: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2019, 185(5): 1-12.
[5]
陈忠, 叶章群. 激光在良性前列腺增生症手术中的应用.[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 30(9):767-771,775.
[6]
陈忠, 马俊, 杨竣, 等. 1 470 nm激光直出光纤TURP式前列腺汽化剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生初步报告[J]. 现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2015, 7(1): 5-8.
Glybochko PV, Rapoport LM, Enikeev ME, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia: tips and tricks.[J]. Urologia, 2017, 84(3): 169-173.
[7]
江东根, 庞俊, 肖楚天, 等. 经尿道1 470 nm激光与等离子前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的前瞻性随机对照研究.[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 32(12): 908-911.
[8]
Primiceri G, Castellan P, Marchioni M, et al. Bladder Neck Contracture After Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2017, 18(10): 79.
[9]
Nickel JC, Aaron L, Barkin J, et al. Canadian Urological Association guideline on male lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (MLUTS/BPH): 2018 update[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018, 12(10): 303-312.
[10]
Sogutdelen E, Haberal HB, Guliyev F, et al. Urethral Stricture is an Unpleasant Complication after Prostate Surgery: A Critical Review of Current Literature[J]. J Urol Surg, 2016, 3(1): 1-6.
[11]
周发友, 张书贤, 沈亚军, 等. 1 470 nm激光前列腺汽化与剜除术中灌注液吸收对内环境的影响[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 274-277.
[12]
何正宇, 余闫宏, 申杰, 等. 1 470 nm激光汽化术通道法治疗晚期前列腺癌并膀胱出口梗阻[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 411-414.
[13]
陈忠, 杨为民, 叶章群, 等. 1 470 nm激光六步法前列腺分叶剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症(附46例报告)[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 31(6): 497-500.
[14]
Kim K S, Choi J B, Bae W J, et al. Comparison of photoselective vaporization versus holmium laser enucleation for treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia in a small prostate volume[J]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(5): e0156133.
[15]
Enikeev DV, Glybochko PV, Alyaev YG, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (holep) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia. practice guidelines. experience of more than 450 surgeries[J]. Urologiia, 2016(4): 63-69.
[16]
Elshal AM, Elkoushy MA, El-Nahas AR, et al. Greenlight&trade; laser (XPS) photoselective vapo-enucleation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized controlled study[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(3): 927-934.
[1] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[2] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[9] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[10] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[12] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要