切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 126 -129. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.02.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

泌尿系CT定量分析对输尿管结石嵌顿的预测价值
赵书晓1, 李峰1, 覃智标1, 毕革文1, 宁鑫1, 雷华1, 黄崛倬1, 狄金明2,()   
  1. 1. 530023 南宁,广西中医药大学第一附属医院泌尿外科
    2. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 狄金明
  • 基金资助:
    2017国家自然科学基金面上项目(81772752)

Predictive value of urinary CT quantitative analysis for incarceration of ureteral calculi

Shuxiao Zhao1, Feng Li1, Zhibiao Qin1, Gewen Bi1, Xin Ning1, Hua Lei1, Juezhuo Huang1, Jinming Di2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530023, China
    2. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2020-04-08 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinming Di
引用本文:

赵书晓, 李峰, 覃智标, 毕革文, 宁鑫, 雷华, 黄崛倬, 狄金明. 泌尿系CT定量分析对输尿管结石嵌顿的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 126-129.

Shuxiao Zhao, Feng Li, Zhibiao Qin, Gewen Bi, Xin Ning, Hua Lei, Juezhuo Huang, Jinming Di. Predictive value of urinary CT quantitative analysis for incarceration of ureteral calculi[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 126-129.

目的

评价泌尿系CT定量分析对输尿管结石治疗后出理嵌顿的预测价值。

方法

将2018年1月至2018年12月于广西中医药大学第一附属医院行结石清除术治疗的120例输尿管结石患者进行回顾性研究,结石清除治疗后出现输尿管结石嵌顿的患者为嵌顿组(49例),未出现的为对照组(71例),对两组患者的年龄、性别等一般资料及患者接受结石清除治疗前的结石大小、体积,肾积水程度及CT值进行比较,并应用Logistic回归分析对影响治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的因素进行分析,应用受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)对相关危险因素预测治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的诊断价值及诊断效能进行分析。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别等一般资料及治疗前结石的数量、位置及部位相比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而嵌顿组患者的结石长径、CT值及肾积水发生率均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);Logistic回归示结石长径、结石CT值及肾积水是治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的独立危险因素(OR=1.365,1.011,1.049;P=0.005,<0.001,0.041);ROC曲线显示,CT值联合结石长径诊断治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿方面具有较高的诊断效能(AUC=0.903),明显高于CT值、结石长径、肾积水的单一诊断(Z=2.036,2.790,5.355;均P<0.05),此时敏感性为89.80%,特异性为76.06%。

结论

泌尿系CT定量分析能有效对治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿进行预测,且结石的CT值联合结石长径在预测治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿方面具有较高的敏感性及特异性。

Objective

To evaluate the predictive value of urinary CT quantitative analysis for incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent calculus removal in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2018 were enrolled. Patients with ureteral calculi incarcerated after calculus removal were incarcerated (49 patients), the control group appeared (71 cases), comparing the age and gender of the two groups and the stone size, volume, hydronephrosis and CT value before the patient received the stone removal treatment, and applying logistic regression analysis. The factors affecting the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment were analyzed, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze the diagnostic value and diagnostic efficacy of vascular catheter incarceration after the relevant risk factors were predicted.

Results

There was no significant difference in the age, gender and other general data and the number, and location of the stones before treatment (P>0.05). The long diameter, CT value and hydronephrosis of the patients in the incarceration group. The incidence rate was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Logistic regression showed that the long diameter of the stone, CT value of the stone and hydronephrosis were independent risk factors for the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment (OR=1.365, 1.011, 1.049; P=0.005, <0.001, 0.041). The ROC curve showed that the CT value combined with the diameter of the stone was diagnosed and treated with high diagnostic efficiency (AUC=0.903), which was significantly higher than the CT value, the long diameter of the stone, and the single diagnosis of hydronephrosis (Z=2.036, 2.790, 5.355; every P<0.05), the sensitivity was 89.80% and the specificity was 76.06%.

Conclusion

Quantitative analysis of urinary CT can effectively predict the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment, and the CT value of calculus has high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the incarceration of ureteral calculi after treatment.

表1 两组输尿管结石治疗后患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组输尿管结石治疗后患者结石情况比较
表3 影响输尿管结石嵌顿的多因素分析
表4 不同指标预测治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的AUC
图1 不同指标预测治疗后输尿管结石嵌顿的ROC曲线
[1]
Hu M, Zhong X, Cui X, et al. Development and validation of a risk-prediction nomogram for patients with ureteral calculi associated with urosepsis: A retrospective analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8): e0201515.
[2]
Hu JS, Xie GH, Yuan HS, et al. Guide sheath-assisted ureteroscope lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi: An observational study on 81 cases[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 16(4): 3459-3463.
[3]
Tran TY, Bamberger JN, Blum KA, et al. Predicting the Impacted Ureteral Stone with Computed Tomography[J]. Urology, 2019.
[4]
中华医学会泌尿外科分会. 中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[R/OL]. [2014-06-17]
[5]
欧洲泌尿外科学会. 2006年EAU泌尿系结石诊疗指南[J]. 中华现代外科学杂志, 2006, 3(20): 1852-1696.
[6]
许清江,叶烈夫,朱庆国, 等. 输尿管壁厚度对嵌顿性输尿管结石的预测价值[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40(3): 210-214.
[7]
Huang W, Xue P, Zong H, et al. Efficacy and safety of silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2016, 81(1): 13-22.
[8]
Hu Q, Ding W, Gou Y, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for proximal ureteral calculi in selected patients[J]. Scientific World J, 2014,2014:687876.
[9]
Zhu H, Ye X, Xiao X, et al. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(1): 100-103.
[10]
Ordon M, Andonian S, Blew B, et al. CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2015,9(11-12):E837-E851.
[11]
Legemate JD, Wijnstok NJ, Matsuda T, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones[J]. World J Urol, 2017, 35(10): 1497-1506.
[12]
Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M. Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy of impacted ureteral calculi[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2006, 32(3): 295-299.
[13]
Goertz JK, Lotterman S. Can the degree of hydronephrosis on ultrasound predict kidney stone size?[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2010, 28(7): 813-816.
[14]
王进峰,李晓刚,吴志坚, 等. 体重指数及结石CT值预测体外冲击波碎石术结石排空率[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2007, 20(3): 23-25.
[15]
郭子臣,包建成,王惠泉, 等. 探讨上尿路结石CT值对结石成分和体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)疗效的预测和评价[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2016, 16(57): 76-77.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[3] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[4] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[5] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[6] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[7] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[8] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[9] 倪颖, 张铁龙, 王岗, 高玉龙, 陈韶鹏, 倪家璇. 未预置支架逆行输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石手术中的困难与应对[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 795-801.
[10] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[11] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[12] 李金星, 陈志宏, 孙铭均, 孙岩岩, 党树伟, 李广恩, 彭书奇, 付大伟, 李宏伟, 李国东. 基于多层螺旋CT 的腹腔干解剖变异与新分型研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 756-763.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[15] 黄圣楷, 许斌, 苏健, 孙龙. 海南省2010~2020年乙型肝炎流行趋势的时间序列分析及预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 555-561.
阅读次数
全文


摘要