切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 198 -202. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.03.005

临床研究

经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后联合静脉化疗与根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌疗效对比研究
王伟1,(), 栾杰1, 刘镇1, 綦德柱1, 王培耕1   
  1. 1. 266300 山东,青岛市胶州中心医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-06 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王伟

Comparative study of the efficacy of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor combined with intravenous chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer

Wei Wang1,(), Jie Luan1, Zhen Liu1, Dezhu Qi1, Peigen Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Jiaozhou Central Hospital, Shandong Province, Qingdao 266300, China
  • Received:2020-05-06 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei Wang
引用本文:

王伟, 栾杰, 刘镇, 綦德柱, 王培耕. 经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后联合静脉化疗与根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌疗效对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 198-202.

Wei Wang, Jie Luan, Zhen Liu, Dezhu Qi, Peigen Wang. Comparative study of the efficacy of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor combined with intravenous chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 198-202.

目的

比较经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切(TURBT)术后联合静脉化疗与根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年8月我院泌尿外科收治的96例T2期肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同,将行TURBT联合静脉化疗的55例患者设为观察组,行根治性膀胱切除术的41例患者设为对照组。比较两组围手术期指标、并发症发生率及预后情况。

结果

观察组患者手术时间为(65.3±12.5) min,术中出血量为(68.6±11.2) ml,肠道恢复时间为(1.4±0.3)d;对照组患者手术时间为(172.3±27.4) min、术中出血量为(398.3±96.3)ml、肠道恢复时间为(4.3±0.6)d。观察组的手术时间、肠道功能恢复时间、术中出血量均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为16.3%,明显较对照组(52.2%)少;远期并发症中,观察组在反复泌尿感染的发生率为3.6%,明显较对照组(26.8%)少,以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组在肾积水的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访期间,两组患者复发率,1年、3年及5年总生存率及肿瘤特异性生存率比较中,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

选择合适的MIBC患者的前提下,TURBT术后联合静脉化疗的预后较根治性膀胱切除术相当,且其手术创伤更小,术后生存质量亦更优。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor(TURBT) combined with intravenous chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer(MIBC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made of the clinical data of 96 patients with stage T2 MIBC admitted to the urology department of our hospital from January 2011 to August 2014. According to the different treatment methods, 55 patients with TURBT combined with intravenous chemotherapy were selected as observation group and 41 patients with radical cystectomy (RC) as control group. The perioperative indexes, incidence of complications and prognosis were compared between the two groups.

Results

In the observation group, the operative time was (65.3±12.5) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (68.6±11.2) ml, and the intestinal recovery time was (1.4±0.3) d. In the control group, the operative time was (172.3±27.4) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (398.3±96.3) ml, and the intestinal recovery time was (4.3±0.6) d. The operative time, intestinal function recovery time and intraoperative blood loss of the observation group were all better than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 16.3%, significantly lower than that in the control group (52.2%). Among the long-term complications, the incidence of recurrent urinary infection in the observation group was 3.6%, significantly lower than that in the control group (26.8%), and the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of hydronephrosis between the two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rate and tumor-specific survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The prognosis of TURBT combined with intravenous chemotherapy is similar to that of RC, and the surgical trauma is smaller and the quality of life is better after TURBT combined with intravenous chemotherapy.

表1 TURBT+化疗(观察组)和RC(对照组)两组患者一般临床资料的比较
表2 TURBT+化疗(观察组)和RC(对照组)两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组患者并发症情况
图3 两组患者肿瘤特异性生存率曲线图
[1]
马潞林,毕海. 更新观念规范诊疗提高生存期——《肌层浸润性膀胱癌加拿大泌尿外科学会指南(2019版)》解读[J]. 中华医学信息导报, 2019, 34(8): 21.
[2]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(1): 7-30.
[3]
Milowsky MI, Rumble RB, Booth CM, et al. Guideline on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (european association of urology guideline): american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(16): 1945-1952.
[4]
曹志,张国辉,朱立夏, 等. 肌层浸润性膀胱癌保留膀胱的治疗现状[J]. 癌症进展, 2016, 14(2): 94-97.
[5]
杨诚,梁朝朝. 膀胱肿瘤整块切除术的应用现状与进展[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 33(3): 245-248.
[6]
白云金,杨玉帛,王晓明, 等.肌层浸润性膀胱癌保留膀胱治疗研究进展[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 22(2): 149-151.
[7]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
[8]
张志凌,周芳坚. 膀胱癌的诊断和治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2015, 23(2): 91-92.
[9]
谢立平,王潇. 2015年欧洲泌尿外科年会膀胱癌临床研究热点关注及展望[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(7): 547-551.
[10]
Cai W, Yang X, Han S, et al. Notch1 pathway protects against burn-induced myocardial injury by repressing reactiveoxygen species production through jak2/stat3 signaling[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016, 2016: 5638943.
[11]
陈思,李剑峰,麦惠洪. 膀胱部分切除术在肌层浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的价值[J]. 中国医药科学, 2016, 6(5): 202-204.
[12]
李刚,李庆文. 膀胱部分切除术与根治性膀胱切除术治疗T2 M0 N0期膀胱癌的疗效比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(3): 305-307.
[13]
孙笑含,窦启锋. 肌层浸润性膀胱癌保留膀胱治疗进展[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2018, 17(24): 2687-2688.
[14]
刘杰,崔伟,车梓, 等. 经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2018, 56(7): 81-85.
[15]
何乾,张国辉. 保留膀胱的综合治疗与根治性膀胱切除术对肌层浸润性膀胱癌疗效的比较[J]. 癌症进展, 2017, 15(3): 334-337.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 廖玥, 王可, 秦江月, 吴艳秋, 陈俊, 汪涛, 文富强, 王浩. 丹龙口服液治疗轻中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的多中心及前瞻性研究[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 306-311.
[3] 边亚礼, 杨艳双, 何新霞. 清咳平喘颗粒联合左氧氟沙星对社区获得性肺炎的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 254-256.
[4] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[5] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.
[6] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[7] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[8] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[9] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[10] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[11] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[12] 董骏, 吴芳芳. mFOLFOX6与FOLFOX4化疗方案治疗直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[13] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
[14] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
[15] 穆曼娜, 胡莹清, 李远, 张勇军, 胡细玲, 林倍思, 刘德昭. 氯雷他定联用普瑞巴林治疗2型糖尿病皮肤瘙痒症的临床效果评价[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 114-119.
阅读次数
全文


摘要