切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 169 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.02.016

病例研究

腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中完全腹膜外经皮输尿管造口术
刘天琦1, 张振辉2, 刘豪圣3, 方建雄3, 赵超3, 刘久敏3, 蒲小勇3,()   
  1. 1. 515041 广东,汕头大学医学院;510080 广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
    2. 510000 广州,南方医科大学第二临床医学院;510080 广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
    3. 510080 广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-10 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 蒲小勇
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学项目-面上项目(2019A1515012019)

Complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during laparoscopic radical resection of bladder cancer: A technical report

Tianqi Liu1, Zhenhui Zhang2, Haosheng Liu3, Jianxiong Fang3, Chao Zhao3, Jiumin Liu3, Xiaoyong Pu3,()   

  1. 1. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515000, China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. Second Clinical School, Southern medical university, Guangzhou 510080,China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
    3. Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2020-11-10 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoyong Pu
引用本文:

刘天琦, 张振辉, 刘豪圣, 方建雄, 赵超, 刘久敏, 蒲小勇. 腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中完全腹膜外经皮输尿管造口术[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 169-172.

Tianqi Liu, Zhenhui Zhang, Haosheng Liu, Jianxiong Fang, Chao Zhao, Jiumin Liu, Xiaoyong Pu. Complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during laparoscopic radical resection of bladder cancer: A technical report[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 169-172.

目的

介绍一种腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中,完全腹膜外输尿管造口新技术,评价其治疗一例T4期高级别膀胱浸润性尿路上皮癌患者的疗效。

方法

以1例75岁男性高级别膀胱浸润性尿路上皮癌(T4N0M0)为例,介绍一种腹腔镜下膀胱根治性切除术中,完全腹膜外输尿管造口技术的4个关键步骤,包括游离输尿管(将左侧输尿管游离足够长度)、汇集两根输尿管(腹腔镜下将左侧输尿管经直肠后方拉至右侧)、建立腹膜外通道(游离扩大右侧腹膜外间隙,将两根输尿管从此通道拉出)、腹膜重建。

结果

手术共耗时(从消毒铺单开始计时到输尿管造口结束)248 min,出血量100 ml,造口处可见清晰尿液流出,患者术后住院时间8 d。

结论

本例输尿管造口术是一种完全腹腔镜下经皮输尿管造口技术的尝试,相较于传统输尿管造口术而言,该术式创伤小,出血量少,术后恢复时间缩短。对于需要永久性尿流改道,但心肺功能差,手术风险高或没有机会做肠道尿流改道的患者,该术式是一种可行且安全的尿流改道方式。

Objective

To describe a new technique of unilateral complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during laparoscopic radical resection of bladder cancer, and evaluate the efficacy of this technique in the treatment of a patient with grade T4 infiltrating urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Methods

A case study of a 75-year-old man with a malignant tumor of the bladder (T4N0M0) was conducted to introduce the four key steps of a unilateral complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during radical cystectomy by laparoscope, which include separate ureter (separate the left ureter into a sufficient length), collect two ureters (pull the left ureter behind the rectum to the right), establish an extraperitoneal passage (expand the right extraperitoneal space, pull the two ureters out of the passage), and reconstruct the peritoneum.

Results

The total operation time was 248 minutes (from the start of the disinfection to the end of the ureterostomy), the blood loss was 100 ml, clear urine outflow was visible at the stoma, and the postoperative hospital stay of the patient was 8 days.

Conclusion

This is an attempt at a complete laparoscopic ureterostomy with less trauma, less bleeding and shorter postoperative recovery time than conventional ureterostomy. This is a feasible and safe urinary diversion for patients who need permanent urinary diversion, but have poor cardiopulmonary function, high surgical risk, or no opportunity for intestinal urinary diversion.

图13 两输尿管末端外翻缝合呈乳头状并造口
[1]
Cai Q, Chen Y, S Xin, et al. Temporal trends of bladder cancer incidence and mortality from 1990 to 2016 and projections to 2030 [J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(2): 153-165.
[2]
Sebastien A, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(1): 96-108.
[3]
Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al-Lami FH, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(11): 1553-1568.
[4]
Babjuk M. Bladder cancer in the elderly[J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 73(1): 51-52.
[5]
Yong C, Daihui C, Bo Z. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer over 75-year-old: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(16): 26565-26572.
[6]
Tsaturyan A, Sahakyan S, Muradyan A, et al. A new modification of tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy following radical cystectomy[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019, 51(6): 959-967.
[7]
Zhenhua L, Yisen M, Shaobo L, et al. Perioperative recovery in different urinary reconstruction approaches of radical cystectomy: Are the advantages of laparoscopy consistent?[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2020, 16(4): 390-398.
[8]
Su X, Wu K, Wang S, et al. The impact of orthotopic neobladder vs ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy on the survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer: A propensity score matched analysis[J]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(20):7590-7600.
[9]
Longo N, Imbimbo C, Fusco F, et al. Complications and quality of life in elderly patients with several comorbidities undergoing cutaneous ureterostomy with single stoma or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2016, 118(4): 521-526.
[10]
Bhanvadia SK. Bladder Cancer Survivorship[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2018, 19(12): 111.
[11]
陈晓芳, 陈万青, 周薇薇, 等. 2013年中国膀胱癌发病和死亡流行状况分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2018, 27(2): 81-85.
[12]
Tsaturyan A, Beglaryan M, Kirakosyan Y, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life of male patients with ileal orthotopic neobladder compared to cutaneous ureterostomy[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2020, 73(2): 160-166.
[13]
Suzuki K, Hinata N, Inoue TA, et al. Comparison of the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of ileal conduit and cutaneous ureterostomy: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Urol Int2020, 104(1-2): 48-54.
[14]
Ariyoshi A, Fujisawa Y, Ohshima K, et al. Catheterless cutaneous ureterostomy[J]. J Urol, 1975, 114(4): 533-535.
[15]
Ubrig B, Lazica M, Waldner M, et al. Extraperitoneal bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy with midline stoma for palliation of pelvic cancer[J]. Urology, 2004, 63(5): 973-975.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[13] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[14] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[15] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
阅读次数
全文


摘要