切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 169 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.02.016

病例研究

腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中完全腹膜外经皮输尿管造口术
刘天琦1, 张振辉2, 刘豪圣3, 方建雄3, 赵超3, 刘久敏3, 蒲小勇3,()   
  1. 1. 515041 广东,汕头大学医学院;510080 广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
    2. 510000 广州,南方医科大学第二临床医学院;510080 广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
    3. 510080 广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-10 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 蒲小勇
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学项目-面上项目(2019A1515012019)

Complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during laparoscopic radical resection of bladder cancer: A technical report

Tianqi Liu1, Zhenhui Zhang2, Haosheng Liu3, Jianxiong Fang3, Chao Zhao3, Jiumin Liu3, Xiaoyong Pu3,()   

  1. 1. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515000, China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. Second Clinical School, Southern medical university, Guangzhou 510080,China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
    3. Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2020-11-10 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoyong Pu
引用本文:

刘天琦, 张振辉, 刘豪圣, 方建雄, 赵超, 刘久敏, 蒲小勇. 腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中完全腹膜外经皮输尿管造口术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 169-172.

Tianqi Liu, Zhenhui Zhang, Haosheng Liu, Jianxiong Fang, Chao Zhao, Jiumin Liu, Xiaoyong Pu. Complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during laparoscopic radical resection of bladder cancer: A technical report[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 169-172.

目的

介绍一种腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中,完全腹膜外输尿管造口新技术,评价其治疗一例T4期高级别膀胱浸润性尿路上皮癌患者的疗效。

方法

以1例75岁男性高级别膀胱浸润性尿路上皮癌(T4N0M0)为例,介绍一种腹腔镜下膀胱根治性切除术中,完全腹膜外输尿管造口技术的4个关键步骤,包括游离输尿管(将左侧输尿管游离足够长度)、汇集两根输尿管(腹腔镜下将左侧输尿管经直肠后方拉至右侧)、建立腹膜外通道(游离扩大右侧腹膜外间隙,将两根输尿管从此通道拉出)、腹膜重建。

结果

手术共耗时(从消毒铺单开始计时到输尿管造口结束)248 min,出血量100 ml,造口处可见清晰尿液流出,患者术后住院时间8 d。

结论

本例输尿管造口术是一种完全腹腔镜下经皮输尿管造口技术的尝试,相较于传统输尿管造口术而言,该术式创伤小,出血量少,术后恢复时间缩短。对于需要永久性尿流改道,但心肺功能差,手术风险高或没有机会做肠道尿流改道的患者,该术式是一种可行且安全的尿流改道方式。

Objective

To describe a new technique of unilateral complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during laparoscopic radical resection of bladder cancer, and evaluate the efficacy of this technique in the treatment of a patient with grade T4 infiltrating urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Methods

A case study of a 75-year-old man with a malignant tumor of the bladder (T4N0M0) was conducted to introduce the four key steps of a unilateral complete extraperitoneal ureterostomy during radical cystectomy by laparoscope, which include separate ureter (separate the left ureter into a sufficient length), collect two ureters (pull the left ureter behind the rectum to the right), establish an extraperitoneal passage (expand the right extraperitoneal space, pull the two ureters out of the passage), and reconstruct the peritoneum.

Results

The total operation time was 248 minutes (from the start of the disinfection to the end of the ureterostomy), the blood loss was 100 ml, clear urine outflow was visible at the stoma, and the postoperative hospital stay of the patient was 8 days.

Conclusion

This is an attempt at a complete laparoscopic ureterostomy with less trauma, less bleeding and shorter postoperative recovery time than conventional ureterostomy. This is a feasible and safe urinary diversion for patients who need permanent urinary diversion, but have poor cardiopulmonary function, high surgical risk, or no opportunity for intestinal urinary diversion.

图13 两输尿管末端外翻缝合呈乳头状并造口
[1]
Cai Q, Chen Y, S Xin, et al. Temporal trends of bladder cancer incidence and mortality from 1990 to 2016 and projections to 2030 [J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(2): 153-165.
[2]
Sebastien A, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(1): 96-108.
[3]
Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al-Lami FH, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(11): 1553-1568.
[4]
Babjuk M. Bladder cancer in the elderly[J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 73(1): 51-52.
[5]
Yong C, Daihui C, Bo Z. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer over 75-year-old: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(16): 26565-26572.
[6]
Tsaturyan A, Sahakyan S, Muradyan A, et al. A new modification of tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy following radical cystectomy[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019, 51(6): 959-967.
[7]
Zhenhua L, Yisen M, Shaobo L, et al. Perioperative recovery in different urinary reconstruction approaches of radical cystectomy: Are the advantages of laparoscopy consistent?[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2020, 16(4): 390-398.
[8]
Su X, Wu K, Wang S, et al. The impact of orthotopic neobladder vs ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy on the survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer: A propensity score matched analysis[J]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(20):7590-7600.
[9]
Longo N, Imbimbo C, Fusco F, et al. Complications and quality of life in elderly patients with several comorbidities undergoing cutaneous ureterostomy with single stoma or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2016, 118(4): 521-526.
[10]
Bhanvadia SK. Bladder Cancer Survivorship[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2018, 19(12): 111.
[11]
陈晓芳, 陈万青, 周薇薇, 等. 2013年中国膀胱癌发病和死亡流行状况分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2018, 27(2): 81-85.
[12]
Tsaturyan A, Beglaryan M, Kirakosyan Y, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life of male patients with ileal orthotopic neobladder compared to cutaneous ureterostomy[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2020, 73(2): 160-166.
[13]
Suzuki K, Hinata N, Inoue TA, et al. Comparison of the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of ileal conduit and cutaneous ureterostomy: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Urol Int2020, 104(1-2): 48-54.
[14]
Ariyoshi A, Fujisawa Y, Ohshima K, et al. Catheterless cutaneous ureterostomy[J]. J Urol, 1975, 114(4): 533-535.
[15]
Ubrig B, Lazica M, Waldner M, et al. Extraperitoneal bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy with midline stoma for palliation of pelvic cancer[J]. Urology, 2004, 63(5): 973-975.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?