切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 311 -315. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.04.006

临床研究

机器人辅助腹腔镜系统在肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄中的临床应用
虞勤舟1, 冯星亮1, 宋正尧1, 邰胜1, 周骏1, 郝宗耀1, 梁朝朝1, 樊松1,†()   
  1. 1. 230022　合肥，安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科；230022　安徽医科大学泌尿外科研究所；230022　泌尿生殖系统疾病安徽省重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-19 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 樊松
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校协同创新项目(GXXT-2019-014)

Clinical application of robot-assisted laparoscopy in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Qinzhou Yu1, Xingliang Feng1, Zhengyao Song1, Sheng Tai1, Jun Zhou1, Zongyao Hao1, Chaozhao Liang1, Song Fan1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Genitourinary Diseases, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2021-04-19 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Song Fan
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

虞勤舟, 冯星亮, 宋正尧, 邰胜, 周骏, 郝宗耀, 梁朝朝, 樊松. 机器人辅助腹腔镜系统在肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 311-315.

Qinzhou Yu, Xingliang Feng, Zhengyao Song, Sheng Tai, Jun Zhou, Zongyao Hao, Chaozhao Liang, Song Fan. Clinical application of robot-assisted laparoscopy in ureteropelvic junction obstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 311-315.

目的

探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜系统在肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄治疗中的应用价值。

方法

收集2014年10月至2019年12月我院行机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗的99例肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄患者的临床资料，男74例，女25例，平均年龄（28±15）岁。左侧、右侧和双侧肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄分别为54例、40例和5例。手术中同时处理合并疾病共16例，其中同侧尿路结石13例。

结果

99位患者均接受机器人辅助肾盂输尿管离断成形术，合并疾病同期处理。手术时间为（179±58）min。术后拔除引流管、导尿管时间分别为（5.2±2.0）d和（7.5±2.7）d，术中未发生并发症，无中转开放手术。Clavien-Dindo分类（Ⅰ~Ⅱ级）13例（13.1%）。平均住院日（14±4） d。术后平均住院日（7.0±2.2）d。随访（11.9±0.4）个月，均无复发。

结论

机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄具有创伤小，手术视野清晰，恢复快，手术成功率高，并发症少等优点。它也可以同时处理合并疾病，在临床应用中具有明显的优势。

关键词: 机器人, 腹腔镜, 输尿管狭窄
Objective

To explore the value of robot-assisted laparoscopy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Methods

Medical records were collected from 99 patients who underwent robot-assisted ureteropelvic dissociation plasty in our hospital from October 2014 to December 2019, including 74 males and 25 females, with an average age of (28±15) years. There were 54 cases with left side UPJO, 40 cases right side and 5 cases bilateral side. 16 cases were treated with concurrent diseases during operation, including 13 cases with ipsilateral urolithiasis.

Results

All the 99 patients received the robot-assisted ureteropelvic dissociation plasty, and the disease was treated simultaneously. The operative time was (179±58) min. The time to drainage and catheter removal was (5.2±2.0) days and (7.5±2.7) days. No intraoperative complications occurred, no conversion to open surgery. Clavien classification-Dindo (grade I-Ⅱ) 13 cases (13.1%). The average length of stay was (14±4) days and the average postoperative hospital stay was (7.0±2.2) days. The patients were followed up for (11.9±0.4) months without recurrence.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of UPJO has the advantages of less trauma, clear operative field, high success rate of surgery, quick recovery and fewer complications, and can simultaneously deal with complicating diseases, with obvious clinical application advantages.

Key words: Robot, Laparoscopy, UPJO
[1]
Lucas JW, Ghiraldi E, Ellis J, et al. Endoscopic management of ureteral strictures: an update[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2018, 19(4): 24.
[2]
Wang J, Xiong S, Fan S, et al. Appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasty for the treatment of complex ureteral strictures: initial experience of nine patients[J]. J Endourol, 2020, 34(8): 874-881.
[3]
Higgins M, Saltzman AF. Intraoperative decision-making: thermal injury during robotic pyeloplasty[J]. Urology, 2020, 141: 178.
[4]
Kaouk JH, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, et al. Robot-assisted surgery for benign distal ureteral strictures: step-by-step technique using the SP((R) surgical system[J]. BJU Int, 2019, 123(4): 733-739.
[5]
Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, Hurle R, et al. Robot-assisted surgery for benign ureteral strictures: experience and outcomes from four tertiary care institutions[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(6): 945-951.
[6]
Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty[J]. J Urol, 1993, 150(6): 1795-1799.
[7]
汪朔，王平. 腹腔镜处理肾盂输尿管交界处狭窄的技术探讨(附光盘)[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 20(5): 293-296.
[8]
Bozzini G, Gidaro S, Taverna G. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with the ALF-X Robot on Pig Models[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(2): 376-377.
[9]
Wang Q, Lu Y, Hu H, et al. Management of recurrent ureteral stricture: a retrospectively comparative study with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open approach[J]. Peerj, 2019, 7: e8166.
[10]
韩晓敏，陈敏，肖亚军, 等. 腹腔镜离断式肾盂输尿管成形术治疗UPJO肾积水230例经验总结[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 34(5): 353-357.
[11]
谢汉平，徐耀鹏，文瀚东, 等. 机器人联合膀胱软镜治疗肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄合并继发性肾结石一例报告及文献复习[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 61-63.
[12]
Popelin MB, Pinar U, Benamran D, et al. Functional outcomes after robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A bi-centre experience[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2021, 17(2): e2201.
[13]
Mantica G, Ambrosini F, Parodi S, et al. Comparison of safety, efficacy and outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs conventional laparoscopy[J]. Res Rep Urol, 2020, 12: 555-562.
[14]
高旭，王海峰，鲁欣, 等. 机器人辅助的腹腔镜与普通腹腔镜下UPJ成型的比较研究[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2012, 1(1): 70-72.
[15]
蒋昊，刘光香，赵晓智, 等. 机器人辅助经腹腹腔镜与传统经腹腹腔镜肾盂输尿管成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的临床对照研究[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 22(7): 495-499.
[16]
Rasool S, Singh M, Jain S, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients[J]. J Robot Surg, 2020, 14(2): 325-329.
[17]
Lee M, Lee Z, Strauss D, et al. Multi-institutional experience comparing outcomes of adult patients undergoing secondary versus primary robotic pyeloplasty[J]. Urology, 2020, 145: 275-280.
[18]
Zhang P, Shi T, Fam X, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty as management for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a comparison study with primary pyeloplasty[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(3): 1278-1285.
[19]
Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2019, 15(6): 661-667.
[20]
Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SW, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP(R) system: initial experience with a pediatric patient[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2019, 15(5): 576-577.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？