切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 316 -319. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.04.007

临床研究

经尿道二次电切在pT1期非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的预后价值研究
赵永录1,(), 张兴盛1, 宋广智1, 黄斌1, 张斌1, 顾鹏守1, 刘国淦1   
  1. 1. 733000 甘肃,武威市人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-24 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 赵永录

Prognostic value of transurethral secondary electrotomy in pT1 stage non-muscular invasive bladder cancer

Yonglu Zhao1,(), Xingsheng Zhang1, Guangzhi Song1, Bin Huang1, Bin Zhang1, Pengshou Gu1, Guogan Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, People’s Hospital of Wuwei, Gansu 733000, China
  • Received:2021-05-24 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yonglu Zhao
引用本文:

赵永录, 张兴盛, 宋广智, 黄斌, 张斌, 顾鹏守, 刘国淦. 经尿道二次电切在pT1期非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的预后价值研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 316-319.

Yonglu Zhao, Xingsheng Zhang, Guangzhi Song, Bin Huang, Bin Zhang, Pengshou Gu, Guogan Liu. Prognostic value of transurethral secondary electrotomy in pT1 stage non-muscular invasive bladder cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 316-319.

目的

评估常规二次经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(STURBT)对初诊T1期非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者远期预后的价值。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了在我院接受治疗的256例pT1期NMIBC患者,接受经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)患者126例,接受二次TURBT(STURBT)的患者130例。通过查阅病历资料和随访的方式评估两种手术方式的预后疗效。我们记录了两组患者疾病复发及死亡情况。最后,总的疾病复发率(DRR)、疾病特异性死亡率(DSM)及2年、4年和6年无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)作为两组对比分析指标。

结果

两组患者随访时间为6年,相比较TURBT组,STURBT组的DRR(42.1% vs 61.9%,P=0.001)和DSM(23.1% vs 35.7%,P=0.026)均显著降低;4年和6年的RFS(59.2% vs 44.4%,P=0.018;55.4% vs 38.1%,P=0.006)明显升高;6年OS(76.2% vs 64.3%,P=0.038)也明显升高。利用Kaplan-Meier法构建的RFS、OS曲线显现出差异有统计学意义(RFS:P=0.001;OS:P=0.029),STURBT组RFS、OS均优于TURBT组。

结论

pT1期NMIBC患者STURBT的预后价值,不仅对患者RFS有利,而且对长期OS有利。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of routine second transurethral cystectomy (STURBT) on the long-term prognosis of newly diagnosed pT1 non-muscular invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 256 patients with T1 stage NMIBC who received treatment in our hospital, including 126 patients who received TURBT and 130 patients who received STURBT. The prognosis of the two surgical methods was evaluated by medical records and following up. Recurrence and death were recorded in both groups. Finally, the total rate of disease recurrence (DRR), disease-specific mortality (DSM), 2-year, 4-year and 6-year recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared and analyzed as indicators of the two groups.

Results

The follow-up time of the two groups was 6 years, and the DRR (42.1% vs 61.9%, P=0.001) and DSM (23.1 vs 35.7%, P=0.026) of the STURBT group were significantly reduced compared with TURBT group. 4-year and 6-year RFS (59.2% vs 44.4%, P=0.018; 55.4% vs 38.1%, P=0.006) significantly increased; 6-year OS (76.2 % vs 64.3%, P=0.038) was also significantly higher. The RFS and OS curves constructed by Kaplan-Meier method showed statistical difference (RFS: P=0.001; OS: P=0.029), RFS and OS in STURBT group were superior to those in TURBT group.

Conclusion

The prognostic value of STURBT in pT1 NMIBC patients was not only beneficial to patients' RFS, but also to patients' long-term OS.

图1 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者入组研究流程图
图2 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者无复发生存率和总生存率的Kaplan-Meier曲线
表1 两组患者的人口统计学数据和基线肿瘤特征
表2 研究组的预后和生存参数
[1]
Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016 [J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(3): 447-461.
[2]
Torre LA, BRAY F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA: a Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108.
[3]
Ro JY, Staerkel GA, Ayala AG. Cytologic and histologic features of superficial bladder cancer[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 1992, 19(3): 435-453.
[4]
黄健,郭应禄,那彦群, 等. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南手册: 2019版[M]. 科学出版社, 2019.
[5]
Shen Z, Xie L, Chen T, et al. Risk factors predictive of recurrence and progression for patients who suffered initial recurrence after transurethral resection of stage pt1 bladder tumor in chinese population: a retrospective study [J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(5): e2625.
[6]
Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U, et al. Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(2): 185-190.
[7]
Divrik T, Yildirim U, Eroğlu AS, et al. Is a second transurethral resection necessary for newly diagnosed pT1 bladder cancer? [J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(4): 1258-1261.
[8]
Rigaud J, Karam G, Braud G, et al. T1 bladder tumors: value of a second endoscopic resection] [J]. Prog Urol2002, 12(1): 27-30.
[9]
Zurkirchen MA, Sulser T, Gaspert A, et al. Second transurethral resection of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a must even for experienced urologists [J]. Urol Int, 2004, 72(2): 99-102.
[10]
Vögeli TA, Grimm MO, Simon X, et al. Prospective study of effectiveness. Reoperation (re-TUR) in superficial bladder carcinoma[J]. Der Urologe Ausg A, 2002, 41(5): 470-440.
[11]
Schips L, Augustin H, Zigeuner RE, et al. Is repeated transurethral resection justified in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer?[J]. Urology, 2002, 59(2): 220-223.
[12]
Jakse G, Algaba F, Malmström PU, et al. A second-look TUR in T1 transitional cell carcinoma: why? [J]. Eur Urol, 2004, 45(5): 539-546.
[13]
Engilbertsson H, Aaltonen KE, Björnsson S, et al. Transurethral bladder tumor resection can cause seeding of cancer cells into the bloodstream[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(1): 53-57.
[14]
Divrik RT, Yildirim U, Zorlu F, et al. The effect of repeat transurethral resection on recurrence and progression rates in patients with T1 tumors of the bladder who received intravesical mitomycin: a prospective, randomized clinical trial[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(5): 1641-1644.
[15]
Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF, et al. Repeat transurethral resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review [J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 73(6): 925-933.
[16]
Kim W, Song C, Park S, et al. Value of immediate second resection of the tumor bed to improve the effectiveness of transurethral resection of bladder tumor [J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(8): 1059-1064.
[17]
Herr HW. Restaging transurethral resection of high risk superficial bladder cancer improves the initial response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy [J]. J Urol, 2005, 174(6): 2134-2137.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[6] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[7] 林逸, 钟文龙, 李锴文, 何旺, 林天歆. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第15期)——转移性膀胱癌的综合治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 648-652.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要