切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 400 -403. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.05.004

临床研究

125Ⅰ粒子植入术治疗前列腺癌尿路并发症的临床分析
赵佳晖1,(), 侯铸1, 罗勇1, 李明川1, 彭涛1, 王永兴1, 姜永光1   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-06 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 赵佳晖
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学科研创新项目(XSKY2022296)

Clinical analysis of urinary complications of brachytherapy in patients of prostate cancer

Jiahui Zhao1,(), Zhu Hou1, Yong Luo1, Mingchuan Li1, Tao Peng1, Yongxing Wang1, Yongguang Jiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2021-07-06 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiahui Zhao
引用本文:

赵佳晖, 侯铸, 罗勇, 李明川, 彭涛, 王永兴, 姜永光. 125Ⅰ粒子植入术治疗前列腺癌尿路并发症的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 400-403.

Jiahui Zhao, Zhu Hou, Yong Luo, Mingchuan Li, Tao Peng, Yongxing Wang, Yongguang Jiang. Clinical analysis of urinary complications of brachytherapy in patients of prostate cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 400-403.

目的

探讨前列腺癌125Ⅰ粒子植入术后尿路不良反应及其并发症。

方法

回顾性分析2011~2019年在经直肠超声引导下,经会阴前列腺125Ⅰ永久性放射粒子植入治疗前列腺癌患者资料,观察尿路并发症以及下尿路症状。

结果

共收集120例前列腺癌患者,随访时间2年,平均年龄(73±5)岁;临床Gleason评分6~10分,平均(8.4±1.1)分;前列腺体积(47±12) ml。患者术前、术后1个月、术后3个月、术后半年、术后1年和术后2年IPSS评分分别为:(13.1±3.6),(21.6±4.6),(19.2±4.4),(15.9±3.9),(13.9±3.1)和(13.5±2.7)。术后1个月内尿路Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级并发症发生率分别为14.2%、5.8%;术后3个月尿路Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级并发症发生率分别为5.0%、2.5%。术后无尿路Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级并发症发生。

结论

125Ⅰ粒子永久植入术治疗前列腺癌是一种微创、术后恢复快的治疗方法。虽然放射性粒子对患者的排尿有一定的影响,但程度较轻,具有一定的自限性。术中精确的定位、制定计划及粒子植入操作技术是预防严重合并症的关键。

Objective

To analyze the side effects and complications in prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy.

Methods

A total of 120 prostate cancer patients with average age of (73±5) years were recruited. All the patients were diagnosed as prostate cancer and accepted prostate brachytherapy from 2011 to 2019 under the guidance of transrectal ultrasound. The adverse reactions of urinary tract and their complications after prostate cancer 125I seed implantation were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 120 patients with prostate cancer were collected and the clinical average Gleason score was (8.4±1.1). The IPSS scores of the patients were (13.1±3.6), (21.6±4.6), (19.2±4.4), (15.9±3.9), (13.9±3.1) and (13.5±2.7) before operation, 1 month after operation, 3 months after operation, half a year after operation, 1 year after operation and 2 years after operation, respectively. The incidence of grade I and grade II complications was 14.2% and 5.8% respectively within 1 month after operation, and 5.0% and 2.5% respectively within 3 months after operation. There were no grade III or IV complications.

Conclusions

Prostate brachytherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for prostate cancer. Although the implantation of particles has a certain impact on the urination of patients, but the degree is relatively light, with a certain degree of self-limiting. Intraoperative accurate localization and making accurate implantation plan are factors to the prevention of serious complications.

表1 120例前列腺癌患者125Ⅰ粒子植入术术后尿路并发症[例(%)]
图1 近距离放射性粒子植入术后IPSS评分变化
图2 近距离放射性粒子植入术后IPSS增加的百分比
[1]
Dutta SW, Alonso CE, Libby B, et al. Prostate cancer high dose-rate brachytherapy: review of evidence and current perspectives[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2018, 15(1): 71-79.
[2]
Zaorsky NG, Davis BJ, Nguyen PL, et al. The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2017, 14(7): 415-439.
[3]
Grozescu T, Popa F. Prostate cancer between prognosis and adequate/proper therapy[J]. J Med Life, 2017, 10(1): 5-12.
[4]
Ding XF, Huang TB, Gao Y, et al. Permanent (125) I prostate brachytherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer[J]. Int J Urol, 2019, 26(2) :278-283.
[5]
Hanna SA, Pimentel L, Brazilian SR. Brachytherapy guideline in prostate cancer (high and low dose rate) [J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2017, 63(4): 293-298.
[6]
Stish BJ, Davis BJ, Mynderse LA, et al. Brachytherapy in the management of prostate cancer [J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2017, 26(3): 491-513.
[7]
周智恩,严维刚,周毅,等. 前列腺癌近距离放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志. 2020, 41(5): 362-367
[8]
Hannoun-Levi JM. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: present and future[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2017, 21(6-7): 469-472.
[9]
Chin J, Rumble RB, Kollmeier M, et al. Brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer: american society of clinical oncology/cancer care ontario joint guideline update[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(15): 1737-1743.
[10]
Chargari C, Deutsch E, Blanchard P, et al. Brachytherapy: An overview for clinicians[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(5): 386-401.
[11]
Sanchez-Gomez LM, Polo-deSantos M, Rodriguez-Melcon JI, et al. High-dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer: A systematic review of its safety and efficacy[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2017, 41(2): 71-81.
[12]
Tanimoto R, Bekku K, Katayama N, et al. Predictive factors for acute and late urinary toxicity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy in Japanese patients[J]. Int J Urol, 2013, 20(8): 812-817.
[13]
Bottomley D, Ash D, Al-Qaisieh B, et al. Side effects of permanent I125 prostate seed implants in 667 patients treated in Leeds[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2007, 82(1): 46-49.
[14]
Anderson JF, Swanson DA, Levy LB, et al. Urinary side effects and complications after permanent prostate brachytherapy: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience[J]. Urology, 2009,74(3): 601-605.
[15]
Mori H, Fukumori T, Daizumoto K, et al. Predictive Factors for Prolonged Urination Disorder After Permanent 125I Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer[J]. In Vivo, 2017, 31(4): 755-761.
[16]
Kelly K, Swindell R, Routledge J, et al. Prediction of urinary symptoms after 125iodine prostate brachytherapy[J]. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 2006, 18(4): 326-332.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[10] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[11] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[12] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[13] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[14] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[15] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
阅读次数
全文


摘要