切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 400 -403. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.05.004

临床研究

125Ⅰ粒子植入术治疗前列腺癌尿路并发症的临床分析
赵佳晖1,(), 侯铸1, 罗勇1, 李明川1, 彭涛1, 王永兴1, 姜永光1   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-06 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 赵佳晖
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学科研创新项目(XSKY2022296)

Clinical analysis of urinary complications of brachytherapy in patients of prostate cancer

Jiahui Zhao1,(), Zhu Hou1, Yong Luo1, Mingchuan Li1, Tao Peng1, Yongxing Wang1, Yongguang Jiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2021-07-06 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiahui Zhao
引用本文:

赵佳晖, 侯铸, 罗勇, 李明川, 彭涛, 王永兴, 姜永光. 125Ⅰ粒子植入术治疗前列腺癌尿路并发症的临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 400-403.

Jiahui Zhao, Zhu Hou, Yong Luo, Mingchuan Li, Tao Peng, Yongxing Wang, Yongguang Jiang. Clinical analysis of urinary complications of brachytherapy in patients of prostate cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 400-403.

目的

探讨前列腺癌125Ⅰ粒子植入术后尿路不良反应及其并发症。

方法

回顾性分析2011~2019年在经直肠超声引导下,经会阴前列腺125Ⅰ永久性放射粒子植入治疗前列腺癌患者资料,观察尿路并发症以及下尿路症状。

结果

共收集120例前列腺癌患者,随访时间2年,平均年龄(73±5)岁;临床Gleason评分6~10分,平均(8.4±1.1)分;前列腺体积(47±12) ml。患者术前、术后1个月、术后3个月、术后半年、术后1年和术后2年IPSS评分分别为:(13.1±3.6),(21.6±4.6),(19.2±4.4),(15.9±3.9),(13.9±3.1)和(13.5±2.7)。术后1个月内尿路Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级并发症发生率分别为14.2%、5.8%;术后3个月尿路Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级并发症发生率分别为5.0%、2.5%。术后无尿路Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级并发症发生。

结论

125Ⅰ粒子永久植入术治疗前列腺癌是一种微创、术后恢复快的治疗方法。虽然放射性粒子对患者的排尿有一定的影响,但程度较轻,具有一定的自限性。术中精确的定位、制定计划及粒子植入操作技术是预防严重合并症的关键。

Objective

To analyze the side effects and complications in prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy.

Methods

A total of 120 prostate cancer patients with average age of (73±5) years were recruited. All the patients were diagnosed as prostate cancer and accepted prostate brachytherapy from 2011 to 2019 under the guidance of transrectal ultrasound. The adverse reactions of urinary tract and their complications after prostate cancer 125I seed implantation were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 120 patients with prostate cancer were collected and the clinical average Gleason score was (8.4±1.1). The IPSS scores of the patients were (13.1±3.6), (21.6±4.6), (19.2±4.4), (15.9±3.9), (13.9±3.1) and (13.5±2.7) before operation, 1 month after operation, 3 months after operation, half a year after operation, 1 year after operation and 2 years after operation, respectively. The incidence of grade I and grade II complications was 14.2% and 5.8% respectively within 1 month after operation, and 5.0% and 2.5% respectively within 3 months after operation. There were no grade III or IV complications.

Conclusions

Prostate brachytherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for prostate cancer. Although the implantation of particles has a certain impact on the urination of patients, but the degree is relatively light, with a certain degree of self-limiting. Intraoperative accurate localization and making accurate implantation plan are factors to the prevention of serious complications.

表1 120例前列腺癌患者125Ⅰ粒子植入术术后尿路并发症[例(%)]
图1 近距离放射性粒子植入术后IPSS评分变化
图2 近距离放射性粒子植入术后IPSS增加的百分比
[1]
Dutta SW, Alonso CE, Libby B, et al. Prostate cancer high dose-rate brachytherapy: review of evidence and current perspectives[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2018, 15(1): 71-79.
[2]
Zaorsky NG, Davis BJ, Nguyen PL, et al. The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2017, 14(7): 415-439.
[3]
Grozescu T, Popa F. Prostate cancer between prognosis and adequate/proper therapy[J]. J Med Life, 2017, 10(1): 5-12.
[4]
Ding XF, Huang TB, Gao Y, et al. Permanent (125) I prostate brachytherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer[J]. Int J Urol, 2019, 26(2) :278-283.
[5]
Hanna SA, Pimentel L, Brazilian SR. Brachytherapy guideline in prostate cancer (high and low dose rate) [J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2017, 63(4): 293-298.
[6]
Stish BJ, Davis BJ, Mynderse LA, et al. Brachytherapy in the management of prostate cancer [J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2017, 26(3): 491-513.
[7]
周智恩,严维刚,周毅,等. 前列腺癌近距离放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志. 2020, 41(5): 362-367
[8]
Hannoun-Levi JM. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: present and future[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2017, 21(6-7): 469-472.
[9]
Chin J, Rumble RB, Kollmeier M, et al. Brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer: american society of clinical oncology/cancer care ontario joint guideline update[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(15): 1737-1743.
[10]
Chargari C, Deutsch E, Blanchard P, et al. Brachytherapy: An overview for clinicians[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(5): 386-401.
[11]
Sanchez-Gomez LM, Polo-deSantos M, Rodriguez-Melcon JI, et al. High-dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer: A systematic review of its safety and efficacy[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2017, 41(2): 71-81.
[12]
Tanimoto R, Bekku K, Katayama N, et al. Predictive factors for acute and late urinary toxicity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy in Japanese patients[J]. Int J Urol, 2013, 20(8): 812-817.
[13]
Bottomley D, Ash D, Al-Qaisieh B, et al. Side effects of permanent I125 prostate seed implants in 667 patients treated in Leeds[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2007, 82(1): 46-49.
[14]
Anderson JF, Swanson DA, Levy LB, et al. Urinary side effects and complications after permanent prostate brachytherapy: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience[J]. Urology, 2009,74(3): 601-605.
[15]
Mori H, Fukumori T, Daizumoto K, et al. Predictive Factors for Prolonged Urination Disorder After Permanent 125I Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer[J]. In Vivo, 2017, 31(4): 755-761.
[16]
Kelly K, Swindell R, Routledge J, et al. Prediction of urinary symptoms after 125iodine prostate brachytherapy[J]. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 2006, 18(4): 326-332.
[1] 方晔, 谢晓红, 罗辉. 品管圈在提高前列腺癌穿刺检出率中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[11] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[12] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 王苏贵, 皇立媛, 姜福金, 吴自余, 张先云, 李强, 严大理. 异质性细胞核核糖蛋白A2B1在前列腺癌中的作用及其靶向中药活性成分筛选研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 731-736.
阅读次数
全文


摘要