切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 404 -407. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.05.005

临床研究

肾周脂肪梅奥粘连概率评分系统在肾癌后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用
王苏贵1, 胡根吾1,(), 姜福金1, 李强1, 吴自余1, 张先云1   
  1. 1. 223002 江苏,徐州医科大学附属淮安医院(淮安市第二人民医院)泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-24 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 胡根吾
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省第十六批"六大人才高峰"项目资助(2019-WSW-218); 淮安市自然科学基金资助项目(HAB201730)

Clinical application of perirenal fat Mayo adhesion probability (MAP) score system in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Sugui Wang1, Genwu Hu1,(), Fujin Jiang1, Qiang Li1, Ziyu Wu1, Xianyun Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Huai’an Hospital Affiliated of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, 223002, China
  • Received:2021-06-24 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Genwu Hu
引用本文:

王苏贵, 胡根吾, 姜福金, 李强, 吴自余, 张先云. 肾周脂肪梅奥粘连概率评分系统在肾癌后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 404-407.

Sugui Wang, Genwu Hu, Fujin Jiang, Qiang Li, Ziyu Wu, Xianyun Zhang. Clinical application of perirenal fat Mayo adhesion probability (MAP) score system in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 404-407.

目的

探讨肾周脂肪梅奥粘连概率评分系统(MAP)在肾癌后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年6月徐州医科大学附属淮安医院泌尿外科收治的行后腹腔镜肾部分切除术的153例肾癌患者的临床病例资料。依据MAP评分系统将其分为低度复杂组、中度复杂组和高度复杂组三组。比较各组间的手术时间、术中出血量、术中及术后并发症、术中热缺血时间、术后住院时间及术后血肌酐变化情况。

结果

在153例患者中,低度复杂组68例,中度复杂组58例和高度复杂组27例。三组患者在年龄、性别、术前血肌酐水平、肿瘤最大径、肿瘤位置、BMI、RENAL评分等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随着复杂程度的提高,手术时间、术中出血量也在不断增加(P<0.05);而术中热缺血时间、术后住院时间及术后血肌酐水平无明显变化(P>0.05)。在术中并发症方面,随着复杂程度的提高,术中并发症的发生率也在增加(P<0.05),且高度复杂组的术后并发症发生风险是低度复杂组的13.895倍(P=0.002),MAP评分系统预测术中并发症发生的精度较高(AUC=0.757,P=0.002)。但是术后并发症各组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

MAP评分系统在肾癌后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中,对预估手术难度及术中并发症发生风险有较好的临床应用价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of perirenal fat Mayo adhesion probability (MAP) score system in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 153 patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Department of Urology, Huai'an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University from January 2015 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the MAP score system, they were divided into three groups: low complexity group, moderate complexity group and high complexity group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, intraoperative warm ischemia time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative serum creatinine were compared among the groups.

Results

Among 153 patients, 68 were in low complexity group, 58 in moderate complexity group and 27 in high complexity group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, preoperative serum creatinine level, tumor diameter, tumor location, body mass index and renal score among the three groups (P>0.05). With the increase of complexity, the operation time and blood loss were also increasing (P<0.05), while the warm ischemia time, postoperative hospital stay and serum creatinine level had no significant change (P>0.05). In terms of intraoperative complications, the incidence of intraoperative complications increased with the increase of complexity (P<0.05), and the risk of postoperative complications in high complexity group was 13.895 times higher than that in low complexity group (P=0.002). The accuracy of MAP scoring system in predicting intraoperative complications was higher (AUC=0.757, P=0.002). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications among the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

MAP score system in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma has good clinical application value in predicting the difficulty of operation and the risk of intraoperative complications.

表1 153例不同MAP评分组肾癌患者的一般资料
表2 153例不同MAP分组肾癌患者围手术期观察指标比较
表3 肾部分切除术中并发症的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
董毅,王林辉.转移性肾癌减瘤性肾切除术的指征该如何把握[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 289-292.
[2]
王苏贵,马松,姜福金, 等. 3D后腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗T1b期肾癌的临床研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(16): 2378-2381.
[3]
王苏贵,马松,阳东荣, 等.术前解剖特征分类评分系统在后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(12): 1691-1694.
[4]
李强,王苏贵,马松, 等.后腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗T1b期肾癌15例报告[J].国际泌尿系统杂志, 2016, 36(1): 55-58.
[5]
Kutikov A, Uzzo R-G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3): 844-853.
[6]
王苏贵, 阳东荣, 单玉喜, 等. R.E.N.A.L.评分系统在后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2): 18-21.
[7]
Davidiuk AJ, Parker AS, Thomas CS, et al. Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(6): 1165-1171.
[8]
王苏贵,马松,阳东荣, 等.向心性指数评分系统在肾癌后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用价值研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2017, 22(2):139-143.
[9]
Jin D, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. A Combination of the mayo adhesive probability score and the renal score to predict intraoperative complications in small renal masses[J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104(1-2): 142-147.
[10]
谢福晨,张会江,张伟丽,等. 新一代肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 140-144.
[11]
杨浩森, 阴克强, 双卫兵. 肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展[J].现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2019, 11(4): 252-256.
[12]
张华俊,唐世英,张中元, 等.肾部分切除术术前肾周脂肪粘连的评估[J].现代泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 21(9): 727-729.
[13]
Macleod LC, Hsi RS, Gore JL, Wright JL, et al. Perinephric fat thickness is an independent predictor of operative complexity during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy[J].J Endourol, 2014, 28(5): 587-591.
[14]
Liu ZW, Olweny EO, Yin G, et al. Prediction of perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: role of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score[J].World J Urol, 2013, 31(5):1183-9.
[15]
Veccia A, Antonelli A, Uzzo RG, et al. Predictive value of nephrometry scores in nephron-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2020, 6(3): 490-504.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要