切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 78 -81. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.01.017

临床研究

改良留置导尿管相关尿路感染病原菌及感染危险因素研究
王微1, 杜相珠2, 马悦2, 祁晓芳3,()   
  1. 1. 056001 河北,邯郸市第一医院妇产科
    2. 056001 河北,邯郸市第一医院综合内科
    3. 056001 河北,邯郸市第一医院陪送中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-12 出版日期:2023-02-01
  • 通信作者: 祁晓芳
  • 基金资助:
    河北省科技计划项目(182777169)

Study of the pathogenic bacteria and risk factors for patients with modified indwelling catheter-associated urinary tract infection

Wei Wang1, Xiangzhu Du2, Yue Ma2, Xiaofang Qi3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Hospital of Handan, Hebei 056001, China
    2. Department of General Internal Medicine, The First Hospital of Handan, Hebei 056001, China
    3. Department of Escort Center, The First Hospital of Handan, Hebei 056001, China
  • Received:2021-11-12 Published:2023-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofang Qi
引用本文:

王微, 杜相珠, 马悦, 祁晓芳. 改良留置导尿管相关尿路感染病原菌及感染危险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 78-81.

Wei Wang, Xiangzhu Du, Yue Ma, Xiaofang Qi. Study of the pathogenic bacteria and risk factors for patients with modified indwelling catheter-associated urinary tract infection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 78-81.

目的

研究改良留置导尿管相关尿路感染患者病原菌的分布情况,分析改良留置导尿管患者尿路感染的危险因素。

方法

纳入2018年3月至2020年3月邯郸市第一医院收治的168例改良留置导尿管患者作为研究对象,观察所有患者尿路感染和病原菌分布情况。将发生尿路感染和未发生尿路感染的患者收集资料并进行对比,差异有统计学意义项目代入Logistic回归方程计算,分析改良留置导尿管患者发生尿路感染的危险因素。

结果

168例改良留置导尿管患者中有49例患者发生尿路感染,发生率为29.17%。共检出病原菌84株。其中革兰阴性杆菌50株(59.52%),革兰阳性球菌24株(28.57%),真菌10株(11.90%)。发生尿路感染和未发生尿路感染患者在年龄、住院时间、留置导尿管时间、糖尿病、肾结石、低蛋白血症以及抗菌药物使用种类上对比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。将上述项目代入Logistic回归方程计算发现,年龄≥60岁、住院时间≥21 d、留置导尿管时间≥13 d、合并糖尿病、合并肾结石、合并低蛋白血症以及尿路感染前抗菌药物使用种类≥3种均是改良留置导尿管患者发生尿路感染的危险因素。

结论

改良留置导尿管患者相关尿路感染发生率较高,主要病原菌为革兰阴性杆菌。患者发生尿路感染的危险因素较多,临床应针对性给予干预措施,降低尿路感染的发生率。

Objective

To study the pathogenic bacteria distribution conditions and its risk factors for patients with modified indwelling catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Methods

168 patients received the modified indwelling catheter from March 2018 to March 2020 in the First Hospital of Handan were selected as research subjects. The urinary tract infection and pathogenic bacteria distribution conditions were observed. Clinical data about infection cases and non-infection cases were acquired. Logistic regression equation was used to analyze the risk factors of medified indwelling catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Results

Among 168 cases, 49 patients were occurred with urinary tract infection (29.17%), a total of 84 pathogenic bacteria strains were detected, including 50 gram-negative bacilli strains (59.52%), 24 gram-positive coccus strains (28.57%) and 10 fungus strains (11.90%). There were significant differences in age, hospital stay, time of indwelling catheter, diabetes, kidney stones, hypoproteinemia and the types of antibiotics used between patients with urinary tract infection and without urinary tract infection (P<0.05). Logistic regression equation results indicated that the risk factors of urinary tract infection included the age ≥60 years old, hospital stays ≥21 d, indwelling time ≥13 d, hypoproteinemia and types of antibacterial agents used ≥3.

Conclusion

Patients with modified indwelling catheter are prone to have urinary tract infection, of which the major pathogenic bacteria are gram-negative bacilli. There are multiple risk factors for urinary tract infection. Therefore, the specific intervention measures can reduce the incidence of urinary tract infection.

表1 改良留置导尿管患者尿路感染病原菌分布情况
表2 发生尿路感染和未发生尿路感染患者资料对比(例)
表3 改良留置导尿管患者发生尿路感染的危险因素分析
[1]
郭利民. 老年监护室患者导尿管相关尿路感染病原菌及其感染危险因素研究[J]. 实验与检验医学, 2019, 37(2): 198-201, 214.
[2]
Mitchell BG, Fasugba O, Gardner A, et al. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in hospitals: study protocol for a multi-site randomised controlled study[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(11): e018871.
[3]
王潇,李玖军. PICU导尿管相关性尿路感染的病原菌分布及高危因素分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2018, 16(9): 137-138.
[4]
Lavelle ES, Alam P, Meister M, et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Catheter-Managed Postoperative Urinary Retention After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 134(4): 727-735.
[5]
尚红,王毓三,申子瑜,等.全国临床检验操作规程(第4版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[6]
林立国,刘思平,杜秀华,等. 输尿管镜留置多孔三腔硅胶导尿管治疗尿道球部损伤的临床应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(2): 160-163.
[7]
童巧莉,陈晓丽.全麻术后导尿管插管患者发生尿路感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2018, 28(12): 1512-1514.
[8]
张柳燕, 丁妍, 余健, 等. 改良留置导尿管外固定的方法[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(z1): 267-268.
[9]
Menegueti MG, Ciol MA, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, et al. Long-term prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among critically ill patients through the implementation of an educational program and a daily checklist for maintenance of indwelling urinary catheters: A quasi-experimental study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(8): e14417.
[10]
McClurg D, Walker K, Pickard R, et al. Participant experiences of clean intermittent self-catheterisation, urinary tract infections and antibiotic use on the ANTIC trial - A qualitative study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018, 81(1): 1-7.
[11]
Fasugba O, Cheng AC, Gregory V, et al. Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2019, 19(6): 611-619.
[12]
张伟,张娟娟,任艳利,等. 导尿管相关尿路感染的病原菌分布及危险因素分析[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2019, 36(7): 532-534.
[13]
Mills JT, Rapp DE, Shaw NM, et al. Effect of active versus passive void trials on time to patient discharge, urinary tract infection, and urinary retention: a randomized clinical trial[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(9): 2247-2252.
[14]
刘芳,范雅静. 妇科导尿管相关尿路感染发生情况及危险因素分析[J]. 华南预防医学, 2020, 46(4): 444-446.
[15]
Bossa L, Kline K, McDougald D, et al. Urinary catheter-associated microbiota change in accordance with treatment and infection status[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(6): e0177633.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[6] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[7] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[8] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[9] 邢嘉翌, 龚佳晟, 祝佳佳, 陆群. 肺癌化疗患者继发肺部感染的病原菌耐药性及炎症因子变化分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 714-718.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?