切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 261 -264. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.03.013

临床研究

保留睾丸动脉的腹腔镜精索内静脉高位结扎术对精索静脉曲张致不育的疗效分析
王晓利1, 李琦1, 李春风2, 王璟琦3,(), 管晓东1   
  1. 1. 044000 运城,山西医科大学附属运城医院泌尿外科
    2. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第一医院泌尿外科
    3. 山西医科大学第二医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-09 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王璟琦

Effect of laparoscopic high ligation of internal spermatic vein with testicular artery preservation on infertility caused by varicocele

Xiaoli Wang1, Qi Li1, Chunfeng Li2, Jingqi Wang3,(), Xiaodong Guan1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Yuncheng Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Yuncheng 044000, China
    2. Department of Urology, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
    3. Department of Urology, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2023-01-09 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jingqi Wang
引用本文:

王晓利, 李琦, 李春风, 王璟琦, 管晓东. 保留睾丸动脉的腹腔镜精索内静脉高位结扎术对精索静脉曲张致不育的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 261-264.

Xiaoli Wang, Qi Li, Chunfeng Li, Jingqi Wang, Xiaodong Guan. Effect of laparoscopic high ligation of internal spermatic vein with testicular artery preservation on infertility caused by varicocele[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 261-264.

目的

探究腹腔镜下精索内静脉高位结扎术中通过保留睾丸动脉对治疗精索静脉曲张导致不育的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年12月山西医科大学第一医院行腹腔镜手术治疗的精索静脉曲张伴不育患者,共完整收集病例资料69例,按照腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术中对睾丸动脉处理方式的不同,将其分为两组。A组:保留睾丸动脉36例;B组:精索血管集束结扎33例。统计比较两组患者精子质量改善情况,自然生育率,并发症和复发率。

结果

精子质量改善情况:(1)两组术后较术前均有明显改善(P<0.05);(2)两组比较,A组精子密度和精子活力改善率均高于B组(P<0.05);自然生育率比较:A组生育率高于B组(P<0.05)。并发症发生情况:(1)两组各有3例睾丸鞘膜积液,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);(2)A组无睾丸萎缩,B组有1例睾丸萎缩,A、B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。复发率比较:A组有1例复发,B组有2例复发,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于精索静脉曲张不育患者,两种手术方式都可以明显地改善精子密度和活力,但保留睾丸动脉组的精子质量改善情况和自然生育率显著优于集束结扎组,而在并发症(睾丸鞘膜积液、萎缩)和复发率方面,两组无显著差别。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic high ligation of internal spermatic vein in the treatment of infertility caused by varicocele by preserving testicular artery.

Methods

69 cases of infertile patients with varicocele from January 2014 to December 2016 of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. According to the surgical method, the patients were divided into two groups. Group A: 36 cases were reserved for the testicular artery, group B: 33 cases were ligated by the cluster of spermatic vessels.The sperm quality improvement, natural fertility rate, postoperative complication rate and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups, and the clinical effects of the two surgical methods were analyzed and evaluated.

Results

Semen parameters improvement: (1)there was significant improvement in two groups after operation compared with those before operation (P<0.05); (2)the improvement rate of sperm density and motility in group A was higher than those in group B (P<0.05). Natural fertility: the fertility rate of group A was higher than that of group B (P<0.05). Complications: (1) there were 3 cases of hydrocele in the testis in both groups and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05); (2) there was no testicular atrophy in group A, and there was 1 case of testicular atrophy in group B, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Recurtence rate: there was 1 case of relapse in group A and 2 cases in group B and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The sperm quality recovery and natural fertility of the reserved testicular artery group are superior to those of the spermatic vessel cluster ligation group. There was no significant difference in the hydrocele of the testicle, atrophy of the testis and the recurrence of varicocele between the two methods.

表1 两组精索静脉曲张伴不育患者一般资料比较
表2 精索静脉曲张伴不育患者手术前后精子密度、活力对比(±s
表3 两组精索静脉曲张伴不育患者术后精子质量改善情况对比[例(%)]
表4 两组精索静脉曲张伴不育患者术后自然生育情况、并发症对比[例(%)]
[1]
邓春华, 商学军.精索静脉曲张诊断与治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2015, 21(11): 1035-1042.
[2]
Mesrur SS, Lisette H, Josine Q, et al. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis from european association of urology/european society for paediatric urology guidelines panel[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 75(3): 448-461.
[3]
Zavattaro M, Ceruti C, Motta G,et al. Treating varicocele in 2018: current knowledge and treatment options[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2018, 41(12): 1365-1375.
[4]
李宏军. 男性不育伴精索静脉曲张的治疗策略[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(3): 195-198.
[5]
王晓利, 王璟琦, 王东文. 腹腔镜手术治疗精索静脉曲张的进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 139-141.
[6]
张立元, 张小康, 剡锐, 等. 经腹腔入路腹腔镜高选择性精索静脉结扎术的疗效观察 [J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 452-455.
[7]
苗腾飞, 王利辉, 李云龙,等.精准分离精索内静脉的腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术对精索静脉曲张的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 37(6): 422-426+435.
[8]
Demirdöğen ŞO, Özkaya F, Cinislioğlu AE,et al. A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy[J]. Turk J Urol, 2019, 45(4): 254-260.
[9]
Majzoub A, ElBardisi H, Covarrubias S, et al. Effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on fertility outcome and treatment plans of patients with severe oligozoospermia: An original report and meta-analysis[J]. Andrologia, 2021, 53(6): e14059-e14059.
[10]
Wang H, Ji ZG. Microsurgery versus laparoscopic surgery for varicocele: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Invest Surg, 2020, 33(1): 40-48.
[11]
唐启胜, 王磊, 李瑞晓, 等. 腹腔镜下高选择性精索静脉高位结扎与显微镜下低位精索静脉结扎术的疗效对比[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(9): 782-787.
[12]
Wu X, Liu Q, Zhang R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery versus microsurgery for varicocele of adult males: A meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(34): e7818.
[13]
吴杰英,李腾成,黄展森,等.腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术中保留睾丸动脉的手术技巧和临床疗效[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 42(4): 294-299.
[14]
Almekaty K, Zahran MH, Zoeir A, et al. The role of artery-preserving varicocelectomy in subfertile men with severe oligozoospermia: a randomized controlled study[J]. Andrology, 2019, 7(2): 193-198.
[15]
杨彬, 王浦, 李宏军,等. 腹腔镜下精索内脉管系统的解剖结构特点研究[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2016, 22(5): 406-410.
[16]
张金可, 邵为民, 陈涤平, 等. 显微镜下精索静脉结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的应用解剖[J].现代泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 23(9): 672-676.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?