切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 461 -465,475. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.05.007

临床研究

儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较
朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏†()   
  1. 541002　桂林，广西壮族自治区南溪山医院泌尿外科
    中国人民解放军第924医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-28 出版日期:2023-10-01
  • 通信作者: 廖松柏
  • 基金资助:
    桂林市科学研究与技术开发项目(20220139-13-2)

Comparison of surgery and renal artery embolization for high-grade blunt renal trauma in pediatric

Liangzhen Zhu, Yonggang Yu, Gao Chen, Songbai Liao†()   

  1. Department of Urology, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin 541002, China
    Department of Urology, The 924th Hospital of PLA, Guilin 541002, China
  • Received:2023-02-28 Published:2023-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Songbai Liao
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.

Liangzhen Zhu, Yonggang Yu, Gao Chen, Songbai Liao. Comparison of surgery and renal artery embolization for high-grade blunt renal trauma in pediatric[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.

目的

探讨高级别闭合性肾损伤患儿肾动脉栓塞相对于手术探查在肾功能保护方面的优势及两者的疗效对比。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月1日至2021年12月31日桂林地区两大三甲医院（广西壮族自治区南溪山医院、解放军第924医院）高级别闭合性肾损伤患儿的临床资料，并从中筛选出经保守治疗无效或血流动力学不稳定而接受了进一步干预的病例。经筛选，共44例满足条件，其中接受高选择性肾动脉栓塞的患儿共21例，为介入组（A组）；急诊手术探查（依据术中情况行肾修补术、肾部分切除术或切除患肾）共23例，为探查组（B组）。比较A、B两组住院费用、住院天数、止血成功率等术后临床数据。出院后1年复查肾动态显像，比较两组患肾肾小球滤过率。

结果

住院天数、止血成功率两组间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。与B组相比，A组疼痛更轻（P<0.05）、住院费用更低（P<0.05）、输血量更少（P<0.05），患肾肾小球滤过率值更高（P<0.05）。

结论

在儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤的治疗中，对于单纯保守治疗无效需要进一步止血干预的病例，高选择性肾动脉栓塞与手术探查相比，止血效率相当，而高选择性肾动脉栓塞疼痛轻、输血量少、住院费用低，且有利于远期肾功能保护，应作为优先选择。

关键词: 儿童, 肾损伤, 肾动脉栓塞, 手术探查
Objective

To compare the renal function protection and curative effect between surgical exploration and renal artery embolization in pediatric with high-grade closed renal trauma.

Methods

The data of patients hospitalized for Grade Ⅲ-Ⅴ blunt renal trauma in Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi and the 924th Hospital of PLA in Guilin from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients who failed to respond to conservative treatment or were hemodynamic unstable and received further intervention were selected. A total of 44 cases were enrolled. 21 patients were given highly selective renal artery embolization (RAE), named Group A. The other 23 cases received emergency surgical exploration, renal repair, partial nephrectomy or removal of the affected kidney, named Group B. The hospitalization expenses, days of hospitalization, glomerular filtration rate and other perioperative data were compared between A and B groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in the length of stay, and successful rate of hemostasis between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with group B, group A had less pain (P<0.05), lower hospitalization costs (P<0.05), less blood transfusion (P<0.05), and higher glomerular filtration rate of affected kidney (P<0.05).

Conclusions

In the treatment of children with high-grade closed renal injury, compared with surgical exploration, highly selective renal artery embolization has the same hemostatic efficiency, less pain, less blood transfusion, lower hospitalization costs, and is beneficial to the protection of long-term renal function, so it should be priority to surgical exploration.

Key words: Children, Renal trauma, Renal artery embolization, Surgical exploration
表1 介入栓塞（A组）与探查组（B组）儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤患者一般资料比较
组别 例数 性别(例) 年龄[岁，(±s)] 受伤原因(例) Wong-Baker疼痛评分[M(Q)] 肉眼血尿(例) 血红蛋白<10 g/dL(例) 收缩压<90 mmHg(例) 心率>120次/min(例) 血肿大小[cm，(±s)] 入院肌酐[μmol/L，(±s)]
男 女 交通事故 高处坠落 撞击
A组 21 13 8 8±4 13 3 5 7(6，8) 19 8 4 17 5.1±1.0 76±17
B组 23 16 7 9±3 16 3 4 7(6，8) 20 8 5 22 4.9±0.9 70±21
统计值   χ2=0.287 t=0.076 χ2=0.331 Z=0.012 χ2=0.135 χ2=0.052 χ2=0.049 χ2=1.122 t=0.605 t=1.113
P值   0.592 0.500 0.847 0.991 0.713 0.820 0.825 0.290 0.548 0.272
表2 介入栓塞（A组）与探查组（B组）儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤Ⅳ、Ⅴ级构成比和止血成功率比较(例)
  例数 Ⅳ、Ⅴ级构成比 止血成功率 合计成功率
Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅴ
A组 21 17 4 16/17 3/4 19/21
B组 23 18 5 18/18 4/5 22/23
χ2值   0.049 1.475 0.032 0.007
P值   1.000 0.224 0.858 0.935
表3 介入栓塞（A组）与探查组（B组）儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤治疗后数据比较
组别 例数 发热(例) 尿量[ml，(±s)] Wong-Baker疼痛评分[M(Q)] 血尿天数[d，(±s)] 输血量[ml，M(Q)] 抗生素使用时间[d，(±s)]
A组 21 3 1 523±312 6(4，8) 2.3±1.3 181(0，400) 3.4±1.2
B组 23 2 1 621±353 8(6，10) 1.4±0.8 435(400，600) 3.2±0.6
统计值   χ2=0.120 t=0.976 Z=2.669 t=3.053 Z=-3.800 t=0.738
P值   0.914 0.335 0.008 0.004 <0.001 0.464
组别 卧床时间[d，(±s)] 尿漏或尿性囊肿(例) 住院天数[d，(±s)] 住院花费[元，(±s)] 患肾滤过率(ml/min，(±s)]
A组 3.1±1.1 3 20±8 21 075±5 086 38±6
B组 3.1±1.2 3 18±7 33 629±4 748 27±15
统计值 t=0.024 χ2=0.014 t=0.462 t=6.248 t=2.144
P值 0.981 0.905 0.649 <0.001 0.043
[1]
Fernández-Ibieta M. Renal Trauma in Pediatrics: A Current Review[J]. Urology, 2018, 113: 171-178.
[2]
Wong KY, Jeeneea R, Healey A, et al. Management of pediatric high-grade blunt renal trauma: a 10-year single-centre UK experience[J]. BJU Int, 2018, 121(6): 923-927.
[3]
Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney[J]. J Trauma, 1989, 29(12): 1664-1666.
[4]
Smith TA, Eastaway A, Hartt D, et al. Endovascular embolization in renal trauma: a narrative review[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(14): 1198-1198.
[5]
Thirayan V, Kong VY, Elsabagh A, et al. High-grade renal trauma in children and adolescents can be successfully managed non-operatively[J]. S Afr J Surg, 2023, 61(1): 56-60.
[6]
Keihani S, Xu YZ, Angela P, et al. Contemporary management of high-grade renal trauma: results from the american association for the surgery of trauma genitourinary trauma study[J]. J Trauma Acute Care surg, 2018, 84(3): 418-425.
[7]
Loftus CJ, Hagedorn JC, Johnsen NV. Does routine repeat imaging for blunt high-grade renal trauma lead to unnecessary interventions? J Trauma Acute Care Surg[J]. 2021, 90(1): 143-147.
[8]
Redmond EJ, Darcie AK, Peter DM, et al. Contemporary management of pediatric high grade renal trauma: 10-year experience at a level 1 trauma centre[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2020, 16(5): 656.e1-656.e5.
[9]
Eassa W, El-Ghar MA, Jednak R, et al. Nonoperative management of grade 5 renal injury in children: does it have a place? [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 57(1): 154-163.
[10]
Liguori G, Rebez G, Larcher A, et al. The role of angioembolization in the management of blunt renal injuries: a systematic review[J]. BMC Urol, 2021, 21(1): 104.
[11]
Hakam N, Keihani S, Shaw NM, et al. Grade V renal trauma management: results from the multi-institutional genito-urinary trauma study[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(7): 1983-1989.
[12]
Deininger C, Freude T, Wichlas F, et al. On the black slope: analysis of the course of a blunt renal trauma collective in a winter sports region[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022, 48(3): 2125-2133.
[13]
Sarang B, Raykar N, Gadgil A, et al. Outcomes of Renal Trauma in Indian Urban Tertiary Healthcare Centres: A Multicentre Cohort Study[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(12): 3567-3574.
[14]
Sujenthiran A, Elshout PJ, Veskimae E, et al. Is nonoperative management the best first-line option for high-grade renal trauma? a systematic review[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2019, 5(2): 290-300.
[15]
Kitrey ND, Campos-Juanatey F, Hallscheidt P, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urological Trauma[EB/OL].[2023-03-20].

URL    
[16]
Marios H, Edmund G, Robert G, et al. Managing penetrating renal trauma: experience from two major trauma centres in the UK[J]. BJU international, 2018, 121(6): 928-934.
[17]
Hao X, Xu LM, Yu JL, et al. A comparative study of conservation, endovascular embolization therapy, and surgery for blunt renal trauma[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2020, 26: e922802.
[18]
Hakam N, Amend GM, Nabavizadeh B, et al. Utility and Outcome of Angioembolization for High-Grade Renal Trauma Management in a Large Hospital-Based Trauma Registry[J]. J Urol, 2022, 207(5): 1077-1085.
[19]
Aragona F, Pepe P, Patanè D. Management of severe blunt renal trauma in adult patients: a 10-year retrospective review from an emergency hospital[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(5): 744-748.
[20]
Chen J, Cai WC, Li LP. Profile of renal artery embolization (RAE) for renal trauma: A comparison of data from two major trauma center[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2020, 46(2): 194-202.
[21]
Salem MS, Urry RJ, Kong VY, et al. Traumatic renal injury Five-year experience at a major trauma centre in South Africa[J]. Injury, 2020, 51(1): 39-44.
[22]
Sarang B, Raykar N, Gadgil A, et al. Outcomes of renal trauma in indian urban tertiary healthcare centres: a multicentre cohort study[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(12): 3567-3574.
[23]
Khoschnau S, Jabbour G, Al-Hassani A, et al. Traumatic kidney injury: An observational descriptive study[J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104:148-155.
[24]
Locke JA, Neu S, Navaratnam R, et al. Management of high-grade renal traumas with collecting system injuries[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2021, 15(11): E588-E592.
[25]
Keihani S, Rogers DM, Putbrese BE, et al. The american association for the surgery of trauma renal injury grading scale: implications of the 2018 revisions for injury reclassification and predicting bleeding interventions[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020, 88(3): 357-365.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 韩圣瑾, 周正武, 翁云龙, 黄鑫. 碳酸氢钠林格液联合连续性肾脏替代疗法对创伤合并急性肾损伤患者炎症水平及肾功能的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 376-381.
[7] 张秋彬, 张楠, 林清婷, 徐军, 朱华栋, 姜辉. 急性胰腺炎合并急性肾损伤患者的预后评估[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 382-389.
[8] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 易成, 韦伟, 赵宇亮. 急性肾脏病的概念沿革[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 906-910.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号