切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 12 -18. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.01.003

临床研究

机器人腹腔镜后入路筋膜内和筋膜外根治性前列腺切除术技术分析
李腾成, 黄群雄, 胡成, 肖恒军, 徐锦斌, 高舜天, 黄展森, 高新, 狄金明()   
  1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
    510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院不育与性医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-21 出版日期:2024-02-01
  • 通信作者: 狄金明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82272840); 广东省自然科学基金(2021A1515010129)

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: intrafascial and extrafascial techniques

Tengcheng Li, Qunxiong Huang, Cheng Hu, Hengjun Xiao, Jinbin Xu, Shuntian Gao, Zhansen Huang, Xin Gao, Jinming Di()   

  1. Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
    Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2023-02-21 Published:2024-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinming Di
引用本文:

李腾成, 黄群雄, 胡成, 肖恒军, 徐锦斌, 高舜天, 黄展森, 高新, 狄金明. 机器人腹腔镜后入路筋膜内和筋膜外根治性前列腺切除术技术分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 12-18.

Tengcheng Li, Qunxiong Huang, Cheng Hu, Hengjun Xiao, Jinbin Xu, Shuntian Gao, Zhansen Huang, Xin Gao, Jinming Di. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: intrafascial and extrafascial techniques[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 12-18.

目的

探讨应用保留Retzius间隙机器人腹腔镜筋膜内和筋膜外根治性前列腺切除术(Rs-RARP)治疗局限性前列腺癌的策略选择和技术要领。

方法

2022年8月至2023年8月中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科由同一高年资术者完成的Rs-RARP术共30例,其中20例D'Amico风险分层中低危患者行完全筋膜内手术,10例高危患者行筋膜外手术。所有手术均利用达芬奇机器人系统完成。手术方法为首先建立机器人操作平台后显露道格拉斯窝,游离双侧输精管和精囊腺。筋膜内技术要领:在紧贴前列腺后方、侧方和前方分别钝性推开狄氏筋膜前层,离断侧韧带和Aphrodite面纱下方游离显露尿道;筋膜外技术要领:在前列腺后方、侧方和前方分别锐性剪开狄氏筋膜前层,离断侧韧带打开盆筋膜和Aphrodite面纱上方游离显露尿道。离断尿道完整切除前列腺后双针倒刺线连续吻合膀胱颈后尿道。

结果

30例患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放和转前入路,围手术期无严重并发症发生。完全筋膜内手术患者的手术时间、术中失血量、膀胱颈尿道吻合时间和导尿管留置时间比筋膜外手术患者的更短(P<0.05)。30例患者术后病理显示pT2 12例,pT3a 12例,pT3b 6例。完全筋膜内和筋膜外T3期患者中分别发现2例和1例手术切缘阳性;术后随访两组患者各有1例出现生化复发(PSA>0.2 ng/ml)。两组患者拔除导尿管后即刻控尿率55%和10%(P<0.05),1个月后控尿率80%和60%(P>0.05)。两组患者IEEF-5评分≥18术后1个月分别是20%和0,术后3个月分别是35%和20%。

结论

筋膜内与筋膜外Rs-RARP治疗局限性前列腺癌均安全可行,中低危患者可选择筋膜内技术,局部高危患者可选择筋膜外技术,近期随访控瘤、控尿和勃起功能恢复效果满意,远期效果需进一步随访。

Objective

To explore the intrafascial and extrafascial techniques of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (Rs-RARP) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Methods

From August 2022 to August 2023, 30 cases of Rs-RAPR were performed by the same senior surgeon in the Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 20 low and medium-risk patients with D'Amico risk stratification who underwent intrafascial surgery and 10 high-risk patients underwent extrafascial surgery. All surgeries were performed by the da Vinci robotic system. The surgical method was after establishing the robotic platform, the Douglas fossa was revealed, and then the vas deferens and seminal vesicles were freed. Intrafascial techniques: the urethra can be exposed after bluntly pushing away the anterior layer of denonvillier’s fascia close to the back of the prostate, dissecting the lateral ligament laterally, and mobilizing the front under the Aphrodite veil. Extrafascial techniques: cutting the anterior layer of Denonvillier’s fascia sharply behind the prostate, dissecting the lateral ligament laterally to open the pelvic fascia, and mobilizing above the Aphrodite veil to expose the urethra. Finally, the bladder neck and posterior urethra are continuously anastomosed with double-needle barbed sutures.

Results

All 30 patients with Rs-RARP were completed, there was no conversion to open and traditional surgery, and no serious complications occurred in the perioperative period. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bladder neck urethral anastomosis time and urinary catheter indwelling time were shorter in patients with complete intrafascial surgery than in patients with extrafascial surgery (P<0.05). The postoperative pathology of 30 patients showed pT2 12 cases, pT3a 12 cases, and pT3b 6 patients. 2 patients with intrafascial and extrafascial T3 stage were found to have positive surgical margins, respectively, and 1 patient in each group had biochemical recurrence (PSA>0.2 ng/ml). The urinary continence rates of the two groups were 55% and 10% immediately after removal of the catheter (P<0.05), and the continence rate after 1 month was 80% and 60% (P>0.05). The IEEF-5 scores of the two groups were 20% and 0% ≥18 months after surgery, and 35% and 20% in 3 months after surgery.

Conclusions

The treatment of localized prostate cancer with Rs-RARP is safe and feasible, and it is recommended to choose intrafascial technology for intermediate and low-risk Pca patients, and the extrafascial technique for local high-risk patients. The short-term follow-up effect of tumor control, urinary continuation, and erectile function recovery is satisfactory, and the long-term effect requires further follow-up.

表1 筋膜内和筋膜外Rs-RARP病例术前一般资料比较
图1 前列腺根治性切除术机器人腹腔镜后入路途径游离双侧精囊腺和精囊管  图2 后入路筋膜内和筋膜外技术要领  图3 后入路膀胱颈后尿道吻合技术要领注:1a为透过腹膜皱褶可见双侧输精管走行汇入到膀胱后壁;1b为在输精管皱褶上方1~2 cm处打开腹膜;1c为提起输精管钝性和锐性分离脂肪向深部膀胱后壁游离;1d为用Hem-o-lok夹闭精囊蒂血管后离断完整游离出右侧输精管和精囊腺;2a为紧贴前列腺后方向下推开Denonvillier筋膜前层可显露前列腺后方筋膜内层面;2b为完全筋膜内钝性加锐性游离前列腺侧面和前列腺前方Aphrodite面纱下层面至前列腺尖部,显露并离断尿道;2c为直肠表面锐性横行打开Denonvillier筋膜前层,向上推开Denonvillier筋膜前层可显露前列腺后方筋膜外层面;2d为筋膜外层面向上、向前联合钝性锐性分离前列腺侧面盆筋膜和前列腺前方Aphrodite面纱上层面至前列腺尖部,显露并离断尿道;3a为逆时针3点~7点位置开始连续缝合膀胱颈前唇黏膜与后尿道前唇黏膜;3b为3点~6点位置顺时针连续缝合膀胱颈后唇;3c为缝合完毕后膀胱内导尿管注水200 ml测漏;3d为术后12 d膀胱软镜检查膀胱颈后尿道吻合口;P为前列腺,DEF为输精管,D为直肠,SV为精囊腺,aDF为狄氏筋膜前层,U为尿道,pDF为狄氏筋膜后层,PEF为盆筋膜,BN为膀胱颈
表2 筋膜内和筋膜外Rs-RARP围手术期临床资料比较
[1]
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, et al. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 457-461.
[2]
Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥1 year of follow-up[J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 64(6): 974-980.
[3]
Nyarangi-Dix JN, Görtz M, Gradinarov G, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer[J]. BMC Urol, 2019, 19(1): 113-117.
[4]
Egan J, Marhamati S, Carvalho FLF, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy leads to durable improvement in urinary function and quality of life versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy without compromise on oncologic efficacy: single-surgeon series and step-by-step guide[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(6): 839-857.
[5]
Barakat B, Othman H, Gauger U, et al. Retzius sparing radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which technique is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients (MASTER study)? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol focus, 2022, 8(4): 1060-1071.
[6]
Deng W, Zhang C, Jiang H, et al. Transvesical versus posterior approach to retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective comparison with a 12-month follow-Up[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11:641887.
[7]
Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, et al. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 77(1): 38-52.
[8]
Zhu Y, Mo M, Wei Y, et al. Epidemiology and genomics of prostate cancer in Asian men[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2021, 18(5): 282-301.
[9]
Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: report of the advanced prostate cancer consensus conference 2019[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 77(4): 508-547.
[10]
Lancee M, Tikkinen KAO, De Reijke TM, et al. Guideline of guidelines: primary monotherapies for localised or locally advanced prostate cancer[J]. BJU Int, 2018, 122(4): 535-548.
[11]
Chung DY, Jung HD, Kim DK, et al. Outcomes of retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(5): e0268182.
[12]
Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, et al. Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the retzius sparing and standard approaches[J]. J Urol, 2018, 199(5): 1210-1217.
[13]
Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 57(2): 179-192.
[14]
Rosenberg JE, Jung JH, Edgerton Z, et al. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 8(8): CD013641.
[15]
Galfano A, Secco S, Bocciardi AM. Will retzius-sparing prostatectomy be the future of prostate cancer surgery?[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 72(5): 686-688.
[16]
Gao X, Pang J, Si-tu J, et al. Single-port transvesical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer: technique and outcomes.[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(7): 944-952.
[17]
江东根, 黄群雄, 庞俊, 等.单孔经膀胱腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术39例临床分析[J].中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(10): 751-754.
[18]
Wagaskar VG, Mittal A, Sobotka S, et al. Hood technique for robotic radical prostatectomy-preserving periurethral anatomical structures in the space of retzius and sparing the pouch of douglas, enabling early return of continence without compromising surgical margin rates.[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 80(2): 213-221.
[19]
李辉, 杨超, 汪凯红,等. 改良前入路保留Retzius间隙机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺筋膜内切除术应用10例的疗效[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 28(3): 201-205.
[20]
杨俊, 胡嘏, 管维, 等. Hood技术在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的应用及疗效分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(3): 176-180.
[21]
Bassett JC, Salibian S, Crivellaro S. Single-port retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility and early outcomes[J]. J Endourolo, 2022, 36(5): 620-625.
[22]
Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching[J]. Prostate, 2023, 83(8): 773-780.
[23]
郭飞, 刘久敏, 蒲小勇, 等. 后-前入路腹腔镜筋膜内前列腺癌根治术临床应用探讨[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50 (14): 2161-2163.
[24]
Elliott N, Pahouja G, Felice M, et al. Transition from standard robotic prostatectomy to retzius-sparing prostatectomy: feasibility and early outcomes[J]. J Robotic Surg, 2023, 17(5): 2035-2040.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[12] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[13] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[14] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[15] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要