| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Gu J, Luo S, Jiang L, et al. Novel scoring system combined with a virtual reality technique for the preoperative evaluation of the stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy: the H.L.P.E.S. score[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22(1): 161. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01108-2.
|
| [4] |
Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Hein S, et al. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10-20 mm[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(10): 1601-1605. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1489-4.
|
| [5] |
Zhong W, Zhu W, Zhao Z, et al. 7.5 F mini flexible ureteroscope in retrograde intrarenal surgery: initial results from a multicenter randomized clinical trial[J]. J Endourol, 2024, 38(5): 421-425. DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0540.
|
| [6] |
Manzo BO, Tejeda E, Chew BH, et al. Long-term passive ureteral dilatation with double-J stent: possibly an effective treatment for recurrent renal colic caused by papillary renal necrosis[J]. J Endourol Case Rep, 2020, 6(4): 526-529. DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0141.
|
| [7] |
Alenezi H, Denstedt JD. Flexible ureteroscopy: Technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis[J]. Asian J Urol, 2015, 2(3): 133-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.06.002.
|
| [8] |
Ripa F, Tokas T, Griffin S, et al. Role of pediatric ureteral access sheath and outcomes related to flexible ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation: a systematic review of literature[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2022, 45: 90-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012.
|
| [9] |
Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy in the new stone age: dust or bust?[J]. Front Surg, 2017, 4: 57. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00057.
|
| [10] |
Macejko A, Okotie OT, Zhao LC, et al. Computed tomography-determined stone-free rates for ureteroscopy of upper-tract stones[J]. J Endourol, 2009, 23(3): 379-382. DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0240.
|
| [11] |
De Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodríguez-Monsalve M, et al. Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: facts and myths[J]. BJU Int, 2018, 122(6): 959-969. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14389.
|
| [12] |
Zhang Z, Xie T, Li F, et al. Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(12): 3619-3627. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w.
|
| [13] |
Ding J, Su T, Zhang X, et al. Omnidirectional (flexible) ureteral access sheath: safety, efficacy, and initial experience report[J]. J Endourol, 2023, 37(11): 1184-1190. DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0358.
|
| [14] |
Liang H, Liang L, Lin Y, et al. Application of tip-bendable ureteral access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an initial experience of 224 cases[J]. BMC Urol, 2023, 23(1): 175. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01347-x.
|
| [15] |
Ostergar A, Wong D, Shiang A, et al. Intrarenal pressure with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheaths using an In situ cadaveric porcine model[J]. J Endourol, 2023, 37(3): 353-357. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0573.
|
| [16] |
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 801-810. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
|
| [17] |
Wawrysiuk S, Naber K, Rechberger T, et al. Prevention and treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in the era of increasing antimicrobial resistance-non-antibiotic approaches: a systemic review[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 300(4): 821-828. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05256-z.
|
| [18] |
Bhojani N, Koo KC, Bensaadi K, et al. Retrospective first-in-human use of the LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope to measure intrarenal pressure[J]. BJU Int, 2023, 132(6): 678-685. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16173.
|
| [19] |
Traxer O, Corrales M. Managing urolithiasis with thulium fiber laser: updated real-life results-a systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(15): 3390. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153390.
|
| [20] |
Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with holmium: YAG laser[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(8): 1883-1894. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5.
|
| [21] |
Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Comparison of holmium: YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects[J]. J Biomed Opt, 2011, 16(7): 071403. DOI: 10.1117/1.3564884.
|
| [22] |
Kronenberg P, Traxer O. The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2019, 8(Suppl 4): S398-S417. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.01.
|
| [23] |
Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, et al. Thulium fibre laser versus holmium: YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2022, 82(1): 73-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027.
|
| [24] |
Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Chinenov D, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in larger kidney stones. Could SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser change the game?[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2021, 74(2): 229-234. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0133.
|
| [25] |
Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS, et al. Flexible robotic retrograde renoscopy: description of novel robotic device and preliminary laboratory experience[J]. Urology, 2008, 72(1): 42-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.076.
|
| [26] |
Saglam R, Muslumanoglu AY, Tokatlı Z, et al. A new robot for flexible ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2b)[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(6): 1092-1100. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.047.
|