切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 352 -357. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2026.03.018

MDT精选病例

广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第29期)——膀胱癌保膀胱综合治疗后进展
朱东熙, 李锴文, 何旺()   
  1. 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-04 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 何旺
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82173266)

Multidisciplinary consultation on difficult cases in Guangdong Urological Association (Phase 29): progression of bladder cancer after bladder-preserving multimodal therapy

Dongxi Zhu, Kaiwen Li, Wang He()   

  1. Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2025-12-04 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wang He
引用本文:

朱东熙, 李锴文, 何旺. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第29期)——膀胱癌保膀胱综合治疗后进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 352-357.

Dongxi Zhu, Kaiwen Li, Wang He. Multidisciplinary consultation on difficult cases in Guangdong Urological Association (Phase 29): progression of bladder cancer after bladder-preserving multimodal therapy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 352-357.

本文报道一例膀胱癌保膀胱综合治疗后进展的病例。患者因"确诊膀胱癌并接受保膀胱综合治疗2年余"入院。患者2022年8月初诊时经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBt)病理提示高级别浸润性尿路上皮癌,伴部分腺性分化及固有肌层侵犯,Her-2(3+),PD-L1联合阳性分数≈10。患者基于强烈保膀胱意愿接受维迪西妥单抗联合特瑞普利单抗方案及多次TURBt治疗,用药6周期时出现免疫性药疹,同期TURBt显示部分尿路上皮重度不典型增生及癌变,但患者后续未积极配合治疗。2025年1月影像学提示膀胱后壁进展性病灶并多发盆腔/腹膜后淋巴结转移,同期TURBt病理示高级别乳头状尿路上皮癌,建议行根治性切除或系统化疗,患者再次拒绝。2025年4月PET-CT示左侧髂总血管旁及髂内外血管旁多发肿大淋巴结代谢高度活跃。行机器人辅助下根治性膀胱切除术联合盆腔淋巴结清扫及回肠通道术,术后病理示膀胱尿路上皮癌浸润固有层,左盆腔淋巴结可见癌(ypT1N3M0),并基于靶向二代测序检出TP53等关键基因突变。经广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊,专家认为患者属高危人群,推荐术后化疗+免疫治疗+放疗为核心的多模式治疗。患者因既往免疫相关皮疹未予免疫巩固,改行同步放化疗并吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗巩固,目前随访病情稳定。本病例提示:保膀胱治疗失败后淋巴结阳性患者需根治性膀胱切除+术后辅助治疗;早期进展识别需结合影像学形态学标准与分子诊断,以优化个体化管理和改善长期预后。

This article reports a case of progression after bladder-preserving multimodal therapy. A 47-year-old man was admitted with a 2-year history of bladder-preserving treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt) in August 2022 revealed high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation and invasion of the lamina propria, with immunohistochemistry showing Her-2 (3+) and PD-L1 combined positive score≈10. Owing to his strong preference for bladder preservation, the patient received combination therapy with disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab and underwent repeated TURBt, achieving temporary disease stabilization. In January 2025, imaging studies revealed a progressive lesion in the posterior wall of the urinary bladder with multiple pelvic/retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. Concurrently, pathology results from TURBt confirmed high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Radical resection or systemic chemotherapy was recommended, but the patient refused again. In April 2025, further PET-CT demonstrated multiple enlarged lymph nodes with highly active metabolism adjacent to the left common iliac vessels and internal/external iliac vessels. And then, the patient underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and ileal conduit. Pathology revealed urothelial carcinoma with lamina propria invasion and lymph node metastases (ypT1N3M0). Next-generation sequencing identified pathogenic mutations in TP53, EP300, KMT2A, and TERT. Multidisciplinary team discussion concluded that this patient represents a high-risk subgroup requiring multimodal systemic therapy. Given prior immune-related rash, adjuvant immunotherapy was withheld, and the patient instead received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, followed by consolidation chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, achieving stable disease on follow-up. This case highlights that bladder-preserving strategies failing with nodal metastasis warrant salvage radical cystectomy combined with systemic therapy. Early recognition of nodal metastases requires not only conventional imaging size criteria but also morphologic features and integration of molecular diagnostics, which may improve individualized management and long-term outcomes.

视频1 膀胱癌患者保膀胱治疗前后MRI影像
图1 膀胱癌患者保膀胱治疗前后影像学结果对比注:a~b示2022年(患者入院时)盆腔MR见膀胱壁不均匀增厚及盆腔内多发稍大淋巴结(6 mm) ;c~d示2025年1月(保膀胱治疗后)盆腔MR见膀胱后壁不均匀增厚并出现异常强化,伴盆腔多发肿大淋巴结(最大约31 mm×29 mm) ;e~f示2025年4月(保膀胱治疗后)PET-CT见左侧髂总血管旁及髂内外血管旁多发肿大淋巴结代谢显著活跃(SUVmax 17.3~19.0);箭头示病灶
图2 膀胱癌患者保膀胱治疗前后及挽救性膀胱切除术后病理结果注:a~b示2022年9月(患者入院时)TURBt术后病理,左侧瘢痕基底部见少数尿路上皮重度不典型增生及癌变;c~d示2023年4月,靶免治疗6周期后TURBt术后病理,膀胱三角区左侧黏膜见部分尿路上皮不典型增生及癌变,间质纤维组织增生伴钙化;e示行挽救性膀胱切除术后左盆腔淋巴结病理,转移性尿路上皮癌;f为行挽救性膀胱切除术后大体标本病理,示膀胱尿路上皮癌浸润固有层(HE染色×100)
图3 膀胱癌患者全流程诊疗时间轴
[1]
Ditonno F, Veccia A, Montanaro F, et al. Trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. BJU Int, 2024, 134(5): 684-695. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16366.
[2]
Gupta S, Hensley PJ, Li R, et al. Bladder preservation strategies in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: recommendations from the international bladder cancer group[J]. Eur Urol, 2026, 89(1): 18-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.017.
[3]
Weickhardt A, Foroudi F, Lawrentschuk N, et al. Pembrolizumab with chemoradiation as treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: analysis of safety and efficacy of the PCR-MIB phase 2 clinical trial (ANZUP 1502)[J]. Eur Urol Oncol, 2024, 7(3): 469-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.011.
[4]
Wen F, Lin T, Zhang P, et al. RC48-ADC combined with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: a multi-center phase Ib/II study (HOPE-03)[J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 13: 1233196. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1233196.
[5]
Li K, Zhong W, Fan J, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab in persons with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial[J]. Nat Cancer, 2024, 5(10): 1465-1478. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00822-0.
[6]
Shankar PR, Barkmeier D, Hadjiiski L, et al. A pictorial review of bladder cancer nodal metastases[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2018, 7(5): 804-813. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.25.
[7]
Powles T, Catto JWF, Galsky MD, et al. Perioperative durvalumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable bladder cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2024, 391(19): 1773-1786. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2408154.
[8]
Powles T, Assaf ZJ, Degaonkar V, et al. Updated overall survival by circulating tumor DNA status from the phase 3 IMvigor010 trial: adjuvant atezolizumab versus observation in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma[J]. Eur Urol, 2024, 85(2): 114-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.007.
[9]
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, et al. Incidence and outcome of salvage cystectomy after bladder sparing therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(6): 1757-1768. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03436-0.
[10]
Leissner J, Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H, et al. Extended radical lymphadenectomy in patients with urothelial bladder cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. J Urol, 2004, 171(1): 139-144. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000102302.26806.fb.
[11]
Gakis G. Re: extended versus limited lymph node dissection in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 76(1): 126. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.034.
[12]
Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Rajagopal PS, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a 2013 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(1): 42-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.033.
[13]
Mak RH, Hunt D, Shipley WU, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after selective bladder-preserving combined-modality therapy: a pooled analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols 8802, 8903, 9506, 9706, 9906, and 0233[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(34): 3801-3809. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.5548.
[14]
Zaghloul MS, Christodouleas JP, Smith A, et al. Adjuvant sandwich chemotherapy plus radiotherapy vs adjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer after radical cystectomy: a randomized phase 2 trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2018, 153(1): e174591. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4591.
[15]
Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 384(22): 2102-2114. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034442.
[1] 莫遵玉, 赖莉萍, 李水平, 葛肖艳. 基于多种超声参数构建乳腺癌高负荷腋窝淋巴结转移的预测模型[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 82-90.
[2] 深圳市医学会乳腺病学分会, 深圳市医学会肿瘤学分会, 深圳市医师协会乳腺专科医师分会, 深圳市健康管理协会乳房健康与康复管理专业委员会, 深圳市抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 深圳市抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会, 深圳市中西医结合学会甲状腺乳腺病专业委员会. 乳腺癌新辅助治疗的疗效预测和疗效评价专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 321-330.
[3] 王天艺, 李筝, 许锐. 激素受体阳性/HER-2阴性早期乳腺癌的新辅助治疗[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 352-357.
[4] 刘建勇, 江艺. 免疫检查点抑制剂新辅助治疗在肝细胞癌肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 127-132.
[5] 徐世伟, 廖杜荣, 张镐, 叶辉, 陈志平, 雒洪志. 基于一种新炎症-营养指标构建结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 383-389.
[6] 高加勒, 张忠涛. 结直肠癌外科领域最新进展与热点[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 595-599.
[7] 钱龙, 蔡大明, 王行舟, 艾世超, 胡琼源, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王峰, 王萌, 陆晓峰, 朱欢欢, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 局部不可切除胃癌转化治疗(联合免疫治疗)后淋巴结转移的相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 624-627.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝癌肝移植术后防治复发转移中国专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 385-397.
[9] 张俊峰, 牛越, 陈鹏. 局部进展期肾细胞癌新辅助和辅助治疗策略的现实挑战与未来发展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-254.
[10] 田超, 黄若曦, 蒋茂林, 谢崇伟, 刁鹏飞, 钟苏权, 陈东, 王航涛, 陈桂柳, 陈虞娟, 李国良. 不同亚型前列腺癌新辅助化疗后盆腔淋巴结转移的风险因素及时间分布[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 727-735.
[11] 黄少坚, 梁汉标, 李清平, 唐善华, 李青妍, 李芷西, 黄灿, 王小振, 陈灿辉, 王恺, 李川江. 基于影像组学和临床特征构建肝癌新辅助/转化治疗后病理学完全缓解预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 860-867.
[12] 张钧, 梁宗康, 高天, 闫泽宇, 王刚, 高鹏, 何显力. SEMS植入后序贯新辅助治疗与腹腔镜手术在梗阻性结直肠癌中的应用效果对比:一项倾向评分匹配研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 160-167.
[13] 常莉娜, 刘囡囡. DWI联合DCE-MRI定量参数对局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 125-129.
[14] 胡斌, 柳林. 食管癌新辅助治疗后CT影像特征变化与术后病理完全缓解率的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 627-634.
[15] 《中华胸部外科电子杂志》编辑部. 达芬奇菁英术者系列线上研讨会第二期:新辅助免疫治疗后机器人肺外科专题[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 91-94.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?