切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 53 -56. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.01.014

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

临床研究

R.E.N.A.L.评分系统在经腹腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗T1a期肾肿瘤中的应用
郝强1, 薛芃1, 宗焕涛1, 张勇1,()   
  1. 1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-17 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 张勇

Application of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in renal tumor of T1a stage

Qiang Hao1, Peng Xue1, Huantao Zong1, Yong Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2016-12-17 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yong Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yong, Email:
引用本文:

郝强, 薛芃, 宗焕涛, 张勇. R.E.N.A.L.评分系统在经腹腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗T1a期肾肿瘤中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 53-56.

Qiang Hao, Peng Xue, Huantao Zong, Yong Zhang. Application of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in renal tumor of T1a stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 53-56.

目的

探讨肾脏肿瘤测量评分系统(R.E.N.A.L.评分系统)在T1a期肾肿瘤行经腹入路腹腔镜肾部分切除术(TLPN)中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2010年7月至2016年10月首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院泌尿外科67例行TLPN的T1a期肾肿瘤患者的临床资料,其中男52例(78%),女15例(22%),年龄26~75岁,平均(56±13)岁。肿瘤平均直径(2.5±0.8)cm,其中左侧32例(48%),右侧35例(52%);应用R.E.N.A.L.评分系统对肾脏肿瘤进行量化评分。比较低、中与高评分组在肿瘤最大径、热缺血时间、术中出血量、手术时间、术前术后肌酐及住院天数等临床指标的差异。

结果

67例患者均顺利完成TLPN,无中转开放及死亡病例。平均R.E.N.A.L.评分为(6.3±1.7)分,其中低评分组有37例(55%),中评分组有24例(36%),高评分组有6例(9%),低、中与高评分组肿瘤最大直径差异有统计学意义(F=5.230,P=0.008),热缺血时间、术中出血量、手术时间、术前术后肌酐及住院天数差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

使用R.E.N.A.L.评分系统评估TLPN治疗T1a期肾肿瘤手术风险及手术难易程度的价值有限,临床应用需慎重。

Objective

To evaluate R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (TLPN).

Methods

Between July 2010 and October 2016, 67 cases (52 males and 15 females) underwent TLPN. Mean age was (56±13) years, mean tumor size was (2.5 ± 0.8) cm in diameter, 32 cases (48%) on the left side and 35 cases (52%) on the right side. R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were evaluated in tumor size, warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, preoperative and postoperative creatinine and hospitalization days.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were successfully completed TLPN, no conversion to open surgery and deaths. Mean R.E.N.A.L.score was (6.3± 1.7). 37 cases(55%), 24 cases(36%) and 6 cases(9%) were enrolled in low, moderate and high score group, respectively. There were significant differences between patients of different R.E.N.A.L.score groups in tumor size (F=5.230, P=0.008). There was no difference in warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, preoperative and postoperative creatinine and hospitalization days (P>0.05).

Conclusions

In patients with T1a kidney tumor undergoing TLPN, the value of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score is limited in clinical application.

表1 R.E.N.A.L.肾肿瘤评分系统
表2 67例患者的临床资料[,MQ)]
[1]
Russo P, HuangW. The medical and oncological rationale for partial nephrectomy for the treatment of T1 renal cortical tumors[J]. UrolClin North Am, 2008, 35(4):635-643.
[2]
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M]. 7th ed. New York: Springer Verlag, 2009, 547-560.
[3]
Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma:the 2014 update[J].Eur Urol, 2015,67(5):913-924.
[4]
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score:a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3):844-853.
[5]
Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, et a1. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial ease report for benign disease[J]. J Endo Urol, 1993, 7(6):521-526.
[6]
Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 49(4):660-665.
[7]
张宇,刘东,胡岚亭,等. 后腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗局限性肾癌的疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(1):9-12.
[8]
Ren T, Liu Y, Zhao X, et al.Transperitoneal approach versus retroperitoneal approach: a meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3):e91978.
[9]
王东文, 张旭辉. 腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术的适应证及技术新进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(6):1-3.
[10]
Chapin BF, WoodCG. The RENAL nephrometry nomogram: statistically significant, but is it clinically relevant?[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60(2):249-251.
[11]
Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy[J].J Urol, 2011,186(1):42-46.
[12]
Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatmentdecision-making of the enhancing renal mass[J]. Urology, 2011, 78(5):1089-1094.
[13]
Bruner B, Breau RH, Lohse CM, et al. Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(1):67-72.
[14]
方咏, 王道虎, 罗俊航, 等. R.E.N.A.L.评分系统在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用研究[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(1):40-43.
[15]
张中元, 唐琦, 李学松, 等. R.E.N.A.L.肾肿瘤评分系统用于肾部分切除术的临床分析[J].北京大学学报:医学版, 2012, 44(4):539-543.
[16]
Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, et al. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(6):876-881.
[17]
Mufarrij PW, Krane LS, Rajamahanty S, et al. Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25(10):1649-1653.
[18]
Bruner B, Breau RH, Lohse CM, et al. Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(1):67-72.
[19]
Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, et al. Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(6):2363-2368.
[20]
张东旭, 滕竞飞, 李勋钢, 等. 腹腔镜下肾部分切除术在R.E.N.A.L.评分为中度复杂性肾癌中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2012, 27(10):737-740.
[21]
Liu ZW, Olweny EO, Yin G, et al. Prediction of perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy:role of the R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry score[J]. World J Urol, 2013, 31(5):1183-1189.
[22]
Okhunov Z, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, et a1. The comparison of three reilal tumor scoring systems: C-Index, P.A.D.U.A., and R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry scores[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25(12):1921-1924.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[13] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[14] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要