切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 128 -131. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.02.014

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

三种精索静脉高位结扎术治疗儿童精索静脉曲张的疗效分析
谢起根1, 苏诚1, 徐哲1, 钟志海1, 高鹏飞1, 周李1, 李作青1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院小儿外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-05 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李作青

Analysis of clinical effect of three different approaches of varicocelectomy in treatment of varicocele

Qigen Xie1, Cheng Su1, Zhe Xu1, Zhihai Zhong1, Pengfei Gao1, Li Zhou1, Zuoqing Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2018-02-05 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zuoqing Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Zuoqing, Email:
引用本文:

谢起根, 苏诚, 徐哲, 钟志海, 高鹏飞, 周李, 李作青. 三种精索静脉高位结扎术治疗儿童精索静脉曲张的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 128-131.

Qigen Xie, Cheng Su, Zhe Xu, Zhihai Zhong, Pengfei Gao, Li Zhou, Zuoqing Li. Analysis of clinical effect of three different approaches of varicocelectomy in treatment of varicocele[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 128-131.

目的

探讨经腹腔、腹膜后、腹股沟三种不同精索静脉结扎手术对儿童精索静脉曲张疗效的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2009年至2017年单中心收治的97例行精索静脉高位结扎手术患儿(0~14岁)的临床资料,并对其随访。根据精索静脉结扎的手术方式分为A组(腹腔镜下精索静脉高位结扎术,30例)、B组(腹膜后高选择性精索静脉高位结扎术,38例)、C组(腹股沟高选择性精索静脉高位结扎术,29例),比较三组患儿手术时间、出血量、术后住院天数、阴囊水肿、睾丸鞘膜积液、复发、睾丸萎缩、阴囊不适改善情况的差别。

结果

A组平均手术时间(63±4)min长于B组(36±2)min,(P<0.001)和C组(45±4)min,(P=0.002)。A组术后平均住院时间(2.40±0.18) d高于B组(1.04±0.18)d,(P<0.001)和C组(1.28±0.22)d,(P<0.001)。三组患者术后均未出现睾丸萎缩。A组阴囊水肿发生率高于C组(χ2=6.15,P=0.015),A组鞘膜积液发生率高于B组(χ2=4.76,P=0.034)和C组(χ2=7.67,P=0.006)。三组复发率、阴囊不适改善率比较差异均无统计学意义。

结论

腹股沟精索高选择性静脉结扎术操作简单、创伤小、恢复快、并发症发生率低。腹腔镜下精索静脉结扎术需注意保护淋巴管,以减少阴囊水肿和鞘膜积液的发生。

Objective

To access the clinical effect of different approaches of varicocelectomy (laparoscopic palomo, microsurgical palomo and microsurgical ivinissaich) in treatment of children varicocele.

Method

Data of 97 children (0-14 years old) who underwent varicocelectomy in a single center during 2009 to 2017 were retrospectively analysed and the patients were followed-up. According to the approach of varicocelectomy, the patients were divided into group A (laparoscopic Palomo, 30 cases), group B (Palomo with magnifying glass, 38 cases) and group C (Ivinissaich with magnifying glas, 29 cases). Operation time, blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), rates of scrotal edema, hydrocele, recurrence, orchiatrophy and scrotum discomfort improvement were compared between the three groups.

Results

The average operation time of group A (63±4) min was longer than group B (36±2) min, (P<0.001) and group C (45±4) min, (P=3.54). The average postoperative LOS of group A (2.40±0.18) d was higher than group B (1.04±0.18) d, (P<1.04) and group C (1.28±0.22) d, (P<0.001). No orchiatrophy occurred in the three groups. Scrotal edema rate of Group A was higher than group C (χ2=6.15, P=6.15). Hydrocele rate of group A was higher than group B (χ2=4.76, P=4.76) and group C (χ2=7.67, P=7.67). There were no statistical differences in terms of rates of recurrence and scrotum discomfort improvement between the three groups.

Conclusions

Palomo varicocelectomy has advantages of less-injury, quick recovery and low complication incidence. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy should protect lymphatic vessels to reduce hydrocele.

表1 三组患者术前基本资料的比较
表2 三组患者术后并发症发生率及阴囊不适改善率的比较
[1]
Samplaski MK,Lo KC,Grober ED, et al. Varicocelectomy to "upgrade" semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 108(4): 609-612.
[2]
Kohn TP,Kohn JR,Pastuszak AW. Varicocelectomy before assisted reproductive technology: are outcomes improved?[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 108(3): 385-391.
[3]
Locke JA,Noparast M,Afshar K. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2017, 13(5): 437-445.
[4]
de Los Reyes T,Locke J,Afshar K. Varicoceles in the pediatric population: Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2017, 11 (1-2Suppl1): S34-S39.
[5]
Sack BS,Schäfer M,Kurtz MP. The Dilemma of Adolescent Varicoceles: Do They Really Have to Be Repaired?[J]. Curr Urol Rep,2017, 18(5): 38.
[6]
Moursy EE,ElDahshoury MZ,Hussein MM, et al. Dilemma of adolescent varicocele: long-term outcome in patients managed surgically and in patients managed expectantly[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2013, 9(6): 1018-1822.
[7]
司徒杰,邱剑光,蒲小勇,等. 精索静脉曲张与左肾静脉压迫综合征相互关系的研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,4(5): 414-417.
[8]
He Y,Wu Z,Chen S, et al. Nutcracker syndrome-how well do we know it?[J] Urology, 2014, 83(1): 12-17.
[9]
唐庆来,戴玉田. 睾丸微石症的临床研究进展[J]. 中华男科学杂志,2017,23(8): 734-738.
[10]
聂欢,高强利,阮安明. 睾丸微石症合并精索静脉曲张36例分析[J]. 中国性科学,2017,26(10): 5-8.
[11]
Pogorelić Z,Sopta M,Jukić M, et al. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy using polymeric ligating clips and its effect on semen parameters in pediatric population with symptomatic varicocele: a 5-year single surgeon experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(12): 1318-1325.
[12]
Esposito C,Escolino M,Castagnetti M, et al. Two decades of experience with laparoscopicvaricocele repair in children: standardizing the technique[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2018, 14(1): 10.e1-10.e7.
[13]
Hosseini K,Nejatifar M,Kabir A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of palomo, ivanissevich and laparoscopic varicocelectomy in iranian infertile men with palpable varicocele[J]. Int J Fertil Steril, 2018, 12(1): 81-87.
[14]
Gómez Beltrán O,Garrido Pérez JI,García Ceballos A, et al. Open surgery, laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy and embolization in children with varicocele[J]. Cir Pediatr, 2013, 26(1): 9-12.
[15]
Chiarenza SF,DAgostino S,Scarpa MG, et al. Lymphography prior to laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy to prevent postoperative hydrocele[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2006, 16(4): 394-396.
[16]
Tatem AJ,Brannigan RE. The role of microsurgical varicocelectomy in treating male infertility[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2017, 6(4): 722-729.
[17]
Sangrasi AK,Leghari AA,Memon A, et al. Laparoscopic versus inguinal (Ivanissevich) varicocelectomy[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2010, 20(2): 106-111.
[18]
Bryniarski P,Taborowski P,Rajwa P, et al. The comparison of laparoscopic and microsurgical varicocoelectomy in infertile men with varicocoele on paternity rate 12 months after surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Andrology, 2017, 5(3): 445-450.
[19]
Feber KM,Kass EJ. Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: long-term experience with the Palomo procedure[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(4Suppl): 1657-1659.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[7] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[8] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[9] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[10] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[11] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[12] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[13] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[14] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[15] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
阅读次数
全文


摘要