切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 325 -328. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.05.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术
顾绍栋1, 王瑛珣1, 陆如纲2,(), 罗洪1, 许祥飞1, 李鑫1   
  1. 1. 222061 江苏,连云港市第一人民医院小儿外科
    2. 210008 南京医科大学附属儿童医院小儿泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-02 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 陆如纲

Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty with double-line suspension

Shaodong Gu1, Yingxun Wang1, Rugang Lu2,(), Hong Luo1, Xiangfei Xu1, xin Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222061, China
    2. Department of Pediatric Urology Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu 21008, China
  • Received:2018-12-02 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Rugang Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Rugang, Email:
引用本文:

顾绍栋, 王瑛珣, 陆如纲, 罗洪, 许祥飞, 李鑫. 双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 325-328.

Shaodong Gu, Yingxun Wang, Rugang Lu, Hong Luo, Xiangfei Xu, xin Li. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty with double-line suspension[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 325-328.

目的

探讨双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术的临床价值。

方法

2016年9月至2018年11月在连云港市第一人民医院采取双线悬吊法经腹腔入路腹腔镜下肾盂成形术患者22例,其中男19例,女3例。年龄4个月~14岁,平均年龄(5.3±2.7)岁。左侧20例,右侧1例,双侧1例,共23侧。右侧经结肠肝曲系膜缘打开侧腹膜入路,左侧经结肠系膜入路,在术中将输尿管和肾盂切口的两端用双线悬吊于腹壁,以便于缝合,用5-0可吸收线行Anderson-Hynes肾盂输尿管成形术,并从吻合口留置双J管,术后结合超声检查随访。

结果

22例顺利完成手术,无中转开腹手术者。手术时间90~260 min,单侧平均(137±55)min。术中失血5~20 ml。平均住院时间7 d。术后1例因返流反复发热,在拔出双J管后症状消失,1例发生尿外渗,保留腹腔引流3 d后自愈。术后随访6~25个月,患儿临床症状消失,复查超声提示肾积水消失或减少,肾皮质逐渐增厚。

结论

双线悬吊法经腹腹腔镜下肾盂成形术是一种安全、有效、容易学习的手术方法。

Objective

To explore the clinical value of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty with double-line suspension.

Methods

Twenty-two pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty with double-line suspension from September 2016 to November 2018 in the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang. Among them, 19 males and 3 females aged from 4 months to 14 years with average of (5.3±2.7) years. Twenty patients had obstruction on the left ureteropelvic junction and one on the right, and one bilateral, twenty-three laterals in total. The right side UPJO were exposured via open the side peritoneum of colon. The left side UPJO were exposured via open mesentery. During the operation, two line were sutured to the ends of the ureter and renal pelvis hunging to the abdominal wall to make anastomotic suturing more easily. The renal pelvis and ureter were anastomosed using 5-0 absorbable sutures anda double-J ureteric stent was placed through the anastomotic stoma. Patients were followed-up by ultrasound.

Results

All operations were successful. None was converted to open surgery. The operative time was 90-260 min, The mean operative time was (137±55) min. The blood loss was 5-20 ml. The median duration of hospitalization was 7 days. One case had a fever due to reflux, the symptom disappeared after removal of the double J stent one month later. One case appeared urinary ofextravasation, which naturally disappeared after three days drainage. With 6 to 25 months of follow-up, the clinical symptomsdisappeared and the hydronephrosis gradually improved.

Conclusion

Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty with double-line suspension is not only safe and effective but also a easy-to-learn surgical method.

图1 双线悬吊法肾孟成形术的示意图及手术图,a双线悬吊的位置示意图,b双线悬吊肾盂输尿管,c离断肾盂,d劈开输尿管,e吻合肾盂输尿管后半部分,f剪断带有狭窄段的肾盂输尿管连接部,g在气腹针引导下置入双J管,h吻合肾盂输尿管的前半部分
图2 学习曲线描述:每例患者手术所需要的时间变化
[1]
Klein J, Gonzalez J, Miravete M. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: human disease and animal models[J]. Int J Exp Pathol, 2011, 92(3): 168-192.
[2]
Anderson KR, Weiss RM. Physiology and evaluation of ureteropelvic junction obstruction[J]. J Endourol 1996, 10(2):87-91.
[3]
Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation[J]. Br J Urol 1949, 21(3): 209-214
[4]
刘超,闫动,张蕾, 等. 腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗婴幼儿输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻性肾积水[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 13-16.
[5]
Calvert RC, Morsy MM, Zelhof B, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction[J]. Surg Endosc 2008, 22(2): 411-414.
[6]
Martin H, Theodoros T, Herrmann Thomas RW. Laparoscopic singleincision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS)pyeloplasty: a description of the frst 32 cases[J].W J Urol, 2018, 36: 1883-1888.
[7]
Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty[J]. J Urol, 1993, 150(6): 1795-1799.
[8]
Tan HL Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children[J]. J Urol,1999, 162(3): 1045-1048.
[9]
El-Ghoneimi A, Farhat W, Bolduc S, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children[J]. BJU Int, 2003, 92(1): 104.
[10]
Reddy M, Nerli RB, Bashetty R, et al.Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children[J]. J Urol 2005, 174(2):700-702.
[11]
Gadelmoula M, Abdel-Kader MS, Shalaby M. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: a multi-institutional prospective study[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2018, 71(3): 342-345.
[12]
Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J]. World J Urol 2008, 26(6): 539-547
[13]
Singh O1, Gupta SS. Arvind NK.Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: an analysis of first 100 cases and important lessons learned[J].Int Urol Nephrol, 2011; 43(1): 85-90.
[14]
Jacobson DL, Shannon R, Johnson EK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: an updated series[J]. J Urol, 2019, 201(5): 1005-1011.
[15]
Boysen WR, Gundeti MS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2017, 33(9): 925-935.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?