切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 642 -646. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.06.018

实验研究

EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究
刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰()   
  1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科
    518100 广东,深圳市精锋医疗科技股份有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-17 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 许可慰
  • 基金资助:
    广东省重点领域研发计划"高端医疗器械"重点专项(2020B111114002)

Feasibility study of EDGE SP1000 single hole surgical robot assisted laparoscopic partial ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis in pigs

Cheng Liu, Cong Lai, Jian Huang, Jianchen Wang, Xiyun Luo, Kewei Xu()   

  1. Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    Shenzhen Jingfeng Medical Technology Co., LTD., Guangdong 518100, China
  • Received:2023-10-17 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Kewei Xu
引用本文:

刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.

Cheng Liu, Cong Lai, Jian Huang, Jianchen Wang, Xiyun Luo, Kewei Xu. Feasibility study of EDGE SP1000 single hole surgical robot assisted laparoscopic partial ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis in pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.

目的

利用活体猪模型评估EDGE SP1000单孔机器人辅助腹腔镜输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的安全性和可行性。

方法

利用EDGE SP1000单孔机器人手术系统开展腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术。监测手术过程中猪的生命体征,记录手术困难点和并发症,观察术后2周猪的存活情况。

结果

所有猪均存活至术后两周,手术过程中未出现并发症,也未遇到技术困难。5头猪建立手术通道的平均时间为(15.0±1.2)min,安装EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人系统时间为(5.6±0.6) min,输尿管部分切除时间为(8.8±1.3) min,输尿管端端吻合时间为(39.2±2.3) min,总手术时间为(89±5) min,术中出血量为(1.20±0.24)mL。使用该手术系统的外科医师和助手均对系统的工作给予了高度评价。

结论

本研究证实EDGE SP1000单孔机器人手术系统用于猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术是安全可行的。下一步拟开展EDGE SP1000系统在其他外科手术中的安全性和有效性评价,提供更多可靠的临床前数据支撑。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the EDGE SP1000 single-port surgical robot for laparoscopic partial ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis in a live pig model.

Methods

The EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic surgical system was used to perform laparoscopic partial ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis in pigs. Vital signs of the pigs were monitored during the surgery, and surgical difficulties and complications were recorded. The survival of the pigs was observed for two weeks post-operatively.

Results

All pigs survived for two weeks after the surgery, with no surgical complications or technical difficulties encountered during the procedure. The average time for establishing the surgical access in five pigs was (15.0±1.2) min, while the installation time for the EDGE SP1000 single-port surgical robot system was also (5.6±0.6) min. The time for ureterectomy was (8.8±1.3) min, the time for end-to-end anastomosis of the ureter was (39.2±2.3) min, and the total surgical time was (89±5) min, and intraoperative blood loss was (1.20±0.24) mL. The surgical team highly praised the performance of the surgical system.

Conclusion

This study confirms that the EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic surgical system is safe and feasible for laparoscopic partial ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis in pigs. The next step is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the EDGE SP1000 system in other surgical procedures, providing more reliable preclinical data support.

图1  EDGE SP1000单孔机器人手术系统(医师主控台、手术机械臂推车和三维高清影像系统)
图2 输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合手术中机器人外景  图3 输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合手术关键步骤  图4 输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术缝合后切口注:图2a为套管位置示意(A为助手孔位置,C为单孔套管位置,T为左侧肋腰角位置);2b为安装单孔腔镜保护套;2c为单孔机器人术中套管位置外景;2d为单孔机器人术中操作外景。图3a为打开腹膜,进入腹膜后间隙;3b为游离并显露输尿管;3c为吻合好后壁,置入双J管;3d为输尿管端端吻合结束
[1]
Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Elbeery JE, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da vinci surgical system[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2000, 120(6): 1171-1172.
[2]
罗建伟,曾剑锋. 液体加温护理在老年患者机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中的研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 5(19): 614-618.
[3]
Zhong W, Xia K, Liu L, et al. Long-term survival after female pelvic organ-sparing radical cystectomy versus standard radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2023, 109(9):2742-2750.
[4]
Pakkasjarvi N, Krishnan N, Ripatti L, et al. Learning curves in pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(23):6935.
[5]
Khajeh E, Aminizadeh E, Dooghaie MA, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer compared with open and laparoscopic surgery[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2023, 15(3): 839.
[6]
刘存东,周冉冉,包继明. 单孔腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科的应用进展及展望[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 01(37): 1-5.
[7]
Xie W, Cao D, Yang J, et al. Single-port vs multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23(7): 1049-1056.
[8]
Stein H, Kang SW, Heo SY, et al. Remote-access thyroidectomy with the da Vinci SP system: feasibility in a cadaveric model[J]. Front Surg, 2023, 10:1196021.
[9]
Agarwal DK, Hebert KJ, Gettman MT, et al. How to perform a robotic pyeloplasty utilizing the da Vinci SP platform: tips and tricks[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(2): 919-924.
[10]
Khalil MI, Chase A, Joseph JV, et al. Standard multiport vs single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a single-center initial experience[J]. J Endourol, 2022, 36(8): 1057-1062.
[11]
Pellegrino AA, Chen G, Morgantini L, et al. Simplifying retroperitoneal robotic single-port surgery: novel supine anterior retroperitoneal access[J]. Eur UroL, 2023, 84(2): 223-228.
[12]
Covas MM, Bhat S, Rogers T, et al. Applications of the da Vinci single port (SP) robotic platform in urology: a systematic literature review[J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021, 73(1): 6-16.
[13]
Covas MM, Bhat S, Onol F, et al. Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience[J]. BJU INT, 2021, 127(1): 114-121.
[14]
Liu Y, Yi Y, Deng P, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the new EDGE SP 1000 single-port robotic surgical system in gynecology minimal access surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(7):4780-4785.
[15]
Kang L, Liu HS, Zeng ZW, et al. First preclinical experience with the newly developed EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic surgical system-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2021, 9(6): 603-605.
[16]
Liu C, Lai C, Yao X, et al. Robot-assisted nephrectomy using the newly developed EDGE SP1000 single-port robotic surgical system: a feasibility study in porcine model[J]. J Endourol, 2020, 34(11): 1149-1154.
[17]
Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(7): 1419-1427.
[18]
Lolle I, Rosenstock S, Bulut O. Single-port laparoscopic rectal surgery - a systematic review[J]. Dan Med J, 2014, 61(7): A4878.
[19]
Tsiampa E, Spartalis E, Tsourouflis G, et al. Impact on ovarian reserve after minimally invasive single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in patients with benign ovarian cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2021, 75(12): e14875.
[20]
Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC. Overview of single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers: past, present, and the future[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(4): 997-1004.
[21]
Yang L, Gao J, Zeng L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2016, 133(1): 9-16.
[22]
Chen Y, Fan Z, Zhang X, et al. A brief overview of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an optimal surgical procedure for patients with acute appendicitis: still a long way to go[J]. J Int Med Res, 2023, 51(7): 655722587.
[23]
Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, et al. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery[J]. UrologY, 2010, 76(6): 1279-1282.
[24]
Puschel A, Schafmayer C, Gross J. Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(5): 1789-1795.
[25]
Leal GT, Campos CO. 30 years of robotic surgery[J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(10): 2550-2557.
[1] 甄勇, 张超, 张尊庶, 孙弢. NOSES左半结肠癌根治术功能性端端吻合与Overlap吻合对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 69-72.
[2] 达热拜·热达提, 刘林, 雷程, 赵为民, 孟涛, 金博, 于震, 王海江. 不同消化道重建方式在腹腔镜保留幽门胃切除术的临床效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 533-536.
[3] 周锋, 沙德胜, 史发兰, 褚雪峰, 陈维. 完全腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术中结肠-结肠端端手工缝合的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 307-310.
[4] 王兴琴, 谢铭, 张桃, 宁伟伟, 梁金龙, 刘振兴. Overlap吻合与FEEA在腹腔镜结肠癌根治术中的临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 621-624.
[5] 黄河. 腹腔镜辅助直肠癌根治术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 0-0.
[6] 曹亚娟, 张来柱, 余德才. 新辅助联合机器人右半肝切除治疗进展期肝癌:Laennec入路联合背侧入路[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 115-116.
[7] 韩毅力, 赵佳晖, 罗勇, 李明川, 魏德超, 姜永光. 不同入路机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗小体积肾上腺腺瘤[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 359-362.
[8] 郭涛, 周辉霞, 李品, 陶天, 马立飞, 周晓光, 曹华林, 陶元东, 赵扬, 朱炜玮, 吕雪雪, 韩策, 卓然. 儿童膀胱胚胎型横纹肌肉瘤13例诊治分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 287-292.
[9] 刘娟, 肖媛月, 王倩青, 关振堃, 关小明. 盆腔器官脱垂手术新入路:机器人辅助经阴道腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 168-171.
[10] 李明川, 李青, 张娇, 罗勇, 王永兴, 赵佳晖, 魏德超, 冯炳富, 曹鹏, 邢念增, 姜永光. 机器人辅助后腹腔镜肾上腺醛固酮瘤切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(06): 356-359.
[11] 汪根树, 李华, 姜楠, 许赤, 杨建旭, 李势辉, 易述红, 张剑, 杨扬, 陈规划. 胆管空肠吻合术重建胆道对肝移植患者术后胆道并发症的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2012, 01(03): 182-186.
[12] 侯森, 赵世栋, 刘凡, 叶颖江. 端侧吻合与端端吻合改善低位前切除术后排粪功能的安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 371-378.
[13] 孙鹏, 李景文, 耿长辉, 罗寿, 蔡旭浩, 王天宝, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口经直肠取标本的腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术(CRC-NOSES-Ⅷ式B法)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(04): 424-427.
[14] 王楠钧, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强, 李惠凯, 冯秀雪, 翟亚奇, 刘圣圳, 张文刚, 李隆松, 王沙沙, 王祥耀, 徐宁, 高飞. 活体猪模型在高阶内镜治疗技术培训中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 156-161.
[15] 刘圣圳, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强, 李惠凯, 冯秀雪, 翟亚奇, 高飞, 王祥耀, 王楠钧, 赵晨怡, 徐宁. 活体猪模型在超级微创内镜隧道法黏膜下剥离手术培训中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 112-116.
阅读次数
全文


摘要