切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 215 -220. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.03.008

临床研究

术前CT辅助规划经腹和腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较:附509例报告
李星豪1, 柳政1, 吴杰英1, 李腾成1, 李茂胤1, 方友强1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-05 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 方友强
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(201704020052)

Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy under preoperative CT-assisted program: report of 509 cases

Xinghao Li1, Zheng Liu1, Jieying Wu1, Tengcheng Li1, Maoyin Li1, Youqiang Fang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2020-11-05 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Youqiang Fang
引用本文:

李星豪, 柳政, 吴杰英, 李腾成, 李茂胤, 方友强. 术前CT辅助规划经腹和腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较:附509例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 215-220.

Xinghao Li, Zheng Liu, Jieying Wu, Tengcheng Li, Maoyin Li, Youqiang Fang. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy under preoperative CT-assisted program: report of 509 cases[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 215-220.

目的

比较术前CT辅助规划下经腹途径腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(TLA)与经腹膜后途经腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(RLA)两种术式的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析我院自2009年1月至2019年4月行腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的患者共509例。其中采用TLA入路246例,RLA入路263例,所有患者术前均行CT检查,比较两组的围手术期指标;并通过倾向性评分匹配(PSM)将两组平衡为207对,比较两种术式的疗效与并发症。

结果

509例手术均取得成功,PSM后,两组在性别、年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、肿瘤部位、肿瘤直径、ASA分级差异无统计学意义。两组患者在术中出血量、术后引流量、中转开放率、并发症发生率、术后进食天数等方面差异无统计学意义;在手术时间[(125±51)min vs(139±57)min,P=0.012]、手术前后血红蛋白(Hb)差值[(10.35±9.60)g/L vs(14.60±10.16) g/L,P<0.01]、术后住院天数[5(4)d vs 7(3)d,P<0.01]方面TLA组要优于RLA组。

结论

TLA与RLA入路均可达到安全、满意的疗效。术前CT辅助规划下的TLA由于能够提供肾上腺中央静脉解剖的准确识别,在手术时间及出血量等方面更具优势,对于有经验的手术医师我们更推荐采用TLA入路完成手术。

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TLA) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) under preoperative CT-assisted programming.

Methods

The data of 509 patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our hospital from January 2009 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 246 cases were treated with TLA approach and 263 cases with RLA approach. All patients received perioperative CT examination, and the perioperative indicators of the two groups were compared.The balance of the two groups was 207 pairs by propensity score matching (PSM), and the efficacy and complications of the two surgical methods were compared.

Results

All the 509 patients were successfully operated. After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor site, tumor diameter or ASA classification between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, transfer rate, incidence of complications, postoperative feeding days. The TLA group was superior to the RLA group in operation time [(125±51) min vs (139±57) min, P=0.012], hemoglobin (Hb) difference [(10.35±9.60) g/Lvs (14.60±10.16) g/L, P<0.01], postoperative hospital stay [5(4) d vs 7(3) d, P<0.01].

Conclusions

Both TLA and RLA approach can achieve safe and satisfactory curative effect. TLA under preoperative CT-assisted planning is more advantageous in terms of operation time and blood loss due to its ability to provide accurate identification of adrenal vein anatomy. Therefore, TLA approach is more recommended for experienced surgeons to complete the operation.

图2 腹腔镜下经腹途径右侧肾上腺皮质腺瘤切除术
表1 两组肾上腺肿瘤患者倾向性得分匹配后术前临床资料的比较
表2 两组肾上腺肿瘤患者倾向性得分匹配后术中及术后基本情况的比较
表3 两组肾上腺肿瘤患者倾向性得分匹配后并发症的比较[例(%)]
表4 两组肾上腺肿瘤患者倾向性得分匹配后术后病理结果(例)
[1]
Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 1992, 327(14): 1033.
[2]
Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device[J]. J Urol, 1992, 148(4): 1137-1139.
[3]
Mercan S, Seven R, Ozarmagan S, et al. Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy[J]. Surgery, 1995, 118(6): 1071-1076.
[4]
Vilela L, Almeida MQ. Diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism[J]. Arch Endocrinol Metab, 2017, 61(3): 305-312.
[5]
邱剑光. 腹腔镜肾上腺手术应用解剖与手术入路[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版). 2009, 3(2): 162-167.
[6]
Wein A, Kavoussi L, Partin A, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology[M]. 11 ed. Elsevier, 2015: 1577-1595.
[7]
Conzo G, Tartaglia E, Gambardella C, et al. Minimally invasive approach for adrenal lesions: Systematic review of laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and assessment of risk factors for complications[J]. Int J Surg, 2016: S118-S123.
[8]
Lotti M, Giulii CM. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach to the adrenal arteries[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(12):5625.
[9]
Shiraishi K, Kitahara S, Ito H, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: Comparative outcomes[J]. Int J Urol, 2019, 26(2): 212-216.
[10]
Chen W, Liang Y, Lin W, et al. Surgical management of large adrenal tumors: impact of different laparoscopic approaches and resection methods on perioperative and long-term outcomes[J]. BMC Urol, 2018, 18(1): 31.
[11]
Chiang PH, Yu C J, Lee WC, et al. Comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for right-sided benign tumors: a single-institute experience[J]. Urol Int, 2015, 94(2): 144-148.
[12]
Cianci P, Fersini A, Tartaglia N, et al. Are there differences between the right and left laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Our experience[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2016, 87: 242-246.
[13]
Chai YJ, Woo JW, Kwon H, et al. Comparative outcomes of lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in consecutive patients: A single surgeon's experience[J]. Asian J Surg, 2016, 39(2): 74-80.
[14]
Miron A, Enciu O, Toma EA, et al. Risk assessment and learning curve in laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy -early and late experience of a single team[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2019, 114(5): 622-629.
[15]
Vrielink OM, Engelsman AF, Hemmer P, et al. Multicentre study evaluating the surgical learning curve for posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(5): 544-551.
[16]
van Uitert A, D'Ancona F, Deinum J, et al. Evaluating the learning curve for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in a high-volume center for laparoscopic adrenal surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(7): 2771-2775.
[17]
那彦群, 叶章群, 孙颖浩, 等. 中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册: 2014版[M]. 北京: 人民卫出版社, 2014: 521-588.
[18]
Cesmebasi A, Du Plessis M, Iannatuono M, et al. A review of the anatomy and clinical significance of adrenal veins[J]. Clin Anat, 2014, 27(8): 1253-1263.
[19]
Omura K, Ota H, Takahashi Y, et al. Anatomical variations of the right adrenal vein: concordance between multidetector computed tomography and catheter venography[J]. Hypertension, 2017, 69(3): 428-434.
[20]
Rowe SP, Lugo-Fagundo C, Ahn H, et al. What the radiologist needs to know: the role of preoperative computed tomography in selection of operative approach for adrenalectomy and review of operative techniques[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019, 44(1): 140-153.
[21]
Onozawa S, Murata S, Yamaguchi H, et al. Can an enhanced thin-slice computed tomography delineate the right adrenal vein and improve the success rate?[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2016, 34(9): 611-619.
[22]
Morita S, Yamazaki H, Sonoyama Y, et al. Successful adrenal venous sampling by non-experts with reference to CT images[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2016, 39(7): 1001-1006.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?