点阵CO<sub>2</sub>激光治疗女性轻中度压力性尿失禁的临床疗效分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.01.009

目的

探究经阴道点阵CO₂激光治疗女性轻、中度压力性尿失禁（SUI）的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性研究本院2017年1月至2020年12月收治的轻中度SUI女性患者。激光治疗组41例，进行点阵CO₂激光联合盆底肌训练治疗，每月治疗1次，共治疗3次；生物反馈治疗组20例，采用生物反馈电刺激联合盆底肌训练。比较两组患者治疗后临床疗效、国际尿失禁委员会尿失禁问卷简表（ICI-Q-SF）、尿失禁生活质量问卷（I-QOL）及女性性功能量表（FSFI）评分。

结果

治疗后，激光治疗组总有效率为92.68%，疗效强于生物反馈组（P<0.05）；治疗后ICI-Q-SF、I-QOL、FSFI评分均得到改善（P<0.01）；与生物反馈治疗组比较，激光治疗组I-QOL、FSFI增加更显著（P<0.05），ICI-Q-SF评分明显降低（P<0.01）。3例患者治疗时述阴道烧灼感，休息后好转，5例患者出现一过性的尿急，部分患者阴道分泌物增多后自行恢复，整个治疗过程无其他不良事件发生。

结论

点阵CO₂激光治疗能够有效改善轻、中度SUI患者的临床症状，提高患者性功能和生活质量，具有良好临床疗效。

关键词: 压力性尿失禁, 二氧化碳激光, 电刺激, 盆底肌训练

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of transvaginal fractional CO₂ laser in the treatment of female with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

A retrospective study of female patients with mild-to-moderate SUI admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. 41 cases received fractional CO₂ laser treatment once a month for 3 times (Group A). Meanwhile, 20 cases received biofeedback electrostimulation (Group B). Both groups were combined with pelvic floor muscle training. The clinical efficacy, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short Form (ICI-Q-SF), Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) and Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) scores were compared between the two groups after treatment.

Results

After treatment, the total effective rate of Group A was 92.68%, which was higher than that in Group B (P<0.05); the scores of ICI-Q-SF, I-QOL and FSFI improved after treatment (P<0.01) in Group A; Compared with Group B, the I-QOL and FSFI in Group A increased significantly (P<0.05), and the ICI-Q-SF score was significantly reduced (P<0.01). Three patients reported vaginal burning sensation during treatment, which relieved after rest, five patients showed transient urgency of urination, and some patients recovered spontaneously after increased vaginal secretion. No other adverse events occurred during the study.

Conclusion

The fractional CO₂ laser was found to be effective for mild-to-moderate SUI, according to a variety of objective and subjective parameters, which can effectively improve the clinical symptoms, the sexual function and quality of life of patients.

Key words: Stress urinary incontinence, Carbon dioxide laser, Electrostimulalion, Pelvic floor muscle training

表1 两组女性轻中度压力性尿失禁患者治疗前一般资料的比较

组别	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	分娩胎数[胎，(±s)]	1 h尿垫试验漏尿量[g，(±s)]	VLPP[cmH₂O，(±s)]	功能尿道长度[cm，(±s)]	最大尿道闭合压[cmH₂O，(±s)]	绝经人数[例(%)]	剖宫产人数[例(%)]
CO₂激光治疗组	41	47±10	1.76±0.82	3.96±2.23	94.34±26.92	2.74±0.66	66.68±27.34	14(34.15)	7(17.07)
生物反馈治疗组	20	48±10	1.85±0.75	4.82±2.52	93.85±26.76	2.66±0.63	64.35±23.98	8(40.00)	5(25.00)
P值		0.676	0.694	0.183	0.939	0.683	0.661	0.655	0.342

表1 两组女性轻中度压力性尿失禁患者治疗前一般资料的比较

组别	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	分娩胎数[胎，(±s)]	1 h尿垫试验漏尿量[g，(±s)]	VLPP[cmH₂O，(±s)]	功能尿道长度[cm，(±s)]	最大尿道闭合压[cmH₂O，(±s)]	绝经人数[例(%)]	剖宫产人数[例(%)]
CO₂激光治疗组	41	47±10	1.76±0.82	3.96±2.23	94.34±26.92	2.74±0.66	66.68±27.34	14(34.15)	7(17.07)
生物反馈治疗组	20	48±10	1.85±0.75	4.82±2.52	93.85±26.76	2.66±0.63	64.35±23.98	8(40.00)	5(25.00)
P值		0.676	0.694	0.183	0.939	0.683	0.661	0.655	0.342

表2 两组患者治疗前、后各项评分的比较[分，±s]

组别	例数	时间	ICI-Q-SF	I-QOL	FSFI
CO₂激光治疗组	41	治疗前	8±4	79±20	24±4
CO₂激光治疗组	41	治疗后	6±4^bd	88±14^bc	27±3^bc
生物反馈治疗组	20	治疗前	8±3	78±16	24±5
生物反馈治疗组	20	治疗后	7±4^a	81±15^a	25±5

表2 两组患者治疗前、后各项评分的比较[分，±s]

组别	例数	时间	ICI-Q-SF	I-QOL	FSFI
CO₂激光治疗组	41	治疗前	8±4	79±20	24±4
CO₂激光治疗组	41	治疗后	6±4^bd	88±14^bc	27±3^bc
生物反馈治疗组	20	治疗前	8±3	78±16	24±5
生物反馈治疗组	20	治疗后	7±4^a	81±15^a	25±5

表3 两组患者治疗后临床疗效比较（例）

组别	例数	痊愈	显效	有效	无效	总有效率
CO₂激光治疗组	41	4	16	18	3	92.68%
生物反馈治疗组	20	1	5	8	6	70.00%

表3 两组患者治疗后临床疗效比较（例）

组别	例数	痊愈	显效	有效	无效	总有效率
CO₂激光治疗组	41	4	16	18	3	92.68%
生物反馈治疗组	20	1	5	8	6	70.00%

[1]	Almousa S, Bandin van Loon A. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous adolescent and middle-aged women and the associated risk factors: A systematic review[J]. Maturitas, 2018, 107: 78-83.
[2]	Cerruto MA, D'Elia C, Aloisi A, et al. Prevalence, incidence and obstetric factors' impact on female urinary incontinence in Europe: a systematic review[J]. Urol Int, 2013, 90(1): 1-9.
[3]	Al-Mukhtar Othman J, Åkervall S, Milsom I, et al. Urinary incontinence in nulliparous women aged 25-64 years: a national survey[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 216(2): 149.
[4]	Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 10(10): Cd005654.
[5]	Balk EM, Adam GP, Corsi K, et al. Adverse events associated with nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2019, 34(8): 1615-1625.
[6]	D'Hulster AS, Housmans S, Spaans W, et al. Survey on surgery for stress urinary incontinence in an era mid-urethral slings are being questioned[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020, 31(4): 695-702.
[7]	Chang J, Lee D. Midurethral slings in the mesh litigation era[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2017, 6 (Suppl 2): S68-S75.
[8]	Franić D, Fistonić I. Laser therapy in the treatment of female urinary incontinence and genitourinary syndrome of menopause: an update[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 1576359.
[9]	李青, 远丽, 徐青. 女性性功能指数调查量表FSFI的使用现状与评分方法[C]. 第9届北京国际康复论坛, 北京, 2014: 480-485.
[10]	Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, et al. The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire: www.iciq.net[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(3 Pt 1): 1063-1066.
[11]	Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, et al. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure[J]. Urology, 1996, 47(1): 67-71.
[12]	孙菁, 张红妙, 陈敏. 生物反馈电刺激和盆底肌训练对产后压力性尿失禁临床疗效分析[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2017, 27(3): 121-122.
[13]	Mota RL. Female urinary incontinence and sexuality[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2017, 43(1): 20-28.
[14]	Lin YH, Chang SD, Hsieh WC, et al. Persistent stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy and one year after delivery; its prevalence, risk factors and impact on quality of life in Taiwanese women: An observational cohort study[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 57(3): 340-345.
[15]	Elks W, Jaramillo-Huff A, Barnes KL, et al. The stress urinary incontinence in crossfit (SUCCeSS) study[J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2020, 26(2): 101-106.
[16]	Barzegari M, Vahidi B, Safarinejad MR, et al. A computational analysis of the effect of supporting organs on predicted vesical pressure in stress urinary incontinence[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2020, 58(5): 1079-1089.
[17]	Izett M, Kupelian A, Vashisht A. Safety and efficacy of non-absorbable mesh in contemporary gynaecological surgery[J]. Gynecological Surgery, 2018, 15(1): 1-10.
[18]	曾锐, 董焱鑫, 高晓康, 等. 腹膜外入路腹腔镜下膀胱颈悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁TVT-O术后失败或复发患者的初步经验[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 51-54.
[19]	Aoki Y, Brown HW, Brubaker L, et al. Urinary incontinence in women[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017, 3: 17042.
[20]	Ostrzenski A. The new etiology and surgical therapy of stress urinary incontinence in women[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020, 245: 26-34.
[21]	Kaplan I, Goldman J, Ger R. The treatment of erosions of the uterine cervix by means of the CO₂ laser[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1973, 41(5): 795-796.
[22]	Bellina JH, Polanyi TG. Management of vaginal adenosis and related cervicovaginal disorders in DES-exposed progeny by means of carbon dioxide laser surgery[J]. J Reprod Med, 1976, 16(6): 295-296.
[23]	Salvatore S, Maggiore ULR, Athanasiou S, et al. Histological study on the effects of microablative fractional CO₂ laser on atrophic vaginal tissue: an ex vivo study[J]. Menopause, 2015, 22(8): 845-849.
[24]	Samuels JB, Garcia MA. Treatment to external labia and vaginal canal with CO₂ laser for symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2019, 39(1): 83-93.
[25]	Zerbinati N, Serati M, Origoni M, et al. Microscopic and ultrastructural modifications of postmenopausal atrophic vaginal mucosa after fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2015, 30(1): 429-436.
[26]	Alcalay M, Ben Ami M, Greenshpun A, et al. Fractional-Pixel CO₂ Laser Treatment in Patients With Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: 1-Year Follow-Up[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2021, 53(7): 960-967.
[27]	Dabaja H, Lauterbach R, Matanes E, et al. The safety and efficacy of CO₂ laser in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020, 31(8): 1691-1696.

[1]	徐净, 张奥华, 黄泽萍, 郑志娟, 苏漫婷, 周祥福, 张新玲. 女性尿道内口开放与压力性尿失禁的相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 546-549.
[2]	董洁晨, 金海红, 龚姗, 李苗, 高淑蕊, 韩惠萍. 生物反馈电刺激联合药物在绝经后盆腔器官脱垂盆底重建术后应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 60-64.
[3]	刘卓, 段虎斌. 生物电相关疗法在神经损伤修复中的应用进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 257-260.
[4]	张永明. 颈段脊髓电刺激治疗颅脑损伤后慢性意识障碍的进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 129-134.
[5]	王利, 张磊, 费晓炜, 伊西才, 王彦刚. 迷走神经电刺激术中充分剥离迷走神经鞘膜对术后癫痫发作影响的研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 160-164.
[6]	党圆圆, 赵虎林. 机器人辅助小脑齿状核脑深部电刺激植入术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 320-320.
[7]	吴绍伟. 迷走神经电刺激术治疗神经系统疾病的应用进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 180-184.
[8]	梁雪琴, 李娜, 潘芳芳, 张香玉, 段亚男. tDCS结合肌电生物反馈对脑梗死后偏瘫老年患者肢体功能、运动功能和动态姿势稳定性的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 90-96.
[9]	姜佳慧, 毕鸿雁. 基于虚拟现实技术施经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中患者上肢功能影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 75-83.
[10]	徐武, 姜成荣, 种玉龙, 梁维邦. 脑深部电刺激术治疗梅杰综合征的两年疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 365-369.
[11]	陈普建, 张璟, 陈芬, 陈怡伟, 余蓓蓓, 周春英. 双侧丘脑底核交叉电脉冲脑深部电刺激对帕金森病步态障碍的疗效观察[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 298-301.
[12]	黄涌, 邓宏平, 黄丽, 沈秋桐, 曹汉忠. 耳穴压籽联合经皮穴位电刺激对老年膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 285-290.
[13]	王晓丽, 林少华, 刘莹莹, 范颖. 妊娠期女性盆底肌自主收缩的力量差异及对分娩、产后压力性尿失禁的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 260-265.
[14]	张冉, 张明, 刘风平. 磁电联合盆底康复治疗对产后压力性尿失禁患者的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1103-1108.
[15]	晋连超, 杨冰, 周哲, 潘东亮, 谢遵珂. 代谢综合征与女性压力性尿失禁相关性研究[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 109-113.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical efficacy analysis of fractional CO₂ laser in the treatment of female with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical efficacy analysis of fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of female with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence

Clinical efficacy analysis of fractional CO₂ laser in the treatment of female with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence