切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 302 -305. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.04.004

临床研究

膀胱全切及双"拖入式"改良Bricker术治疗结核性膀胱挛缩和炎性尿道狭窄
徐海1, 伊尔范江·亚力坤1, 加素尔·巴吐尔1, 吴海岐2, 谭震宇2, 艾尔肯·吐尔逊1, 陆立2,()   
  1. 1. 844000 新疆,喀什地区第一人民医院泌尿外科
    2. 844000 新疆,喀什地区第一人民医院泌尿外科;510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 陆立
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技厅援疆农村科技(特派员)项目(KTP2020339)

Early experiences of cystectomy combined with the modified Bricker procedure with pull-through techniques for tuberculous contracted bladder and inflammatory urethral stricture

Hai Xu1, Yaliku Irfanjan·1, Batul Gasol·1, Haiqi Wu2, Zhenyu Tan2, Turso Elken·1, Li Lu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First People’s Hospital of Kashgar Prefecture, Kashgar, Xinjiang 844000, China
    2. Department of Urology, the First People’s Hospital of Kashgar Prefecture, Kashgar, Xinjiang 844000, China; Department of Rectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2021-04-16 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Li Lu
引用本文:

徐海, 伊尔范江·亚力坤, 加素尔·巴吐尔, 吴海岐, 谭震宇, 艾尔肯·吐尔逊, 陆立. 膀胱全切及双"拖入式"改良Bricker术治疗结核性膀胱挛缩和炎性尿道狭窄[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 302-305.

Hai Xu, Yaliku Irfanjan·, Batul Gasol·, Haiqi Wu, Zhenyu Tan, Turso Elken·, Li Lu. Early experiences of cystectomy combined with the modified Bricker procedure with pull-through techniques for tuberculous contracted bladder and inflammatory urethral stricture[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 302-305.

目的

探讨膀胱全切并双"拖入式"改良Bricker术治疗结核性膀胱挛缩和尿道狭窄的安全性及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2020年4月至2020年9月喀什地区第一人民医院诊治的4例结核性挛缩膀胱患者临床资料特征,总结该手术要点及步骤。4例男性患者(36~76岁),术前影像学及T-SPOT诊断为泌尿系结核,膀胱容量<40 ml,合并后尿道炎性狭窄。4例患者均施行挛缩膀胱切除并双"拖入式"改良Bricker术。术中取中下腹正中切口,先切除挛缩膀胱,术中膀胱颈部多点活检后最大限度保留膀胱颈口组织并封闭。双"拖入式"改良Bricker术步骤:游离输尿管并保护其血运,置入7 F尿流改道支架管并固定;距离回盲部20 cm以上,寻找血管分支适合的回肠段(15~18 cm),近端3-0可吸收线缝合封闭;直线切割闭合器回肠侧侧吻合;将取出的回肠段清洁;拖入右侧造口腹壁,回肠末端浆肌层与皮下组织缝合两次固定,形成自然乳头3 cm突出于皮肤;将输尿管"拖入式"错位植入回肠对侧系膜腔内。

结果

手术时间131~178 min,术中出血为50~400 ml。术后5~7 d拔除尿流改道支架管,术后住院时间5~7 d,无严重并发症。术后随访3~8个月肾功能恢复良好,Bricker造口乳头满意。3例患者恢复正常性生活。

结论

膀胱全切并双"拖入式"改良Bricker术可作为难治性结核性膀胱挛缩和尿道狭窄的手术选择方式,其远期安全性尚需进一步验证。

Objective

To explore the experiences of the modified Bricker procedure with pull-through techniques for tuberculous contracted bladder and urethral stricture.

Methods

The data of patients with intractable urogenital tuberculosis from March 2020 to September 2020 in the First People’s Hospital of Kashgar Prefecture were analyzed retrospectively. Four males patients of with the age range from 36-76 years were admitted, and imaging confirmed contracted bladder with the maximum volume less than 40 ml and pathology demonstrated the inflammatory urethral stricture. All patients were eligible for cystectomy and Bricker surgery. After resected the tuberculous contracted bladder and sutured the bladder neck with the negative margins, the modified Bricker procedure in seven steps as follow: Firstly, Ureteral dissection and pigtail stent insertion; Isolation of the ileal loop (15-18) cm; Stapled side to side ileo-ileal anastomosis; Suturing the end of ileal Conduit; Urostomy fixation with the pull-through technique; The posterior ileo-ureteral anastomosis with pull-through technique were placed first and, the anterior sutures were completed; finally, Ileal conduct testing with blue dye.

Results

The operating time was (131-178) min and the estimated blood loss was (50-400)ml,respectively. The average hospital stay was (5-7) days and the double stents were removed within 1 week postoperatively. No severe complications were observed and renal function imaging showed good effects of operation within three to eight months follow-up.

Conclusions

Cystectomy plus the modified Bricker procedure with pull-through techniques could be an option for selected cases with tuberculous contracted bladder and urethral stricture, but the long-term clinical effectiveness needed to be assessed.

图2 改良Bricker手术步骤
表1 四例患者均施行膀胱全切合及双"拖入式"改良Bricker术的临床资料
[1]
Rode HB, Lade DM, Gree R, et al. Strategies towards the synthesis of anti-tuberculosis drugs[J]. Org Biomol Chem, 2019, 17(22): 5428-5459.
[2]
Ding C, Wang S, Shangguan Y, et al. Epidemic trends of tuberculosis in china from 1990 to 2017: evidence from the global burden of disease study[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2020, 13: 1663-1672.
[3]
Muneer A, Macrae B, Krishnamoorthy S, et al. Urogenital tuberculosis-epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical features[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2019, 16(10): 573-98.
[4]
Cek M, Lenk S, Naber KG, et al. EAU guidelines for the management of genitourinary tuberculosis[J]. Eur Urol, 2005, 48(3): 353-362.
[5]
Couvelaire R. The "little bladder" of genito-urinary tuberculosis; classification, site and variants of bladder-intestine transplants[J]. J Urol Medicale Chir, 1950 56(6): 381-434.
[6]
Roth JD, Cain MP. Neuropathic bladder and augmentation cystoplasty[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2018, 45(4): 571-585.
[7]
Kulchavenya E, Kholtobin D, Shevchenko S. Challenges in urogenital tuberculosis[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(1): 89-94.
[8]
Nataprawira HM, Pratama AA, Widiasta A, et al. Complicated urinary tract tuberculosis in a 13-year-old adolescent with chronic kidney disease and antituberculous drug-induced hepatotoxicity[J]. Case Rep Infect Dis, 2019, 2019: 7370150.
[9]
Goel A, Dalela D. Options in the management of tuberculous ureteric stricture[J]. Indian J Urol, 2008, 24(3): 376-81.
[10]
Wagaskar VG, Chirmade RA, Baheti VH, et al. Urinary tuberculosis with renal failure: challenges in management[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(1): PC01-PC03.
[11]
Porter MP, Penson DF. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(4): 1318-1322.
[12]
Kent I, Gilshtein H, Wexner SD. The retro-ileal pull-through technique for colorectal and coloanal anastomosis[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2020, 24(9): 943-946.
[1] 唐博, 罗季平, 周桃, 黄多, 刘廷琼, 陈亚萍, 岳文胜. 慢性肾衰竭血液透析患者造瘘侧上肢肱动脉-指端微小动脉血流动力学变化特点分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1276-1281.
[2] 韩圣瑾, 周正武, 翁云龙, 黄鑫. 碳酸氢钠林格液联合连续性肾脏替代疗法对创伤合并急性肾损伤患者炎症水平及肾功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 376-381.
[3] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[4] 周川鹏, 杨浩, 魏微阳, 王奇, 黄亚强. 微创与标准通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石合并肾功能不全的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 470-475.
[5] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[6] 陈意志. 核磁共振钆造影剂导致的肾源性系统性纤维化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 358-358.
[7] 刘思含, 张静. 老年人血清铁与C 反应蛋白的比值及25-羟基维生素D3 与肾功能受损的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 268-272.
[8] 刘宇立, 姚瑶, 徐锦雯. 过敏性紫癜性肾炎患儿肾功能不全的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 68-73.
[9] 陈意志. 老年人肾小球滤过率估算公式的选择及预后意义:基于循证医学的证据解读[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 360-360.
[10] 潘春江, 李科, 李新楼, 杨博, 任雪玲. 高龄老人骨转换代谢标志物与肾功能的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 260-264.
[11] 崔转云, 吕丽萍, 常栋. 彩色多普勒超声引导在慢性肾功能衰竭患者建立血液透析血管通路中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 205-209.
[12] 罗阳燕, 王少清, 高芳, 沈艳, 张万军, 李莉. 尿毒清颗粒对腹膜透析患者残余肾功能及腹透液纤连蛋白和TGF-β1水平的作用[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 200-204.
[13] 余海峰, 聂艳芳, 陈孜炜, 李春胜. 不同剂量火把花根片降低蛋白的尿疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 166-170.
[14] 王丽丽, 张春霞, 申磊, 吴立娜, 潘青, 冯雪. 吗替麦考酚酯联合雷公藤多苷及糖皮质激素治疗对IgA肾病患者肾功能、炎症因子和氧化应激的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1285-1290.
[15] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?