切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 413 -418. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.05.007

临床研究

经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术的手术经验与临床疗效
董毅1, 杨濛2, 王正2, 江爱民2, 张宗勤2, 吴震杰3, 王林辉3, 徐红3, 刘冰4,()   
  1. 1. 572013 三亚,解放军总医院海南医院泌尿外科
    2. 200003 上海,海军军医大学第二附属医院泌尿外科
    3. 200433 上海,海军军医大学第一附属医院泌尿外科
    4. 200438 上海,海军军医大学第三附属医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-16 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 刘冰
  • 基金资助:
    上海申康医院发展中心临床科技创新项目(SHDC12021118); 上海市自然科学基金面上项目(22ZR1477800)

Clinical experiences and efficacy of plasmakinetic anatomical enucleation of the prostate with cylindrical electrode

Yi Dong1, Meng Yang2, Zheng Wang2, Ai'min Jiang2, Zongqin Zhang2, Zhenjie Wu3, Linhui Wang3, hong Xu3, Bing Liu4,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Hainan Hospital, PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572013, China
    2. Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
    3. Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
    4. Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
  • Received:2020-10-16 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing Liu
引用本文:

董毅, 杨濛, 王正, 江爱民, 张宗勤, 吴震杰, 王林辉, 徐红, 刘冰. 经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术的手术经验与临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 413-418.

Yi Dong, Meng Yang, Zheng Wang, Ai'min Jiang, Zongqin Zhang, Zhenjie Wu, Linhui Wang, hong Xu, Bing Liu. Clinical experiences and efficacy of plasmakinetic anatomical enucleation of the prostate with cylindrical electrode[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 413-418.

目的

总结经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术的关键步骤、技术要点与临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析上海长征医院2018年6月至2019年12月接受经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术患者的临床资料与手术步骤。对患者年龄、前列腺体积、手术时间、术后膀胱冲洗时间、术后住院天数、术后留置尿管时间、术后尿失禁情况进行统计学分析,比较术前与术后3个月时的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、勃起功能国际问卷-5(IIEF-5)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(RUV)、生活质量评分(QOL)等方面情况。

结果

本组共有90例患者,平均年龄(69±9)岁,平均前列腺体积(67±16)ml,所有患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放或术中更换术式,围手术期无输血、无电切综合征、无直肠和膀胱穿孔病例,无输尿管损伤等严重并发症。手术时间(65±12)min,术后膀胱冲洗(20.0±6.5)h,术后住院(3.3±0.8)d,留置尿管(6.6±1.4)d。术后随访时间10~28个月,平均(18±5)个月,术后早期尿失禁6例,均在拔除尿管2周内恢复,术后3个月时IPSS评分[(8.0±2.5)vs(24.2±5.6)],Qmax[(18.5±3.8)vs(8.0±4.8)]ml/s,RUV[(18.9±4.1)vs(109.3±14.8)]ml,QOL[(4.3±0.7) vs (1.8±0.6)],均显著优于术前(P<0.05)。41例规律性生活患者,IIEF-5术前(13.4±3.9)与术后3个月时(12.6±3.5),差异无统计学意义(P=0.105),随访期间无复发及再次前列腺手术病例。

结论

杆状电极具备良好的组织切割及止血效果,而且操作直接,可控性好,符合手指剥离操作习惯,经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术安全可行,可显著改善患者的排尿症状与生活质量,对患者性功能影响较小,并发症与复发率低。

Objective

To explore the procedures and efficacy of plasmakinetic anatomical enucleation of the prostate with cylindrical electrode.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data and operating procedure of patients who received plasmakinetic anatomical enucleation of the prostate with cylindrical electrode in Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital from June 2018 to December 2019. Statistical analysis was performed about age, prostate volume, operation time, time of bladder irrigation, postoperative hospitalization, catheter retention time and occurrence of urinary incontinence. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), international index of erectile function 5(IIEF-5), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (RUV), and quality of life score (QOL) were compared between pre-operation and 3 months after surgery.

Results

There were a total of 90 patients in this group, the average age was (69±9) years, the volume was (67±16) ml. All the patients successfully completed the operation without transfering to open surgery or other surgical procedure. No patient received blood transfusion during perioperation period. No transurethral resection syndrome, rectal and bladder perforation, ureteral injury and other serious complications occurred. The operation time was (65±12) min, the time of bladder irrigation was (20.0±6.5) h, the postoperative hospitalization was (3.3±0.8) d, the catheter retention time was (6.6±1.3) d. Postoperative follow-up time was 10-28 months, with an average of (18±5) months, there were urinary incontinence in 6 cases and recovered within 2 weeks. IPSS [(8.0±2.5) vs (24.2±5.6)], Qmax [(18.5±3.8) vs (8.0±4.8)] ml/s, RUV [(18.9±4.1) vs (109.3±14.8)] ml, QOL [(4.3±0.7) vs (1.8±0.6)] in 3 months after surgery were significantly improved compared with preoperation (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the IIEF-5 (13.4±3.9 vs 12.6±3.5) of the 41 patients with regular sex life (P=0.015). There were no recurrence or reoperation cases during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

The cylindrical electrode has good effect in tissue cutting and hemostasis, and the operation is direct and controllable, in line with the finger dissection operation habits. Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate with cylindrical electrode is safe and feasible, which can significantly improve the condition of urination and quality of life, but not significantly affect sexual function. The complication rate and recurrence rate were low.

图6 12点位置黏膜处理
图7 前列腺剜除步骤模式图注:a为左侧叶剜除步骤,b为中叶及右侧叶剜除步骤,c为前列腺剜除术后观
表1 90例BPH患者术前术后3个月指标比较(±s
[1]
Aho T, Armitage J, Kastner C. Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: The next gold standard? Yes![J]. Andrologia, 202052(8): e13643.
[2]
Hiraoka Y. Transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP)[J]. World J Urol, 2017, 35(10): 1629-1630.
[3]
刘大乐, 肖克峰, 刘岩峰, 等. "四步法"保留膀胱颈等离子前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生的临床观察[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 124-128.
[4]
Wang SJ, Mu XN, Chen J, et al. Plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate versus 160-W laser photoselective vaporization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Asian J Androl, 2017, 19(1): 15-19.
[5]
邹志辉, 刘春晓. 多种能量平台在腔内前列腺剜除术中的应用[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2018, 38(1): 11-16.
[6]
Ferretti M, Phillips J. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques[J]. Can J Urol, 2015, 22 Suppl 1: 60-66.
[7]
Rimtebaye K, Mpah EHM, Tashkand AZA, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Urol, 2017, 158(1): 100.
[8]
Rassweilera J, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)—Incidence, Management, and Prevention[J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 50(5): 969-979,980.
[9]
罗保华, 李名钊, 王华, 等. 层面递进法激光腔内剜除高危前列腺增生的治疗体会[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 166-170.
[10]
Peng B, Huang J, Wang G, et al. Transurethral enucleation of prostate with button electrode plasmakinetic vaporization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 39583.
[11]
Zou Z, Xu A, Zheng S, et al. Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results[J]. World J Urol, 2018, 36(7): 1117-1126.
[12]
沈锋, 缪惠东, 薛亚岗, 等. 钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生的手术效率及学习曲线探讨[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2019, 39(4): 633-636.
[13]
朱凌峰, 谭建明. 经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术治疗体积>60 ml前列腺增生的疗效分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(5): 394-398.
[14]
陈俊毅, 陈东, 王加良, 等. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术中保留尿控的策略[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(2): 138-141.
[15]
Liu Y, Cheng Y, Zhuo L, et al. Impact on Sexual Function of Endoscopic Enucleation vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2020, 34(10): 1064-1074.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[3] 吴春风, 卢国汉, 姚汝贺, 李健辉, 陈文杰, 黄宇. 21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜与等离子电切镜在膀胱结石钬激光碎石术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 579-584.
[4] 李想, 郭征, 田洪哲, 李杜, 熊梦瑶, 潘铁军. 1 470 nm半导体激光减容性切除治疗高危前列腺增生的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 448-452.
[5] 程志刚, 魏辉, 李一波, 韩健, 钟永豪, 王铭, 张文辉, 周传东. 经尿道前列腺剜除术中保留前列腺分叶沟间组织对术后顺行射精功能的保护[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 453-458.
[6] 莫林键, 杨舒博, 农卫赟, 程继文. 人工智能虚拟数字医师在钬激光前列腺剜除日间手术患教管理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 318-322.
[7] 杨登科, 蔡明志, 张星星, 胡青, 郭大勇, 高喆, 毕永启, 胡伟. 腹腔镜膀胱颈Y-V成形术与经尿道膀胱颈电切治疗膀胱颈挛缩的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 392-396.
[8] 潘兴赫, 董翔, 杨海洋, 张雪斌, 甘卫东. 超选择性前列腺动脉栓塞治疗伴急性尿潴留的高危高龄前列腺增生[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[9] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[10] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[11] 杨万荣, 任治坤, 时新颍. 沙丁胺醇雾化吸入脾多肽治疗AECOPD的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 609-612.
[12] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[13] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[14] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[15] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
阅读次数
全文


摘要