切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 579 -584. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.06.008

临床研究

21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜与等离子电切镜在膀胱结石钬激光碎石术中的应用
吴春风1, 卢国汉1,(), 姚汝贺1, 李健辉1, 陈文杰1, 黄宇1   
  1. 1.528305 广东佛山,新容奇医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2024-12-01
  • 通信作者: 卢国汉
  • 基金资助:
    广东省佛山市科技创新项目(2016AB003243)

Application of 21 F cystoscope sheath combined with 8.0/9.8 F ureteroscope and plasma electroscope in holmium laser lithotripsy on bladder lithiasis

Chunfeng Wu1, Guohan Lu1,(), Ruhe Yao1, Jianhui Li1, Wenjie Chen1, Yu Huang1   

  1. 1.Department of Urology,the Xinrongqi Hospital,Foshan,Guangdong 528300,China
  • Received:2023-10-10 Published:2024-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Guohan Lu
引用本文:

吴春风, 卢国汉, 姚汝贺, 李健辉, 陈文杰, 黄宇. 21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜与等离子电切镜在膀胱结石钬激光碎石术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 579-584.

Chunfeng Wu, Guohan Lu, Ruhe Yao, Jianhui Li, Wenjie Chen, Yu Huang. Application of 21 F cystoscope sheath combined with 8.0/9.8 F ureteroscope and plasma electroscope in holmium laser lithotripsy on bladder lithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 579-584.

目的

探讨21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜与等离子电切镜在膀胱结石钬激光碎石术中的临床疗效,并进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年5月在广东新容奇医院泌尿外科行膀胱结石钬激光碎石的112例膀胱结石患者,其中采用21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜碎石58例(膀胱镜鞘组),采用等离子电切镜碎石54例(电切镜组)。统计两组患者临床资料,比较两组患者手术时间、术中冲水量、结石清除率、手术视野满意度、住院时间、住院费用、术后血尿持续时间、术后尿道疼痛评分。

结果

两组患者术前一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。膀胱镜鞘组同电切镜组相比,手术时间短,手术视野满意度高,术中冲水少,住院费用低,术后血尿持续时间短,尿道疼痛评分低,结石清除率高(P<0.05)。两组患者住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜应用于膀胱结石钬激光碎石安全、有效。与等离子电切镜相比,该方法具有手术效率高、住院费用低、手术创伤小、可操作性强等特点,值得推广。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of holmium laser lithotripsy of bladder lithiasis between F8.0/9.8 ureteroscopy combined with 21 F cystoscope sheath and plasma electroscope.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 112 bladder lithiasis patients admitted from January 2016 to May 2023 in the Urology department of Xinrongqi Hospital. According to different surgical methods,the patients were divided into two groups,including 58 cases in the 21 F cystoscope sheath combined with 8.0/9.8 F ureteroscopy (cystoscope sheath group) and 54 cases in the plasma electroscope(electroscope group). Operation time,intraoperative flush volume,surgical field satisfaction,length of hospital stay,hospitalization cost,postoperative hematuria duration,urethral pain score,stone clearance rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in the preoperative general information between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with plasma electroscope group,cystoscope sheath group showed shorter operation time,higher surgical field satisfaction,less intraoperative flushing,lower hospitalization costs,shorter postoperative hematuria duration and low pain score and higher stone clearance rate (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

21 F cystoscope sheath combined with 8.0/9.8 F ureteroscopy is safe and effective surgical methods for bladder lithiasis patients using holmium laser lithotripsy. Compared with plasma electroscope,21 F cystoscope sheath combined with 8.0/9.8 F ureteroscopy has the characteristics of higher surgical efficiency,lower hospitalization cost,less surgical trauma,strong operability,better clinical application value and can be popularized widely.

表1 两组膀胱结石患者术前基线资料对比
图1 21 F膀胱鞘联合输尿管镜行膀胱结石钬激光碎石
图2 等离子电切镜行膀胱结石钬激光碎石 注:图1a示输尿管镜置入膀胱进行碎石;图1b为输尿管镜联合膀胱镜鞘冲出碎石块;图1c为膀胱镜鞘组术中使用器械(8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜、21 F膀胱镜鞘、灌注泵);图2a为电切镜鞘置入膀胱进行碎石;图2b为采用Ellik冲出碎石块;图2c为电切镜组术中使用器械(26 F等离子电切镜鞘、Ellik、电切镜头、操作手柄、冲水管)
表2 两组膀胱结石患者术中及术后资料比较(±s
表3 两组膀胱结石患者手术视野满意度、术后尿道疼痛评分、结石清除率对比[例(%)]
[1]
张家铭,罗康. 高龄前列腺增生患者膀胱结石的影响因素及其风险模型[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2022,27(2): 144-147.Zhang JM,Luo K. Influencing factors and risk models of bladder stones in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Mod Urol,2022,27(2): 144-147.
[2]
Alkhamees MA. Bladder stones in a closed diverticulum caused by schistosoma mansoni: a case report[J]. World J Clin Cases,2020,8(19): 4475-4480.
[3]
Fonseka T,Melchionna A,De Luyk N,et al. 14F super-mini percutaneous cystolitholapaxy: a novel technique in the treatment of bladder stones[J]. J Endourol,2023,37(4): 422-427.
[4]
黄健,张旭. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南: 2022版[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2022: 408.Huang J,Zhang X,Wei Q,et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Urology and Andrology diseases in China:2022 version[M]. Beijing: science press,2022: 408.
[5]
Xiao KW,Zhou L,He Q,et al. Enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia thulium laser versus holmium laser: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lasers Med Sci,2019,34(4): 815-826.
[6]
Gou L,Wang Z,Zhou Y,et al. Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg,2021,21(1): 448.
[7]
Bhat A,Katz JE,Banerjee I,et al. A prospective evaluation of highand low-power holmium laser settings for transurethral lithotripsy in the management of adults with large bladder calculi[J]. World J Urol,2021,39(9): 3481-3488.
[8]
Conway JM,Christodoulidou M,Reid S,et al. Flexible cystoscopy and laser stone fragmentation via Mitrofanoff stoma: a case series[J].J Clin Urol,2022,15(5): 376-379.
[9]
邱智,吴栗洋,王伟,等. 经尿道前列腺电切术联合气压弹道碎石治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的中长期随访报告[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(5): 385-387,393.Qiu Z,Wu LY,Wang W,et al. Transurethral resection of prostate combined with pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder calculi: a medium and long-term follow-up report[J]. Chin J Minim Invasive Surg,2019,19(5): 385-387,393.
[10]
李成柏,陈卫国,丁炜宏,等. 经皮膀胱造瘘钬激光碎石术联合经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的临床效果[J]. 广西医学,2021,43(7): 794-798.Li CB,Chen WG,Ding WH,et al. Clinical effect of percutaneous cystostomy and holmium laser lithotripsy combined with transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate on benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder stone[J]. J Natl Prosec Coll,2021,43(7): 794-798.
[11]
王刚,成波. 电切镜下钬激光碎石术与肾镜下气压弹道-超声碎石术治疗老年膀胱结石的疗效对比[J]. 实用老年医学,2019,33(9): 917-919.Wang G,Cheng B. Comparison of therapeutic effects of holmium laser lithotripsy under electrocision and pneumatic ballistic-ultrasonic lithotripsy under nephroscope in the treatment of senile bladder stones[J]. Pract Geriatr,2019,33(9): 917-919.
[12]
覃江,韦克暖,蓝杰,等. 普通电切镜和等离子电切镜在前列腺增生手术治疗中的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志,2020,28(10):985-987.Qin J,Wei KN,Lan J,et al. Clinical application of general electrosurgical mirror and plasma electrosurgical mirror in surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Clin Surg,2020,28(10): 985-987.
[13]
卢喜伟,傅荣升,吴俊武,等. 经电切镜外鞘碎石联合前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症合并膀胱结石患者的临床效果[J]. 医疗装备,2019,32(23): 132-133.Lu XW,Fu RS,Wu JW,et al. Clinical effect of extravagal lithotripsy combined with transurethral resection of prostate on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder calculi[J].Med Equip,2019,32(23): 132-133.
[14]
孙之勇,梁朝朝,张贤生,等. 经尿道前列腺等离子电切术后发生尿道狭窄的危险因素分析[J]. 中国男科学杂志,2020,34(6): 48-51.Sun ZY,Liang CZ,Zhang XS,et al. Analysis of risk factors for urethral stricture after transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate[J]. Chin J Androl,2020,34(6): 48-51.
[15]
范俊. 大体积前列腺增生的不同微创手术治疗的疗效对比研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2018,33(1): 67-70.Fan J. Comparative efficacy of large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia between two different minimally invasive surgeries[J].China Ind Econ,2018,33(1): 67-70.
[16]
Noureldin YA,Andonian S. Do percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes depend on the way stone burden is measured? [J]. J Endourol,2015,29(9): 975-977.
[17]
李宾,吕蔡,刘振湘,等. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术联合耻骨上小切口切开膀胱治疗大体积良性前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的疗效[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志,2022,11(3): 189-193.Li B,Lyu C,Liu ZX,et al. Clinical effect of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate combined with small suprapubic incision in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder lithiasis[J]. J Minim Invasive Urol,2022,11(3): 189-193.
[18]
Hughes T,Ho HC,Pietropaolo A,et al. Guideline of guidelines for kidney and bladder stones[J]. Turk J Urol,2020,46(Supp. 1):S104-S112.
[19]
吕远,许长宝,万优,等. 摩西技术120 W钬激光 “三线一面” 法在高风险良性前列腺增生合并膀胱结石治疗中的体会[J]. 临床外科杂志,2021,29(2): 117-119.Lyu Y,Xu CB,Wan Y,et al. Clinical medical study of moses technology-120 W holmium laser treated in “three lines and one layer” method for elderly patients with combined BPH and bladder stones[J]. J Clin Surg,2021,29(2): 117-119.
[20]
Noel P,Eddbali I,Nedelcu M,et al. The interest of enhanced recovery after surgery in a new bariatric center[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2020,30(1): 6-11.
[21]
谢海林. 经尿道前列腺切除术联合腔内气压弹道碎石治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者的效果观察[J]. 黑龙江医学,2022,46(18): 2201-2204.Xie HL. Effect of transurethral prostatectomy combined with pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder stones[J]. Heilongjiang Med J,2022,46(18): 2201-2204.
[22]
Anderson KM,Herring JC. A jackstone calculus residing in a urinary bladder diverticulum[J]. Cureus,2022,14(10): e30140.
[23]
万建省,刘四明,邹源. 经尿道前列腺等离子电切术联合钬激光碎石术对老年前列腺增生并膀胱结石患者的临床观察[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(6): 938-939.Wan JS,Liu SM,Zou Y. Clinical observation of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder stones[J]. Guizhou Med J,2022,46(6): 938-939.
[24]
曹奇峰,康健,崔心刚,等. 新型等离子针状电极行膀胱肿瘤整块切除与经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术治疗非肌层浸润型膀胱癌的手术效果比较[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2023,38(2): 86-91.Cao QF,Kang J,Cui XG,et al. Comparison of surgical effects between new transurethral plasma needle electrode en bloc resection and transurethral resection of bladder tumor on nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer[J]. J Clin Urol,2023,38(2): 86-91.
[25]
蔡鑫涛,邓艳芳,江满涛. 经尿道双极等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床效果[J]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2021,13(4):77-79.Cai XT,Deng YF,Jiang MT. Clinical effect of transurethral bipolar plasma resection in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Urol Clin Electron Version,2021,13(4): 77-79.
[26]
贾静,吴小梅,王金萍. 护士主导的留置导尿管拔除模式构建与实施[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(9): 48-50.Jia J,Wu XM,Wang JP. lmplementation of nurse-led removal of urinary catheter[J]. J Nurs Sci,2020,35(9):48-50.
[27]
杨利平,许璟. 快速康复外科理念在高龄膀胱结石患者围术期的应用效果分析[J]. 临床医学工程,2022,29(12): 1703-1704.Yang LP,Xu J. Analysis on the application effect of fast track surgery concept in perioperative period of elderly patients with bladder calculus[J]. Clin Med Eng,2022,29(12): 1703-1704.
[1] 杜贵伟, 陆勇, 成博, 贺薏, 梁爽. 钬激光碎石术术后联合坦索罗辛治疗对输尿管结石患者的影响分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-496.
[2] 许娟, 郭逸飞, 张玥, 睢晓静, 张兵. 输尿管镜引导下经尿道组织钳取出膀胱大体积异物一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 294-295.
[3] 王永兴, 陈铭, 林灿彬, 何珊, 赵志敏, 黄家鹏, 李泓涛, 孟磊. 前列腺癌根治术后Hem-o-lok结扎夹突入膀胱致结石一例并文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 175-177.
[4] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[5] 王东, 刘晓辉, 韩镇远. 吸引鞘辅助处理膀胱结石合并精囊多发结石一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 647-648.
[6] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[7] 吴骏超, 和术臣, 王海峰, 王家平, 邱学德. 输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗有经皮肾镜手术史的复杂性结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 233-236.
[8] 汪帮琦, 张小明, 肖远松, 聂海波, 吕军, 王尉. 电切镜与输尿管镜在输尿管中下段结石并输尿管开口进镜困难中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 157-159.
[9] 李晓山, 刘巍, 魏世平. 双J管-Folys导尿管捆绑复合体在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 154-156.
[10] 马涛, 叶春伟, 李志鹏. 输尿管镜碎石术后留置输尿管支架的必要性探讨[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 463-467.
[11] 邓超华, 李炯明, 刘建和, 方克伟, 王光, 李沛, 段飞. 经皮肾镜联合输尿管镜治疗双J管长期滞留并发结石[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 335-338.
[12] 胡庆庆, 王建忠, 樊松, 赵磊, 徐汉江, 刘明, 詹长生, 郝宗耀, 傅强, 梁朝朝. 无线智能腔镜系统在泌尿系结石输尿管镜治疗中的初步应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 298-301.
[13] 庄宝琳, 郑万祥, 庄宝钧, 杨力军, 王福利, 袁建林, 秦卫军, 武国军, 刘飞. 数字化肾脏及其衍生应用在肾结石内镜手术中的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 285-288.
[14] 何海填, 罗锦斌, 曹石金, 曾灿, 汪洋, 王可兵, 狄金明, 高新. 6/7.5 F输尿管镜联合输尿管导管负压吸引治疗输尿管上段结石216例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 248-251.
[15] 陈晨, 罗佳, 汪新天, 彭创, 蒋超, 李浩, 王永刚, 何自力, 梁路峰, 王永, 张凝乐, 李业荣, 王涛, 张占国. 一种新型腹腔镜下免气腹硬质内镜钬激光碎石治疗肝内胆管结石的疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 200-204.
阅读次数
全文


摘要