切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 528 -533. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.06.009

临床研究

混合现实辅助导航联合超声与传统超声在PCNL中引导穿刺效果的比较
李宁1, 曹志强1, 高子剑1,()   
  1. 1. 100840 沈阳,中国人民解放军北部战区总医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-02 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 高子剑

Comparison of the effects of mixed reality assisted navigation combined with ultrasound and traditional ultrasound in guided puncture in PCNL

Ning Li1, Zhiqiang Cao1, Zijian Gao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, General Hospital of the Northern Theater of the People's Liberation Army, Shenyang 100840, China
  • Received:2021-09-02 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Zijian Gao
引用本文:

李宁, 曹志强, 高子剑. 混合现实辅助导航联合超声与传统超声在PCNL中引导穿刺效果的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 528-533.

Ning Li, Zhiqiang Cao, Zijian Gao. Comparison of the effects of mixed reality assisted navigation combined with ultrasound and traditional ultrasound in guided puncture in PCNL[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 528-533.

目的

探讨超声联合混合现实在经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)的应用价值。

方法

将2019年3月至2021年3月在北部战区总医院收治的100例肾结石患者采用随机信封法分组,实验组和对照组各50例,实验组接受超声联合混合现实辅助导航经皮肾穿刺,对照组采用传统CT图像阅片并结合术中超声定位实施PCNL。术者分别使用HoloLens眼镜(实验组)或CT图像(对照组)向患者及家属陈述病情,制定手术方案。运用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验及χ2检验比较两组患者的穿刺准确性、穿刺时间和术中出血量、住院时间、Ⅰ期结石清除率、术后并发症等临床指标及一般资料。所有手术均由经验丰富的泌尿外科医师进行。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术。实验组和对照组比较,1针穿刺准确性为90% vs 74.0%,穿刺时间中位数为[8.3(7.3,8.7)] vs [9.4(8.6,10.8)]min,手术时间中位数为[75(45,100)] vs [88(65,122)]min,术中出血量中位数为[30(20,50)] vs [40(30,50)]ml,Hb改变值中位数为[10.0(6.0,17.5)] vs [18.0(14.2,26.5)]g/L,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),提示使用超声联合混合现实与传统手术相比,穿刺准确性高,穿刺时间短,术中出血量少,术后Hb改变值低,且手术时间短。混合现实组和对照组患者在年龄、性别、BMI、结石大小、结石侧别、STONE评分、住院时间及I期结石清除率等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

超声联合混合现实辅助导航符合精确穿刺理念,穿刺准确性高,耗时及出血量少,在PCNL中辅助定位穿刺是有帮助的,安全可行,可应用于临床,值得推荐。

Objective

To explore the application value of ultrasound combined with mixed reality in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods

One hundred patients with renal calculi treated in the Northern Theater General Hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (n=50) and the control group (n=50). The experimental group received ultrasound combined with reality-assisted percutaneous renal puncture, while the control group received traditional CT image reading combined with intraoperative ultrasound localization to perform PCNL. HoloLens glasses (experimental group) or CT images (control group) were used to state the patient's condition and make the operation plan to the patients and their family members. The clinical indexes and general data such as puncture accuracy, puncture time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, stage I stone clearance rate and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups by t-test, Mann-WhitneyU test and χ2 test . All operations were performed by experienced urologists.

Results

All patients completed the operation successfully. The accuracy of the first puncture in the experimental group and control group was 90% vs 74.0 %, the median puncture time was [8.3(7.3, 8.7)] vs [9.4(8.6, 10.8)] min, the median operative time was [75(45, 100)] vs [88(65, 122)] min, the median intraoperative blood loss was [30(20, 50)] vs [40(30, 50)]ml, and the median change value of Hb was [10.0(6.0, 17.5)] vs [18.0(14.2, 26.5)] g/L, and all the differences were statistically significant. These results suggest that compared with the traditional operation, the ultrasound combined with mixed reality has higher puncture accuracy, shorter puncture time, less intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative Hb change, and shorter operation time. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, stone size, stone side, STONE score, hospital stay and stage I stone clearance rate between the mixed reality group and the control group.

Conclusion

Ultrasound combined with mixed reality assisted navigation accords with the concept of accurate puncture, high puncture accuracy, less time consuming and bleeding, and the application of assisted location puncture in PCNL is helpful, safe and feasible, and can be used in clinic, which is worth recommending.

图1 利用混合现实系统与患者进行PCNL术前沟通注:a在透明脏器下选择穿刺通道;b旋转三维模型;c实质脏器具体化
图2 混合现实技术在PCNL术中应用注:a术者核查资料;b配准校正前准备;c与定位网成功配准;d混合现实辅助下穿刺
表1 两组肾结石患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组肾结石患者的临床资料
[1]
Rupel E, Robert B. Nephroscopy with removal of stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculous anuria[J]. No longer published by Elsevier, 1941, 46(2): 177-182.
[2]
Dean GA. Re: EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis[J]. J Urol, 2016, 195(3): 659.
[3]
Jens TV, Haglin JM, Verhey EM, et al. Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2020, 16(2): e2067.
[4]
Gregory Thomas-M, Jules Gregory, John Sledge, et al. Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept[J]. Acta Orthop, 2018, 89(5): 480-483.
[5]
汤轶, 肖高明, 陈跃军, 等. 虚拟现实、增强现实和混合现实技术在胸壁肿瘤切除及重建手术治疗中的应用[J/CD]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2018, 5(2): 129-133.
[6]
Ye L, Chen Xl, Wang N, et al. A wearable mixed-reality holographic computer for guiding external ventricular drain insertion at the bedside[J]. J Neurosurg, 2019, 131(5): 1599-1606.
[7]
Sudah Mazen. Re: Christian türk, aleš petřík, kemal sarica, et al. eau guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(4): 468-474.
[8]
Gallioli Andrea, Berrettini Alfredo, Sampogna Gianluca, et al. Semi-closed-circuit vacuum-assisted mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric population: the initial experience of two tertiary referral centers[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2022,74(1):93-101.
[9]
Gökce Mehmet-İlker, Ömer Gülpınar, Çağrı Akpınar, et al. Description of a novel method for renal puncture in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy and comparison with a previously described method.[J]. Turk J Urol, 2019, 45(6): 444-448.
[10]
Rassweiler-S MC, Lima E, Ritter M, et al. Navigation systems for the percutaneous access to the kidney[J]. Urologe, 2020, 59(9): 1017-1025.
[11]
付晓华, 张英晨, 丁吉阳, 等. 低剂量CT尿路成像辅助定位行经皮肾镜术的可行性研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 102-106.
[12]
彭华, 朱海涛, 刘帅, 等. 3D打印个性化经皮肾镜穿刺导板的临床应用[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 24(7): 555-559.
[13]
Ben S, Łącki M, Shahait M, et al. Evaluation of a virtual reality percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgical simulator[J]. Front Robot AI, 2020, 6:145.
[14]
Monica F, Reynolds LF, Lee JY. Simulation-based percutaneous renal access training: evaluating a novel 3d immersive virtual reality platform[J]. J Endourol, 2021, 35(5): 695-699.
[15]
Meulstee-JW, Johan N, Ruud S, et al. Toward Holographic-Guided Surgery[J]. Surg Innov, 2019, 26(1): 86-94.
[16]
Zmyślony M, Paweł B, Alicja B, et al. Protection of the population health from electromagnetic hazards - challenges resulting from the implementation of the 5G network planned in Poland[J]. Med Pr, 2020, 71(1): 105-113.
[17]
Enrico C, Daniele A, Angela P, et al. 3D mixed reality holograms for preoperative surgical planning of nephron-sparing surgery: evaluation of surgeons' perception[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2021, 73(3): 367-375.
[18]
温星桥,祝炜安,王喻,等. DVPV系统三维影像及虚拟现实导航在泌尿外科复杂手术的应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 91-95.
[19]
Sara C , Turini G , Parchi PD, et al. How to build a patient-specific hybrid simulator for orthopaedic open surgery: benefits and limits of mixed-reality using the microsoft hololens[J]. J Healthc Eng , 2018, 2018: 1-12.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[8] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[9] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[10] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[11] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[12] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[13] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[14] 张晓燕, 武玺宁, 张一休, 刘真真, 孝梦甦, 李建初. 超声医学科人文素养教育提升医患沟通能力的调查分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 899-903.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要