经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石的比较

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.06.010

目的

比较经皮肾镜（PCNL）与输尿管软镜（FURS）治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性纳入并分析我院2017年4月至2019年4月43例肾下盏小鹿角形结石，其中PCNL治疗20例（PCNL组），FURS治疗23例（FURS组），比较两组手术时间、结石清除率、手术并发症和术后住院天数等。

结果

43例均顺利完成手术，PCNL组的手术时间、术后住院天数均显著长于FURS组（P<0.05）；术后1~4 d PCNL组结石清除率85.0%，显著高于FURS组52.2%，术后4周及术后半年两组结石清除率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但FURS组的二次干预率更高（P<0.05）；两组在术后发热、出血及石街形成等方面差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但PCNL组的血红蛋白丢失量及术后止痛药使用率更高（P<0.05）。

结论

PCNL与FURS在治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石均安全、有效，两者远期疗效相当，但FURS比PCNL创伤更小，术后恢复更快，值得临床推广。

关键词: 经皮肾镜, 输尿管软镜, 肾下盏结石, 鹿角形结石

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy(FURS) in treatment of lower pole minor staghorn calculi.

Methods

From April 2017 to April 2019, 43 patients having lower pole minor staghorn calculi were treated with PCNL or FURS in our hospital. The patients were all retrospectively investigated and classified as PCNL group or FURS group. Of them, 20 patients received PCNL and 23 underwent FURS, respectively. The two groups were compared and analyzed statistically in terms of operation time, stone-free rate, surgical-related complications rate and postoperative hospital stay.

Results

Successful surgery had been done in all the patients. Operation time and postoperative hospital stay of the PCNL group were significantly longer than that of the FURS group (P<0.05). In PCNL group, initial stone-free rate(SFR) in 4 days after surgeries achieved 85.0%, which was significantly higher than that of 52.2% in FURS group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall SFR in 4 weeks and 6 months after surgeries, respectively (P>0.05). Nevertheless, the need for further intervention(staged FURS surgery or ESWL) in the FURS group was significantly more than that in the PCNL group (P<0.05). Complication rate between the two groups was similar in terms of postoperative fever, bleeding and steinstrasse (P>0.05), but the PCNL group suffered more loss of hemoglobin and postoperative pain (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Both PCNL and FURS are safe and feasible for patients with minor renal staghorn calculi in the lower pole. Compared to PCNL, FURS deserves its priority to deal with lower pole minor staghorn calculi for its less invasive and faster postoperative recovery.

Key words: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL), Flexible ureteroscopy(FURS), Lower pole stone, Staghorn calculi

表1 两组肾下盏小鹿角形结石患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	性别(例)		结石侧别(例)		结石最大径[mm，(±s)]	结石分支(例)		肾积水(例)
组别	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	男	女	左	右	结石最大径[mm，(±s)]	两个分支	三个分支	有	无
PCNL组	20	61±11	8	12	9	11	19.2±3.6	15	5	4	16
FURS组	23	59±8	14	9	13	10	18.6±4.3	16	7	6	17
统计值		t=0.529	χ²=1.865		χ²=0.568		t=0.410	χ²=0.157		χ²=0.012
P值		0.599	0.172		0.451		0.684	0.692		0.913

表1 两组肾下盏小鹿角形结石患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	性别(例)		结石侧别(例)		结石最大径[mm，(±s)]	结石分支(例)		肾积水(例)
组别	例数	年龄[岁，(±s)]	男	女	左	右	结石最大径[mm，(±s)]	两个分支	三个分支	有	无
PCNL组	20	61±11	8	12	9	11	19.2±3.6	15	5	4	16
FURS组	23	59±8	14	9	13	10	18.6±4.3	16	7	6	17
统计值		t=0.529	χ²=1.865		χ²=0.568		t=0.410	χ²=0.157		χ²=0.012
P值		0.599	0.172		0.451		0.684	0.692		0.913

表2 两组肾下盏小鹿角形结石患者术中、术后情况比较

组别	例数	手术时间[min，(±s)]	术后住院天数[d，中位数(范围)]	术后1~4 d结石清除率[例(%)]	术后4周结石清除率[例(%)]	术后半年结石清除率[例(%)]	二次干预率[例(%)]
PCNL组	20	106±12	6.5(5.0~14.0)	17(85.0)	17(85.0)	18(90.0)	1(5.0)
FURS组	23	73±11	2.0(1.0~6.0)	12(52.2)	17(73.9)	20(82.6)	9(39.1)
统计值		t=9.358	Z=-5.431	χ²=3.861	χ²=0.266	χ²=0.000	χ²=5.201
P值		<0.001	<0.001	0.049	0.606	1.000	0.023

表2 两组肾下盏小鹿角形结石患者术中、术后情况比较

组别	例数	手术时间[min，(±s)]	术后住院天数[d，中位数(范围)]	术后1~4 d结石清除率[例(%)]	术后4周结石清除率[例(%)]	术后半年结石清除率[例(%)]	二次干预率[例(%)]
PCNL组	20	106±12	6.5(5.0~14.0)	17(85.0)	17(85.0)	18(90.0)	1(5.0)
FURS组	23	73±11	2.0(1.0~6.0)	12(52.2)	17(73.9)	20(82.6)	9(39.1)
统计值		t=9.358	Z=-5.431	χ²=3.861	χ²=0.266	χ²=0.000	χ²=5.201
P值		<0.001	<0.001	0.049	0.606	1.000	0.023

表3 两组肾下盏小鹿角形结石患者并发症比较

组别	例数	术后血红蛋白下降值[g/L，中位数(范围)]	止痛药使用率[例(%)]	发热(>38.5℃)[例(%)]	出血[例(%)]	石街形成[例(%)]
PCNL组	20	26.5(12.0~43.0)	9(45.0)	1(5.0)	2(10.0)	0(0)
FURS组	23	17.0(-16.0~27.0)	2(8.7)	2(8.7)	0(0)	2(8.7)
统计值		Z=-3.361	χ²=5.622	χ²=0.00	-	-
P值		0.001	0.018	1.0000	0.210	0.491

表3 两组肾下盏小鹿角形结石患者并发症比较

组别	例数	术后血红蛋白下降值[g/L，中位数(范围)]	止痛药使用率[例(%)]	发热(>38.5℃)[例(%)]	出血[例(%)]	石街形成[例(%)]
PCNL组	20	26.5(12.0~43.0)	9(45.0)	1(5.0)	2(10.0)	0(0)
FURS组	23	17.0(-16.0~27.0)	2(8.7)	2(8.7)	0(0)	2(8.7)
统计值		Z=-3.361	χ²=5.622	χ²=0.00	-	-
P值		0.001	0.018	1.0000	0.210	0.491

[1]	Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones[J]. Eur Urol, 2001, 40(6): 619-624.
[2]	Vargas AD, Bragin SD, Mendez R. Staghorn calculus: its clinical presentation, complications and management[J]. J Urol, 1982, 127(5): 860-862.
[3]	Aljuhayman A , Abunohaiah I , Addar A, et al. Assessment of lower calyceal single-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: A single-surgeon and a single-center experience at KAMC, Riyadh[J]. Urol Ann, 2019, 11(1): 62-65.
[4]	Yu W, Yao J, Zhang D, et al. Clinical factors of stone free rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2016, 9(4): 7289-7296.
[5]	Qi S, Li L, Liu R, et al. Impact of stone branch number on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn calculi[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(2): 152-157.
[6]	Singh BP, Dhakad U. Factors affecting stone-free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stone[J]. Urology, 2012, 79(6): 1236-1241.
[7]	齐士勇, 张志宏, 张昌文, 等. 鹿角形肾结石分支数对经皮肾镜取石术的影响[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2013, 51(12): 1085-1088.
[8]	章尹岗, 刘文. 经皮肾镜取石术并发出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(6): 83-87.
[9]	Sanguedolce F, Liatsikos E, Verze P, et al. Use of flexible ureteroscopy in the clinical practice for the treatment of renal stones: results from a large european survey conducted by the eau young academic urologists-working party on endourology and urolithiasis[J]. Urolithiasis, 2014, 42(4): 329-334.
[10]	Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(3): 468-474.
[11]	Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi[J]. BJU international, 2013, 111(3b), e127-e131.
[12]	李龚龙, 乔庆东, 王磊, 等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石疗效分析[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2016, 22(6): 10-12.
[13]	Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi[J]. Urol J, 1998, 160(2): 346-351.
[14]	Ryoji T, Sachi K, Toshihiko T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater[J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(3): 264-267.
[15]	Oner S, Okumus MM, Demirbas M, et al. Factors influencing complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center study[J]. Urol J, 2015, 12(5): 2317-2323.
[16]	Ullah S, Ali S, Karimi S, et al. Frequency of blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(10): e11086-e11094.
[17]	Keoghane SR, Cetti RJ, Rogers AE, et al. Blood transfusion, embolisation and nephrectomy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)[J]. BJU International, 2013, 111(4): 628-632.
[18]	Meng X, Bao J, Mi Q, et al. The analysis of risk factors for hemorrhage associated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. BioMed Res Int, 2019, 2019(5): 1-6
[19]	刘杰, 白大应, 石磊, 等. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗2~3 cm肾结石的对照研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 375-379.

[1]	石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[2]	曹彬, 王强, 卢扬柏, 黄红星, 黄亚强, 龙永富, 钟睿, 李灿永, 罗刚. 单孔经皮肾镜和腹腔镜处理肾囊肿的术式对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 566-571.
[3]	莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10～25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[4]	苏博兴, 肖博, 李建兴. 2024年美国泌尿外科学会年会结石领域手术治疗相关热点研究及解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 303-308.
[5]	张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[6]	麦子结, 曾学晴, 张乾升, 刘永达. 输尿管软镜术后严重出血治疗的初步探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 366-371.
[7]	莫淇舟, 柳建军, 叶木石, 黄兴端, 李健维, 李思宁, 黄健, 苏劲. 二期原通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗经皮肾镜术后残石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 380-385.
[8]	詹留松, 刘百川, 赵建朋, 薛国详. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘辅助输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-276.
[9]	李云智, 蒋晓峰, 金铭, 杨江华, 李海斌, 赵盟杰, 刘冬, 高国静, 孟繁超, 崔功静, 廖晓星. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗累计直径>2 cm上尿路结石一期清石率影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 58-63.
[10]	张飞, 许陈祥, 邵涛, 王伟, 周红庆. 二期局麻下应用膀胱软镜处理复杂性肾结石经皮肾镜术后残石的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-73.
[11]	张毅, 苟成仁, 郭振宇, 郑进, 蒋旭东. 经皮肾镜术中损伤肾静脉导致造瘘管异位至腔静脉内一例报告（附专家点评）[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-92.
[12]	陈美仁, 戴逸骅, 张茹, 戴英波. "蛙泳"俯卧位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 581-586.
[13]	龙卫兵, 刘晓冰, 易仁政, 邹德博, 蒋玉斌, 陈亮, 谢超群, 刘红叶, 粟周华, 张雄峰, 李麒麟. CT、B超预定位"三步法"经皮肾镜治疗上尿路结石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 587-592.
[14]	张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
[15]	张曦才, 曹先德, 高建萍, 沈大庆, 曹现祥, 郭诗杰, 李凤岳, 肖琳. 免人工肾积水在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 798-803.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole minor staghorn calculi

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole minor staghorn calculi