切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 574 -578. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.06.019

综述

肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展
陈世凯1, 牟君一2, 宋诗璋3, 申宵茹1, 侯四川4,()   
  1. 1. 261053 山东,潍坊医学院临床医学院
    2. 116000 辽宁,大连医科大学研究生院
    3. 266071 山东,青岛大学研究生院
    4. 266071 山东,青岛市市立医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-18 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 侯四川

Progress in renal tumor scoring system

Shikai Chen1, Junyi Mou2, Shizhang Song3   

  • Received:2021-08-18 Published:2022-12-01
引用本文:

陈世凯, 牟君一, 宋诗璋, 申宵茹, 侯四川. 肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 574-578.

Shikai Chen, Junyi Mou, Shizhang Song. Progress in renal tumor scoring system[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 574-578.

目前我国针对肾肿瘤的核心治疗方式为外科手术切除,而手术方式的选择,关键在于肿瘤的生长位置、复杂度、大小、转移侵犯情况、患者一般耐受情况、医师经验等[1]。为了术前评估及预测术后疗效,国内外泌尿外科和影像科学者们基于CT和MRI等影像学检查设计了各种肾肿瘤术前评分,其目的是使术者对肾肿瘤术前评估更加规范化和定量化,为手术方式的确定提供相对客观标准的依据[2]。通过总结回顾国内外的文献,取关注较多的几类评分系统进行回顾和综述。

[[1]
那彦群, 孙光, 叶章群,等. 中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南: 2009版[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2009.
[2]
Kheterpal E, Taneja SS. Partial nephrectomy: contemporary outcomes, candidate selection, and surgical approach[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2012, 39(2): 199-210.
[3]
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3): 844-853.
[4]
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 56(5): 786-793.
[5]
Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, et al. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method[J]. J Urol, 2010, 183(5): 1708-1713.
[6]
Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass[J]. Urology, 2011, 78(5): 1089-1094.
[7]
Bruner B, Breau RH, Lohse CM, et al. Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(1): 67-72.
[8]
Mathieu R, Verhoest G, Droupy S, et al. Predictive factors of complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective multicentre study[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(4): E283-289.
[9]
姜德田, 刘勇, 钟修龙,等. PADUA评分系统与保留肾单位手术中相关问题的研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 29(6): 518-522.
[10]
Karamık K, İslamoğlu E, Erdemir AG, et al. The associations of RENAL, PADUA and C-index nephrometry scores with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy[J]. Turk J Urol, 2021, 47(1): 14-21.
[11]
Veccia A, Antonelli A, Uzzo RG, et al. Predictive value of nephrometry scores in nephron-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2020, 6(3): 490-504.
[12]
Sharma AP, Mavuduru RS, Bora GS, et al. Predicting trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted nephron-sparing surgery: Beyond the nephrometry score[J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2018, 59(5): 305-312.
[13]
Nisen H, Ruutu M, Glücker E, et al. Renal tumour invasion index as a novel anatomical classification predicting urological complications after partial nephrectomy[J]. Scand J Urol, 2014, 48(1): 41-51.
[14]
陈帅, 胡卫列. 肾部分切除术术前评分系统的临床应用和研究进展[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(5): 390-393.
[15]
Spaliviero M, Poon BY, Aras O, et al. Interobserver variability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and centrality index nephrometry score systems[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(6): 853-858.
[16]
Papalia R, De Castro Abreu AL, Panebianco V, et al. Novel kidney segmentation system to describe tumour location for nephron-sparing surgery[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(6): 865-871.
[17]
Gury-Coupier L, Audenet F, Delavaud C, et al. Retrospective comparison of the reproducibility and the performances of R.E.N.A.L. score, 12 segments score and UPRCC score for the partial nephrectomy[J]. Prog Urol, 2017, 27(16): 1050-1057.
[18]
Naya Y, Kawauchi A, Oishi M, et al. Comparison of diameter-axial-polar nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score for treatment decision-making in patients with small renal mass[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2015, 20(2): 358-361.
[19]
Leslie S, Gill IS, de Castro Abreu AL, et al. Renal tumor contact surface area: a novel parameter for predicting complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(5): 884-893.
[20]
尹水平, 周骏, 杨诚,等. 肿瘤接触表面积在保留肾单位手术中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 34(9): 695-698.
[21]
李鹏, 杨庆, 陈俊明,等. 近似肿瘤实质接触面积与肾部分切除术围手术期参数的相关性分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 30(3): 213-217.
[22]
Haifler M, Lask A, Gal J, et al. Interobserver agreement of the estimated contact surface area system for renal masses[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2019, 17(4): e802-e805.
[23]
Tornberg SV, Kilpeläinen TP, Järvinen P, et al. Renal tumor invasion depth and diameter are the two most accurate anatomical features regarding the choice of radical versus partial nephrectomy[J]. Scand J Surg, 2018, 107(1): 54-61.
[24]
Spaliviero M, Poon BY, Karlo CA, et al. An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) Scoring System to Assess the Morbidity Profile of Partial Nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(1): 72-79.
[25]
朱梁松, 陈勇辉, 王建丰,等. ABC评分系统在肾部分切除术中的临床应用研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 31(9): 806-809.
[26]
贺兴军, 祁乐中, 景遐勇,等. 基于动脉复杂性肾肿瘤评分系统对LPN复杂程度的预测价值[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(2): 252-255.
[27]
彭琪, 王雪荣, 袁璐璐,等. ABC评分系统在微创肾部分切除术中的外部验证[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(08): 394-398.
[28]
Antonelli A, Veccia A, Sandri M, et al. External validation of the arterial-based complexity score and first head-to-head comparison with the r.e.n.a.l. and padua scores and c-index[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2018, 16(3): e595-e604.
[29]
Kocher NJ, Kunchala S, Reynolds C, et al. Adherent perinephric fat at minimally invasive partial nephrectomy is associated with adverse peri-operative outcomes and malignant renal histology[J]. BJU Int, 2016, 117(4): 636-641.
[30]
Davidiuk AJ, Parker AS, Thomas CS, et al. Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(6): 1165-1171.
[31]
Egen L, Kowalewski KF, Riffel P, et al. Nephrometry Scores: Can Preoperative Assessment of Sectional Imaging Really Mirror Intraoperative Renal Tumor Anatomy?[J]. Urol Int, 2021, 105(1-2): 108-117.
[32]
Yanishi M, Kinoshita H, Koito Y, et al. Adherent perinephric fat is a surgical risk factor in laparoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: analysis using mayo adhesive probability score[J]. Transplant Proc, 2020, 52(1): 84-88.
[33]
Khene ZE, Peyronnet B, Mathieu R, et al. Analysis of the impact of adherent perirenal fat on peri-operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(11): 1801-1806.
[34]
DI Maida F, Vittori G, Campi R, et al. Clinical predictors and significance of adherent perinephric fat assessed with Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and perinephric fat surface density (PnFSD) at the time of partial nephrectomy for localized renal mass. A single high-volume referral center experience[J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021, 73(2): 225-232.
[35]
王坚超, 李明敏, 吴震杰,等. 肾周脂肪梅奥粘连概率评分在机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的初步应用[J]. 第二军医大学学报, 2020, 41(7): 709-713.
[36]
Thiel DD, Davidiuk AJ, Meschia C, et al. Mayo adhesive probability score is associated with localized renal cell carcinoma progression-free survival[J]. Urology, 2016, 89: 54-60.
[37]
Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Cung B, et al. Internal validation of the renal pelvic score: a novel marker of renal pelvic anatomy that predicts urine leak after partial nephrectomy[J]. Urology, 2014, 84(2): 351-357.
[38]
Bier S, Aufderklamm S, Todenhöfer T, et al. Prediction of postoperative risks in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using renal, mayo adhesive probability and renal pelvic score[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(3): 1369-1373.
[39]
Shin TY, Komninos C, Kim DW, et al. A novel mathematical model to predict the severity of postoperative functional reduction before partial nephrectomy: the importance of calculating resected and ischemic volume[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(2): 423-429.
[40]
Huang WH, Chang CH, Huang CP, et al. The percentage of resected and ischemic volume determined by a geometric model is a significant predictor of renal functional change after partial nephrectomy[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2017, 43(1): 80-86.
[41]
Simmons MN, Hillyer SP, Lee BH, et al. Functional recovery after partial nephrectomy: effects of volume loss and ischemic injury[J]. J Urol, 2012, 187(5): 1667-1673.
[42]
谢福晨, 张会江, 张伟丽,等. 新一代肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 140-144.
[1] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[2] 卫杨文祥, 黄浩然, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 王海彬, 周驰. 股骨头坏死细胞治疗的前景和挑战[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 694-700.
[3] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[4] 刘波, 涂志坚, 李传富, 李江涛, 陈国栋. 机器人解剖性左半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-486.
[5] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[6] 杨春亭, 毛云华, 罗云, 刘博皓. 孤立肾合并肾混合性上皮间质肿瘤一例报告并文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 407-409.
[7] 刘阳阳, 王梁, 戴志红, 郝建戈, 张力仁, 刘志宇. 腹膜后去分化脂肪肉瘤合并左肾透明细胞癌一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 412-414.
[8] 刘麒, 曾弘, 徐子昕, 方超, 黄铭, 郑俊炯, 吴少旭, 钟广正, 林天歆, 黄健, 董文. 乳头状肾细胞癌单中心11年临床诊治与预后分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 351-355.
[9] 董翔, 马文亮, 纪长威, 李笑弓, 张古田, 甘卫东, 郭宏骞. 回顾性评估肾细胞癌假包膜状态及其影响因素[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 356-360.
[10] 李国良, 吴凡, 李浩民, 江俊斌, 郭泽雄, 卓育敏, 马鑫, 赖彩永. 抽栓技术在完全腹腔镜左肾癌合并Ⅳ级腔静脉癌栓取出术的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 403-406.
[11] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[12] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[13] 王建奇, 陈政良, 刘雨, 俞星新, 耿志达, 姜洪池, 梁英健. 基于160例患者CT三维重建的肝血管解剖变异分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 427-433.
[14] 张臣熊, 吴雨凝, 谭皓, 续菡, 张迪, 孙锋. 肛周坏死性筋膜炎感染路径浅析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 353-362.
[15] 陈静, 逯艳艳, 徐耀东, 马颖才. 联动成像技术在肠道病变中的研究进展[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 195-199.
阅读次数
全文


摘要