切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 169 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.02.015

临床研究

机器人辅助与普通腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对老年患者尿控功能的影响
刘容1, 翁铭芳1, 郭春雨1, 邱仁慧1, 方潇1, 贺立民1, 邓震1,()   
  1. 1. 350025 福建福州,联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-24 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 邓震
  • 基金资助:
    福建省临床重点专科泌尿外科建设项目(2017ZDZKMN)

Effects of robot assisted and pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary control function in elderly patients

Rong Liu1, Mingfang Weng1, Chunyu Guo1, Renhui Qiu1, Xiao Fang1, Limin He1, Zhen Deng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the 900th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA), Fuzhou 350025, China
  • Received:2021-12-24 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhen Deng
引用本文:

刘容, 翁铭芳, 郭春雨, 邱仁慧, 方潇, 贺立民, 邓震. 机器人辅助与普通腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对老年患者尿控功能的影响[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 169-172.

Rong Liu, Mingfang Weng, Chunyu Guo, Renhui Qiu, Xiao Fang, Limin He, Zhen Deng. Effects of robot assisted and pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary control function in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 169-172.

目的

探讨机器人辅助与普通腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对老年患者尿控功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年4月联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院泌尿外科接受机器人辅助腹腔镜或腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术老年(年龄≥65岁)患者的临床资料,对比机器人辅助腹腔镜(机器人组,n=37)和普通腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(腹腔镜组,n=62)手术时间、术中失血量、术中并发症、中转开腹情况、术后住院时间、术后并发症、术后早期和长期尿控完全恢复情况。

结果

机器人组术中失血量(141±37)ml显著低于腹腔镜组(160±41)ml,术后并发症(5.4% vs 21.0%)和术后住院时间[(4.5±1.2)d vs(5.1±1.4)d]显著低于腹腔镜组,术后早期(1个月)尿控完全恢复情况(43.2% vs 24.2%)显著优于腹腔镜组,术后早期(1个月)尿控未完全恢复患者尿垫使用量显著少于腹腔镜组,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。两组手术时间、术中并发症、中转开腹情况、术后长期(3、6、12个月)尿控完全恢复情况和尿控未完全恢复患者尿垫使用量差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对老年患者创伤小,并可促进尿控功能早期恢复。

Objective

To investigate the effects of robot assisted and pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary control function in elderly patients.

Methods

The clinical data of elderly patients (≥65 years old) underwent robot assisted or pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from January 2017 to April 2020 in the 900th Hospital of PLA were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative complications, conversion to open surgery, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, early and long-term urinary control recovery of robot assisted laparoscopic (robot group, n=37) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (laparoscopic group, n=62) were compared.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss in the robot group [(141±37) ml] was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic group [(160±41) ml], the postoperative complications (5.4% vs 21.0%) and postoperative hospital stay [(4.5±1.2) d vs (5.1±1.4 d)] were significantly lower than those in the laparoscopic group. The recovery of early urinary control (43.2% vs 24.2%) after operations (1 month) in the robot group was significantly better than that in the laparoscopic group, and the use of urinary pads in patients with incomplete recovery of urinary control was significantly less than that in the laparoscopic group(all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, long-term urinary control recovery and urine pad usage in patients with incomplete recovery of urinary control after operations (3, 6 and 12 months) (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients with small trauma, and can promote the early recovery of urinary control function.

表1 机器人组和腹腔镜组前列腺癌患者一般资料比较
表2 机器人组和腹腔镜组前列腺癌患者手术相关指标比较
表3 机器人组和腹腔镜组前列腺患者术后尿控完全恢复情况比较[例(%)]
表4 机器人组和腹腔镜组术后尿控未完全恢复前列腺癌患者尿垫使用情况比较(例)
[1]
Minafra P , Carbonara U , Vitarelli A , et al. Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2021, 32(1): 11-17.
[2]
Cao L , Yang Z , Qi L , et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(22): e15770.
[3]
Nyarangi-Dix JN, Tosev G, Damgov I, et al. Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(2): 351-360.
[4]
Health Quality Ontario. Robotic surgical system for radical prostatectomy: a health technology assessment[J]. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, 2017, 17(11): 1-172.
[5]
宋灵敏, 王钢, 陈特磊, 等. 改良经腹膜外腹腔镜全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的疗效和安全性[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 42(8): 576-580.
[6]
李帅, 汪继红, 俞建军. 经膀胱途径腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术对性功能和尿控功能的影响[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 42(10): 778-779.
[7]
蒋国松, 程功, 阮海龙, 等. 侵犯膀胱颈的T4期前列腺癌根治性手术的疗效分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 42(9): 696-699.
[8]
Lee SH, Seo HJ, Lee NR, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2017, 58(3): 152-163.
[9]
Xia L, Sperling CD, Taylor BL, et al. Associations between hospital volume and outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2020, 203(5): 926-932.
[10]
张超, 魏勇, 景泰乐, 等. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在前列腺癌根治术中的初步应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(4): 293-297.
[11]
魏勇, 沈露明, 朱辰, 等. 单一术者机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(1): 30-35.
[12]
Urkmez A, Ranasinghe W, Davis JW. Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(6): 3036-3048.
[13]
Davis M, Egan J, Marhamati S, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted robotic prostatectomy: past, present, and future[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2021, 48(1): 11-23.
[14]
曲发军, 张宗勤, 吴震杰, 等. 联合保留最大尿道长度和膀胱颈的尿道重建术在机器人前列腺癌根治术早期尿控中的应用[J]. 机器人外科学杂志, 2020, 1(3): 174-179.
[15]
Kim JW, Kim DK, Ahn HK, et al. Effect of bladder neck preservation on long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8(12): 2068.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[11] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[12] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[13] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[14] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[15] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
阅读次数
全文


摘要