切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 173 -177. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.02.016

临床研究

三孔法腹腔镜下顺行经腹皮下入路腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌20例报告
周佳维1, 刘义迅1, 张宗锁2, 肖峻1, 项平1,()   
  1. 1. 230001 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院泌尿外科
    2. 242000 安徽,宣城市中心医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-28 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 项平

Three-hole laparoscopic antegrade hypogastric subcutaneous approach inguinal lymph node dissection for 20 patients with penile carcinoma

Jiawei Zhou1, Yixun Liu1, Zongsuo Zhang2, Jun Xiao1, Ping Xiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China
    2. Department of Urology, XuanCheng City Central Hospital, Anhui 242000, China
  • Received:2021-12-28 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ping Xiang
引用本文:

周佳维, 刘义迅, 张宗锁, 肖峻, 项平. 三孔法腹腔镜下顺行经腹皮下入路腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌20例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 173-177.

Jiawei Zhou, Yixun Liu, Zongsuo Zhang, Jun Xiao, Ping Xiang. Three-hole laparoscopic antegrade hypogastric subcutaneous approach inguinal lymph node dissection for 20 patients with penile carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 173-177.

目的

探讨阴茎癌患者行三孔法腹腔镜下顺行经腹皮下入路腹股沟淋巴结清扫术可行性及优势。

方法

回顾性分析2019年3月至2021年7月于中国科学技术大学附属第一医院行三孔法腹腔镜下顺行经腹皮下入路腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的阴茎癌患者病例资料。于脐下1 cm处切开皮肤及皮下,人工自制球囊建立皮下空间,在双侧腹直肌旁分别置入双侧12 mm套管,脐下置入10 mm套管作腔镜观察孔;在腹壁前方脂肪层下向右侧腹股沟区游离,寻及腹股沟韧带和浅筋膜、深筋膜;以此为标志,游离腹股沟区浅、深淋巴结。同法处理左侧腹股沟区。

结果

20例患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间(122±22) min(不包括阴茎部分切时间),手术中出血量(49±7) ml,术后住院时间为(7.3±2.0)d,术后引流管拔除时间(7.9±1.3)d。左侧清扫淋巴结数量11.5(5~21)枚,右侧清扫淋巴结10(2~19)枚。20例患者术后随访3~28个月,2例患者术后淋巴漏液严重予以加强营养、延长拔管时间,其余患者随访过程中均无原发灶、腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结复发、转移及严重不良并发症发生。

结论

三孔法腹腔镜下顺行经腹皮下入路腹股沟淋巴结清扫术能达到预期手术疗效,术中及术后并发症少,术后恢复快,是一种安全有效的微创治疗手段,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the feasibility and advantages of three hole laparoscopic antegrade hypogastric subcutaneous approach inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.

Methods

The data of patients with penile cancer who underwent three-hole laparoscopic antegrade hypogastric subcutaneous approach inguinal lymph node dissection in the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from March 2019 to July 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The skin and subcutaneous area were cut 1cm below the umbilicus, and the subcutaneous space was established with a self-made balloon. A 12 cm trocar and a 5 cm trocar were inserted into the McBurney's point and the inverse McBurney's point, respectively, and a 10 cm trocar was inserted into the infra-umbilical for endoscopic observation. The inguinal ligament, superficial fascia and deep fascia were searched under the fat layer in front of the abdominal wall. Marked by these anatomical structures, shallow and deep inguinal lymph nodes were isolated. The same procedure was performed on the left inguinal area.

Results

All the 20 patients were completed the operations successfully, the operation time was (122±22) min (excluding the partial penis resection time), the amount of blood loss was (49±7) ml, the postoperative hospital stay was (7.3±2.0) days, and the postoperative drainage tube removal time was (7.9±1.3) days. The number of left dissected lymph nodes was 11.5(5-21), and the number of right dissected lymph nodes was 10(2-19). Twenty patients were followed up for 3 to 28 months. Two patients had serious lymphatic leakage after operations, which improved after symptomatic treatment with enhanced nutrition and prolonged the retention of drainage tube removed. No recurrence, metastasis or serious adverse complications occurred in the other patients during follow-up.

Conclusion

Three hole laparoscopic antegrade hypogastric subcutaneous approach inguinal lymph node dissection is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment, which is worthy of clinical application.

图4 阴茎癌患者腹腔沟区淋巴结清扫术后切口及负压引流球摆放位置
表1 20例阴茎癌患者相关术前检查术后病理及并发症情况
病历 腹股沟区超声结果 CT/MR结果 术后淋巴结病理(阳性/总数) 并发症
1 双侧腹股沟探及数个低回声结节,右侧较大的11 mm×5 mm,左侧较大的9 mm×5 mm,界清规则 双侧腹股沟区见数枚结节状软组织影,边界尚清,较大者位于左侧腹股沟区,短径约为7 mm 左(0/21)
右(0/12)
2 双侧腹股沟区未见明显异常肿大淋巴结 双侧腹股沟区无异常 左(0/14)
右(0/7)
3 左侧腹股沟低回声结节(异常淋巴结可能) 双侧腹股沟区见多个肿大淋巴结影,边界欠清,较大灶短径约17 mm,部分边缘强化 左(0/7)
右(1/7)
4 双侧腹股沟显示数个低回声结节,右侧较大的约17.8 mm×4.5 mm,左侧较大的20 mm×5 mm,边界清晰,规则 双侧腹股沟区散在淋巴结影,较大者短径约为9 mm,增强扫描后均匀强化 左(0/5)
右(0/15)
5 双侧腹股沟低回声结节(淋巴结,部分肿大) 双侧腹股沟区见多发软组织影,较大者位于右侧腹股沟区,短径约12 mm,增强后部分不均匀强化 左(2/14)
右(0/10)
6 双侧腹股沟探及数个低回声结节,右侧较大的8 mm×6 mm,左侧较大的14 mm×8 mm,皮髓质界限欠清 左侧腹股沟区见多发稍肿大淋巴结,大者短径约10 mm,呈长T1长T2信号,DWI呈明显高信号 左(0/9)
右(0/10)
淋巴漏
7 双侧腹股沟区未见明显异常肿大淋巴结 双侧腹股沟区无异常 左(1/9)
右(0/10)
8 双侧腹股沟显示数个低回声结节,右侧较大的14 mm×10 mm,左侧较大的8 mm×11 mm,边清,欠规则 双侧腹股沟区见多发小淋巴结影,呈轻中度强化,部分环形强化,右侧较大径约11 mm 左(1/15)
右(2/14)
9 双侧腹股沟区探及数个低回声结节,较大者位于左侧,大小为25 mm×9 mm,边界规则,回声均匀 左侧腹股沟区见大小约为30 mm×22 mm不规则软组织肿块影,形态不规则,周边见片絮状稍高密度影 左(2/5)
右(0/2)
10 双侧腹股沟低回声结节(肿大淋巴结可能) 双侧髂血管旁及腹股沟区见多发肿大淋巴结影,边界尚清,较大者短径约19 mm 左盆腔(3/5)
左(4/11)
右盆腔(1/8)
右(3/19)
11 未查 双侧腹股沟区见多发小淋巴结影 左(0/21)
右(0/14)
淋巴漏
12 双侧腹股沟区探及数个低回声结节,较大者位于左侧,大小为23 mm×8 mm,边界规则,回声均匀 双侧腹股沟区见多发结淋巴结影,较大者短径约为15 mm,增强扫描边缘轻度强化 左(1/12)
右(0/7)
13 双侧腹股沟低回声结节(肿大淋巴结可能) 双侧腹股沟区见多发肿大淋巴结,较大者约为18 mm×12 mm,边界较清,强化欠均 左(1/5)
右(1/8)
14 双侧腹股沟部位探及数个低回声结节,右侧居多,较大的位于右侧,大小约12 mm×6.5 mm,边界规则 双侧腹股沟区见多发软组织影,边界清,较大者短径8 mm 左(0/5)
右(0/6)
15 双侧腹股沟显示多个较低回声区,右侧较大的20 mm×4 mm,左侧较大的19 mm×7 mm 双侧腹股沟区见多发肿大淋巴结影,较大者短径约为9 mm,密度不均,边缘轻度强化 左(0/5)
右(0/6)
16 未查 左侧腹股沟区可见肿大淋巴结影,密度欠均,相互融合,大小约16 mm×23.7 mm 左(1/19)
右(0/8)
17 双侧腹股沟区未见明显异常肿大淋巴结 双侧腹股沟区无异常 左(0/12)
右(0/14)
18 双侧腹股沟区未见明显异常肿大淋巴结 双侧腹股沟区无异常 左(0/11)
右(0/10)
19 双侧腹股沟部位探及数个低回声结节,左侧较大者20 mm×10 mm,右侧较大者13 mm×24 mm,边界欠规则 双侧髂血管旁及及腹股沟区见数枚结节状软组织影较大者短径约为10 mm 左盆腔(0/1)
左(0/10)
右盆腔(0/4)
右(0/7)
20 未查 左侧腹股沟区见低密度影,大小约30 mm×13 mm,增强扫描边缘轻度强化 左(2/22)
右(0/6)
[1]
Teh J, Duncan C, Qu L, et al. Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a contemporary review[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(6): 3210-3218.
[2]
Thomas A, Necchi A, Muneer A, et al. Penile cancer[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2021, 7(1): 11.
[3]
Galgano SJ, Norton JC, Porter KK, et al. Imaging for the Initial Staging and Post-Treatment Surveillance of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12(1): 170.
[4]
卢惠明, 洪宇彤, 刘喜媛, 等. 阴茎癌术后老年患者出院准备度影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 341-344.
[5]
Li K, Sun J, Wei X, et al. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis following surgery[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 476.
[6]
张昊, 姜元军, 刘涛. 顺行性腹腔镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术14例经验总结[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 317-320.
[7]
Sigdel PR, Mahaseth N, Pokharel BM, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of carcinoma penis over 10 years in a tertiary-level oncology center in Nepal: a retrospective study of 380 cases [J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2022, Online ahead of print.
[8]
Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Molina WJ, et al. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2006, 32(3): 316-321.
[9]
Xu H, Wang D, Wang Y, et al. Endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with a novel abdominal approach to vulvar cancer: description of technique and surgical outcome[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011, 18(5): 644-650.
[10]
Wang H, Li L, Yao D, et al. Preliminary experience of performing a video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy using a hypogastric subcutaneous approach in patients with vulvar cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2015, 9(2): 752-756.
[11]
Azizi M, Chipollini J, Peyton CC, et al. Current controversies and developments on the role of lymphadenectomy for penile cancer[J]. Urol Oncol, 2019, 37(3): 201-208.
[12]
Hakenberg O.W. (Chair), Compérat E., Minhas S., et al. EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer[J]. Eur Urol,2018,46(1):1-8.
[13]
刘超, 李权, 曹文舟, 等. 预防性清扫阴茎癌患者双腹股沟淋巴结疗效观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(24): 49-51.
[14]
王海舟, 刘振华, 刘健帮, 等. 阴茎癌原发灶术后即刻腹股沟淋巴结清扫对患者生存的影响[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(3): 371-375.
[15]
Luan L, Chen R, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of the two routes of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer: a systematic review and a single-center experience[J]. Transl Cancer Res, 2021, 10(2): 1034-1042.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?