| [1] |
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834.
|
| [2] |
Calpin GG, Ryan FR, McHugh FT, et al. Comparing the outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a network meta-analysis[J]. BJU Int, 2023, 132(4): 353-364. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16093.
|
| [3] |
Okhawere KE, Beksac AT, Wilson MP, et al. A propensity-matched comparison of the perioperative outcomes between single-port and multi-port robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: a report from the single port advanced research consortium (SPARC)[J]. J Endourol, 2022, 36(12): 1526-1531. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0115.
|
| [4] |
Harrison R, Ahmed M, Billah M, et al. Single-port versus multiport partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes[J]. J Robot Surg, 2023, 17(1): 223-231. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01415-8.
|
| [5] |
Carbonara U, Amparore D, Borregales LD, et al. Single-port robotic partial nephrectomy: impact on perioperative outcomes and hospital stay[J]. Ther Adv Urol, 2023, 15: 17562872231172834. DOI: 10.1177/17562872231172834.
|
| [6] |
Okhawere KE, Beksac AT, Ferguson E, et al. Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multiport retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy[J]. Urol Oncol, 2025, 43(1): 63.e1-63.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.017.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Carbonara U, Crocerossa F, Campi R, et al. Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2022, 40: 27-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.015.
|
| [10] |
Ali S, Ahn T, Papa N, et al. Changing trends in surgical management of renal tumours from 2000 to 2016: a nationwide study of Medicare claims data[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2020, 90(1-2): 48-52. DOI: 10.1111/ans.15385.
|
| [11] |
Zhou J, Liu ZH, Cao DH, et al. Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better?[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(10): 3299-3308. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3888.
|
| [12] |
Arora S, Heulitt G, Menon M, et al. Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison in a multi-institutional setting[J]. Urology, 2018, 120: 131-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.026.
|
| [13] |
Porpiglia F, Mari A, Amparore D, et al. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(8): 4295-4304. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07919-4.
|
| [14] |
Rong RZ, Zhang P, Zhao M, et al. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 56. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02217-4.
|
| [15] |
Choi CI, Kang M, Sung HH, et al. Comparison by pentafecta criteria of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for large renal tumors[J]. J Endourol, 2020, 34(2): 175-183. DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0410.
|
| [16] |
Thakker PU, O'Rourke TK Jr, Hemal AK. Technologic advances in robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery: a narrative review[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2023, 12(7): 1184-1198. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-107.
|
| [17] |
Minoda R, Takagi T, Yoshida K, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between enucleation and standard resection in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors through a 1: 1 propensity score-matched analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2021, 35(12): 1779-1784. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0213.
|
| [18] |
Zhao X, Lu Q, Ji C, et al. Trifecta outcomes of modified robot-assisted simple enucleation and standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for treating clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2021, 10(3): 1080-1087. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1153.
|
| [19] |
Patel HD, Koehne EL, Gali K, et al. Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus standard margin partial nephrectomy: Perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes for low and intermediate complexity renal masses[J]. Urol Oncol, 2022, 40(7): 347.e9-347.e16. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.004.
|
| [20] |
Lu Q, Zhao X, Zhang S, et al. Robot-assisted simple enucleation versus standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for low- or intermediate-complexity, clinical T1 renal tumors: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial[J]. Eur Urol Oncol, 2024, 7(2): 275-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.019.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Cole R, Semerjian A. Robotic partial nephrectomy: Techniques for complex tumors[J]. Urol Oncol, 2025, 43(8): 461-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.019.
|
| [23] |
Li M, Cheng L, Zhang H, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: an overview of hot issues[J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104(9-10): 669-677. DOI: 10.1159/000508519.
|
| [24] |
Socarrás MR, Elbers JR, Rivas JG, et al. Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN): surgical technique and review[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2021, 22(6): 33. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01051-z.
|
| [25] |
Mahmud H, Haitovic B, Zilberman DE, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy is associated with a significantly decreased rate of postoperative pseudoaneurysm compared to open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 241. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01999-3.
|
| [26] |
Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, et al. "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(1): 36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.042.
|
| [27] |
Morrone A, Bentellis I, Bernhard JC, et al. Positive surgical margin’s impact on short-term oncological prognosis after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (MARGINS study: UroCCR no 96)[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 18342. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23146-4.
|
| [28] |
Egen L, Quan A, Gottstein LIM, et al. Relevance of positive surgical margins in localized renal cell carcinoma after surgical resection: predictive factors and survival implications[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2024, 22(4): 102110. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102110.
|
| [29] |
Cao DH, Liu LR, Fang Y, et al. Simple tumor enucleation may not decrease oncologic outcomes for T1 renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Urol Oncol, 2017, 35(11): 661.e15-661.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.007.
|
| [30] |
Fransvea P, Miccini M, Rondelli F, et al. A green lantern for the surgeon: a review on the use of indocyanine green (ICG) in minimally invasive surgery[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(16): 4895. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164895.
|
| [31] |
Guo L, Zhou Y, Ding J, et al. A near-infrared triggered multi-functional indocyanine green nanocomposite with NO gas release function inducing improved photothermal therapy[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2025, 679(Pt B): 307-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.10.071.
|
| [32] |
Egloff-Juras C, Bezdetnaya L, Dolivet G, et al. NIR fluorescence-guided tumor surgery: new strategies for the use of indocyanine green[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019, 14: 7823-7838. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S207486.
|
| [33] |
Giulioni C, Mulawkar PM, Castellani D, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cancers, 2023, 15(23): 5560. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235560.
|
| [34] |
Zhang Y, Ouyang W, Wu B, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with a standard laparoscopic ultrasound probe in treating endophytic renal tumor[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(2): 423-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.005.
|
| [35] |
Funahashi Y, Yoshino Y, Sassa N, et al. Comparison of warm and cold ischemia on renal function after partial nephrectomy[J]. Urology, 2014, 84(6): 1408-1412. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.040.
|
| [36] |
Obrecht F, Padevit C, Froelicher G, et al. The association of ischemia type and duration with acute kidney injury after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy[J]. Curr Oncol, 2023, 30(11): 9634-9646. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110698.
|
| [37] |
Bertolo R, Campi R, Klatte T, et al. Suture techniques during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis of peri-operative outcomes[J]. BJU Int, 2019, 123(6): 923-946. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14537.
|
| [38] |
Huang Y, Cen J, Tang Y, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for large complex renal cancer: step-by-step segmental artery unclamping[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2023, 49(3): 393-394. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0572.
|
| [39] |
Diana P, Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, et al. The role of intraoperative indocyanine green in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: results from a large, multi-institutional series[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 78(5): 743-749. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.040.
|
| [40] |
Li H, Hu Y, Lu D, et al. Clinical application of superselective transarterial embolization of renal tumors in zero ischaemia robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1212696. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1212696.
|
| [41] |
Joffe BI, Li G, Gorroochurn P, et al. The impact of indocyanine green on partial nephrectomy perioperative outcomes[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 78. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02242-3.
|
| [42] |
Hendriks KDW, Brüggenwirth IMA, Maassen H, et al. Renal temperature reduction progressively favors mitochondrial ROS production over respiration in hypothermic kidney preservation[J]. J Transl Med, 2019, 17(1): 265. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-2013-1.
|
| [43] |
De Backer P, Vangeneugden J, Berquin C, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using intra-arterial renal hypothermia for highly complex endophytic or hilar tumors: case series and description of surgical technique[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2023, 58: 19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.10.004.
|
| [44] |
王尉. 一种腹腔复杂性肾脏手术用降温装置: CN105726200B[P]. 2018-06-05.
|
| [45] |
Sharma G, Sharma AP, Tyagi S, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate to highly complex renal masses. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Indian J Urol, 2022, 38(3): 174-183. DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_393_21.
|
| [46] |
Jiménez MT, Calvo DC, Moscatiello P, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses: outcomes and complications[J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2024, 77(8): 858-864. DOI: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247708.121.
|
| [47] |
Kola O, Smigelski M, Nagpal S, et al. Urine leak and vascular complications following robotic partial nephrectomy: a contemporary single-center experience[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 387. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02096-1.
|
| [48] |
Zuo M, Yuan H, Ou S, et al. Superselective transcatheter arterial embolization to control renal hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a report of 9 cases and a literature review[J]. J Interv Med, 2019, 2(3): 134-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2019.09.015.
|
| [49] |
Morey AF, Broghammer JA, Hollowell CMP, et al. Urotrauma guideline 2020: AUA guideline[J]. J Urol, 2021, 205(1): 30-35. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001408.
|
| [50] |
Froghi S, Ahmed K, Khan MS, et al. Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a)[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(4): E322-E333. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12053.
|
| [51] |
Naughton A, Ryan éJ, Keenan R, et al. Surgical approach for partial nephrectomy in the management of small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2024, 38(4): 358-370. DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0107.
|
| [52] |
Gu L, Ma X, Wang B, et al. Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumours of >4 cm: a propensity score-based analysis[J]. BJU Int, 2018, 122(3): 449-455. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14386.
|
| [53] |
Gill IS, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors[J]. J Urol, 2005, 174(3): 850-853;discussion853-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169493.05498.c3.
|
| [54] |
Tyagi S, Sharma G, Bora GS, et al. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar tumors: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. Indian J Urol, 2021, 37(4): 318-324. DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_136_21.
|
| [55] |
Lu SY, Chung HJ, Huang EY, et al. The perioperative outcomes between renal hilar and non-hilar tumors following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2018, 81(8): 676-681. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.014.
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Grosso AA, Lambertini L, Di Maida F, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction and intraoperative ultrasonography: Crucial tools to safely approach highly complex renal masses[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2022, 48(6): 996-997. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0224.
|
| [58] |
Autorino R, Khalifeh A, Laydner H, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience[J]. BJU Int, 2014, 113(5): 762-768. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12455.
|
| [59] |
Carbonara U, Simone G, Minervini A, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: a multicenter analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(5): 1179-1186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012.
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
Bahler CD, Dube HT, Flynn KJ, et al. Feasibility of omitting cortical renorrhaphy during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a matched analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29(5): 548-555. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0763.
|
| [62] |
Williams RD, Snowden C, Frank R, et al. Has sliding-clip renorrhaphy eliminated the need for collecting system repair during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?[J]. J Endourol, 2017, 31(3): 289-294. DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0562.
|
| [63] |
Guo Q, Lin Y, Zhang C, et al. Hemostatic agent may improve perioperative outcomes in partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Urol Int, 2022, 106(4): 352-359. DOI: 10.1159/000518125.
|