切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 498 -502. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2026.05.002

指南与共识

男性困难导尿管理中国专家共识
中国医师协会男科与性医学医师分会   
  1. 1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,安徽医科大学泌尿外科研究所,泌尿男科疾病研究与医学转化安徽省重点实验室,合肥 230032
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-03 出版日期:2026-10-01

Chinese expert consensus on the management of difficult male urethral catheterization

Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine, Chinese Medical Doctor Association   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University; Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Urology, Andrology and Translational Medicine), Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2026-07-03 Published:2026-10-01
引用本文:

中国医师协会男科与性医学医师分会. 男性困难导尿管理中国专家共识[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 498-502.

Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Chinese expert consensus on the management of difficult male urethral catheterization[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 498-502.

导尿术是临床最常用的基础操作。男性因尿道解剖特点更易发生困难导尿,盲目操作可诱发医源性尿道损伤及远期尿道狭窄,而目前国内尚缺乏统一规范。该共识基于GRADE证据分级体系,结合国内外循证医学证据及国内临床诊疗现状,明确了男性困难导尿的标准化定义与三级临床分级标准,系统梳理了前列腺增生、尿道狭窄、骨盆外伤、医源性操作等危险因素;规范了术前评估和分层操作流程,依次推荐常规导尿、弯头导尿管应用、导丝引导、内镜辅助、耻骨上穿刺造瘘等递进式处置方案;细化了出血、假道、感染、继发尿道狭窄等并发症的防治策略,并提出医护分层培训、操作质控与会诊制度。共识强调,非泌尿外科人员遇到置管阻力、出血等高危情况时需及时转诊至专科,避免反复暴力置管。本共识旨在为各级医院医护人员处理男性困难导尿提供相对统一、具有可操作性的参考,有助于规范临床处置流程,减少不当操作导致尿道损伤的风险。

Urethral catheterization is one of the most fundamental routine clinical procedures. Males are more prone to difficult catheterization due to the anatomical characteristics of the urethra. Blind manipulation may cause iatrogenic urethral injury and long-term urethral stricture, yet unified domestic standards are currently absent in China. Based on the GRADE evidence grading system, combined with domestic and international evidence-based medical data and the actual clinical practice in China, the consensus on the management of difficult male urethral catheterization has been formulated. This consensus clarifies the standardized definition and three-tier clinical grading criteria for difficult male urethral catheterization, and systematically sorts out risk factors including benign prostatic hyperplasia, urethral stricture, pelvic trauma and iatrogenic manipulation. It standardizes preoperative assessment and tiered procedural workflows, and recommends a stepwise management algorithm consisting of conventional catheterization, coude catheterization, guidewire-assisted catheterization, endoscopic-guided catheterization, and suprapubic puncture cystostomy. Strategies for the prevention and treatment of complications such as hemorrhage, false passage, infection and secondary urethral stricture are elaborated in detail, and tiered training for medical staff, procedural quality control and consultation protocols are also proposed. The consensus emphasizes that non-urological practitioners shall promptly refer patients to specialized urologists when encountering high-risk scenarios such as catheter resistance or hematuria, to avoid repeated forceful catheterization. This consensus provides unified, actionable guidance for medical staff at all levels of medical institutions to manage difficult male urethral catheterization, standardizes clinical workflows, and lowers the risk of urethral injury caused by inappropriate catheterization operations.

表1 GRADE系统推荐意见证据等级划分
表2 GRADE系统推荐意见级别划分
表3 男性困难导尿分级
[1]
Flynn JT, Blandy JP. Urethral catheterisation[J]. Br Med J, 1980, 281(6245): 928-930. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.281.6245.928.
[2]
Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, et al. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010, 31(4): 319-326. DOI: 10.1086/651091.
[3]
中国残疾人康复协会康复评定专业委员会, 甘肃省残疾人康复学会脊柱脊髓损伤康复专业委员会, 甘肃省医学会物理医学与康复分会, 等. 神经源性膀胱综合管理临床实践指南(上)[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2024, 46(12): 1057-1064. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421666-20240703-00545.
[4]
Warren J, Ruckle HC. Guidelines for difficult urethral catheterization in males[J]. Nursing, 2019, 49(10): 49-52. DOI: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000580652.96436.97.
[5]
Davis NF, Quinlan MR, Bhatt NR, et al. Incidence, cost, complications and clinical outcomes of iatrogenic urethral catheterization injuries: a prospective multi-institutional study[J]. J Urol, 2016, 196(5): 1473-1477. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.114.
[6]
徐月敏, 姜海, 孙光, 等. 中国男性尿道狭窄病因与治疗变化的多中心调查[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2012, 33(5): 329-332. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2012.05.002
[7]
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations[J]. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.
[8]
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations[J]. BMJ, 2004, 328(7454): 1490. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
[9]
Bianchi A, Leslie SW, Chesnut GT. Difficult foley catheterization[M]//StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2025.
[10]
Croghan SM, Hayes L, O'Connor EM, et al. A prospective multi-institutional evaluation of iatrogenic urethral catheterization injuries[J]. J Invest Surg, 2022, 35(10): 1761-1766. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2109226.
[11]
Hadfield-Law L. Male catheterization[J]. Accid Emerg Nurs, 2001, 9(4): 257-263. DOI: 10.1054/aaen.2001.0290.
[12]
Verla W, Oosterlinck W, Spinoit AF, et al. A comprehensive review emphasizing anatomy, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of male urethral stricture disease[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 9046430. DOI: 10.1155/2019/9046430.
[13]
涂洋, 刘相臣, 皇甫雪军, 等. 尿管源性尿道狭窄的病因分析及预防对策[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 35(10): 846-850. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2020.10.019.
[14]
陈英, 沈宏. 留置导尿护理操作技术的进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2004, 19(18): 78-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4152.2004.18.040.
[15]
杨永丽, 张静华, 白阳娟. 导尿护理进展[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2009, 28(12): 1591-1592. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2009.12.003.
[16]
Canes D, Thomsen TW, Setnik GS. Male urethral catheterization[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(11): 1178-1179. DOI: 10.1056/nejmc061704.
[17]
Miller D, Pelzman D, Bonfili J, et al. Implementation of a standardized process of coude catheter insertion decreases traumatic catheterizations[J]. Urology, 2024, 194: 253-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.016.
[18]
Mohammed A, Khan A, Shergill IS, et al. A new model for suprapubic catheterization: the MediPlus Seldinger suprapubic catheter[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2008, 5(6): 705-707. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.5.6.705.
[19]
Bugeja S, Mistry K, Yim IHW, et al. A new urethral catheterisation device (UCD) to manage difficult urethral catheterisation[J]. World J Urol, 2019, 37(4): 595-600. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2499-9.
[20]
中华医学会泌尿外科学分会尿控学组. 间歇性导尿临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 45(9): 654-657. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20240812-00361.
[21]
Schneevoigt BS, Stief C. Bladder catheterization[J]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2011, 136(4): 145-147. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272498.
[22]
Patil BS, Patil SB, Kundargi VS, et al. Optimised protocol for managing failed catheterisation: leveraging bedside retrograde urethrography and cystourethroscopy[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(9): e69363. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69363.
[23]
Cameron AP, Werneburg GT. Foley catheter management: a review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2025, 160(6): 701. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0565.
[24]
Kranz J, Schmidt S, Wagenlehner F, et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adult patients[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2020, 117(6): 83-88. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0083.
[25]
Ling ML, Ching P, Apisarnthanarak A, et al. APSIC guide for prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs)[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2023, 12(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01254-8.
[26]
Davis NF, Bhatt NR, MacCraith E, et al. Long-term outcomes of urethral catheterisation injuries: a prospective multi-institutional study[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(2): 473-480. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02775-x.
[27]
Atkins L, Sallis A, Chadborn T, et al. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions[J]. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 44. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2.
[28]
Wessells H, Morey A, Vanni A, et al. Urethral stricture disease guideline amendment (2023)[J]. J Urol, 2023, 210(1): 64-71.
[29]
Fletke KJ, Jeong DH, Herrera AV. Urinary catheter management[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2024, 110(3): 251-258.
[30]
Sullivan JF, Forde JC, Thomas AZ, et al. Avoidable iatrogenic complications of male urethral catheterisation and inadequate intern training: a 4-year follow-up post implementation of an intern training programme[J]. Surgeon, 2015, 13(1): 15-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.02.001.
[31]
Manalo M Jr, Lapitan MC, Buckley BS. Medical interns' knowledge and training regarding urethral catheter insertion and insertion-related urethral injury in male patients[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2011, 11: 73. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-73.
[32]
Yuminaga Y, Kam J, Louie-Johnsun M. Multi-centre, prospective evaluation of the Seldinger technique for difficult male urethral catheter insertions by non-urology trained doctors[J]. BJU Int, 2017, 120(Suppl 3): 21-27. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13928.
[1] 韩广玮, 申雪晴, 吴涵潇, 曹炎武, 唐黎明. 前列腺增生并轻度尿道狭窄行去外鞘半导体激光汽化剜除与等离子电切的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 490-494.
[2] 王锋锋, 李虎, 苏孟媛, 苏嘉明, 何祖强, 钟自强. 包皮环切术致尿道损伤的原因分析及修补方法[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 394-396.
[3] 赖良海, 赵伟, 肖云新, 杨伟明, 陈光耀. 1 470 nm激光"平均三分法"剜除术与等离子剜除术治疗前列腺增生的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 252-256.
[4] 刘悦, 满晓军, 姜振明, 苗淼, 刘涛, 张昊. 尿道球囊扩张术治疗男性前尿道狭窄的初步尝试[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 242-246.
[5] 苏容万, 张玉涛, 冯泽恩, 时圣力, 邓天星, 张成伟. 导丝引导试插尿管技术治疗球部尿道裂伤32例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 232-233.
[6] 冯权尧, 杨云杰, 赵振华, 徐勋, 崔学江. 小儿输尿管镜钬激光内切开术治疗男性尿道狭窄[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 191-193.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?