切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 4 -8. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.01.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

1470 nm激光顺行法前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生
江东根1, 肖楚天1, 庞俊1, 张浩1, 毛云华1, 高新1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-20 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 高新
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81572503); 广州市科技计划资助项目(201604020006)

Technique and efficacy of 1470 nm diode laser antegradeenucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Donggen Jiang1, Chutian Xiao1, Jun Pang1, Hao Zhang1, Yunhua Mao1, Xin Gao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2016-12-20 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xin Gao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: GaoXin, Email:
引用本文:

江东根, 肖楚天, 庞俊, 张浩, 毛云华, 高新. 1470 nm激光顺行法前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(01): 4-8.

Donggen Jiang, Chutian Xiao, Jun Pang, Hao Zhang, Yunhua Mao, Xin Gao. Technique and efficacy of 1470 nm diode laser antegradeenucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(01): 4-8.

目的

报告1470 nm激光顺行法前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生的手术技巧和临床疗效。

方法

2016年9月至2017年1月我院采用600 μm光纤1470 nm直出激光行顺行法前列腺剜除术共治疗30例前列腺增生患者。年龄53~86岁,平均(72±9)岁;前列腺体积27~120 ml,平均(54±25)ml。先在膀胱颈5、7点切割至包膜并延伸至精阜近端1 cm处,气化中叶后沿两侧叶下缘切割至包膜并分别延伸至3、9点,于12点膀胱颈至尿道外括约肌内侧纵行切开至包膜,沿12点处包膜分别向下行左、右侧叶顺行剜除。>80 ml腺体用组织粉碎器取出,<80 ml腺体分段气化切割。

结果

手术时间(65±14)min,中位出血量[M(QR)]10(15)ml。术后中位住院日4(3.8)d,留置尿管2~8 d,平均(4.5±1.5)d。术前、术后血红蛋白浓度为(129±23)g/L和(125±20)g/L,血钠浓度为(141±3)mmol/L和(140±3)mmol/L,P值均>0.05。术前IPSS和QOL评分为(22±6)和(5.2±0.7),最大尿流率(7.8±2.1)ml/s;术后1个月时IPSS和QOL评分为(8±3)和(1.9±0.9),最大尿流率(17.2±3.9)ml/s,P值均<0.05。随访1~4个月,中位随访时间2.3(2.8)个月,随访期间无尿失禁或尿道狭窄等并发症。

结论

经尿道1470 nm激光顺行法前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症安全、有效,术后恢复快。该术式操作简便规范、易推广。

Objectives

To present the surgical technique of 1470 nm diode laser antegrade enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and evaluate its clinical efficacy.

Methods

30 consecutive patients with BPH who underwent transurethral 1470 nm diode laser antegradeenucleation of the prostate at our institution from September 2016 to January 2017 were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was (72±9) years (range 53 to 86 years), and the prostate volume was (54±25) ml (range 27 to 120 ml). All procedures had been accomplished with antegrade approach: Firstly, two grooves deep into the capsule were created from bladder neck to 1 cm proximalto verumontanum at 5 and 7 o’clock direction. After the median lobe was vaporized, the distal margin of prostate was deepened to the capsule plane and extended to 9 and 3 o’clock position. Then the adenoma at 12 o’clock were vaporized to expose the capsule from the bladder neck to the proximal urethral sphincter. Subsequently, two lateral lobes were enucleated along the capsule with antegrade approach, respectively. The adenoma >80 ml were sucked by tissue morcellator and the adenoma <80 ml were vaporized segmentally.

Results

The mean operation time was (65±14) min, and the median estimated blood loss [M(QR) ] was 10 (15) ml. The median postoperative hospital stay and mean duration of catheterization were 4 (3.8) d and (4.5±1.5) d (range 2 to 8 d), respectively. Preoperative and postoperative mean hemoglobin and serum sodium concentration were (129±23) versus (125±20) g/L and (141±3) versus (140±3) mmol/L, respectively, where the differences were not statistically significant. The mean IPSS score, QOL sore and Qmaxpreoperative and 1 month postoperative were (22±6) versus (8±3), (5.2±0.7) versus (1.9±0.9), and (7.8±2.1) versus (17.2±3.9) ml/s, respectively, with significantly differences. No patient experienced postoperative complications such as incontinence or urethral stricture during a median follow-up of 2.3(2.8) months (range 1 to 4 months).

Conclusion

Transurethral 1470 nm diode laser antegradeenucleation of the prostate is safe and effective for treatment of BPH which could provide rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

图3 气化12点处前叶至包膜层面
图4 "顺行法"剜除左侧叶
[1]
Van Asseldonk B, Barkin J, Elterman DS. Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review[J]. Can J Urol, 2015, 22 Suppl 1: 7-17.
[2]
Hong JY, Yang SC, Ahn S, et al. Preoperative comorbidities and relationship of comorbidities with postoperative complications in patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection[J]. J Urol, 2011, 185(4): 1374-1378.
[3]
Nair SM, Pimentel MA, Gilling PJ. A review of laser treatment for symptomatic BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia)[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2016, 17(6): 45.
[4]
Gravas S, Bachmann A, Reich O, et al. Critical review of lasers in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 107(7): 1030-1043.
[5]
吕蔡,白志明.激光技术在前列腺增生治疗中的应用[/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2014, 8(1): 58-61.
[6]
杨国胜,刘刚.绿激光治疗前列腺增生的优势及进展[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2016, 10(1): 1-4.
[7]
Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE. Experience with more than 1,000 Holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(1, S): S141-S145.
[8]
Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(6): 1066-1096.
[9]
Bach T, Muschter R, Sroka R, et al. Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(2): 317-325.
[10]
Wezel F, Wendt-Nordahl G, Huck N, et al. New alternatives for laser vaporization of the prostate: experimental evaluation of a 980-, 1,318- and 1,470-nm diode laser device[J]. World J Urol, 2010, 28(2): 181-186.
[11]
Razzaghi MR, Mazloomfard MM, Moeini A. Diode laser (980 nm) vaporization in comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up[J]. Urology, 2014, 84(3): 526-532.
[12]
杨德林,柯昌兴,王剑松,等.等离子电切术中不同方法治疗前列腺增生症(附1900例报告)[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2009, 3(1): 37-42.
[13]
Xu A, Zou Y, Li B, et al. A randomized trial comparing diode laser enucleation of the prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(10): 1254-1260.
[1] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[2] 韩广玮, 申雪晴, 吴涵潇, 曹炎武, 唐黎明. 前列腺增生并轻度尿道狭窄行去外鞘半导体激光汽化剜除与等离子电切的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 490-494.
[3] 李全喜, 唐辉军, 唐友杰, 杨飞. DISCO成像技术在前列腺增生与前列腺癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 332-335.
[4] 李国峰, 李显文, 周祥福, 何昊麟, 杜红兵, 宾开云. 单极滚珠电极与等离子行经尿道前列腺剜除术的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 247-251.
[5] 赖良海, 赵伟, 肖云新, 杨伟明, 陈光耀. 1 470 nm激光"平均三分法"剜除术与等离子剜除术治疗前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 252-256.
[6] 邹志辉, 张礼刚, 胡永涛, 牛迪, 陈佳, 葛秦涛, 尹水平, 杨诚, 施浩强, 邰胜, 周骏, 郝宗耀, 梁朝朝. 无线智能高清内镜在经尿道双极等离子解剖性前列腺剜除术中的应用初探[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 39-43.
[7] 游猛, 顾志文, 宋生生, 张贺庆, 詹河涓. 等离子电切术与钬激光剜除术治疗体积>80 ml前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 44-49.
[8] 荆翌峰. 经尿道铥激光前列腺剜除术[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 0-.
[9] 廖云峰. 经尿道等离子解剖性前列腺剜除术(整叶法)[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 0-.
[10] 顾志波, 苏倩, 陈建刚, 陆明. 低功率钬激光与等离子剜除治疗中等体积前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 496-500.
[11] 邹志辉, 张礼刚, 梁朝朝. 电外科和激光平台等技术在前列腺增生日间手术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 489-495.
[12] 万颂, 华伟, 兰红梅, 骆正馨, 万跃平. 前列腺钬激光整块剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 427-431.
[13] 董毅, 杨濛, 王正, 江爱民, 张宗勤, 吴震杰, 王林辉, 徐红, 刘冰. 经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术的手术经验与临床疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 413-418.
[14] 许立哲, 夏煜琦, 程帆. 前列腺尿道悬吊术治疗前列腺增生的进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 385-388.
[15] 张宁, 张梦菲, 邱建新, 高闫尧, 陈育, 高靖榆. 腹腔镜下经尿道等离子电切术联合疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝合并前列腺良性增生[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 441-444.
阅读次数
全文


摘要