切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 388 -393. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.04.015

实验研究

新型溶瘤病毒M1激活内质网应激致前列腺癌细胞凋亡的机制
刘硕儒, 王功炜, 张斌, 李书豪, 胡成()   
  1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-15 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 胡成
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(2021A1515012322)

Oncolytic virus M1 activates endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway to induce apoptosis of prostate cancer cells

Shuoru Liu, Gongwei Wang, Bin Zhang, Shuhao Li, Cheng Hu()   

  1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2023-03-15 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Cheng Hu
引用本文:

刘硕儒, 王功炜, 张斌, 李书豪, 胡成. 新型溶瘤病毒M1激活内质网应激致前列腺癌细胞凋亡的机制[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 388-393.

Shuoru Liu, Gongwei Wang, Bin Zhang, Shuhao Li, Cheng Hu. Oncolytic virus M1 activates endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway to induce apoptosis of prostate cancer cells[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 388-393.

目的

探讨新型溶瘤病毒M1对前列腺癌细胞的杀伤作用及其所引起凋亡的机理。

方法

通过四甲基偶氮唑盐比色法(MTT)检测不同滴度(0、0.001、0.01、0.1、1、10 PFU/cell)M1病毒对前列腺癌细胞进行48 h处理后细胞的存活率,通过流式细胞术检测前列腺癌细胞凋亡的情况,通过蛋白标记(Western Blot)检测细胞内质网应激通路和凋亡通路的关键分子。

结果

与对照组(0 PFU/cell)相比,不同滴度(0.001、0.01、0.1、1、10 PFU/cell)溶瘤病毒M1能显著降低前列腺癌细胞存活率(P<0.05),且随着M1病毒剂量增加,前列腺癌细胞凋亡率显著上升(P<0.05)。蛋白标记(Western Blot)结果显示前列腺癌感染M1病毒后,内质网应激通路CHOP、Caspase 12、凋亡通路Cleaved-caspase 3蛋白显著上调(P<0.05)。

结论

新型溶瘤病毒M1可能通过引起前列腺癌细胞发生内质网应激而产生凋亡,最终杀伤前列腺癌细胞。

Objective

To investigate if M1 virus causes apoptosis of prostate cancer cells and its mechanism.

Methods

MTT assay was used to detect survival rate of prostate cancer cells that were treated with a range of titers (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 PFU/cell) for 48 h. Flow cytometry was used to detect the effect of different titers (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 PFU/cell) on cell apoptosis after 48 h. Western Blot was performed to explore the effect of various titers (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 PFU/cell) on endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis pathway after 48 h.

Results

Compared with the control group (0 PFU/cell), different titers (0.001, 0.01, 0.1 PFU/cell) of M1 virus could significantly reduce the survival rate of prostate cancer cells (P<0.05). As the M1 virus dose increased, the cell apoptosis rate obviously increased (P<0.05). Western Blot displayed the level of CHOP, Caspase 12 and Cleaved-caspase 3 were significantly up-regulated after M1 infection (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Oncolytic virus M1 may induce cell apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum stress in prostate cancer cells.

图1 溶瘤病毒M1对前列腺癌细胞的杀伤注:实验运用人前列腺癌低转移细胞PC-3M-2B4,人前列腺癌转移性细胞22RV1、PC3;a图为溶瘤病毒M1对不同前列腺癌细胞以及正常前列腺上皮细胞的杀伤,b图为PC-3M-2B4、22RV1、RWPE1分别经过溶瘤病毒M1(10 MOI)和多西他赛(12 nM)处理48 h后的细胞存活率图;图上各点均为与对照组(0 PFU/cell)相比较,**P<0.01,***P<0.001,****P<0.0001
图3 溶瘤病毒M1对内质网应激以及凋亡蛋白水平的影响
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA: Cancer J Clin, 2021,71(3): 209-249.
[2]
方友强, 周祥福. 2020版美国国立综合癌症网络前列腺癌临床实践指南要点解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 405-408.
[3]
Sandhu S, Moore CM, Chiong E, et al. Prostate cancer[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10305): 1075-1090.
[4]
Sharma BK, Kakker NK, Bhadouriya S, et al. Effect of TLR agonist on infections bronchitis virus replication and cytokine expression in embryonated chicken eggs[J]. Mol Immunol, 2020, 120: 52-60.
[5]
Chesney J, Puzanov I, Collichio F, et al. Randomized, open-label phase ii study evaluating the efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced, unresectable melanoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(17): 1658-1667.
[6]
Sharma BK, Kakker NK, Bhadouriya S, et al. Effect of TLR agonist on infections bronchitis virus replication and cytokine expression in embryonated chicken eggs[J]. Mol Immunol, 2020,120: 52-60.
[7]
许青, 陆舜, 朱蕙燕, 等. 溶瘤病毒治疗恶性肿瘤临床应用上海专家共识(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(3): 231-240.
[8]
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent[J]. Eur Urol, 2021,79(2): 243-262.
[9]
Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(17): 1470-1478.
[10]
Zhang H, Lin Y, Li K, et al. Naturally existing oncolytic virus m1 is nonpathogenic for the nonhuman primates after multiple rounds of repeated intravenous injections[J]. Hum Gene Ther, 2016,27(9): 700-711.
[11]
Zhang H, Li K, Lin Y, et al. Targeting VCP enhances anticancer activity of oncolytic virus M1 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2017, 9(404): eaam7996.
[12]
Lin Y, Zhang H, Liang J, et al. Identification and characterization of alphavirus M1 as a selective oncolytic virus targeting ZAP-defective human cancers[J]. Proc Natl Acade Sci USA, 2014, 111(42): E4504- E4512.
[13]
Hu C, Liu Y, Lin Y, et al. Intravenous injections of the oncolytic virus M1 as a novel therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2018, 9(3): 274.
[14]
Kaufman HL, Kohlhapp FJ, Zloza A. Oncolytic viruses: a new class of immunotherapy drugs[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2016, 15(9): 660.
[15]
Ichinohe T. Respective roles of TLR, RIG-I and NLRP3 in influenza virus infection and immunity: impact on vaccine design[J]. Expert Rev Vaccines, 2014, 9(11): 1315-1324.
[16]
Cai J, Zhu W, Lin Y, et al. Systematic characterization of the biodistribution of the oncolytic virus M1[J]. Hum Gene Ther, 2020, 31(21-22): 1203-1213.
[17]
Wang Y, Huang H, Zou H, et al. Liposome encapsulation of oncolytic virus m1 to reduce immunogenicity and immune clearance in vivo[J]. Mol Pharm, 2019, 16(2): 779-785.
[18]
Hu H, Tian M, Ding C, et al. The C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) transcription factor functions in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and microbial infection[J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 9: 3083.
[19]
Xiao X, Liang J, Huang C, et al. DNA-PK inhibition synergizes with oncolytic virus M1 by inhibiting antiviral response and potentiating DNA damage[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 4342.
[1] 钟雅雯, 王煜, 王海臻, 黄莉萍. 肌苷通过抑制线粒体通透性转换孔开放缓解缺氧/复氧诱导的人绒毛膜滋养层细胞凋亡[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 525-533.
[2] 孙鸿坤, 艾虹, 陈正. 内质网应激介导的牙周炎骨改建失衡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 211-218.
[3] 祝炜安, 林华慧, 吴建杰, 黄炯煅, 吴婷婷, 赖文杰. RDM1通过CDK4促进前列腺癌细胞进展的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 618-625.
[4] 王功炜, 李书豪, 魏松, 吕博然, 胡成. 溶瘤病毒M1对不同前列腺癌细胞杀伤效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 626-632.
[5] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[6] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[7] 郑俊, 吴杰英, 谭海波, 郑安全, 李腾成. EGFR-MEK-TZ三联合分子的构建及其对去势抵抗性前列腺癌细胞增殖与凋亡的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 503-508.
[8] 胡思平, 熊性宇, 徐航, 杨璐. 衰老相关分泌表型因子在前列腺癌发生发展中的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 425-434.
[9] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[10] 李鑫钊, 张廷涛, 朱峰, 刘金山, 刘大闯. 血纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体及碱性磷酸酶诊断前列腺癌骨转移的价值分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-463.
[11] 刘中文, 刘畅, 高洋, 刘东, 林世庆, 杨建华, 赵福义. 尿液microRNA-326与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 386-391.
[12] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[13] 黄程鑫, 陈莉, 刘伊楚, 王水良, 赖晓凤. OPA1 在乳腺癌组织的表达特征及在ER阳性乳腺癌细胞中的生物学功能研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 275-284.
[14] 季加翠, 孙春斌, 罗恩丽. 姜黄素通过调节NF-κB/NLRP3通路减轻LPS诱导小胶质细胞神经炎症损伤[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 193-203.
[15] 杜霞, 马梦青, 曹长春. 造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤的发病机制及干预靶点研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 279-282.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?