切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 753 -758. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2025.06.011

临床研究

凶险性前置胎盘输尿管损伤治疗策略分析
汪黎1, 王喻2, 丁杰1, 李文薇1, 欧阳婧1, 张旭1,()   
  1. 1510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院妇科
    2510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-29 出版日期:2025-12-01
  • 通信作者: 张旭
  • 基金资助:
    广东省数字孪生重点实验室开放基金项目(2022B1212010004); 中山大学附属第三医院临床研究专项基金(启航计划)(QHJH202203)

Analysis of therapeutic strategies for ureteral injury in pernicious placenta previa

Li Wang1, Yu Wang2, Jie Ding1, Wenwei Li1, Jing Ouyang1, Xu Zhang1,()   

  1. 1Department of Gynecology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
    2Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2025-08-29 Published:2025-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xu Zhang
引用本文:

汪黎, 王喻, 丁杰, 李文薇, 欧阳婧, 张旭. 凶险性前置胎盘输尿管损伤治疗策略分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 753-758.

Li Wang, Yu Wang, Jie Ding, Wenwei Li, Jing Ouyang, Xu Zhang. Analysis of therapeutic strategies for ureteral injury in pernicious placenta previa[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 753-758.

目的

探讨凶险性前置胎盘(PPP)伴胎盘植入术后输尿管损伤的诊治策略,重点分析术前输尿管逆行置管的作用与局限性,以及多学科协作模式的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析中山大学附属第三医院2024年5月收治的1例PPP合并胎盘植入患者术中发生输尿管损伤的临床资料,结合文献对比术前预置输尿管导管与未置管患者的输尿管损伤发生率,并总结术中输尿管损伤预防方法及术后输尿管成形术的规范化操作流程。

结果

PPP患者术前置管虽降低损伤风险,但术野出血仍导致误扎造成输尿管损伤。患者术后3个月行输尿管再植术,恢复良好。

结论

凶险性前置胎盘术后输尿管损伤是严重的并发症,术前预置输尿管导管、术中谨慎操作及术后及时处理是减少输尿管损伤的关键。对于复杂病例,多学科协作和个体化手术方案的选择尤为重要。

Objective

To explore the diagnosis and treatment strategies for ureteral injury after pernicious placenta previa (PPP) with placental implantation, with a focus on analyzing the role and limitations of preoperative retrograde ureteral catheterization, as well as the clinical value of multidisciplinary collaboration.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of a patient with PPP combined with placental implantation who was admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in May 2024. The incidence of ureteral injury during surgery was compared between patients with preplaced ureteral catheters and those without catheters, and the prevention methods of urinary tract injury during surgery and the standardized operation process of postoperative ureteroscopy were summarized.

Results

Although preoperative catheterization reduces the risk of injury in PPP patients, intraoperative bleeding still leads to ureteral injury caused by accidental ligation. The patient underwent ureteral reimplantation 3 months after surgery and recovered well.

Conclusion

Ureteral injury after dangerous placenta previa surgery is a serious complication. Preoperative placement of ureteral catheter, careful operation during surgery, and timely postoperative management are key factors in reducing ureteral injury. For complex cases, multidisciplinary collaboration and the selection of individualized surgical plans are particularly important.

图1 前置胎盘患者术前MR提示子宫下段胎盘植入且侵犯膀胱前壁
图2 前置胎盘患者术后影像资料提示左侧输尿管下段损伤注:a为腹部平片提示左侧输尿管双J管下段缝扎,b为CT检查提示左侧肾包膜下积液
图3 前置胎盘患者输尿管成形术术中及术后复查影像资料注:a为术中发现左侧输尿管扩张下方的缝扎线,b为输尿管膀胱再植术后输尿管扩张缓解,c为术后复查KUB左侧双J管位置良好,下段无迂曲
[1]
Srisajjakul S, Prapaisilp P, Bangchokdee S. Magnetic resonance imaging of placenta accreta spectrum: a step-by-step approach[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2021, 22(2): 198-212. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0580.
[2]
辛思明, 郑九生, 贺晓菊, 等. 凶险性前置胎盘临床分级诊治方案探讨[J]. 江西医药, 2018, 53(7): 653-656. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2238.2018.7.001.
[3]
Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12): e52893. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052893.
[4]
侯燕燕, 林婧, 顾玮, 等. 前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的临床特点和产前诊断[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(5): 524-531. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.05.005.
[5]
马妍, 杨凯, 王珊珊, 等. 凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术中大量出血的危险因素分析及风险预测模型的建立[J]. 重庆医学, 2024, 53(11): 1650-1655. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2024.11.010.
[6]
陈代娟, 徐金凤, 田园, 等. 凶险性前置胎盘术前评估及手术诊治研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(6): 634-640. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.06.003.
[7]
Wang S, Hu Q, Liao H, et al. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancy in women with scarred uteri[J]. Int J Womens Health, 2023, 15: 1453-1465. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S422187.
[8]
刘建, 李娅, 李俊鹏, 等. 产前MRI在胎盘植入性疾病诊断中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(2): 196-201. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.02.011.
[9]
Qi XR, Liu XH, You Y, et al. The application of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in pernicious placenta previa[J]. J Sichuan Univ Med Sci Ed, 2016, 47(4): 618-623.
[10]
Orsi M, Somigliana E, Paraboschi I, et al. Urological injuries complicating pregnancy-related hysterectomy: Analysis of risk factors and proposal to improve the quality of care[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2025, 306: 106-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.019.
[11]
Li P, Tang Y, Jiang Y, et al. Analysis of clinical features of 231 cases with pernicious placenta previa: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(11): e25023. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025023.
[12]
Zhou Y, Song Z, Wang X, et al. Ultrasound-based nomogram for postpartum hemorrhage prediction in pernicious placenta previa[J]. Front Physiol, 2022, 13: 982080. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.982080.
[13]
左琴, 刘淮, 黄淑晖, 等. 输尿管置管对凶险型前置胎盘子宫切除术的效果评价[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(24): 4110-4112.
[14]
Zhou M, Chen M, Zhang L, et al. Severe adverse pregnancy outcomes in placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery[J]. J Sichuan Univ Med Sci Ed, 2017, 48(5): 783-787.
[15]
Hou Y, Zhou X, Shi L, et al. Influence factors and pregnancy outcomes for pernicious placenta previa with placenta accreta[J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2020, 45(9): 1074-1081. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2020.190656.
[16]
贺晶, 陈璐. 凶险性前置胎盘术中及术后并发症[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017, 33(9): 656-658.
[17]
Lange D,Bidnur S,Hoag N, et al.Ureteral stent-associated complications--where we are and where we are going[J].Nat Rev Urol, 2015, 12(1):17-25. Doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.340.
[18]
Ibrahim MA, Liu A, Dalpiaz A, et al. Urological manifestations of placenta percreta[J]. Curr Urol, 2015, 8(2): 57-65. DOI: 10.1159/000365691.
[19]
Zou L, Wang P, Song Z, et al. Effectiveness of a fetal magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for predicting the prognosis of pernicious placenta previa: a retrospective study[J]. Front Physiol, 2022, 13: 921273. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.921273.
[20]
Fu M, Bu H, Fang Y, et al. Parallel loop binding compression suture, a modified procedure for pernicious placenta previa complicated with placenta increta[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8: 786497. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.786497.
[21]
Fulla J, Prasanchaimontri P, Rizk A, et al. Ureteral diameter as predictor of ureteral injury during ureteral access sheath placement[J]. J Urol, 2021, 205(1): 159-164. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001299.
[22]
Zhao Y, Tan WJ. Ureteral injury[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2023, 66(11):1421-1424. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003032.
[23]
Burks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury[J]. Ther Adv Urol, 2014, 6(3): 115-124. DOI: 10.1177/1756287214526767.
[24]
Pickett CM, Seeratan DD, Mol BWJ, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023, 8(8): CD003677. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
[25]
Xia M, Li X, Zhao F, et al. Traumatic ureteral injury: an initial outcome and experience[J]. Ther Adv Urol, 2024, 16: 17562872241297541. DOI: 10.1177/17562872241297541.
[26]
McCarus S, Alexandre AF, Kimura T, et al. Abdominopelvic surgery: intraoperative ureteral injury and prophylaxis in the United States, 2015-2019[J]. Adv Ther, 2023, 40(7): 3169-3185. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02515-z.
[27]
Morey AF, Broghammer JA, Hollowell CMP, et al. Urotrauma guideline 2020: AUA guideline[J]. J Urol, 2021, 205(1): 30-35. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001408.
[28]
Zhang Z, Chen D, Deng L, et al. Iatrogenic ureteral injury during retroperitoneal laparoscopy for large renal cysts: What we learned and a review of the literature[J]. J Xray Sci Technol, 2021, 29(1): 185-196. DOI: 10.3233/XST-200804.
[29]
钟柳英, 钟梅, 苏春宏, 等. 经子宫后路子宫切除术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入中的临床应用[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2016, 32(8): 609-612.
[30]
Tanase Y, Kato MK, Uno M, et al. Variations in procedures for ureterolysis with sharp dissection in minimally invasive hysterectomy[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2022, 11(3): 171-173. DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_129_21.
[31]
Morey AF, Broghammer JA, Hollowell CMP, et al. Urotrauma guideline 2020: AUA guideline[J]. J Urol, 2021, 205(1): 30-35. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001408.
[1] 蒙燕, 唐如冰, 蒋奕, 陆华, 苏玉兰, 张琼, 何英煜. 基于多学科协作的预防性淋巴管-静脉吻合术在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 204-207.
[2] 许东梅, 马小扬, 黄宇明. 神经梅毒诊疗现状及进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 300-306.
[3] 李明娟, 林陈心子, 吴姝萱, 万启龙. 合并牙列缺损的牙颌面畸形的病因、临床特点及诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-8.
[4] 黄展森, 徐锦斌, 黄群雄, 李腾成, 狄金明. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第22期)——ACTH非依赖性双侧肾上腺增生[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 384-389.
[5] 余东阳, 修一平. 泌尿系统火器伤救治[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 105-109.
[6] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[7] 叶雷, 钟文文, 马波, 李俊涛, 王德娟, 邱剑光. 插入式输尿管膀胱再植术治疗腹盆腔术中输尿管损伤的疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 160-163.
[8] 李俊涛, 叶雷, 吴坚坚, 郭强, 尧冰, 赖华健, 莫嘉辉, 王德娟, 邱剑光. 回肠代输尿管术一期修复医源性长段输尿管损伤的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 423-426.
[9] 王楠, 李立安, 马鑫, 翟青枝, 王铭洋, 孟元光. 机器人手术多学科协作治疗静脉内平滑肌瘤病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 125-128.
[10] 刘云玥, 范文生, 顾成磊, 马鑫, 刘洪一, 孟元光. 达芬奇机器人MDT模式全盆腔廓清术治疗晚期宫颈癌一例[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 249-251.
[11] 李宁, 杨明辉, 朱仕文, 张萍, 吴新宝, 蒋协远. 多学科协作构建老年髋部骨折"绿色通道"[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 290-295.
[12] 刘光华, 欧阳强, 俞炬明, 范国平, 欧敬民, 邱明科, 林霏开, 孙会贞, 张惠, 汪希鹏, 金敏菲. 双侧髂内动脉球囊阻断序贯子宫动脉栓塞辅助下剖宫产的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 33-38.
[13] 向雷, 杨琪, 谢辉, 刘海涛, 夏风, 兰为顺, 杨文忠. 非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 106-112.
[14] 朱文静, 寇惠娟, 倪雅娟, 邓捷, 林琳, 胡筱筠. MDT联合CBL-PBL教学模式及形成性评价在心内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 120-124.
[15] 彭晨健, 张伟, 陈烁, 赵建宁, 王军. 多学科协作诊治模式在老年髋部骨折合并肾功能衰竭透析患者髋关节置换治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 19-23.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?