Comparative analysis of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in management of lower pole renal stones (2~4 cm)

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.02.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the efficacy of MPCNL and RIRS in lower pole renal stones 2-4 cm in diameter.

Methods

A total of 167 patients who underwent MPCNL or RIRS for lower pole stone 2-4 cm in diameter between June 2011 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Lower pole stone was diagnosed with CT scan. Stone size was assessed as the longest axis of the stone. All patients were informed about the advantages, disadvantages and probable complications of both MPCNL and RIRS before the selection of the procedure. Patients were divided into two groups according to the patients' surgery type. Group 1 consisted of 98 patients who underwent MPCNL and Group 2 consisted of 69 patients treated with RIRS. Stone free statuses, postoperative complications,operative time and hospitalization time were compared in both groups.

Results

The mean operation time was (84±28) min vs (116 ±23) min(P<0.001); The mean hemoglobin drop value was (5.2±1.6) g/L vs (1.9±0.4) g/L (P<0.001); The postoperative hospital stay was(8.5 ± 1.4) d for MPCNL, which was longer than that of the RIRS group (3.8 ± 1.2) d (P<0.001). The respective complication rates were 14.3% (14/98) and 4.3%(3/69) (P=0.036). In MPCNL group, stone-free rate was 87.8% (86/98) at first session and 93.9% (92/98) after the additional procedure. In RIRS group, stone-free rate was 55.1%(38/69) at the first procedure and 91.3%(63/69) after the additional procedure. The final stone-free rates were similar in both groups (P=0.506).

Conclusions

MPCNL is an effective method for the treatment of lower pole stones 2-4 cm in diameter. RIRS should be an effective treatment alternative to MPCNL in lower pole stones, especially in selected patients.

Key words: Renal stone, lower pole, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Ureteroscope

Yu Zhang, Jiuzhi Li, Youtao Jiang, Guofei Zhang, Yue Wu. Comparative analysis of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in management of lower pole renal stones (2~4 cm)[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 111-115.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhqjmnmwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.02.011

https://zhqjmnmwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V12/I02/111

Figures/Tables 2

References 23

[1]	Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Members of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. In: EAU Guidelines, edition presented at 28th Annual EAU Congress[J].Milano, 2013, pp: 41-51.
[2]	Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool are children:experience with a new technique[J]. Urology, 1998, 52(4): 697-701.
[3]	Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(10): 1203-1208.
[4]	de la Rosette J, Assimos D,Desai M,et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study:indications, complications,and outcomes in 5803 patients[J]. J endourol, 2011, 25(1): 11-17.
[5]	Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower Pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower Pole nephrolithiasis-initial results[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(6): 2072-2080.
[6]	Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, et al. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis[J]. J Urol, 1994, 151(3):663-667.
[7]	Assimos D,Krambeck A,Miler NL,et al. Surgial management of stones:American urological association/endoulogical society guideline.PART Ⅱ[J]. J urol, 2016, pii: S0022-5347(16)30532-8.
[8]	Giusti G,Proietti S,Villa L,et al.Current stangard technique for modern flexible ureteroscopy:tips and tricks[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 70(1): 188-194.
[9]	Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1976, 10 (3): 257-259.
[10]	Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower Pole I:a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower Pole nephrolithiasis-initial results[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(6): 2072-2080.
[11]	Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, et al. Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of staghorn calculi. The American Urological Association Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel[J]. J Urol, 1994, 151(6): 1648-1651.
[12]	Ozturk U, Sener NC, Goktug HN, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower Pole renal calculi 10-20 mm[J]. Urol Int, 2013, 91(3): 345-349.
[13]	Egilmez T., Goren M.. Predicting surgical outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: validation of the Guy's stone score and nephrolithometricnomogram interms of success and complications[J]. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, 2015, 6(3), 281-286.
[14]	雷光远, 雷鸣, 刘永达等. 微创经皮肾镜治疗孤立肾与非孤立肾结石的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版). 2016, 10(2): 104-107.
[15]	Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool are children:experience with a new technique[J]. Urology, 1998, 52(4): 697-701.
[16]	Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones[J]. Eur Urol, 2001, 40(6): 619-624．
[17]	Hu, G, Guo, Z, Liu, H, et al. A novel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique: safety and efficacy report[J]. Scand J Urol, 2015, 49(2): 174-180.
[18]	程跃, 施小东, 胡嘉盛, 等.电子输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术[J].中国内镜志, 2011, 17(2): 212-217.
[19]	黄丽娟, 李炯明, 刘乔保, 等.输尿管软镜治疗不同大小肾下盏结石的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(1):34-37.
[20]	Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 109(9): 1384-1389．
[21]	Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stone>2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(10): 1257-1263.
[22]	Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B. Influence of pyelocaliceal anantomy on the success of flexible urereroscopic approach[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22(10): 2235-2239.
[23]	Grasso M, Ficazzola M. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi[J]. J Urol, 1999, 162(6): 1904-1908.

组别	例数	年龄(岁，)	性别（例）		结石大小（mm，±s）	下盏位置（例）		结石所在肾脏位置（例）		肾积水程度（例）		随访时间（月，±s）
组别	例数	年龄(岁，)	男	女	结石大小（mm，±s）	前组	后组	左	右	轻度	中度	随访时间（月，±s）
MPCNL组	98	40±12	65	33	28±6	21	77	51	47	16	12	13±4
RIRS组	69	40±14	46	23	26±8	13	56	36	33	9	6	12±3
t/χ²值	?	t=-0.296	χ²=0.002		t=1.681	χ²=0.167		χ²=0.001		χ²=1.019		t=0.565
P值	?	0.768	0.963		0.095	0.683		0.986		0.601		0.573

组别	例数	年龄(岁，)	性别（例）		结石大小（mm，±s）	下盏位置（例）		结石所在肾脏位置（例）		肾积水程度（例）		随访时间（月，±s）
组别	例数	年龄(岁，)	男	女	结石大小（mm，±s）	前组	后组	左	右	轻度	中度	随访时间（月，±s）
MPCNL组	98	40±12	65	33	28±6	21	77	51	47	16	12	13±4
RIRS组	69	40±14	46	23	26±8	13	56	36	33	9	6	12±3
t/χ²值	?	t=-0.296	χ²=0.002		t=1.681	χ²=0.167		χ²=0.001		χ²=1.019		t=0.565
P值	?	0.768	0.963		0.095	0.683		0.986		0.601		0.573

?	一期结石清除率[例（%）]	总结石清除率[例（%）]	手术时间（min，±s）	血红蛋白下降值（g/L，±s）	住院时间（d，±s）	并发症[例（%）]
MPCNL组	86(87.8)	92(93.9)	084±28	5.2±1.6	8.5±1.4	14(14.3)
RIRS组	38(55.1)	63(91.3)	116±23	1.9±0.4	3.8±1.2	3(4.3)
t/χ²值	χ²=22.622	χ²=0.402	t=7.872	t=16.754	t=22.636	χ²=4.374
P值	<0.001	0.506	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.036

?	一期结石清除率[例（%）]	总结石清除率[例（%）]	手术时间（min，±s）	血红蛋白下降值（g/L，±s）	住院时间（d，±s）	并发症[例（%）]
MPCNL组	86(87.8)	92(93.9)	084±28	5.2±1.6	8.5±1.4	14(14.3)
RIRS组	38(55.1)	63(91.3)	116±23	1.9±0.4	3.8±1.2	3(4.3)
t/χ²值	χ²=22.622	χ²=0.402	t=7.872	t=16.754	t=22.636	χ²=4.374
P值	<0.001	0.506	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.036

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export