切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 338 -342. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.04.016

临床研究

米拉贝隆联合坦索罗辛治疗轻中度前列腺增生伴膀胱过度活动症的临床观察
刘泽林1, 黄欣1, 柯帅1, 王清华1, 翟官忠1, 郭佳1,()   
  1. 1. 430060 湖北,武汉大学人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-24 出版日期:2021-08-01
  • 通信作者: 郭佳
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(81702539)

Efficacy and safety of mirabegron combined with tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with overactive bladder

Zelin Liu1, Xin Huang1, Shuai Ke1, Qinghua Wang1, Guanzhong Zhai1, Jia Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2020-12-24 Published:2021-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jia Guo
引用本文:

刘泽林, 黄欣, 柯帅, 王清华, 翟官忠, 郭佳. 米拉贝隆联合坦索罗辛治疗轻中度前列腺增生伴膀胱过度活动症的临床观察[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 338-342.

Zelin Liu, Xin Huang, Shuai Ke, Qinghua Wang, Guanzhong Zhai, Jia Guo. Efficacy and safety of mirabegron combined with tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with overactive bladder[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 338-342.

目的

探讨坦索罗辛联合米拉贝隆治疗轻中度前列腺增生(BPH)伴膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者的安全性及疗效。

方法

2019年9月至2020年12月,采用前瞻性队列研究的方法,将武汉大学人民医院泌尿外科诊断为BPH合并OAB的患者通过纳入及排除标准后得到研究对象70例。采用随机数表法将研究对象分为坦索罗辛组和联合用药组,每组35例。坦索罗辛组单用坦索罗辛(0.2 mg/d);联合用药组同时服用坦索罗辛(0.2 mg/d)和米拉贝隆(50 mg/d)。在基线和治疗12周后,对患者进行复诊及随访,比较两组患者的症状改善情况[国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、储尿期症状评分(USPSS)、排尿期症状评分(VSS)、膀胱过度活动症评分(OABSS)]、尿流动力学参数改变情况[最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(RUV)]以及药物不良反应发生率。

结果

共获得65例(92.86%)BPH合并OAB患者的可靠随访数据,平均年龄62(50~80)岁。两组患者的IPSS、USPSS、VSS评分及Qmax在治疗结束(12周)时相比其对应基线水平均显著改善,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);OABSS治疗前后比较,坦索罗辛组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合用药组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且联合用药组OABSS降低程度(ΔOABSS)显著优于坦索罗辛组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);残余尿量治疗前后比较,两组的差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。治疗结束后,联合用药组在IPSS、USPSS、OABSS评分方面相比坦索罗辛组均显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);在VSS、Qmax、RUV方面,联合用药组治疗后较坦索罗辛组差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。两组患者均未发生严重不良反应,共10例(15.38%)患者出现≥1次不良事件。

结论

坦索罗辛联合米拉贝隆治疗BPH轻中度梗阻症状合并OAB有明显疗效,其疗效优于单用坦索罗辛,且药物相关不良反应无明显增加。

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin combined with mirabelone in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder (OAB).

Methods

From September 2019 to December 2020, 70 patients diagnosed with BPH combined with OAB in the Urology Department of Wuhan University People's Hospital were selected and included in this study. The patients were divided into Group A and Group B, 35 cases in each group by random number table method in accordance with 1∶1 ratio. In group A, tamsolocine was used only (0.2 mg, once per day). In group B, tamsoroxine (0.2 mg, once per day) and mirabellon (50 mg, once per day) were administered simultaneously. At baseline and after 12 weeks symptoms improvement [international prostate symptom score (IPSS), urine storage period symptom scores (USPSS), voiding symptom scores (VSS), bladder excessive activity score (OABSS)], urine flow mechanics parameters change situation [maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (RUV)] and the incidence of drug related adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 65 patients (92.86%) with BPH and OAB were followed up reliably, with an average age of 62 (50-80) years. At the end of treatment (12 weeks), symptom scores of each stage and Qmax of the two groups were significantly improved compared with their corresponding baseline levels, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in RUV between the two groups before and after treatment (all P was >0.05). After the end of treatment, IPSS, USPSS and OABSS in group B were significantly reduced compared with group A, and the differences were statistically significant (All P<0.05). In terms of VSS, Qmax and RUV, there were no statistically significant differences between group B and group A after treatment (all P>0.05). No serious adverse reactions occurred in both groups, with 10 patients (15.38%) suffering at least one adverse event.

Conclusion

The combination of tamsoroxin and mirabelone in the treatment of mild and moderate obstruction symptoms of BPH combined with OAB showed significant efficacy, which was superior to that of tamsoroxine alone, and no significant increase in drug-related adverse reactions was observed.

表1 两组轻中度BPH合并OAB患者基线资料比较
表2 两组轻中度BPH合并OAB患者治疗前后相关指标比较(±s
表3 两组BPH合并OAB患者治疗期间不良反应发生率[例(%)]
[1]
黄健,那彦群,叶章群. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南(2019版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020: 208.
[2]
Knutson T, Edlund C, Fall M, et al. BPH with coexisting overactive bladder dysfunction-an everyday urological dilemma[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2001, 20(3): 237-247.
[3]
Lee HN, Lee KS, Kim JC, et al. Rate and associated factors of solifenacin add-on after tamsulosin monotherapy in men with voiding and storage lower urinary tract symptoms[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2015, 69(4): 444-453.
[4]
Dmochowski R. Antimuscarinic therapy in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: what is the evidence?[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2006, 7(6): 462-467.

URL    
[5]
Yu Q, Gratzke C, Wang Y,et al. New strategies for inhibition of non-adrenergic prostate smooth muscle contraction by pharmacologic intervention[J]. Prostate, 2019, 79(7): 746-756.
[6]
江东,延敏博,麦蕾, 等. 度他雄胺联合坦索罗辛治疗高危前列腺增生的临床观察[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 30-33.
[7]
刘泽林,翟官忠,王清华, 等. 米拉贝隆对比索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症的临床研究[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2020, 37(12): 2199-2202.
[8]
Michel MC, Cernecka H, Ochodnicky P. Desirable properties of β3-adrenoceptor agonists: implications for the selection of drug development candidates[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2011, 657(1-3): 1-3.
[9]
张大磊,张耀光,王建业. 中国泌尿外科下尿路术后患者LUTS现状调查[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2017(Z1): 27-28.
[10]
Kaplan SA, Herschorn S, McVary KT, et al. Efficacy and safety of mirabegron versus placebo add-on therapy in men with overactive bladder symptoms receiving tamsulosin for underlying benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, phase 4 study (PLUS)[J]. J Urol, 2020, 203(6): 1163-1171.
[11]
Kakizaki H, Lee KS, Yamamoto O, et al. Mirabegron add-on therapy to tamsulosin for the treatment of overactive bladder in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a randomized, placebo-controlled study (MATCH) [J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2020, 6(4): 729-737.
[12]
Gillespie JI, Palea S, Guilloteau V, et al. Modulation of non-voiding activity by the muscarinergic antagonist tolterodine and the β(3)-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron in conscious rats with partial outflow obstruction[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(2 Pt 2):E132-E142.
[13]
Nambiar AK, Bosch R, Cruz F, et al. EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence[J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 73(4): 596-609.
[14]
Ichihara K, Masumori N, Fukuta F, et al. A randomized controlled study of the efficacy of tamsulosin monotherapy and its combination with mirabegron for overactive bladder induced by benign prostatic obstruction[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(3): 921-926.
[15]
屠卫超,潘隽玮,王大伟, 等. 托特罗定联合坦索罗辛在改善输尿管支架管相关症状中的作用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 187-190.
[1] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[2] 韩广玮, 申雪晴, 吴涵潇, 曹炎武, 唐黎明. 前列腺增生并轻度尿道狭窄行去外鞘半导体激光汽化剜除与等离子电切的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 490-494.
[3] 李全喜, 唐辉军, 唐友杰, 杨飞. DISCO成像技术在前列腺增生与前列腺癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 332-335.
[4] 赖良海, 赵伟, 肖云新, 杨伟明, 陈光耀. 1 470 nm激光"平均三分法"剜除术与等离子剜除术治疗前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 252-256.
[5] 李国峰, 李显文, 周祥福, 何昊麟, 杜红兵, 宾开云. 单极滚珠电极与等离子行经尿道前列腺剜除术的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 247-251.
[6] 李殷南, 王乾, 孙宾. 膀胱壁、逼尿肌壁厚度与老年女性膀胱过度活动症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 178-182.
[7] 游猛, 顾志文, 宋生生, 张贺庆, 詹河涓. 等离子电切术与钬激光剜除术治疗体积>80 ml前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 44-49.
[8] 邹志辉, 张礼刚, 胡永涛, 牛迪, 陈佳, 葛秦涛, 尹水平, 杨诚, 施浩强, 邰胜, 周骏, 郝宗耀, 梁朝朝. 无线智能高清内镜在经尿道双极等离子解剖性前列腺剜除术中的应用初探[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 39-43.
[9] 顾志波, 苏倩, 陈建刚, 陆明. 低功率钬激光与等离子剜除治疗中等体积前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 496-500.
[10] 邹志辉, 张礼刚, 梁朝朝. 电外科和激光平台等技术在前列腺增生日间手术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 489-495.
[11] 万颂, 华伟, 兰红梅, 骆正馨, 万跃平. 前列腺钬激光整块剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 427-431.
[12] 董毅, 杨濛, 王正, 江爱民, 张宗勤, 吴震杰, 王林辉, 徐红, 刘冰. 经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术的手术经验与临床疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 413-418.
[13] 张宁, 张梦菲, 邱建新, 高闫尧, 陈育, 高靖榆. 腹腔镜下经尿道等离子电切术联合疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝合并前列腺良性增生[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 441-444.
[14] 万秋, 杨伏萍, 唐莉歆. 含氯法齐明的联合方案治疗耐多药肺结核的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 275-277.
[15] 刘兆川, 宋旭东. 重视虹膜松弛综合征围手术期的防治[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 1-5.
阅读次数
全文


摘要