切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 452 -456. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.05.005

临床研究

机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌
李腾成, 谭益元, 黄群雄, 吴杰英, 肖恒军, 胡成, 李茂胤, 高新, 狄金明()   
  1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
    512000 广东,韶关市第一人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-17 出版日期:2023-10-01
  • 通信作者: 狄金明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82272840); 广东省自然科学基金(2021A1515010129)

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy via posterior and completely intrafascial for organ-confined prostate cancer

Tengcheng Li, Yiyuan Tan, Qunxiong Huang, Jieying Wu, Hengjun Xiao, Cheng Hu, Maoyin Li, Xin Gao, Jinming Di()   

  1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
    Department of Urology, Shaoguan First People's Hospital, Guangdong 512000, China
  • Received:2023-07-17 Published:2023-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinming Di
引用本文:

李腾成, 谭益元, 黄群雄, 吴杰英, 肖恒军, 胡成, 李茂胤, 高新, 狄金明. 机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-456.

Tengcheng Li, Yiyuan Tan, Qunxiong Huang, Jieying Wu, Hengjun Xiao, Cheng Hu, Maoyin Li, Xin Gao, Jinming Di. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy via posterior and completely intrafascial for organ-confined prostate cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 452-456.

目的

探讨机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性早期前列腺癌(PCa)的技术要领,并评估其肿瘤学和功能结果。

方法

15例T1-2bN0M0的PCa患者行机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术,术前行国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)-5评分。患者全麻后取平卧头低脚高位,连接机器人系统,显露道格拉斯窝,游离双侧输精管和精囊腺;紧贴前列腺后方、侧方和前方依次钝性推开狄氏筋膜前层、离断侧韧带和脏层盆筋膜;显露并离断尿道;双针连续吻合膀胱颈后尿道。记录围手术期资料和功能结果数据。所有患者术后定期随访PSA检测、日常尿垫和IIEF-5评分。

结果

15例患者成功完成手术,中位手术时间86(65~116)min,术中失血量20(10~60)ml,围手术期无严重并发症发生。术后病理均<pT2c,Gleason评分<8,无切缘阳性病例,术后随访均无生化复发。导尿管中位停留时间为7(6~8)d,13例患者在拔除导尿管后即刻控尿(0片/天),2例患者拔除导尿管后出现轻度失禁(2~3片/d),2周内全部恢复控尿。9例患者在术后6个月内恢复勃起功能,IIEF-5评分均>18。

结论

机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗中低风险局限性早期PCa患者安全有效,近期随访控瘤、控尿和勃起功能恢复效果满意。

Objective

To explore the technical essentials of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy via posterior and completely intrafascial for organ-confined prostate cancer, and to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes.

Methods

Fifteen prostate cancer patients with T1-2bN0M0 were scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy via posterior and completely intrafascial approach, and their international index of erectile function (IIEF) were performed before operation. All patient was placed in a supine position and the robotic system was established. Firstly, expose the Douglas fossa, free bilateral vas deferens and seminal vesicles, blunt dissection of the Denonvillier fascia, severed lateral ligament and visceral pelvic fascia, then exposed and disconnected urethra, continuous suture bladder neck urethra. Perioperative complications and functional outcome data were recorded. All patients were regularly followed up for tPSA testing, daily urine pads and IIEF-5 scores.

Results

All of the 15 patients were successfully completed the operations. The median (range) operation time was 86(65-116) min, and estimated blood loss was 20 (10-60) ml, and no serious complications occurred. Postoperative pathology was <pT2c, Gleason score <8, no cases of positive surgical margins, and no biochemical recurrence (BCR) in postoperative follow-up. Catheter were removed after a median (range) time of 7(6-8) d, 13 patients were immediately continent (0 pads/d), and two patients had mild incontinence (2-3 pads/d). All patients were observed as continent within next two weeks. Nine patients achieved a satisfactory erection at 6 months postoperatively, with an IIEF-5 score >18.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy via posterior and completely intrafascial approach is technically feasible for patients with low-risk localized prostate cancer and demonstrates promising functional outcomes regarding continence and potency.

图1 机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除手术套管布置示意图
图2 机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术主要步骤注:a为打开道格拉斯窝腹膜;b为游离输精管精囊腺并离断精囊腺血管蒂;c为游离前层Denonvillier筋膜;d为离断前列腺侧方血管蒂;e为显露"樱桃小嘴型"膀胱颈;f为打开膀胱颈;g为离断尿道;h为连续吻合膀胱颈后尿道。D:道格拉斯窝;DEF:输精管;SV:精囊腺;P:前列腺;aDF:前层Denonvillier筋膜;BN:膀胱颈;vPEF:脏层盆筋膜;U:尿道
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
[2]
Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7): 783-791.
[3]
Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2020, 31(9): 1119-1134.
[4]
王喻, 孙卓伦, 李腾成, 等. 扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫+前列腺癌根治术治疗局部高危前列腺癌十年随访结果[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 101-105.
[5]
Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 418-430.
[6]
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaidi S, et al. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 457-461.
[7]
Egan J, Marhamati S, Carvalho FLF, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy leads to durable improvement in urinary function and quality of life versus standard Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy without compromise on oncologic efficacy: single-surgeon series and step-by-step guide[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(6): 839-857.
[8]
郭骞宏, 李弓笑, 甘卫东, 等. 保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌(附手术视频) [J]. 中华男科学杂志. 2017, 23(1): 34-38.
[9]
李恭会, 章又云, 王明超, 等. 机器人辅助完全后入路筋膜内前列腺癌根治术5例经验总结[J/OL]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(04): 15-18.
[10]
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(2): 243-262.
[11]
刘方, 曹智, 许亚龙, 等. 三站进阶模式在机器人前列腺癌根治术培训中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 409-413.
[12]
Barakat B, Othman H, Gauger U, et al. Retzius sparing radical prostatectomy versus Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Which technique is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients (MASTER Study)? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2022, 8(4): 1060-1071.
[13]
Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up[J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 64(6): 974-980.
[14]
郭飞, 刘久敏, 蒲小勇, 等. 后-前入路腹腔镜筋膜内前列腺癌根治术临床应用探讨[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(14): 2161-2163.
[15]
Wagaskar VG, Mittal A, Sobotka S, et al. Hood technique for Robotic radical prostatectomy-preserving periurethral anatomical structures in the space of Retzius and sparing the pouch of Douglas, enabling early return of continence without compromising surgical margin rates[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 80(2): 213-221.
[16]
Gao X, Pang J, Si-tu J, et al. Single-port transvesical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer: technique and outcomes[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(7): 944-952.
[17]
Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the Veil of Aphrodite technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing[J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 49(6): 1065-73, discussion 1073-4.
[18]
Kowalczyk KJ, Madi RH, Eden CG, et al. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series[J]. J Urol, 2021, 206(5): 1184-1191.
[19]
Galfano A, Secco S, Dell'Oglio P, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: early learning curve experience in three continents[J]. BIU Int, 2021, 127(4): 412-417.
[20]
Chung DY, Jung HD, Kim DK, et al. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17(5): e0268182.
[21]
Lambert E, Allaeys C, Berquin C, et al. Is It Safe to Switch from a Standard Anterior to Retzius-Sparing Approach in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?[J]. Curr Oncol, 2023, 30(3): 3447-3460.
[22]
罗敏, 盛夏, 梁敏, 等. 达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术手术体位的优化[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 330-333.
[23]
莫承强, 桂程鹏, 王道虎. 机器人辅助下根治性前列腺切除术的不同入路选择[J].微创泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 6(1): 55-58.
[24]
Koukourikis P, Alqahtani AA, Han WK, et al. Pure single-port. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP: Initial experience and technique description[J]. BJUI Compass, 2022, 3(3): 251-256.
[1] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[2] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[3] 武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[4] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[5] 刘波, 涂志坚, 李传富, 李江涛, 陈国栋. 机器人解剖性左半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-486.
[6] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[7] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[8] 梁健, 何京伟, 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超. 多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.
[9] 梅津熠, 王燕, 瞿旻, 董振阳, 周增辉, 沈显琦, 李嘉伦, 高旭. 机器人前列腺癌根治术中"膀胱外中叶"的处理[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 429-433.
[10] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[11] 余俊豪, 麻立. 经腹全腹腔镜上尿路尿路上皮癌根治术在临床中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 529-532.
[12] 张晟, 穆祝萍. 两种联合治疗子宫脱垂伴压力性尿失禁手术方法的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 728-733.
[13] 张立鑫, 朱建交, 李敬东. 机器人肝切除技术的优势与劣势[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 477-479.
[14] 嵇晋, 管锦坤, 汪刘华, 王伟, 任俊, 张琪, 王道荣, 马从超. 达芬奇机器人对比腹腔镜在低位直肠癌APR手术中盆底腹膜关闭联合腹膜外造口的应用研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 381-387.
[15] 党圆圆, 赵虎林. 机器人辅助小脑齿状核脑深部电刺激植入术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 320-320.
阅读次数
全文


摘要